e-Builder is a cloud-based construction program management solution that manages capital program cost, schedule, and documents. It allows owners to measure and manage the capital project delivery process from planning, design, procurement, construction and operations.
N/A
Microsoft Teams
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
SAP Ruum is a presented by the vendor as a lightweight project management, task management, and collaboration software, with use cases and templates for marketing, sales teams, HR tasks (e.g. onboarding), or organizing information for sharing with stakeholders.
N/A
Pricing
e-Builder
Microsoft Teams
SAP Ruum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
e-Builder
Microsoft Teams
SAP Ruum
Free Trial
No
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
e-Builder
Microsoft Teams
SAP Ruum
Features
e-Builder
Microsoft Teams
SAP Ruum
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
e-Builder
7.4
11 Ratings
0% below category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
SAP Ruum
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
8.810 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
8.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
5.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
8.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
7.48 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
7.411 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
As-built drawings
7.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
5.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
e-Builder
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
8.0
238 Ratings
3% above category average
SAP Ruum
9.2
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.0177 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
7.894 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.1205 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
8.2124 Ratings
8.82 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.2226 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
7.5209 Ratings
8.82 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
8.4140 Ratings
8.82 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
e-Builder
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
8.0
247 Ratings
0% below category average
SAP Ruum
8.8
2 Ratings
9% above category average
Chat
00 Ratings
9.0246 Ratings
8.82 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
8.3245 Ratings
8.82 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
8.6232 Ratings
8.42 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
8.2143 Ratings
8.22 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
8.6154 Ratings
8.42 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
00 Ratings
6.547 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
00 Ratings
5.743 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
00 Ratings
9.1155 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Well suited for the owner's side of managing multiple projects as it allows for all aspects of a project from development to closeout to be managed on one platform. Not as appropriate for a general contractor as there is better software out there. e-Builder's app is not as effective as others.
It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
Ruum [by SAP] is well-suited for the task creation and assignment with the responsible persons for the follow-ups and collaboration, which can be used for both internal or external projects. Ruum [by SAP] can also be used for internal tasks, milestones, project and workflow management and team management functionalities respectively. Ruum [by SAP] may not be well suited for those who want to use the CRM tools for the related marketing activities management in [a] particular situation.
Provide a document structure that is easy to navigate. All documents, even within a process, are stored in the document structure and easily accessed by those with the correct permissions.
Scheduling, especially with the new module is easy. It is helpful with a large organization where many hands touch projects to be able to forecast workloads (we have an in house engineering team who reviews all projects during their design phase)
Allows for easy interface with contractors and makes the submittal process more straightforward.
The restrictions in formatting, and sorting of information rendered, in a way, affects the reporting output.
At certain times of day, e-Builder traffic causes the loading of filtered searches to take a while. This is probably common regardless of the site or software used.
More complicated reporting has some limitation, though the program is highly efficient in assisting with simple format reports.
The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Simple, because have a used it for the past two years, so i'm very familiar with the particular aspects of its program that I need to accomplish my tasks.
If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
Again, because our technical support is great. He doesn't always answer the phone but he definitely responds to emails fairly quickly. In addition, I like that he actually resolves an issue and I have yet to encounter the same issue twice. Actually, I haven't encountered many issues at all in the two years I have used the software.
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
1. Set up the time to get training on the sytem before you go all in.
2. Listen, ask questions and actually practice using the tools and features while in class. It helps tremendously with becoming comfortable and remembering how things work.
3. Don't be afraid to mess up. They are helpful and will help resolve your issue in a timely manner
We have not compared other plans since the boss prefers this program from personal experience. But from using this program for 2 years I can see why we don't need to compare. Why fix something that isn't broken? It gets the job done, yes we might run into some issues but I feel like with all companies that can happen
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
The starting price for Ruum by SAP is very affordable, and there is a free trial, available. Further, Ruum by SAP has all forms of training, which gives full knowledge to people who want to work with the software. Again, backlog management, where feedback is issued on the progress of every task is a major boost from the application.
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.