Webex Meetings is a video conferencing solution powering hybrid work. It enables a seamless collaboration experience and better results with meetings that are designed to give everyone the ability to engage no matter their location, language, or communication style.
$14.50
per month per user
Pricing
Google Classroom
Webex Meetings
Editions & Modules
Education Fundamentals
$0
per license/per month
Google Workspace for Education Standard
$3
per student/per year
Teaching and Learning Upgrade
$4
per license/per month
Google Workspace for Education Plus
$5
per student/per year
Webex Meet
$14.50
per month per user
Webex Suite: Meet + Call
$25
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Classroom
Webex Meetings
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Education Fundamentals Version - 30-day free trial for qualifying institutions.
I would select Webex Meetings 2nd to Zoom. Although the functionalities are similar, there are some things that flow better with Zoom. The others are not as reliable for meetings as Webex Meetings or Zoom.
Webex [Meetings] is definitely a top-tier platform. Overall its choice boils down to ease of use and engagement tools from the end user's perspective. While many of the other platforms integrate better with our team or offer easier to use [the] functionality on the …
As Webex has been increasily moving away from document sharing we decided to migrate to a platform which is more compatile with a classroom environment. Adobe Connect
It is way better and easier to use. Especially if you are [a] tech company and trying to connect teams across the world. It helps a lot with features that [have]. For meeting invitations and assigning roles to [attendees] on the meeting. Also, a very great feature that has is …
Features
Google Classroom
Webex Meetings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Classroom
7.6
60 Ratings
8% below category average
Webex Meetings
-
Ratings
Course authoring
8.652 Ratings
00 Ratings
Course catalog or library
7.939 Ratings
00 Ratings
Player/Portal
7.438 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning content
7.541 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile friendly
7.157 Ratings
00 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications
7.444 Ratings
00 Ratings
Assignments
7.558 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance management
7.434 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning administration
7.646 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics
7.442 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social learning
8.451 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gamification
5.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Single Sign On (SSO) Enabled Learning
9.512 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Google Classroom
-
Ratings
Webex Meetings
8.5
837 Ratings
7% above category average
High quality audio
00 Ratings
8.8831 Ratings
High quality video
00 Ratings
8.8823 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements
00 Ratings
8.0792 Ratings
Mobile support
00 Ratings
8.2755 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Google Classroom
-
Ratings
Webex Meetings
8.4
823 Ratings
6% above category average
Desktop sharing
00 Ratings
8.9821 Ratings
Whiteboards
00 Ratings
8.0715 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Google Classroom
-
Ratings
Webex Meetings
8.6
831 Ratings
5% above category average
Calendar integration
00 Ratings
8.8788 Ratings
Meeting initiation
00 Ratings
8.5817 Ratings
Integrates with social media
00 Ratings
8.3344 Ratings
Record meetings / events
00 Ratings
8.8775 Ratings
Slideshows
00 Ratings
8.8701 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Google Classroom
-
Ratings
Webex Meetings
8.6
785 Ratings
6% above category average
Live chat
00 Ratings
8.6763 Ratings
Audience polling
00 Ratings
8.8675 Ratings
Q&A
00 Ratings
8.4684 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Google Classroom allows teachers to post for daily lessons and assignments. It also allows teachers to be able to communicate with students easily outside of class. Students are able to stay connected and know where to find all information and resources easily in a streamlined manner for all of their classes.
The first reason is the ease of use and availability, which makes WebEx work for all. The quality of audio and video is adorable. As a business development associate, I must make an impression on the other side, and WebEx helps me make first impressions. A few features are complex for new users but can be resolved.
Student-teacher communication - I love using Classroom for this because my students can always go back and check what was on Classroom by looking through the stream. This way they don't have to go dig through emails to find what they're looking for.
Posting to multiple classes - I can post the same announcement or assignment to multiple classes at once without having to repeat the process or send separate emails.
Streamlining grading - when students turn work in on Classroom, it all goes to one place and then when I'm grading I can open their documents directly from Classroom or my Drive folder. This way, I'm not looking through emails and Google Doc shared files for their assignment.
Only a few options are there for non-verbal feedback like hand raising or emoji reactions. They should work on it as expressing understanding or agreement would help collaborate with the cross-functional teams.
More options for creating custom workflows and integrations with internal tools would be helpful and the whiteboard also looks basic compared to other similar tools. I think, adding features like sticky notes and freehand drawing would be a great boost.
The mobile app is functional but I find it less intuitive and feature-rich compared to the desktop version. Should have parity in features and a more user-friendly interface will become more helpful for mobile users like me who sometimes conduct or attend meetings on the go.
Testing is particularly important in online learning, and Google Classroom falls far short of other learning management systems in this regard. Security is also a concern: while account control is reasonable for the account used with Google Classroom, the person controlling a particular account is often able to, for example, forward or download proprietary materials.
Because Webex Meetings is known for its consistent performance, with high quality audio and video that works well even in low bandwidth situations. This makes it a dependable tool for both small and large meetings without worrying about technical glitches. Also, the platform is easy to navigate, both for meeting hosts and participants. Features like screen sharing, chat, and breakout rooms are intuitive
Simple design and seamless integration with Google tools and drive, but missing some key features. However, since it is limited in overall functions and ability to truly personalize / customize, it is quite user friendly and easy to set up and get going, other than sending out the code to your course or dropping students in via their gmail account. Users of Google Forms and sites will find the layout similar in design.
Webex Meetings does not provide enough audio feedback for users with visual disabilities to properly navigate the tool. Students, faculty, and staff who are blind or have low vision may not be able to use Webex Meetings. Users with motor disabilities that navigate via keyboard, may not be able to navigate the web conferencing session enough to participate fully.
So personally I have never faced any kind of meeting unavailability issue while scandaling meeting with WebEx the bandwidth is really good and in terms of application performance the same is my opinion what I mentioned for availability it is good and the objective of communication is quite fruitfully achieved with a simple and effective product like WebEx which is often bundled with the purchase of course which is which we have at our company and great discount is being offered so it is easy on our pocket. I really don't have any specific errors which have faced I should mention over here the operation or application uses is quite smooth.
We use browsers to join Webex Meetings and it is very good no issue also appears from Webex APP is very organized and does not consume more resources of PC so no issues appeared. We join audio and video in many ways, all of which are good. We integrated it with active Microsoft Exchange with easy deployment.
Since this platform is provided by Google, the technical support is better than any others, and we are not required to bother about the space constraints for adding the contents. If we have a good uninterrupted internet facility we can access Google Classroom without any delay or lag. They have app support in both Android and iPhone.
The support cases can be opened instantly. The support engineers can support you via Telephone, E-Mail, WebEx Meetings, and My favorite WebEx application.24X7 Availability of the engineers. Step-by-step guidance is available by an engineer. https://help.webex.com/ - Great Site for instant FAQ's. https://status.webex.com/ - Is helpful to identify the updated schedule of WebEx or to know the server status of WebEx services.
It was straight to the point and very informative. effective training often includes clear explanations, hands-on practice opportunities, time for questions and answers, real-world examples, and follow-up support. If you're trying to assess the quality of a specific training session, you might consider these factors. For organizations looking to assess the quality of their in-person training, it's best to solicit feedback directly from the participants. This can be done through anonymous surveys or feedback sessions, enabling the organization to gather firsthand information and improve future training sessions accordingly.
It was very interactive and well explained. The trainor is very much knowledgeable of the product. He was able to answer all of our inquiries in a timely and professional manner. There were lots of exercises done during the duration of the training to ensure that we have a better view on what to expect from the product.
It was relatively easy to implement due to the simplicity of the platform. Even our more technology challenged teachers found it easy to get started with Google Classroom.
That we needed complex implementation that we didn't get tells me 2 things: 1) the product was not designed in a way that "just worked" like some of its peers (Zoom / BlueJeans) and 2) had our company defined actual user needs and validated / verified that they had bought something that matched those, we would have pursued features / designs more closely aligned with what the product actually does: screen share, sometimes video, definitely VOIP audio (always an option regardless of license), and easy recording and retrieval of meetings.
I haven't tested or evaluated another digital classroom website or application. I feel like Google Classroom is convenient for many reasons such as compatibility to Google docs, slides, etc. I also love the ability to link to YouTube and other sites. I don't know if there would be a site that is easier to maneuver.
The ability to transfer multimedia files directly into the platform and a very robust free plan helped me make the decision to try out Webex Meetings. Easy to set up in a company environment and accessible once the learning curve and sign up process are complete. In-platform web navigating is also a nice feature when onboarding new staff or doing market research.
I work for a Fortune 500 company with many employees so I can testify to its usability for large corporations. In addition, I use the software within my small team of sales reps so it is always usable on a small scale as well. In my eyes, this tool is scalable for businesses of all sizes without any hiccups or issues.
The costly nature of individual accounts across multiple schools made it difficult to maintain the budget when our student population grew exponentially.
Often communicated to clients and stakeholders that we were a trustworthy and elevated provider.
Limited engagement and interactive features with students often contributed to complaints around student engagement and buy-in.