Intergy offers ambulatory practices a specialty-focused EHR and practice management solution. With Intergy’s tools, users can manage chronic conditions, capture payer incentives, and thrive in the world of value-based care. The ONC-certified solution has consolidated functionality that simplifies notation, automates tasks, and streamlines workflows. The Intergy ecosystem of products also includes telehealth, remote patient monitoring, chronic care management, patient portal, patient…
N/A
WebPT
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Established in 2008, WebPT is an outpatient rehab therapy software platform helping more than 150,000 rehab therapy professionals from all practice sizes and specialties run their practices to improve care delivery and optimize business performance. And because WebPT is a cloud-based application, PTs, OTs, and SLPs can access the platform (and its data) from anywhere, at any time, promoting collaboration across patient care teams and with third-party payers. In addition to its…
$99
per month per user
Pricing
Intergy EHR
WebPT
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Intergy EHR
WebPT
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
WebPT Enterprise packages are custom-made based on clinic needs, and prices vary accordingly.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Intergy EHR
WebPT
Features
Intergy EHR
WebPT
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
Intergy EHR
6.5
22 Ratings
15% below category average
WebPT
-
Ratings
Real-time eligibility verification
6.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Claims management
7.220 Ratings
00 Ratings
Coding
6.418 Ratings
00 Ratings
Patient billing
6.521 Ratings
00 Ratings
Financial Reporting
6.421 Ratings
00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Intergy EHR
7.0
24 Ratings
9% below category average
WebPT
-
Ratings
Rule-based scheduling
5.321 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders
7.219 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated patient check-in
7.311 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-location support
7.521 Ratings
00 Ratings
Calendar interface
7.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
Intergy EHR
7.0
25 Ratings
3% below category average
WebPT
-
Ratings
Charting / document management
7.425 Ratings
00 Ratings
Templates
7.124 Ratings
00 Ratings
Patient portal
7.121 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support
7.213 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fax integration
7.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems
7.416 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow automation
5.619 Ratings
00 Ratings
Speech recognition
6.411 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
7.225 Ratings
00 Ratings
E-prescribing
7.324 Ratings
00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
Intergy EHR
7.4
25 Ratings
11% below category average
WebPT
-
Ratings
HIPAA compliance
7.524 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels
7.425 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy
7.323 Ratings
00 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe
7.317 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
Intergy EHR
6.5
25 Ratings
15% below category average
WebPT
-
Ratings
Task tracking
7.224 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows
5.623 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities
6.821 Ratings
00 Ratings
Physical Therapy Software
Comparison of Physical Therapy Software features of Product A and Product B
How well is the product customizable for workflow modifications for my clinic? Does the result flow easily for the provider or are there many chunky clicks required? (i.e. one modification to a workflow between the nurse and provider requires 27 clicks.. ok this accomplished the workflow that was needed but at what cost?) Can your system produce customized reports on the fly, is the data real time or lagging? Can the system be tuned in terms of document/note templates and the Graphic User Interface forms so a particular practice/provider/speciality needs can be taken into account?
WebPT is well designed for some areas of rehab but not well suited for others. Speech seems to be a challenge for this type of EMR. Perhaps not the best type for this discipline due to limitations. For the other disciplines, it would be nice if the system suggested only specific tests per diagnosis code rather than all available tests in the EMR
Health Reminders- for different patient needs or preventive care/screenings. For example patients who have a diagnosis of Diabetes- their health reminders will show if they need an A1c, foot exam, eye exam, etc. and when it was last performed
Orders Tracking- This helps nursing staff make notes on referrals or orders and they are able to look at the order tracking section for all patients and filter it by provider, order type, status, etc. to know what needs to be followed up on or what has been completed and so forth...
Tasks- This is a nice feature that has many different options for use. It can be used internally to send a quick message to another user, a phone message, billing message, and any task gives you the option to make it "patient related" if necessary. It can be used by the providers when they make an order they can then send it to the nurse to complete. Lots of different ways for Tasks to be used
The scheduler is very adaptive. There are options to change colors and textures for different insurances and appointment types with make it easier to differentiate patient types and issues at a glance.
Digital Paperwork Intake saves time for both the patient and staff.
Electronic Benefits Verification consolidates verifications so that we do not have to use multiple websites.
Sometimes, Intergy tends to crash on occasion, which is understandable.
Also, when checking for insurance eligibility, sometimes Intergy will not accept a specific insurance card and I have to call up the insurance to make sure the patient is eligible for coverage. It would be nice if more types of insurances could be added.
When creating recalls for patients to remind them to visit, sometimes the system does not cooperate properly.
I like that it carries forward information from previous notes. I also wonder, though, if there could be a more comprehensive "archive" of activities we had done in the past rather than only copying and paste from the previous note.
I like seeing a few comparisons of my outcome measures--when writing a progress note, I don't just want to see the last measure. Seeing the last 3-4 values from the test would have been helpful to really see different trends.
Fewer click boxes in the evals would be helpful to keep things moving along at some points. I appreciate the variety offered, but also struggle with how much clicking there is to get through.
I gave it 9/10 for renewal because I have been using it for so long. It takes a long time to learn new documentation systems. I do not want to use valuable time on that. I also like that it flows directly into billing.
The EMR has a learning curve, but once you get used to it, it's fairly user-friendly: notes are easy to duplicate, information is thorough and useful. In my opinion, WebPT Billing is arcane and difficult to use, and offers no opportunity for the business to correct or edit any payments entered incorrectly by WebPT.
It is always available to me when needed thankfully, I hadn’t had a moment or a time when I was unable to access it when needed. My practice's power went out once which was the only incident when it was unavailable to everyone on the team but again, it had nothing to do with the availability offered by this product.
Pages often load slowly. Our iMacs are highly reliable and we are connected to the highest speed Comcast business internet. We also connected each iMac via Cat 9 cable during COVID-19 pandemic to speed telelhealth appointments. Zoom does integrate very well with WebPT for telehealth. Their own modules do not integrate well with each other. For example, patients receive separate emails for patient intake and clinical outcomes. If confuses and frustrates many patients. Similarly, EMR flow sheet does not integrate with HEP creating redundancy.
Usually they are very helpful. I would prefer they do some of the actual changes I am requesting instead of having me do the work. I feel that they could walk you through it, instead of letting you figure out the desired results on your own.
Support was pretty much always helpful. My only complaint was not being able to always get someone on the phone immediately during working hours and having to wait to hear back. But once we heard back, problems were solved quickly and sufficiently. Staff was always friendly and knowledgeable
I was trained by an in house employee. It was very easy to learn. The EMR is pretty self explanatory. When you click on something to complete a task, it doesn't take an extra 10 steps, what the action says, is what it does
WebPT has its entire separate platform for training, containing many different guides, tutorials, and video references to help you become familiar and competent with the software suites. This includes having various demonstrations that allow you to click and navigate pages in the ways you would actually do it in WebPT. WebPT also gives you a sandbox company in the actual website to tinker with and trial things out. This makes it easy to catch and avoid errors you would have otherwise made with active patient data/schedules.
I think it would help to have another education session maybe 6 months after the initial sessions. This would help the user come up with an enhanced experience after they have used the program for a period of time. It is hard to comprehend everything at first, especially for people that need hands on learning
We moved from Intergy to athenaCollector and athenaClinicals. Athena is cloud-based, meaning we can access it from any location that has internet. My staff misses the ease of scheduling in Intergy, but the accountability of users' productivity is amazing. We had more control over document classification with Intergy, but sometimes that's a double-edged sword. When some people label a document "MRI-Lumbar spine" and others call it "Lumbar Spine MRI," there is some redundancy and sometimes important documents get missed.
Also, I have used PTWired and HEP2GO, but they were not in the database. WebPT automatically generates a patient profile, which is very helpful. WebPT also doesn't require the patient to download an app from the App Store, which is an added step for patients to perform, which will decrease compliance.
The current terms and pricing would be fair if they provided adequate performance, reliability, support, and customer service. As they have lapsed in these areas WebPT is overpriced. I would not recommend any PT practice of any size agree to a long term contract with WebPT until they prove they will deliver on their promises.
I couldn’t access WebPT on multiple screens to complete tasks at an efficient and effective time. It works to adjust to the same things presented on one screen when trying to work on a separate project utilizing one therapists schedule. This complicated the goal and tasks needed to complete at the time