Iterable vs. Net-Results

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Iterable
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Iterable is an AI-powered customer communication platform that activates customers across channels in real-time. With intelligent personalization, dynamic content, and a cross-channel suite, Iterable helps brands create seamless, data-driven experiences across email, SMS, push, and in-app notifications.N/A
Net-Results
Score 8.1 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Net-Results is a marketing automation solution that features segment-driven approaches to lead management and marketing automation. Some key features include support for A/B email testing, drag & drop landing pages, CRM integrations, and automated marketing workflows.
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Pricing
IterableNet-Results
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
One Price Full Platform
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IterableNet-Results
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTiered pricing by total email sends or total contacts, you decide. All features included. No upsells or limitations based on your price.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IterableNet-Results
Features
IterableNet-Results
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Iterable
8.0
119 Ratings
5% above category average
Net-Results
7.1
23 Ratings
7% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor8.8106 Ratings7.021 Ratings
Dynamic content8.6113 Ratings7.214 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content8.4111 Ratings7.311 Ratings
A/B testing8.4115 Ratings6.311 Ratings
Mobile optimization7.8110 Ratings5.022 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting6.7115 Ratings8.023 Ratings
List management7.1115 Ratings7.022 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences8.0102 Ratings8.618 Ratings
Landing pages00 Ratings7.019 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Iterable
5.8
116 Ratings
23% below category average
Net-Results
6.3
22 Ratings
15% below category average
Dashboards6.2116 Ratings7.021 Ratings
Standard reports5.6114 Ratings6.022 Ratings
Custom reports5.4105 Ratings6.019 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Iterable
7.1
113 Ratings
5% below category average
Net-Results
7.5
20 Ratings
1% above category average
API7.9102 Ratings7.015 Ratings
Role-based workflow & approvals8.296 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Customizability7.5103 Ratings7.019 Ratings
Integration with Microsoft Dynamics CRM4.75 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Third-party software integrations7.120 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com00 Ratings7.99 Ratings
Integration with SugarCRM00 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Iterable
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.6
20 Ratings
3% below category average
Lead nurturing automation00 Ratings8.518 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading00 Ratings8.418 Ratings
Data quality management00 Ratings5.018 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks00 Ratings8.616 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Iterable
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.5
15 Ratings
2% above category average
Calendaring00 Ratings7.99 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing00 Ratings7.015 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Iterable
-
Ratings
Net-Results
6.9
7 Ratings
6% below category average
Social sharing and campaigns00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Social profile integration00 Ratings6.77 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IterableNet-Results
Small Businesses
Vbout
Vbout
Score 9.9 out of 10
Vbout
Vbout
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OutboundEngine
OutboundEngine
Score 10.0 out of 10
OutboundEngine
OutboundEngine
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Bloomreach
Bloomreach
Score 9.2 out of 10
Bloomreach
Bloomreach
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IterableNet-Results
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(120 ratings)
8.0
(25 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(2 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(3 ratings)
7.5
(3 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.3
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IterableNet-Results
Likelihood to Recommend
Iterable
- Scalability: as I mentioned, Stayforlong serves more than 3 Million travellers in 40 markets and 32 languages. We managed to build a robust CRM strategy with only 2 members on the CRM team, which helped us expand the channels with a really small, lean team. - Real-time relevance: for us, having the latest available offer is a must; we need to offer the rooms that are available in real time, because the inventory is live.
Read full review
Net-Results
Net-Results is very well-suited for small, medium and large businesses. They seem to be more advanced than what a typical enterprise level implementation would require. When selecting a marketing automation provider make it a point to find out the level of integration with Salesforce and other marketing technologies. Do they have pre-built automation modules or does it require building from the ground up? Also ask questions regarding its specific capabilities ... for example: is it a marketing automation provider? is it a CRM provider? etc
Read full review
Pros
Iterable
  • Customer Journey creation - the platform easily creates a visual path for the marketing team to curate messaging based around timing, channel, behavior as well as add split testing logic and exit criteria so we target only the audiences we want.
  • Customer Success - one of the best teams I've ever had the pleasure of working with. I'm able to move so much quicker because they really create a helpful partnership.
  • Audience segmentation, the platform is easy to work with even if you're a first time user, they do a great job of visually showing the logic and the and/or/none type rules.
Read full review
Net-Results
  • Automated emails in a drip campaign that Sales can remove people from.
  • Lead scoring and alerts that go right to the lead owner.
  • Weekly reports to each Sales person with their hottest lead.
  • Very finely tuned segments that can be used for alerts, emails, and scheduled reports.
  • Integration with Salesforce. The Sales team can basically trigger their own emails.
Read full review
Cons
Iterable
  • In-app channel, although it works, has some shortcomings in UI functionality or system backend logic, which suggests it is built on an email send-out architecture.
  • Drag and drop editor has its own limitations - it isn't perfect. You can't create some basic designs.
Read full review
Net-Results
  • Forms: Would love to have dependent fields, also ability to see all data a user entered without having to create a custom field for every form.
  • Campaign branching: Criteria need to be selected one at a time, which can be very time-consuming.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Iterable
Its a robust platform that can serve complex business needs. Current and futures. It tries to adapt an newest trends and has good CS and CSM specialists.
Read full review
Net-Results
Net-Results does what we need and is straightforward to use. Their team has been very responsive to our requests and great to work with.
Read full review
Usability
Iterable
Iterable very easy to learn and use. It's a great platform for both a new email marketer and a marketer that's been working in email for 20+ years.
Read full review
Net-Results
Net Results is pretty easy to use and understand. I wouldn't say that it is the best in comparison to MailChimp's drag and drop email builder, but Net Results do so much more than MailChimp that it is hard to even compare the two. Overall Net Results has good usability
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Iterable
Iterable is there like 99.9% of the time. However, when it goes down, it grinds us to a halt. Most of the time, outages are an hour or less, but if that's at a peak time, it can be a nightmare. That said, when the worst does happen, there are frequent updates and an easy situation tracker that give you an estimate of how much longer you'll have to wait for the issue to be resolved.
Read full review
Net-Results
No answers on this topic
Performance
Iterable
The API is super quick. The UI can be a little sluggish depending on what you're loading, but overall Iterable performs great. Iterable appears to do a good job of making processes async so that one action isn't blocking another.
Read full review
Net-Results
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Iterable
I've never experienced any issues with Iterable. As I and my colleagues have learnt the system and it's features, response to questions and advice from our account manager is always quick. Kevin knows the product well, and with the few tricky questions has hasn't been able to answer he's been quick to get back to us.
Read full review
Net-Results
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Iterable
My understanding is that Mailchimp has evolved a lot since we moved to Iterable 4 years ago, so any comparison is legacy. Keeping that in mind, Iterable is far more sophisticated, especially the journey builder, personalised STO by user and segmentation.
Read full review
Net-Results
We've used ClickDimensions and Marketo. We felt that ClickDimensions was more limited as far as creating effective email campaigns and not as easy to use. It also is completely native to Dynamics CRM, which can be a positive and a negative. Marketo was the previous solution we owned, we are much happier with Net-Results. It's easier to use, not as complex and there is much better communication from their support team. When looking at a new solution we also looked at Act-On and Hubspot. Act-On probably would've been our second choice, but it didn't have as modern of a feel and wasn't quite as easy to use. Hubspot didn't really fit our business. It was very focused on SEO and blog posts. It didn't have the features we needed from a marketing standpoint
Read full review
Scalability
Iterable
We've definitely tested scalability, and it's no line - it works. The process is pretty easy. Most of the times it goes off without a hitch. Any time we do encounter issues, our support team is quick to get on the job and very communicative as they work us through a successful launch.
Read full review
Net-Results
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Iterable
  • I do not have hard numbers, as I am not in the department that deals with those kinds of quantifications of impact. However, I do believe the use of Iterable has been a positive thing for us in providing more comprehensive data that is useful when dealing with customer tickets.
Read full review
Net-Results
  • Stronger re-engagement rates - The buy cycle for our product can be very long. Net-Results helps us keep in touch with prospects that may have gone cold.
  • Better asset utilization - Net-Results helps us drive continuous utilization of our assets.
  • Efficiency - The automation Net-Results has provided means we can focus on other tasks, like creating new assets or building new partnerships.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Net-Results Screenshots

Screenshot of Advanced nurturing campaignsScreenshot of Form actionsScreenshot of Salesforce integration/FunnelvisionScreenshot of Deep database segmentationScreenshot of Dashboards and reportsScreenshot of Drag and drop email builder