Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mattermost
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Mattermost from the company of the same name in Palo Alto is a messaging, collaboration and communication platform providing high security and compliance for the businesses that need it.
$0
per month per user
Microsoft Teams
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
On2Air
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Openside Studios headquartered in Provo provides premium solutions for Airtable to enhance the Airtable experience, including services and products for those using Airtable. Their On2Air product suite provides tools to enhance what is possible with Airtable.
$29.99
per month
Pricing
MattermostMicrosoft TeamsOn2Air
Editions & Modules
Free Self-Hosted
$0
per month per user
Professional
$10
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Us
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Essential
$29.99
per month
Professional
$49.99
per month
Premium
$79.99
per month
Starter (1st year only)
$100
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MattermostMicrosoft TeamsOn2Air
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MattermostMicrosoft TeamsOn2Air
Considered Multiple Products
Mattermost
Chose Mattermost
Offordable and most preferred partner
Chose Mattermost
Mattermost stands out because of its flexibility, balance between controls and DevOps focus.

Teams is strong for enterprise office workflows and meetings but it can feel heavy and less efficient for fast paced technical collaboration and incident handling.
Chose Mattermost
We've tried other platforms and don't have the amount of people to make Jabber worth the expense. RocketChat was very hard to maintain in an air gapped environment because it required a container being built on the Internet connected domain and transferred over every time we …
Chose Mattermost
Mattermost is definitely the superior product compared with similar products we've used (3rdwave, 1ntegrate, etc.). We find it much easier to use and more secure for our processes. Definitely happy we switched to using Mattermost mainly.
Chose Mattermost
They're very similar. I think it's really a matter of preference. Again, one of the things I like about Mattermost is that it's strictly for business (atleast for us) it's different from the more mainstream messaging apps used so we can kind of separate work vs personal messages.
Chose Mattermost
Slack, Microsoft Teams and Discord
Chose Mattermost
It's cheaper and similar to Slack.
You can break down your project modules better here.
It's secure and self-hosted.
Chose Mattermost
Much more expensive than most chat applications but you have more control over things by self-hosting. Your security team will be able to design a very secure place to store all your code, passwords, and internal details, but most companies will not require this. It would be …
Chose Mattermost
In comparison to Slack, where Slack is strictly for internal communication, Mattermost actually has the format to display and not alter source code. Google chat is also even more limited in comparison to Slack and Mattermost. If you collaborate on code every single day, then …
Chose Mattermost
It is just as good if not better. Can be a superior option depending on the needs of your organization.
Chose Mattermost
These products all required cloud connectivity and licensing that was a significant cost. Mattermost allowed us to pilot this among just the Ops team and then evangelize this to the other infrastructure team. This allowed us to slowly show the value of this software and expand …
Chose Mattermost
Unlike Slack and Discord, Mattermost is self-hosted and focused on security. I used Discord before for community management and much simpler and less secure operations. Slack is great, but the fact that is cloud based takes out a lot of its independence.
Chose Mattermost
We used to have Mattermost and now we have Microsoft Teams. They are both very similar. Mattermost and Microsoft Teams are both great for communicating internally via calls, chats, meetings, etc. They are also both easy to set up an use. However, the Microsoft Teams mobile app …
Chose Mattermost
to reduce cost we shifted to Mattermost.
Chose Mattermost
Mattermost works better in that there aren’t constant updates and changes which can make finding past messages difficult. Mattermost also works better for channel creation and communication
Chose Mattermost
Slack is by far my personal favorite due to the age of the platform and the maturity of the features. Mattermost is a close 2nd-
Chose Mattermost
Honestly iv just used these two but when it comes to customization, they don't come close to Mattermost. Slack and Teams are Less flexible, Not self hosted. Not Open source,etc I will also say that i noticed integration capabilities are very limited with teams and slack and not …
Chose Mattermost
Mattermost is much faster and easier to use. It also has many more features beyond chat. They are more customizations and features for workflow and messaging on this platform also. The ability to integrate with other platforms via plugins, the security features, and the open …
Chose Mattermost
Mattermost is easier to use, faster, and less resource-intensive. Cross-platform support is great, and the mobile experience is awesome.
Chose Mattermost
I feel slack is a bit more difficult to use overall than Mattermost. Mattermost makes the tasks of communicating across departments and team members easier, as well as giving the ability to share information via hyper links, attachments, and other forms of communication among …
Chose Mattermost
We selected mattermost since we can control storage of our data. Slack is a great tool and offers more robust features compared to mattermost. However, the previously mentioned reason & the competitive pricing allowed us to stick with mattermost.
Chose Mattermost
key selling points for us was that its open source and can be self hosted.
Chose Mattermost
Mattermost is cheaper and offers the possibility of self-hosting compared to other competitors. This is a great advantage for our company.
Microsoft Teams
Chose Microsoft Teams
Is the best application between others
Chose Microsoft Teams
I much prefer using Zoom and/or Slack in comparison to Teams. We find more of our external partners utilize Slack vs Teams as well.
Chose Microsoft Teams
Best in the market that provides a modern and comprehensive communication space.
Chose Microsoft Teams
It is better in terms of security and user friendly nature. It has far more better features than the other products.
Chose Microsoft Teams
Provide a single platform where all communication and collaboration tools are available and the user experience is consistent
Chose Microsoft Teams
It has both mobile and desktop application which are very friendly to use and the features it has are very updated on the market.

Microsoft Teams is better than Skype for business and any other chat services. Positives: easy integration with Cloud application like …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Breakout rooms are a very good feature that should be added to the platform. Google Meet ranks above Teams on the web, as it's pretty lightweight; Teams tries to do so much, making it very slow or unstable when just using the web version. Teams is superior to Zoom when it comes …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Seamless integration with different files saved on OneDrive that are automatically compatible with Microsoft Teams. Ability to create different types of groups with different security levels allowing to keep the company data secured and project an organized system and processes …
Chose Microsoft Teams
We use both Slack and Teams. We use Slack for most internal meetings and chats. We only use Teams because our larger company requires it, and many of our external customers already have it installed. If we could get customers to use Slack, we would drop Teams in a heartbeat. If …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Personally, I believe that Microsoft Teams stands tall against all of its competitors. What I value most that it brings ahead of its competitors is its options for customization; the modern look and feel of its user interface; the security that it exemplifies; and its …
Chose Microsoft Teams
I love slack and the functionality it has! However, it lets itself down that you can't have client meetings through it / need to use another app like google meet for the meetings. It just is more apps/logins needed for employees = time that could be used doing other things.

Goog…
Chose Microsoft Teams
I think Teams is closest to Slack but much more ubiquitous and also much more user friendly. I do think products like Webex and Zoom seem to have a little more preference for large scale meetings and it's based mostly on reliability and usability. In addition, Teams tie it …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Teams has been a better experience and also has less security concerns.
Chose Microsoft Teams
The advantage of using Microsoft Teams over Zoom is that Teams seamlessly works with Outlook Calendar, Outlook Email, Lists, Forms, etc. If I create a Zoom meeting, I will have to do twice as much work. Working at a Microsoft 365 organization, it is more convenient to use a …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is Microsoft's modern replacement for Skype for Business, offering significantly enhanced, integrated collaboration beyond Skype's core chat and calling with deep integration into the Microsoft 365 suite, persistent chat channels, advanced meeting features (like …
Chose Microsoft Teams
We're required to use Microsoft Teams as I assume we get it free as part of our enterprise MS Office Suite agreement.
Chose Microsoft Teams
The two products are similar. Zoom has its place in the workplace. It is different from Microsoft Teams. It is more useful for personal use in our environment. Most outside organizations and individuals will have the capability to obtain the product and connect with an entity …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Zoom was the first virtual web program I used, and I still use it for some parts of my job, but I like how chat is included with Teams. Our whole department isn't in the same building, so it is convenient to send a message instead of picking up the phone or even just sending an …
Chose Microsoft Teams
UI is so much smooth to use. As we have to use this collaboration tool daily for connecting with team members Microsoft Teams give mor smooth experience. Everything is categorized on different tab, chat, teams, calander, calls. We can easily navigate through out the …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is better than both Zoom and Google Meets to me. It seems to have the functionality of both these platforms and also that of Slack for internal messaging. It's more of a "one-stop-shop" for both these needs which makes it a handy piece of software for use in the …
On2Air

No answer on this topic

Features
MattermostMicrosoft TeamsOn2Air
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Mattermost
8.2
Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Teams
8.1
Ratings
5% above category average
On2Air
-
Ratings
Task Management8.30 Ratings8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.60 Ratings8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.40 Ratings8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access8.60 Ratings8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Search8.80 Ratings7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.50 Ratings8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Mattermost
8.3
Ratings
4% above category average
Microsoft Teams
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
On2Air
-
Ratings
Chat8.70 Ratings8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.10 Ratings8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions8.60 Ratings8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys8.50 Ratings8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.40 Ratings8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting7.70 Ratings6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts8.00 Ratings5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook7.50 Ratings9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Mattermost
8.9
Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft Teams
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
On2Air
-
Ratings
Versioning7.90 Ratings8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files9.30 Ratings8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files9.30 Ratings8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration7.90 Ratings8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control9.90 Ratings8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features9.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive8.20 Ratings5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync10.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MattermostMicrosoft TeamsOn2Air
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MattermostMicrosoft TeamsOn2Air
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.9
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MattermostMicrosoft TeamsOn2Air
Likelihood to Recommend
Mattermost is definitely appropriate for a growing company with team members spread out across the u.s. and Canada. It’s given me the ability to have access to anyone with the information I need or the ability to develop friendships, working relationships with people I otherwise wouldn’t have access to
Read full review
It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Easy intergration to our main CRM (Monday.com)
  • I'm not techy myself but I have seen a lot of our previous integrations in Slack transferred over to Mattermost so that's fun
  • The desktop and phone app (android) works well enough. I haven't tried it on the Apple ecosystem yet.
Read full review
  • Makes communication and collaboration easier through Chat.
  • Lets us personalize and humanize face-to-face interactions through Meetings.
  • Helps me effectively plan out my day through Calendar.
  • Enables us to safely store and access our information through OneDrive.
  • Simplifies calls and voice communication.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Basic features like custom status, collapsed reply threads are JUST rolling out - kind of slow for a workplace chat app.
  • I don't really get the idea of Playbooks and Boards - there are better, dedicated tools for stuff like this and it's not so easy to turn off.
Read full review
  • The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
  • The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
  • The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Mattermost works perfectly within our company as a way to communicate seamlessly. I have had no issues with the product and continue to use it often while on and off site. The mobile app allows me to continue to communicate with my team even when I don't have my laptop with me.
Read full review
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Since it helps track all the things at one place and the bots can be made which helps to automate many tasks. We use it in our security incident tracking in which there are pre defined tasks like adding people, creating groups, launching bots. All these things make the work easier and oraganized
Read full review
I find that the chat function itself is quite clean, but once you incorporate the rest of the UI it becomes quite clunky. It feels as though there's too many features in one place, and that leads to it becoming convoluted and a little bit tedious to use. Due to that notifications can get missed which can lead to some tricky situations when working. I do find that it is easy to pick up though and help is readily available with a good support centre.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
No answers on this topic
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
We have not had to contact support for Mattermost ever. All that we have needed has been available in the documentation or website. One of our DevOps team members set it up in a couple of hours. The whole team was using Mattermost that same day. No support needed.
Read full review
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
This went as expected. No surprises or major hurdles.
Read full review
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Unlike Slack and Discord, Mattermost is self-hosted and focused on security. I used Discord before for community management and much simpler and less secure operations. Slack is great, but the fact that is cloud based takes out a lot of its independence.
Read full review
Breakout rooms are a very good feature that should be added to the platform. Google Meet ranks above Teams on the web, as it's pretty lightweight; Teams tries to do so much, making it very slow or unstable when just using the web version. Teams is superior to Zoom when it comes to chat and integration with other platforms.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Scalability
No answers on this topic
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The platform is adaptive to storage data center outages in case our cloud storage provider goes away, Mattermost still works with our local database. However, files couldn't be shared. We can switch storage to local temporarily; that's a benefit. Later it all syncs up to main storage.
  • When our team switched to Mattermost from paid solutions, we had much savings and access to unlimited past messages and storage quota (we use our cloud storage provider)
  • We have better visibility of our tools and other products running adjacent to Mattermost due to integration capability. We use it for notifications/ updates sent from other products.
Read full review
  • Allow smooth communication with team members, clients, and other internal and external partners globally.
  • Provide strong security features to ensure secure communication and confidence when sharing sensitive information during our meetings and group calls.
  • When working on collaborative projects, we can work together in the same document in real time.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Mattermost Screenshots

Screenshot of Channels: All team communications in one place.Screenshot of Playbooks: Orchestrates work across tools and teams.Screenshot of Boards: Project planning and milestones.Screenshot of Connections: Unites the entire technology stack through a single point of collaboration.