Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Quo
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Quo (formerly OpenPhone) is a business phone and VoIP solution designed to help maintain work life balance. Features include incoming call identification, set business hours, contact ownership information to associate calls to teammembers, etc., to help organize call responding.
$19
per month per user
Pricing
Microsoft Teams
Quo
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Starter
$19
per month per user
Business
$33
per month per user
Scale
$47
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Teams
Quo
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
Discounts available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Teams
Quo
Features
Microsoft Teams
Quo
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.0
238 Ratings
3% above category average
Quo
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.0177 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.894 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.1205 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
8.2124 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
8.2226 Ratings
00 Ratings
Search
7.5209 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
8.4140 Ratings
00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.0
247 Ratings
0% below category average
Quo
-
Ratings
Chat
9.0246 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications
8.3245 Ratings
00 Ratings
Discussions
8.6232 Ratings
00 Ratings
Surveys
8.2143 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
8.6154 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
6.547 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
5.743 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
9.1155 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.1
232 Ratings
1% above category average
Quo
-
Ratings
Versioning
8.5164 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video files
8.3199 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio files
8.7197 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document collaboration
8.8212 Ratings
00 Ratings
Access control
8.5194 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced security features
8.4154 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive
5.353 Ratings
00 Ratings
Device sync
8.5168 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Quo
5.4
5 Ratings
39% below category average
Hosted PBX
00 Ratings
4.24 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
00 Ratings
4.25 Ratings
User templates
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Call reports
00 Ratings
4.24 Ratings
Directory of employee names
00 Ratings
6.74 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Quo
7.0
9 Ratings
17% below category average
Answering rules
00 Ratings
6.76 Ratings
Call recording
00 Ratings
6.78 Ratings
Call park
00 Ratings
6.75 Ratings
Call screening
00 Ratings
6.77 Ratings
Message alerts
00 Ratings
8.37 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Quo
5.4
10 Ratings
38% below category average
Video conferencing
00 Ratings
4.22 Ratings
Audio conferencing
00 Ratings
4.25 Ratings
Video screen sharing
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Instant messaging
00 Ratings
8.310 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Product A and Product B
It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
If you have more than 2 people in your organization, then this will save you so much time. Delegation is the key to starting a business. Even when you're a 1 person show, being able to present to your user base the differentiation of options for client communications is critical. As a founder, feeling compelled to be always on is something I strive not to be. OpenPhone gives you that flexibility. I have found it to be less appropriate in complex HIPPA compliant areas, but that is it. OpenPhone really does seem to suit an open array of use cases.
The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
In my experience, App features are buggy and confusing, and they often don't match the descriptions and screenshots in their documentation. In fact, many of their help links go to 404 "page not found" errors. In my experience, there are frequent outages and quality issues. My customers prefer to talk to me on a different line, because they find it difficult to understand me on OpenPhone.
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
In my experience, their support feels like the opposite of support. They send you in circles, never directly answer questions, provide vague suggestions with unwanted platitudes, and they often take days between responses to provide that. For me, it's a frustrating experience that leaves you with a net loss of time and energy versus before you reached out to them. In my opinion, you definitely don't get "support".
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
OpenPhone has an easier user interface than Grasshopper. Years ago when I was using Grasshopper, I recall that their user interface looked antiquated and full of complications. They would also update the interface just as everyone was getting used to using it. OpenPhone has many more functions. Grasshopper's app did not offer basic functions such as in-app texting between team members, and its call transfer function was incredibly complicated to use. In my opinion, Grasshopper was an inferior service/product in almost every way.
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
In my experience, Billing lacks transparency, and they have made billing errors (overcharging me) since I started using them. I think the "trust registration" is an insane ripoff charging around $20 for every attempt. Crazy.
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.