Microsoft Teams vs. Whereby

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Teams
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Whereby
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Norwegian company appear.in offers their flagship video conferencing platform to small teams, both in a free edition hosting up to 4 guests simultaneously in a session or a paid edition that supports up to 12 simultaneous meeting guests, among other features.
$0
per user
Pricing
Microsoft TeamsWhereby
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Free
$0
per user
Pro
$9.99
per user
Business
$59.99 and up
per user/room
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft TeamsWhereby
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft TeamsWhereby
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Teams
Chose Microsoft Teams
Is the best application between others
Chose Microsoft Teams
I much prefer using Zoom and/or Slack in comparison to Teams. We find more of our external partners utilize Slack vs Teams as well.
Chose Microsoft Teams
Best in the market that provides a modern and comprehensive communication space.
Chose Microsoft Teams
It is better in terms of security and user friendly nature. It has far more better features than the other products.
Chose Microsoft Teams
Provide a single platform where all communication and collaboration tools are available and the user experience is consistent
Chose Microsoft Teams
It has both mobile and desktop application which are very friendly to use and the features it has are very updated on the market.

Microsoft Teams is better than Skype for business and any other chat services. Positives: easy integration with Cloud application like …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Breakout rooms are a very good feature that should be added to the platform. Google Meet ranks above Teams on the web, as it's pretty lightweight; Teams tries to do so much, making it very slow or unstable when just using the web version. Teams is superior to Zoom when it comes …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Seamless integration with different files saved on OneDrive that are automatically compatible with Microsoft Teams. Ability to create different types of groups with different security levels allowing to keep the company data secured and project an organized system and processes …
Chose Microsoft Teams
We use both Slack and Teams. We use Slack for most internal meetings and chats. We only use Teams because our larger company requires it, and many of our external customers already have it installed. If we could get customers to use Slack, we would drop Teams in a heartbeat. If …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Personally, I believe that Microsoft Teams stands tall against all of its competitors. What I value most that it brings ahead of its competitors is its options for customization; the modern look and feel of its user interface; the security that it exemplifies; and its …
Chose Microsoft Teams
I love slack and the functionality it has! However, it lets itself down that you can't have client meetings through it / need to use another app like google meet for the meetings. It just is more apps/logins needed for employees = time that could be used doing other things.

Goog…
Chose Microsoft Teams
I think Teams is closest to Slack but much more ubiquitous and also much more user friendly. I do think products like Webex and Zoom seem to have a little more preference for large scale meetings and it's based mostly on reliability and usability. In addition, Teams tie it …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Teams has been a better experience and also has less security concerns.
Chose Microsoft Teams
The advantage of using Microsoft Teams over Zoom is that Teams seamlessly works with Outlook Calendar, Outlook Email, Lists, Forms, etc. If I create a Zoom meeting, I will have to do twice as much work. Working at a Microsoft 365 organization, it is more convenient to use a …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is Microsoft's modern replacement for Skype for Business, offering significantly enhanced, integrated collaboration beyond Skype's core chat and calling with deep integration into the Microsoft 365 suite, persistent chat channels, advanced meeting features (like …
Chose Microsoft Teams
We're required to use Microsoft Teams as I assume we get it free as part of our enterprise MS Office Suite agreement.
Chose Microsoft Teams
The two products are similar. Zoom has its place in the workplace. It is different from Microsoft Teams. It is more useful for personal use in our environment. Most outside organizations and individuals will have the capability to obtain the product and connect with an entity …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Zoom was the first virtual web program I used, and I still use it for some parts of my job, but I like how chat is included with Teams. Our whole department isn't in the same building, so it is convenient to send a message instead of picking up the phone or even just sending an …
Chose Microsoft Teams
UI is so much smooth to use. As we have to use this collaboration tool daily for connecting with team members Microsoft Teams give mor smooth experience. Everything is categorized on different tab, chat, teams, calander, calls. We can easily navigate through out the …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is better than both Zoom and Google Meets to me. It seems to have the functionality of both these platforms and also that of Slack for internal messaging. It's more of a "one-stop-shop" for both these needs which makes it a handy piece of software for use in the …
Whereby
Chose Whereby
I find Zoom more complicated to use and harder to use because a lot of people do not like having to download things to their computers or devices and Whereby is so easy to get connected with . I like that Zoom offers larger rooms, but at this point the cost is not worth the …
Chose Whereby
For me it was Zoom, Google Meet vs. Whereby. For me, the main idea was to make it easier for the clients (non-technical people) to join and starting to have a talk. For Zoom, it was too much, even for myself, and Google Meet always needs a calendar integration, but with Whereby …
Chose Whereby
I did not evaluate other applications against Whereby, because we had a very specific need, which was the partner that we would use the solution, only accepted to use Whereby, so, we accepted to use the solution. As it was for a specific period, there was no problem. And in the …
Chose Whereby
Nicer layout than any other competitor by far, reactions for emojis pop up on your video (have not seen this anywhere else), easier to access (no downloads). Also, useful internally to always use the same URL, so if you have an ad hoc meeting everyone knows where to go. This …
Chose Whereby
Whereby offers better features and is easier to use than both Zoom and Google Hangouts.
Chose Whereby
We looked at BlueJeans, Zoom, and Google Hangouts. We selected Whereby because you can see multiple people (up to 12) in one screen. We also liked the interface.
Chose Whereby
Zoom I find clunky and not user-friendly as it's always asking you to do updates, attend their seminar trainings, and different codes. It's also expensive. GoToMeeting is much the same as Zoom.
Chose Whereby
When compared to the other VC platforms, we found Whereby the easiest to use for users and invitees. The only install from a recipient's point-of-view is a Chrome extension. Zoom requires a download and an account to sign into. Microsoft Teams is only for other members on the …
Chose Whereby
You're able to create unique links for people to join and use words and phrases in the link for the invite. I think that helps you with branding yourself as a company. On Google Hangouts we're not able to do something like this, which is why I appreciate Whereby and being able …
Chose Whereby
Whereby allows you to see everyone instead of just the last few people to talk. It also has no software to download and install. It works on any device that can access a website.
Chose Whereby
I don't know that it is an apples-to-apples comparison because in most other cases I used these platforms alongside Whereby. The best direct comparison would be Google Hangouts. With Whereby, I think the video and audio are superior, the UX is superior, and it's just a better …
Chose Whereby
Whereby is a great tool for individual meetings or among small groups. It's super simple to use and very convenient. But if you need to have meetings with more than 10 people, a tool like Zoom is probably necessary. You'll have more options to control who can share and who can …
Chose Whereby
It is a very simple tool. It can be accessed by all very fast. Sometimes we do more than one videoconference simultaneously and Whereby helps a lot as a second option, especially with few participants.
Chose Whereby
appear.in was the least expensive alternative at the time my company used it. It included the right set of features for what we needed.
Features
Microsoft TeamsWhereby
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.1
Ratings
5% above category average
Whereby
-
Ratings
Task Management8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Search7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Whereby
-
Ratings
Chat8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Whereby
-
Ratings
Versioning8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Whereby
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
High quality audio00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
High quality video00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Whereby
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Desktop sharing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Whiteboards00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Whereby
9.4
Ratings
14% above category average
Calendar integration00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Meeting initiation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Integrates with social media00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Record meetings / events00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Slideshows00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Whereby
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Live chat00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Audience polling00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Q&A00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Whereby
6.9
Ratings
16% below category average
User authentication00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft TeamsWhereby
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.8 out of 10
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft TeamsWhereby
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
5.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft TeamsWhereby
Likelihood to Recommend
It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
Read full review
Whereby is well suited for making connections with clients and people who are not technologically savvy. It is very easy to use for the most part. It does not work very well when I am trying to screenshare and show demonstrations of excel spreadsheets, but not a lot of products do
Read full review
Pros
  • Makes communication and collaboration easier through Chat.
  • Lets us personalize and humanize face-to-face interactions through Meetings.
  • Helps me effectively plan out my day through Calendar.
  • Enables us to safely store and access our information through OneDrive.
  • Simplifies calls and voice communication.
Read full review
  • Easy to use: The app is very, very easy to use. Literally just create a chat room (input a name) and access it to chat.
  • Call/video quality: I've experienced better call quality on appear.in than in almost all other chat and video conferencing services out there.
Read full review
Cons
  • The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
  • The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
  • The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
Read full review
  • The paid version may have dial-in. But I have always used the free version. Dial-in is typically required for an "official" multi-purpose teleconference platform.
  • I did have some trouble with larger groups (5+) when it was Appear.in but almost always use it for small 1-on-1 or 3 person meetings.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
We are using a larger tool suite that already includes video conferencing instead of our older approach of using different apps from different vendors. appear.in has a simple but great set of features but its pricing scheme is not as scalable as we really need in a 500+ employee company.
Read full review
Usability
I find that the chat function itself is quite clean, but once you incorporate the rest of the UI it becomes quite clunky. It feels as though there's too many features in one place, and that leads to it becoming convoluted and a little bit tedious to use. Due to that notifications can get missed which can lead to some tricky situations when working. I do find that it is easy to pick up though and help is readily available with a good support centre.
Read full review
Very easy to use, technical and non-technical colleagues have used it with no instructions needed. That says all about the app and services.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
Read full review
Never had to contact support, so we cannot give a rating for their overall support. When we noticed the audio was not always great quality, we simply educated our users to mute the mic and use the in-room conference phone which is connected via a dedicated VOIP link and had much better voice quality. The video performance varied by locations network speed and found it got much worse when the room size increased to over 4 connections.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
After a recommendation from a partner, as the system is very easy to use, we simply start.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Breakout rooms are a very good feature that should be added to the platform. Google Meet ranks above Teams on the web, as it's pretty lightweight; Teams tries to do so much, making it very slow or unstable when just using the web version. Teams is superior to Zoom when it comes to chat and integration with other platforms.
Read full review
I did not evaluate other applications against Whereby, because we had a very specific need, which was the partner that we would use the solution, only accepted to use Whereby, so, we accepted to use the solution. As it was for a specific period, there was no problem. And in the end, it proved to be a very stable, very fast solution, with no need for crazy plugins or anything. Basically, it was access[ed] and use.
Read full review
Scalability
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Allow smooth communication with team members, clients, and other internal and external partners globally.
  • Provide strong security features to ensure secure communication and confidence when sharing sensitive information during our meetings and group calls.
  • When working on collaborative projects, we can work together in the same document in real time.
Read full review
  • In general, any sort of online collaborations saves a lot on your budget. The meetings are rather more on time and can be efficient and short.
  • Easy to drop-by and have a small talk with clients/teammates within COVID era.
  • The URL makes you look fancy instead of a random hash.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Whereby Screenshots

Screenshot of Easy video meetings in your browser. No downloads, no login.Screenshot of Up to 50 participants in Townhall rooms.Screenshot of Record, save, and share meetings.