OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. Wrike

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Content Suite Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
Wrike
Score 8.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
OpenText Content Suite PlatformWrike
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Apex
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Content Suite PlatformWrike
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Content Suite PlatformWrike
Features
OpenText Content Suite PlatformWrike
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
8.4
7 Ratings
4% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.9
905 Ratings
2% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings9.1896 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.7770 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings7.9631 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.2784 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.9773 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.5896 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings7.6498 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings7.9448 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings7.5753 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings7.7676 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings7.8652 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings7.6422 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.4322 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.8
329 Ratings
1% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.63 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings7.6324 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings7.8195 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Content Suite PlatformWrike
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.6 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Content Suite PlatformWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(9 ratings)
8.5
(892 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.6
(103 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(2 ratings)
8.2
(229 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.1
(24 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
6.8
(21 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.7
(90 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(13 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.8
(32 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(12 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(7 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(15 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Content Suite PlatformWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Great for content management and records even for organizations whose staff are not much experienced in the technical backgrounds as it's easy to use and no previous knowledge on HTML is required. It is great for storing invoices and payment proofs and for organizations dealing with global clients for general use documents.
Read full review
Wrike
Wrike is great to keep track of the status of a project: who is doing what, when an item is due, and assigning and reassigning tasks as needed. The one thing I don't like is that, although it is convenient to add links, it opens them in the Wrike window instead of a new tab in your internet browser. I think it is a good platform for projects that have 10 or fewer steps/action items - otherwise, your main page becomes overwhelming.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Document Management is being done well since it allows you to put in a corporate folder structure that applies to the business unit you currently work in.
  • Records Management works well in this organisation as it allows you to classify the document according to the file plan, as well as manage it according to the retention schedule for tat file plan.
  • The ability to collaborate on files works really well. You can share with users within your group, as well as allow other users access to the files for either read access to read/write access.
  • Access control of the folder and even individual files allows you to ensure only necessary people can have the right type of access. This is especially welcome in the government environment where document management is of utmost importance.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Keeps projects on track
  • Provides tools that make editing and reviewing tasks much easier
  • Helps our team work effectively and efficiently despite many of us being remote workers
  • Visually accessible on multiple platforms which makes it easy to do work from anywhere
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
  • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
  • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Finding projects easier. Unless I pin a project, it can be hard to find again even by searching
  • It would be nice to have an option to add the project name to the end of task names. I implemented this in our workflow when i was a PM and it helps find tasks when you are moving assets or things from one task to the next
  • More reminders for overdue tasks
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
Read full review
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
Strong for Core Content and Records Management
Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
Read full review
Wrike
The platform is intuitive, easy to navigate, and flexible enough to accommodate the complexity of payer contracting workflows. Features such as custom workflows, automated reminders, and real-time collaboration make it simple for our team to stay aligned and efficient. Wrike allows us to track negotiations and related tasks without needing extensive training or technical expertise, which has driven adoption across departments and ensured consistent usage.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
OpenText
I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
Read full review
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
OpenText
  • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
Read full review
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
Read full review
Wrike
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
Read full review
In-Person Training
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
OpenText
No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
Read full review
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Having used OpenText Content Suite for a long time, I can say it stands the competition. It offers many versions which is unlike many products in its category. Also, while it is not affordable, I believe the cost is justified considering what a business can achieve with this software.
Read full review
Wrike
We use both monday.com and Wrike. While Monday does have a better user interface, Wrike allows us to have more visibility into tasks where multiple people are collaborating. And also to receive project brief-ins and requests for new projects. We use both differently and I would say for us Wrike is more the collaboration tool than the day to day individual task management tool - and it works great.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I do not use professional services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • With OpenText Content Suite, we can easily keep documents safe
  • Document collaboration is easy with OpenText
  • We can easily handle invoicing and automation thanks to features such as content capture and imaging.
  • With OpenText Content Suite, there is better file sync and archiving
Read full review
Wrike
  • Wrike has improved our resource management significantly.
  • Wrike has improved the request intake process for us.
  • One negative impact of using Wrike is that we had to include Workato for some customised automations, which were not supported by Unito, but this can be on a need-to basis.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows