IBM App Connect
Overview
What is IBM App Connect?
Recent Reviews
Popular Features
View all 6 features- Pre-built connectors (6)9.090%
- Support for real-time and batch integration (6)9.090%
- Data quality services (6)9.090%
- Data security features (6)9.090%
Reviewer Pros & Cons
View all pros & consVideo Reviews
Leaving a video review helps other professionals like you evaluate products. Be the first one in your network to record a review of IBM App Connect, and make your voice heard!
Pricing
View all pricingEntry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting / Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
Alternatives Pricing
Product Demos
Features
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is IBM App Connect?
IBM App Connect allows businesses to connect applications and build integration flows with no-code apprach, a catalog of pre-built connectors and commn templates. It provides rapid access to business-critical information, while also securing and protecting, enabling businesses to more easily create new and engaging user experiences for their customers. Built-in AI with suggestive data mapping and transformation also speed up development and testing of hybrid integrations. |
IBM App Connect Video
IBM App Connect Competitors
IBM App Connect Technical Details
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
---|---|
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
View all alternativesCompare with
Reviews and Ratings
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-5 of 5)- Popular Filters
"Swiss army knife" of the Integration world
- Mapping through different formats
- Lots of different connectors available
- Flexible, allows you to be creative
- Documentation - Documentation for older versions of the product was more detailed, with more examples.
- Sometimes not very intuitive, you need a certain learning curve.
- Some concepts are difficult to grasp or explain, due to "legacy" reasons (e.g. when to use DFDL vs MRM?)
- We can integrate different applications in just few hours
- We can validate the received/sent messages
- We can monitor any error appeared in the flows
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it
- Easy to connect to databases. Ex: DB2,Salesforce
- Easy to build the activity flow
- Easy to validate and verify the logic
- Cannot open multiple orchestrations in the same studio
- Need to install another studio if we need to refer to other orchestrations
- Sometimes the system behaves unusually
- I don't see any negative Impact .
- I like using this tool to do my job.
- I am comfortable using this tool.
IBM API Connect - Leaders in the API Management Space
- Securely expose APIs to Intranet/Internet
- The pn-premise set up of API Connect is fairly easier compared to Apigee.
- The development of API proxy is fairly easy.
- The development and the transformation capability is not so great. I believe IBM is looking to incorporate some of features of IBM App Connect into API Connect.
- The authentications features are no way close to CA API Management (f.k.a Laye r7).
- The development experience is not as good as Apigee's.
- The GUI should be improved. Maybe the product team should see the other API management tools in their offering.
- It helped our organization seamlessly integrate the on-premise services with partner organization.
IBM API Connect is positioned ahead of Apigee in the Gartner report. But in my opinion the development experience and the data transformation capability is way better in Apigee and it’s a proved solution and has a huge client list. (I have worked on an American Express implementation where the Apigee platform supported millions of transactions).
The analytics features are not available in the free Bluemix version of API Connect. Whereas it is available in Apigee. The security features in Layer 7 (now known as CA API Management) are way better than Apigee or IBM API Connect.
2. Daily, Monthly and Weekly data loads and feeds.
3. File Handling
4. Securely exposing Web Services (REST and SOAP) to applications outside the ecosystem.
5. Bulk data loads in Salesforce.com
2. Good understanding of Application integration concepts, Web Services (SOAP and REST)
3. Understanding of XML, CSVs, JSONs
4. Understanding of the endpoints and their functioning like Salesforce.com, SAP, Oracle (At least the basic concepts)
- Salesforce.com integration. IBM App Connect has pre built connectors for different endpoints (Like Oracle, SAP, Peoplesoft etc) which will save lot of development time
- File Handling in different data formats like JSONs, XML, CSVs and Fixed Length and scheduling of Data loads and feeds
- Web Service Integration (RESTful and SOAP)
- User friendly Web Management Console access through a browser for monitoring purpose
- Handling huge files for daily, weekly, and monthly data load jobs
- Integrating Oracle with Salesforce.com
- Integration of web services
- Continue using for dataloads and for web service integration
IBM used the wrong Cast for this Iron... it is head and shoulders BELOW competition.
- During our evaluation the support was fairly good as they were willing to spend literally hours on the phone trying to work through some of our issues. Unfortunately, they were unable to resolve them all.
- The UI crashed constantly while trying to develop integrations.
- The UI was not nearly as intuitive as many of its competitors in the iPaaS space, which lead to a much larger learning curve.
- We never implemented Cast Iron in production. When compared to five competing products in the iPaaS space it didn't make it past the first few test scenarios we threw at it.
IBM Cast Iron within Salesforce integrations
- WebSphere Cast Iron allows us to integrate Salesforce with other cloud and on-premise systems quickly and efficiently.
- Templated Integrations and connectors for Salesforce and other systems allow us to integrate with confidence and speed.
- The variety of form factors allows us to right-size our solutions for customers and the complexity of initial integrations vs the roadmap a customer has for future integrations.
- WebSphere Cast Iron is not aligned with the Salesforce product roadmap in the way that other ETL competitors are. When I speak with Salesforce reps and other partners they see Cast Iron as lagging significantly behind in that ecosystem.
- WebSphere Cast Iron has allowed us to shorten sales and delivery cycles for integration projects.
WebSphere Cast Iron struggles to compete with Jitterbit in most customer and project segments when Salesforce is involved in the system integrations. Jitterbit is highly aligned with the Salesforce product roadmap and features, including Lightning Connect and Wave Analytics Cloud.