Good Internally, Bad for External Representation and Sophisticated Scheduling
Overall Satisfaction with ClickUp
BoxPower uses ClickUp for project management (gantt creation, scheduling project status visualizations) for utility and commercial microgrid customers. In short, we use this as an internally accessible and more affordable version of MS Project. We export schedules that are used for internal purposes as PDF and Excel files from ClickUp and provide them to customers. BoxPower also uses ClickUp for internal task management, assignment, and scheduling.
Pros
- docs - meeting agendas with the docs feature are great
- external links - sharing schedule views externally are great
- internal task assignment - assigning tasks is easy
Cons
- gantt scheduling - very unpredictable and non-dynamic
- task dependencies - very little ability to create good schedule logic
- financial allocation - very simple finance tracking (money in / money out per task) with little ability to provide more detail
- Clickup has been a great interim project scheduler and task manager while our company raises money and can afford something robust
- ClickUp has been a very positive force in meeting agenda management and document version control
- ClickUp has provided more value than its cost in terms of time saved
Clickup has made cross-departmental meetings and task assignments more easy to track. I love the embedded smart-writing capabilities in the docs view. It's extremely useful for gaining visibility into the processes and current assignments of other departments as well. It has been frustrating that changes are easy to track but difficult to undo - this has led to situations in which people change task parameters in other departments, and its clear who made the changes, but unclear how to get the information back to its previous state.
ClickUp has allowed our team to cut a lot of time out of scheduling, duplicating process flows and creating templates for task assignment on projects that are similar to each other. Also, it has decreased the amount of time we spend prepping agendas -- templateizing docs has been useful, and ability to track and assign tasks and other embedded clickup processes in documents is really helpful for progress visibility.
For task management, clickup was clearly better than the rest - it has a variety of functions and a document interface that's better that most other task managers. As a scheduler, clickup had clear limitations from the start - MS Project is more sophisticated and an industry standard, unlike clickup which typically isn't used for complex project scheduling.
Do you think ClickUp delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with ClickUp's feature set?
Yes
Did ClickUp live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of ClickUp go as expected?
No
Would you buy ClickUp again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation