AB Tasty is a SAAS application created for e-marketers that enables them to optimize their website and conversion rate without technical knowledge. They can test several versions of their pages to identify which one has the biggest impact on their business objectives, e.g. click-through rate on a call to action button, add-to-cart rate, global conversion rate of their website.
N/A
Ion Interactive
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Ion is an enterprise-grade content experience platform that empowers modern marketers and designers to create no-code interactive content experiences integrated with their CRM or marketing automation tools.
N/A
Pricing
AB Tasty
Ion Interactive
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Managed Services + SaaS
Custom
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AB Tasty
Ion Interactive
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$5,500 per customer
Additional Details
—
ion’s Build Anything SaaS platform provides organizations with an entirely new and agile interactive content marketing capability. It enables non-technical marketers and designers to create, test and measure an unlimited number of all types of interactive content marketing experiences. It includes unlimited seats, experiences, tests, customization, phone and email support, analytics and more.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AB Tasty
Ion Interactive
Features
AB Tasty
Ion Interactive
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
AB Tasty
8.3
22 Ratings
1% below category average
Ion Interactive
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
8.222 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
8.215 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
8.219 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
7.616 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
6.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
7.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
10.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
8.78 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
7.39 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
9.16 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
9.59 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
AB Tasty
8.6
21 Ratings
2% below category average
Ion Interactive
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
9.220 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
7.618 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
9.221 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
8.419 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
AB Tasty
8.5
22 Ratings
2% below category average
Ion Interactive
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool
7.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click analytics
9.116 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scroll maps
9.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion tracking
8.221 Ratings
00 Ratings
Goal tracking
9.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test reporting
8.422 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results segmentation
8.119 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard
9.19 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
AB Tasty
-
Ratings
Ion Interactive
7.5
105 Ratings
5% below category average
Ideation
00 Ratings
10.099 Ratings
Content collaboration
00 Ratings
5.094 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Product A and Product B
AB Tasty
-
Ratings
Ion Interactive
8.7
120 Ratings
10% above category average
Content hub
00 Ratings
10.0104 Ratings
Forms / Gated content
00 Ratings
10.0107 Ratings
Embedded CTAs
00 Ratings
10.0108 Ratings
Content distribution
00 Ratings
8.093 Ratings
Content promotion
00 Ratings
8.086 Ratings
Content automation
00 Ratings
6.090 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
A/B Tasty tool allows us do easy testing without burdening our limited developer resources all the time. Reports are simple enough to interpret. Support has been excellent and proactive, also the onboarding was successful. It is also an advantage that we have the possibility to drive all our traffic to the test versions rather than being limited to specific user amount per month. We can recommend A/B Tasty for testing purposes, as the platform keeps it’s promises, doesn’t require too much technical knowledge and the support is excellent.
If you want to choose a quick start template and fill in the fields with your content, Ion will be fantastic for you. We've done this with whitepapers and quizzes and it's been great and extremely easy to use. If you have an exact idea of what you want, and a background in web development, you may get frustrated. Ion has some quirks that make it tricky to fully customize - everyone once in a while I really just want to go into the HTML and make some changes, but can't. If you are looking to reuse a piece of content for specific targeting (industry or account-specific), Ion is great. The dynamic substitutions are great and very helpful.
Customer-focused. Over the past year, AB Tasty has worked with us to overcome many obstacles (e.g. tracking hurdles, ITP issues, etc.). The team always finds a solution in a timely manner to ensure we're able to execute on experiments.
Reliability. One of the biggest hurdles earlier this year were the ITP regulations set out by Apple. Over 40% of our ad traffic was Safari users. AB Tasty was using 3rd party cookies but quickly migrated over to a local session storage solution that circumvented the issue.
Sometimes the platform is a little glitchy and requires a refresh.
Would be great to be able to see the experiments and projects on a timeline with their status and main result to have an immediate view of ongoing and completed projects.
Email notification for when an experiment reaches a certain confidence level.
Ion University, while stacked with a wealth of information, is difficult to navigate from a troubleshooting perspective. The tutorial videos are all very helpful, but they are also very long. Sometimes I would want to search for how to address a particular issue I was struggling with and it would be a two-minute segment buried in a 45-minute video.
Again, getting back the self-guidance side of things. I think a lot of the tutorials are set up in a way that makes sense to Ion, but not as much to the end user.
I think the controls admins use when creating new users could be a bit more straightforward.
AB Tasty's tool as well as the support team completely met my goals on A/B Testing. Editing a test is really easy and AB Tasty made the marketing team free to launch nearly any test. Reporting is also easy to set up and give us the information needed to keep improving transformation on landing pages and forms
We use it for every landing page and we plan on only doing more dynamic content creation. We dont see that option coming in-house any time ever in the future. ION has a very robust platform for us to work with that really allows us to do more for our customers in regards to having the one-to-one conversation.
The tool’s usability is excellent, with a smooth and intuitive interface. It is continuously updated with new features and improvements aimed at enhancing the user experience. Setting up experiments and personalizations is straightforward, thanks to a well-structured process that even less experienced users can easily follow. There are sometimes small issues with the QA section which slows the QA process but it is so much better now compared to 2024.
Usability is straightforward, with extensive documentation and tutorials provided to ensure landing pages are built to specifications and can be optimized for performance. Built-in platform funnels give insight into customer dropoff, success/failures, and conversions (at a glance). Setting up a landing page can be done quickly and easily, with numerous integrations (CRMs like SalesForce, for instance) supported
Support is good, but it would be better if it was quicker or if AB Tasty provided a quicker SLA. At times, you require stuff urgently but AB Tasty support isn't as quick as I personally like it to be.
The ION support team is amazing. There has not been a single issue they they could not solve for me. If there is a feature or request that they do not have, they have even, on occasion, created custom scripts for our team. *Update 6/5/17 - ION has continued to delight on multiple occasions. I appreciate their attention to detail and ability to solve whatever issue I have. After 3+ years of use and support, ION still has my full endorsement.
There is a vast amount of training available on their online platform, including their university area of which you can get certified for (and then share this with your connections on platforms such as Linkedin). There is also specific hand created training which can be provided by your customer success manager if that is requested by yourself.
They offer a great amount of online training, videos, articles, etc. There is usually an answer available if you run into an issue. I would recommend taking advantage of the online training they offer. I wish I would have done it sooner.
There were a lot of things we learned about the tool once we really got in and got our hands dirty. Being hands-on was essential for our team to be able to utilize ION in the most effective manner.
We selected AB Tasty mostly because we got a sense that their dev and customer service teams were going to go above and beyond to help us out. We were right! The cost was also a factor as they came in a small bit lower, but cost wasn't the only factor.
I was not the decision maker to choose this over Uberflip, but the UI is much more appealing to me. It's incredibly easy to use, clean, and from a backend standpoint, it requires little to no tech savvy'ness. Our team has really enjoyed using it and has required no training what-so-ever.
Separate client portfolios enable scalability, however, some elements are still grouped for all accounts so it's difficult to scale for an ad agency with multiple clients. Would prefer totally separate sections of the platform for all clients with each element housed separately.
Since we use AB tasty our conversion rates have significantly increased on the Watch pages.
We can report positive comments about the evolutions of our interfaces, from our expert users. And so improved customer satisfaction.
The solution allows us to validate or invalidate without taking major risk while gaining in reactivity, our proposals relook pages.
Commitment rates are much higher, multiplied by 2 or 3, when we implement customizations that are relevant. These customizations are very relevant insofar as we are governed by the seasonality of events as a media site.
Though we have not had the service long enough to see any measurable outcomes, we've been able to create interactive web content faster than ever before
The speed with which we can build interactive pages and re-use assets has been critical as projects we've done with Ion have made their way around and more and more internal clients have said "me too" for their own projects
It is very pricey at $28K for the base annual subscription (dropping to $24k after the first year), so depending on your budgetary situation, that may make no sense for your team--but we had contract money set aside for a company to build us a microsite for around the amount, so we just used it for Ion instead and will now be building the microsite ourselves using it