Adobe Audience Manager is a data management platform (DMP) that is integrated into the Adobe Marketing Cloud.
N/A
Netlify CMS
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Netlify CMS is an open source Git-based CMS for static site generators. it runs 100% in a browser.
N/A
Optimizely Content Management System
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Optimizely Content Management System (CMS) is purpose-built for marketers, and fully composable for developers. The CMS supports the end-to-end content lifecycle, helping users to deliver on-brand, high-impact digital experiences that 'wow' audiences.
N/A
Pricing
Adobe Audience Manager
Netlify CMS
Optimizely Content Management System
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Audience Manager
Netlify CMS
Optimizely Content Management System
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Audience Manager
Netlify CMS
Optimizely Content Management System
Features
Adobe Audience Manager
Netlify CMS
Optimizely Content Management System
Data Collection
Comparison of Data Collection features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Audience Manager
8.6
16 Ratings
5% above category average
Netlify CMS
-
Ratings
Optimizely Content Management System
-
Ratings
Collection of first-party data
8.116 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collection of third-party data
8.116 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Access to Third-party Data Providers
9.616 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Classification
Comparison of Data Classification features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Audience Manager
7.3
16 Ratings
12% below category average
Netlify CMS
-
Ratings
Optimizely Content Management System
-
Ratings
Audience taxonomy
7.916 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tag Management
6.215 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Analysis Dashboard
7.816 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad Network Integration
Comparison of Ad Network Integration features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Audience Manager
8.9
16 Ratings
11% above category average
Netlify CMS
-
Ratings
Optimizely Content Management System
-
Ratings
Data Transfer
8.916 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
DSP integration
8.815 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
DMP Analytics
Comparison of DMP Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Audience Manager
6.8
16 Ratings
14% below category average
Netlify CMS
-
Ratings
Optimizely Content Management System
-
Ratings
Campaign Analytics
5.516 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Analytics
8.116 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Audience Manager
-
Ratings
Netlify CMS
6.0
1 Ratings
26% below category average
Optimizely Content Management System
7.9
165 Ratings
2% above category average
API
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
7.9158 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.8126 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Audience Manager
-
Ratings
Netlify CMS
6.1
1 Ratings
24% below category average
Optimizely Content Management System
7.8
193 Ratings
0% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
7.7177 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
8.1165 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
8.1177 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
8.2171 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
7.596 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
7.9175 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
8.1171 Ratings
Form generator
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.6130 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Audience Manager
-
Ratings
Netlify CMS
4.3
1 Ratings
54% below category average
Optimizely Content Management System
7.5
179 Ratings
1% above category average
Content taxonomy
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
8.1164 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
7.5141 Ratings
Community / comment management
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
8.0116 Ratings
SEO support
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.1163 Ratings
Bulk management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.0136 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
If you are already using multiple other pieces of the Adobe Experience Cloud stack, adobe audience manager is an easy choice. It allows for quick and easy data activation for your first and potentially brokered 2nd party data. However this product will likely be absorbed into the adobe experience platform (AEP) soon. In the end I would wait to see where adobe is truly headed with this product before investing heavily without additional heavy adobe investments.
Netlify CMS is well suited when you have very less frequent updates to your content, maybe once a day and very few people need to access your data. You can connect it to Netlify, GitHub, or any platform and have multiple people access it and do as many updates as you wish, but the process is not well-defined and you need to build your own system for that. It is well suited for projects you need to pull off with very low cost, it is essentially free as the software is open source and free to use, and all you need to do is set up your schema correctly and find a deployment pipeline where you can build your static site/API to redeploy whenever the content changes. I personally used a GitHub Login -> Netlify CMS -> next app consumer of content -> GitHub pipelines to run next SSG -> GitHub Pages to deploy the built static site. It might not be appropriate for large teams where users themselves need no-code tools to modify the schema of the content.
If you want to build a website quickly there are plenty of ways to do so with some great examples and plenty of support both from the company and in the forums. if you want to build a more complex structure you can but be ready to spend the time to build exactly what you need as a solid foundation goes a massive way before building out content and making those choices early and sticking with them helps
We are able to generate reports that provide valuable insights into potential customer behavior, allowing us to better focus our marketing efforts.
By allowing us to understand who are key audiences are and how they overlap with other brands and products, AAM allows us to get a fuller picture of how we should target our audience.
Reporting in AAM is wonderful in that it is easy to understand and exportable. The use of graphics and updates make it easier to share insights with various team members--even those with minimum experience in marketing and analytics.
I think the user interface for content admins is very good and very competitive. And compared to other providers, the technology that CMS in particular has. So the way it integrated the net ecosystem is very well because it follows the MBC pattern. So basically it just allows really simple implementations for what would normally be complex components on any other sort of vendor that's out there.
Magento did have some nice tools for creating product groups or carousels for promotion. Opti seems to be lacking in that.
A blog - maybe this is available and we don't have it installed, but a searchable blog would be very appreciated.
Structured Data/MicroData - maybe it's our install, but this seems to be missing
Meta data: we have access to limited types and need to make a request from IT, it would be nice to be able to access more to adjust for SEO needs.
When in a folder on the BLOCKS tab, it would be wonderful to hit the MEDIA tab and stay in that same folder.
I have some less technical people that will make folders with spaces - which Opti handles, but it would be great if it wouldn't accept a space or gave an error message not to use them.
I think I know why the extra code is added to urls and image links, but it causes issues when taking things from our testing site to the live site. For example, I need to copy the Navigation from Inspect Element on testing to put it in production. I have learned to work around it, but it's not my favorite.
Since I work on the implementation side of things, and do not directly own licensing for Ektron CMS, I have to base this rating off of how I think it will be received or presented to customers looking to start a new site deployment. I try to remain CMS agnostic, though my specialty is with the .NET and Microsoft stack. Because of the experience I have working with Ektron, I tend to be more forgiving with the shortcomings as I am familiar with how to work around them or past them from experience. Being familiar with the community available also helps, as you become familiar with the best approaches to find solutions to your issues. Each product has it's ups and downs and all of them are only going to be as good as the company or development team implementing them can make them. This is EXTREMELY important to remember when choosing a CMS, as it can make or break your expensive investment.
Overall usability is great, as are most of Adobe's software. Maybe a UI refresh could make it a bit easier to do advanced functions or reporting but, overall, it works very well. This is something you take for granted with Adobe solutions because when you try another vendor you realize how bad it can be.
From our editors perspective they find the CMS system easy and to clear to use. Our developers find it very easy to design on and appreciate the level of service support available. It's also always evolving and getting better every year. We find this investment reassuring and encourages us to try keep pace and see how we can continue to push the envelope and continue to improve all aspect of our websites and online touch points.
AAM has good support, but the support is not as available, due to waiting time and queue. The instructions presented are available, but it navigation is not easy between pages. However, instructions are usually direct and straightforward, but any underlying thoughts or questions won’t be easily answered without support from their service.
I attended multiple trainings/tutorials early in the process. The vendor-supplied content about Optimizely was engaging for users/attendees (I often analyze training content, compliance programs, governance plans), which helps our OCM people by having good "word of mouth" about the product long before a rollout ever happens. I actually when the user-focused portion of the Optimizely Academy twice in 2022 to ensure I had a grasp on operability and to be able to support the training and OCM efforts
Ektron is one of the best solution for .Net platform. Over the years have improved the performance issues that the previous versions had. My only complain is right now you can't do Page builder pages if you choose to have a MVC architecture
I personally like the Adobe Audience Manager interface and it's easier to use for beginners. It also has some features that Google does not, nor do its other competitors. It is worth the money and time spent, overall. I feel like it gives a bigger and more in-depth picture to our company's audience than other programs.
We really can't compare it to full-fledged CMS software, like WordPress, which has a lot of community and support with widgets, plugins, and whatnot. It's not built for that, but you can compare it to Contentful, Ghost, Strapi, etc., which provide similar functionality to a headless CMS with custom schema options, but even among them, it still lacks a lot of functionality, ease of use, and support. But Netlify CMS pros would be of the opinion that compared to other platforms where most schemas need to use their own tools and frameworks, it's very cost-effective. Something new called TinaCMS has come up to compete with Netlify CMS by covering most of its shortcomings, but it's something new being built by the same team that built Forestry CMS and comes with many modern features, yet currently only supports NextJS SSG.
Optimizely Content Management System is much more feature rich, and less complex that the other CMS platforms we have used. Optimizely Content Management System is more intuitive in how the content is structured and how easy it is to pull blocks of content to create the layout of a page.