Atlassian Jira is a project management tool, featuring an interactive timeline for mapping work items, dependencies, and releases, Scrum boards for agile teams, and out-of-the-box reports and dashboards.
$9
per month per user
Contractor Foreman
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Pricing
Atlassian Jira
Contractor Foreman
Editions & Modules
Standard
$9
per month per user
Premium
$17
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Atlassian Jira
Contractor Foreman
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Higher volume teams may qualify buyers for a discount.
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian Jira
Contractor Foreman
Features
Atlassian Jira
Contractor Foreman
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Jira
7.8
34 Ratings
1% above category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.833 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
7.732 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.224 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
7.831 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
8.132 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
8.533 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
8.934 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
7.828 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
6.928 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
8.030 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.125 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
7.625 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
7.925 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
6.918 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Jira
7.4
19 Ratings
4% below category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates
7.416 Ratings
00 Ratings
Invoicing
7.712 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting
7.217 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software
7.415 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Jira
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
53 Ratings
1% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.247 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.750 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.83 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.43 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
4.65 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Jira
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
5.9
4 Ratings
25% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
4.63 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
3.74 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
4.51 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.43 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Jira
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Jira
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
8.8
67 Ratings
13% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.966 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.861 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.857 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
8.656 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Jira
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
8.1
71 Ratings
6% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing
00 Ratings
5.55 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
00 Ratings
6.245 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
00 Ratings
8.861 Ratings
Photo documentation
00 Ratings
8.670 Ratings
Jobsite reports
00 Ratings
9.262 Ratings
Document sharing
00 Ratings
8.466 Ratings
RFI tools
00 Ratings
9.453 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
00 Ratings
8.958 Ratings
Mobile app
00 Ratings
8.871 Ratings
Submittal design and management
00 Ratings
7.550 Ratings
Checklists
00 Ratings
9.062 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
Specifications
00 Ratings
5.54 Ratings
Change orders
00 Ratings
9.062 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Jira facilitates software development, bug tracking, and sprints. It's ideal for structured workflows, issue management, and customer communication. However, more straightforward tools might be more efficient for highly creative, unstructured tasks or tiny, agile teams with quick visual overviews. Jira's complexity can be overkill for basic task lists.
Contractor Foreman has been a great tool for managing a variety of projects, from home remodels to large-scale builds. It works especially well for keeping everything organized in one place, whether it’s estimates, schedules, or job costs. One scenario where it’s been really useful is in managing multiple jobs at once. With several remodels and new construction projects happening at the same time, having a centralized system to track progress, store documents, and communicate with subcontractors has helped keep everything on schedule. It’s also great for estimating—being able to quickly generate and send professional proposals has made bidding much more efficient. It’s especially well-suited for projects that require a lot of moving parts, like tracking permits and compliance documents. For larger jobs, like school construction, it helps ensure that all approvals, budgets, and schedules stay on track without getting lost in a mess of paperwork. Where it’s less ideal is for smaller, one-off jobs where a full project management system might be overkill. If it’s just a quick repair or a simple remodel, sometimes it’s easier to just handle things manually. The mobile app could also be a bit more intuitive for on-site use, especially for field updates and quick changes. Overall, it’s a strong tool for contractors managing multiple projects, budgets, and teams. It keeps things organized and saves time, especially on jobs that require detailed tracking and coordination.
Integration of tools like Bitbucket, Github, etc., has made it easier to track the code changes, pull requests, and branches linked to the respective ticket.
The detailed tracking system in JIRA has helped the teams prioritize and understand the project tasks and issues.
JIRA's project tracking board helps you keep track of the project, its flow, and expectations in a structured format.
Security and sensitive file visibility. Users with no permissions can have access to some hidden files.
Daily log navigation. Users now need to exit one log entirely to view or check another, resulting in a significant waste of time and reduced efficiency.
Customization options for reports. No options to set up and automatically send reports by email to specified users.
This is because Jira Software generates a huge profit for an affordable price. Having a tool that makes team management transparent and effective is very valuable.
In addition, the renewal of Jira Software and all Atlassian tools is predictable and clear, as the prices are published on the Atlassian website and there is no pyramid of intermediaries.
The interface is simple and easy to use if you have some experience with it. Configuration is also logical most of the time. However, less experienced users tend to find themselves lost in some tasks - usually complex project configuration- but sometimes simple things, such as seeing why a user can't move issues in a workflow. Jira configuration requires a good amount of experience - and even experienced users often resort to documentation. It's a tool that's easy to use if you know what you're doing and where to find the proper documentation, but novice users tend to find it challenging.
Overall, Contractor Foreman is a great product, and I’m sure we’ve only scratched the surface of everything it has to offer. It can be a little quirky at times, occasionally displaying a 'Bad Gateway' message, but we haven’t experienced any timeout issues in the past few months. As we continue to use it, I’m confident we’ll uncover even more ways to streamline our workflow
Did not face any issues and whenever they plan maintanance they update all of us very well in advance also so in that view we are good with the product stability.
Performance is really good though it holds lot of data it loads quickly especially search operation also get the results very quickly as needed hence its good
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
I have not had a chance to contact JIRA's customer support. It does offer extensive documentation, although it often feels too technical for me. There is also a JIRA training app that lets you take little lessons and quizzes on different areas (e.g., JIRA basics, agile). I did find it a helpful way to teach myself.
We have only had one issue the entire time we have had Contractor Foreman and that was that we had the hardest time getting the platform to allow us to log in, but we called our support and within 5 mins we able to log back in
Had received training from our own internal user so it was good and also very easy to understand topics and many tasks in the UI are self explanatory and we can do by our own
One of their strong points i stheir documentation. Almost all of the basic set up needed within JIRA is available online through atlassian and its easy to find and very precise. The more critical issues need to be addressed as well and hence the rating of 8 instead of a 9.
Take your time implementing Jira. Make sure you understand how you want to handle your projects and workflows. Investing more time in the implementation can pay off in a long run. It basically took us 5 days to define and implement correctly, but that meant smooth sailing later on.
monday.com cannot be integrated with CI/CD tools, whereas Atlassian Jira integrates with CI/CD tools seamlessly. Atlassian Jira has strong Agile and Scrum support. Coming to monday.com, it has basic agile functionality. But Atlassian Jira has a complex UI, and monday.com has an intuitive, drag-and-drop interface. Overall, Atlassian Jira provides features like Agile project management, DevOps integration, and customizable workflows.
There's just no comparing these two. I'm actually going to suggest we keep CE to my boss, and here's why: Clearestimates is perfect for what I just described. You have a little job that you just BOOM it's done? Put it into Clearestimates. That system does not care at all if you did it "properly." Now Contractor Foreman does so. much. more. than CE. It just does. You can do everything on CF (just not anything haha). Most businesses wouldn't need anything else, but since we're still growing, we do some handyman stuff every now and again that CE is perfect for, and we don't have to go through CF's really picky system to make sure every little tiny thing is correct
Atlassian Jira's robust workflow automation has boosted team efficiency, shortening delivery cycles and driving a positive ROI through improved project management.
Its advanced reporting and integration capabilities have enabled data-driven decisions, aligning operations with key business objectives.
However, the steep learning curve can delay adoption, potentially hindering short-term ROI.
Prior to using Contractor Foreman we had to wait until the end to capture all change orders in one summary. Now, with the client portal, we can capture in real time and the client has visibility.
We have been trying to reduce administration time in tracking field expenses and with Contractor Foreman our field crew can uplaod reciepts and track expenses right from their mobile phones.
Punchlist - the punch list and To Do features are so robust we have drastically improved getting punchlists and small tasks completed in single trips without the wasted time and travel of multiple trips due to missed/forgotten items.