Google Jamboard vs. MindManager vs. Miro

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Jamboard
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Google Jamboard is a collaborative whiteboard, available as an add-on to Google Workspaces.
$4,999
MindManager
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
MindManager is a mind mapping and project management tool that aims to boost users’ productivity. It is designed to facilitate a wide range of project types, and includes cross-platform functionality and 3rd party integrations.
$105
per year
Miro
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Miro is the AI Innovation Workspace that brings teams and AI together to plan, co-create, and build the next big thing, faster. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro's collaborative AI workflows keep teams in the flow of work, scale shifts in ways of working, and drive organization-wide transformation.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Google JamboardMindManagerMiro
Editions & Modules
Google Jamboard
4,999
MindManager for Microsoft Teams
$105
per year
Annual Subscription
$179
per year
Organizations
Contact sales team
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google JamboardMindManagerMiro
Free Trial
NoYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsMonthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google JamboardMindManagerMiro
Considered Multiple Products
Google Jamboard
Chose Google Jamboard
Google Jamboard is a much simpler tool. This is not necessarily a bad thing e.g. if I just want to set up a warm-up exercise for students before we start the session using Miro would be flash over substance. Do not get me wrong, everyone who knows me knows I love Miro but I …
Chose Google Jamboard
Miro is more user friendly, and interactive as compared to Google Jamboard. Advantages of using jamboard would be that since it's a part of the Google suite, individuals are more comfortable using the tool and tracking changes/updates. Both can be used for collaboration, and …
Chose Google Jamboard
The decision was made on the basis of the availability of the tool versus the licence fees.
MindManager
Chose MindManager
Miro: have not evaluated before. I find Miro more cumbersome than MindManager. MindManager was easier to pick up.
Chose MindManager
Each does very similar things. I like Miro because it is very easy to allow anyone to collaborate without having to have a file saved anywhere. Visio is great if you have spent a lot of time learning the ins and outs of it. I prefer Mind Manager for presentation and …
Chose MindManager
I have known and followed MindManager developments since 2000 and maintain my knowledge base. I even used it to create my wheel of life based on the Indian model and would also like to use the MM in a VR version. No tool offers comparable holistic functions - as well as - 25 …
Chose MindManager
It had more business functionality as integrated well with ms office tools. Other two tools have their own benefits.
Chose MindManager
MindManager has many functions that others don't allow. Users can also use it offline rather than relying on an internal connection. It works with many standard business software programs that other products do not. This makes it very applicable for the workplace, as it helps …
Chose MindManager
MindManager excels in visualizing complex ideas and projects through interactive mind maps and flowcharts, making it superior to traditional list-based tools. Its intuitive interface, robust features like task management, and integration with various platforms streamline …
Chose MindManager
Word in Outline view creates outlines but it is not possible to add pictures nor keep it in a coherent tree presentation.
Powerpoint are individual slides where the audience see only the current slides without looking at its relation with all other topics. When deploying a …
Chose MindManager
It is different from other project management software because it is easy to use and can be used by just about anyone. With its intuitive interface, you can create mind maps and brainstorm up to four levels of notes and ideas. It has over 50 predefined shapes to capture your …
Chose MindManager
MindManager is software that you can install on your computer and you can trust that your information is safe and confidential. Other similar products use open website platforms that store the information in clouds and you can't really control who has access to the information …
Miro
Chose Miro
We analyzed Google Jamboard as well, but after analyzing these two, we finally came to one decision, which was going with Miro. Google Jamboard requires a technical expert to use because even non-technical people can use it simultaneously. That is why we decided to go with Miro.
Chose Miro
I previously used Coda for documenting labelling rules and Google Jamboard for quick brainstorming. While using Coda, I always felt it was too text-heavy and too simplistic. Jamboard was visual but too shallow for structured mapping. Miro became the optimum choice for fast, …
Chose Miro
Miro is very intuitive, but I think it's more a force of habit. The features aren't massively differentiated; it's just that we've been using Miro for longer and are used to it.
Chose Miro
Jamboard (RIP)
I like the interface and additional functionality better on Miro than in Mural
Figma is great, but it's a little more than I need (I'm not a designer). I can get what I need for it from Canva.
Chose Miro
What I needed was Jamboard along with Sheets and Docs all in one. Because Jamboard was simple but not meant for my bigger explanation flows and Docs, Sheets fell short at visualization because of its limited tools. The lack of infinite canvas, visualization, tracking and topic …
Chose Miro
I have worked with Jamboard, but I found Miro to be much more flexible and feature rich. Miro has tons of templates you can use it has a corresponding set of collaboration capabilities with features like clustering sticky notes and voting. When it came to organizing a large …
Chose Miro
Compared to the others, the platform offers a far more extensive feature set and a sleeker, more professional UI/UX, making it ideal for creating professional-looking diagrams.
Chose Miro
Miro is great for collaborating. I think it definitely is better than Mural and Jamboard because it has more features and it's easier to use. Compared to FigJam, as a designer I would probably choose FigJam to have everything in the same product. However, in my opinion, Miro …
Chose Miro
Miro basically cover the needs of all the other tools. I started using Miro extensively during the pandemic and at that point only Jamboard provided similar options and was free when collaborating in a bigger group and when not everyone had a license. This is still the main …
Chose Miro
Way better! More functionality, amaazing templates, easy to use, possibility to do so much int he tool.
Chose Miro
We chose Miro because it filled the blanks when it comes to interactive collaboration and visualization. None of the other tools we use daily promotes the kind of active involvement by the team members and our external workshop or meeting participants. Miro has become the …
Chose Miro
Miro surpasses Jamboard, Trello, and Zen Mind Map by combining whiteboarding, planning, and mind mapping in one platform. Miro offers real-time collaboration, templates, and integrations make it ideal for cross-functional teams. I chose Miro for its flexibility, visual …
Chose Miro
They do provides the solution for bringing qual and quant together and in a way that is structured. It also works with back end data like Snowflake and is adaptive. You also dont feel like you're having to zoom in and out in varous ways to read the content. The others arent …
Chose Miro
I haven't used other tools seriously but whatever little I've seen/used of them paled in comparison with Miro. The UI/UX just feels better!
Chose Miro
It stands out because of its versatility, number of tools and balance between structure and creativity.
Chose Miro
The ease of use. Again, the templates are really helpful because it helps provide a solid structure or foundation.
Chose Miro
Working in Figma is more difficult due to its non-intuitive interface, although it also has good drawing tools and supports a good variety of files. Compared to Miro, it has fewer tools and they are more difficult to use. Jamboard is very limited, few tools and little file …
Chose Miro
Google Jamborad it's great for meetings note taking, but only the meeting is going on. Whe it finished, it's not possible to do new notations. Microsoft Planner is a great tool for planning and tasks tracking, but it does note have te colaboration tools, and real-time …
Chose Miro
Miro is popular online collaborative whiteboard platform which is almost many different team is using it. Miro provide best features like best templates, and voting features and best diagramming tools as compared with other hence it's suitable for all kinds of requirements. We …
Chose Miro
I find most other digital collaboration tooling are slowly catching up with Miro, although I'm please that Miro continues to develop, improve and iterate their products. They provide easy to use solutions that don't require much training, although the academy is cool to learn …
Chose Miro
I actually think Miro is better because it's faster to load. Mural is better to Agile spaces, because it's easier to vote. FigJam is good because its connected with Figma, and Jamboard is terrible. Lol.
As described previously, I've used both Mural and Google Jamboards. I found Google Jamboards trickier to use - I ended up creating titles and layouts in PowerPoint and importing logos and headings into my Jamboards because their inter-active functionality is much less …
Features
Google JamboardMindManagerMiro
Mind Mapping
Comparison of Mind Mapping features of Product A and Product B
Google Jamboard
-
Ratings
MindManager
7.5
70 Ratings
1% above category average
Miro
-
Ratings
Cross-Platform Compatibility00 Ratings7.455 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Templates00 Ratings7.764 Ratings00 Ratings
Import and Export Options00 Ratings7.265 Ratings00 Ratings
Real-time Collaboration Tools00 Ratings6.849 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-Drop Capabilities00 Ratings8.960 Ratings00 Ratings
Notes and Attachments00 Ratings7.763 Ratings00 Ratings
Color and Style Customization00 Ratings7.864 Ratings00 Ratings
Presentation Mode00 Ratings7.456 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Task Management00 Ratings6.951 Ratings00 Ratings
Mind Map Revision History00 Ratings6.942 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google JamboardMindManagerMiro
Small Businesses
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 9.3 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 9.3 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 9.3 out of 10
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 9.3 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google JamboardMindManagerMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(6 ratings)
8.0
(255 ratings)
9.1
(6063 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(24 ratings)
9.4
(185 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.4
(19 ratings)
8.6
(450 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(7 ratings)
9.5
(20 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(6 ratings)
9.0
(19 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(16 ratings)
7.7
(63 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(6 ratings)
9.0
(3657 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(5 ratings)
8.7
(14 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(4 ratings)
8.1
(3999 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(6 ratings)
8.7
(19 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(5 ratings)
6.4
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(5 ratings)
5.9
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google JamboardMindManagerMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Google Jamboard is ideal for live, synchronous sessions to support collaboration and engagement. It can be used for the entire class, small group, or independent work. Create a Jamboard for a simple student knowledge check, or annotation exercise, or sorting activity. Insert a Google document, spreadsheet, or presentation, and have students annotate the file. There are many types of active learning activities you can do with a Google Jamboard!
Read full review
Alludo
It is well suited for a quick prototype of product/development planning to show relationships amongst the APIs used. This helps developers understand the impact of the product changes and identifies the need to update integration components to avoid erroneous deployments. I have not personally experienced a less appropriate scenario at the moment.
Read full review
Miro
I first used Miro in a service design module at university, where we used it for personas, customer journey mapping, and more. I've since used it in marketing for SWOT analysis, RACI models, project planning, and more. I've yet to use it in a wider team setting, but from my experience, some team activities, even a SWOT analysis, for instance, where it is brainstorming-based, are better done in a physical space and then brought onto a digital tool, rather than done purely digitally.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Colorful and engaging designs and layout
  • Freeform format
  • Real-time collaboration without lagging or download wait-time
  • Can be used for many different purposes-- business, education, personal, etc.
Read full review
Alludo
  • Allows me to learn by organizing notes.
  • Enables me to create and present strategic plans.
  • Empowers me to present complex concepts in a different and straightforward way.
  • Captivates my audience when I prepare and present a conference, a class, or a seminar in MindManager.
  • Allows me to share mind maps in a variety of formats like JPG, PDF, and HTML.
Read full review
Miro
  • Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
  • Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
  • Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
  • Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Jamboard includes nice set of function that allows to do basic and not so basic things
  • I am not really sure if there is a need to add any more functions
  • I am pretty happy with the set available
  • of course it may not work well on iOS but I guess it is kind of obvious
Read full review
Alludo
  • There should be some more functionality in the Notes window, such as a "Paste Special " Icon in the notes area to maintain format control.
  • Although I create many of my own Web export templates, an add-on for web export design would be great, as I regularly create Interactive Electronic Technical Publications (IETP) in HTML export format.
  • The ability to sync Map shortcuts between devices would also be welcome. I use MM on three devices, and I have to add or amend the Map list individually. My maps are on OneDrive, so using them should not be that hard if they are cloud-based.
Read full review
Miro
  • As a designer, I miss some more creative features. I can't even get really into designing small things (like paths). Many of my colleagues have already switched to the Figma board because it is possible there.
  • Things often get lost in the workflow, especially in teams. Working on the same file often leads to misunderstandings and can be frustrating. For example, if text is accidentally deleted and cannot be recovered, or if images become distorted.
  • The scale on the board is missing, which often leads to size differences.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
No answers on this topic
Alludo
I feel the main issues of the old Mindjet seem to be gone with the
Corel purchase. With the huge advance of sharing via browser HTML even 1
user can affect many. And, actually, using MM kind of forced my rigid
brain to rethink how I categorize and classify information/projects.
The
idea of paying $69USD for an annual cost is more than fair and a great
model for Corel/Mindjet to keep rolling out improvements!
Read full review
Miro
Miro saves my day. I would spend at least 4x more time on documenting my projects and work without this tool. It support my day to day role and helps me be successful while saving my capacity. It is not only very easy to start working on it without additional training required, but also adapts to any use case that I might need to implement
Read full review
Usability
Google
It's a tool that's easily accessible from your Google Suite. For a whiteboarding workspace, it provides a good basic platform. Multiple whiteboards can be created in one workspace, so you can share a session with multiple teams/plants. Compared to more advanced whiteboarding tools, it has limited features. You'll need to have access to the Internet to take full advantage of the collaborative workspace. The amount of storage space required for your session will use up your Google Drive quota.
Read full review
Alludo
MindManager is very intuitive. The user interface is not cluttered and the ribbon icons are easy to understand. Several excellent "how-to" videos are available on the MindManager site as well as on YouTube. MindManager starts quickly and the user interface is very responsive. Launching other programs from MindManager such as Excel is very fast and issue free. The browsing feature is lightning fast. The drag-and-drop capability is also very fast and reliable.
Read full review
Miro
It's very easy to use, while having endless features. When I start a new board, I know that there's almost nothing that I cannot put on it, whether these are builtin tools, like documents and diagrams, or whether these are 3rd party services that can be imported onto the board. Using Miro is very easy. When I'm onboarding a new user, I focus on what can be done and not on how, as everything is very intuitive.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
No answers on this topic
Alludo
We have had no issues with the application's availability
Read full review
Miro
I have not encountered events where Miro is not available. It is quite nice and reliable to be fair, even on my freemium version (startup) I don't have reliability issues. It does have sometimes where the screen refresh or "freezes" or "consumes a lot of data" and we have to rewind windows and the likes, this instances are very less
Read full review
Performance
Google
No answers on this topic
Alludo
The application is quick and responsive. We are able to produce mindmaps and reports with ease. The program is not complicated at all and integrates well with software and programs like Microsoft Outlook and Teams, which we truly appreciate.
Read full review
Miro
I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Alludo
I have called technical support a few times. During the COVID Crisis, I called a few times repeatedly due to a rush request. The technical support guy called me back in minutes. He somehow knew that I had called repeatedly and wanted to make sure my issue was resolved immediately
Read full review
Miro
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
Read full review
Online Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Alludo
There is a wide range of online training through webinars led by expert users. They are particularly useful for explaining how to use new features and using MindManager 'in the real world' for projects, tasks etc.
Read full review
Miro
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Alludo
better backup and exporting functions
Read full review
Miro
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Miro is more user friendly, and interactive as compared to Google Jamboard. Advantages of using jamboard would be that since it's a part of the Google suite, individuals are more comfortable using the tool and tracking changes/updates. Both can be used for collaboration, and brainstorming. Miro holds more features, since we can add emojis, stickers, media content etc.
Read full review
Alludo
MindManager stands out for its wide range of export options, customization and how they have enriched the format over time. As a constantly evolving tool, and having tried others, I consider it superior for the abovementioned reasons. Its cross-platform nature has been decisive, and although there are many alternatives in the form of web applications or the like, MindManager presents itself as a more complete and robust option.
Read full review
Miro
Both FigJam and ClickUp have similar features where we can do collective brainstorming and idea mapping. We have gone back to Miro from both of those platforms because of the intuitive nature and usability of the Miro interface. Surprisingly, we do still pay for ClickUp and Figma. Miro has not been able to replace either of these for us because we use them for different use cases. Our team expressed the most comfort and ease of use with Miro versus these two platforms, so we gladly have decided to stay.
Read full review
Scalability
Google
No answers on this topic
Alludo
A team can collaborate on the same project but cannot create a shared project file. It would be helpful for that feature to be added.
Read full review
Miro
Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Faculty love having an active learning tool that's easy to use in synchronous sessions.
  • Not as well known as other Google apps like Docs, Sheets, or Slides.
  • Can be used synchronously (for live engagement) or asynchronously (for self-paced learning).
  • Easy to miss in the Google Suite or forget it's available to use.
Read full review
Alludo
  • For a single person business presentation it is a plus.
  • Project difficulty is well assessed using the map.
  • Giving away a paper version of a map is a positive gesture. People like the map, the look, and what it says, and it may also be a way to promote MindManager to them.
  • Keep the PDF or JPEG saving capabilities for small customers like me. It's important.
Read full review
Miro
  • Miro allows me to plan work for the future without having to reference tedious spreadsheets. This gives me better insight into workload forecasting.
  • Just today, I was able to quickly put together a Miro to show a team member who was confused the workflow for a problem. The easy 'on-the-fly' tools let me create something quickly in real time.
  • Flowcharts often get a bad rap because people think they are too complicated, but Miro lets me get more work done quickly than just using a doc or sheet.
Read full review
ScreenShots

MindManager Screenshots

Screenshot of MindmapScreenshot of Reverse BrainstormingScreenshot of MindManager for Microsoft TeamsScreenshot of MindManager SnapScreenshot of MindManager GoScreenshot of Mind Maps in MindManager

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.