Grasshopper vs. Text-Em-All

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Grasshopper
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
Grasshopper is an IP telephony business communication solution that provides companies with a toll-free or local phone number. It has both desktop and mobile applications and includes features such as custom greeting recording, call forwarding, call transfer, call reporting, and voicemail.
$18
per month for a single user
Text-Em-All
Score 9.8 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Text-Em-All, headquartered in Frisco, delivers personalized, informational, emergency mass text messages and phone calls, whether they’re going to five people or 50,000.
$0
Pricing
GrasshopperText-Em-All
Editions & Modules
True Solo
$18
per month for a single user
Solo Plus
$32
per month
Small Business
$70
per month
Starter
$0
Credits
$0.05
per credit
Monthly
$19
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GrasshopperText-Em-All
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details20% discount available for annual pricing.Text-Em-All offers a variety of pricing plans to cater to different user needs. The monthly plan starts at $19, with pricing based on group size, making it ideal for consistent senders who reach the same group(s) each month as often as needed. Plans provide access to the full range of Text-Em-All features, to ensure a comprehensive messaging experience. Additionally, the platform offers credits, or pay-as-you-go pricing model, with costs ranging from 5¢ to 9¢ per credit, suitable for users with occasional or high-volume messaging needs. To help potential customers evaluate the service, Text-Em-All offers a free account so users can evaluate and try the service with 25 free credits.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GrasshopperText-Em-All
Considered Both Products
Grasshopper
Chose Grasshopper
It came down to price and reliability. Even though it's not 100% perfect, it's significantly better than the other options we have tried.
Chose Grasshopper
We moved away from Grasshopper when we implemented an answering service that had an application which provided the same functions as grasshopper for calling and texting. We initially selected Grasshopper as our communication solution because our original answering service just …
Chose Grasshopper
Their mobile and desktop apps are so much easier to use and very user friendly. Customer service was very kind and helpful, too.
Chose Grasshopper
I switched because Grasshopper was more reasonably priced and the functionality was better. It is also easier to use and the customer service is better. Overall, the experience with Grasshopper has been great. And I like how I can access my calls and voicemails on my android …
Chose Grasshopper
Before using Grasshopper, we were only using personal cell phones. Giving out our numbers to all customers and visitors meant that they could call our cell phones even after business hours. Implementing Grasshopper allowed our organization to make it so that business calls …
Chose Grasshopper
Grasshopper stacks up against the competition. With an easy to use portal, low cost, and multiple options to choose from, Grasshopper is a formal contender. We’ve used Grasshopper for the last few years with an amazing amount of success. There is no competition when it comes to …
Chose Grasshopper
I have not tested other systems. Grasshopper worked fine and it would have been a waste of time to explore others.
Chose Grasshopper
Grasshopper was recommended and worked well enough that we haven't even thought about looking at any other service.
Chose Grasshopper
We selected Grasshopper because of its price and ease of use.
Chose Grasshopper
What went into my decision making process was price, ease-of-use, being able to port or carry over my 800 number no matter what my physical location would be. How I came upon Grasshopper is because I moved from one office location to another and the business number I had for …
Chose Grasshopper
It stacks up very well against a traditional phone alternative. No hardware necessary, no complicated setup or training, it's perfect. I honestly did not compare to other internet based companies. They checked all of the boxes and came highly recommended from a colleague, so I …
Chose Grasshopper
When researching solutions, Grasshopper just seemed the most user-friendly and I could get running fast on it.
Chose Grasshopper
The amount of features is unmatched by the other service I've used. It's not a fair comparison, however, I will say that the features work very well. I've never had a client complain, only compliments, so as far as I'm concerned. The price for the value is good.
Chose Grasshopper
For some small businesses that want a virtual phone number, Skype might also be an option. We use Skype as well, but it is not a replacement for the features of Grasshopper. Skype can give you a virtual number, but it won't provide extensions, caller directory, complex …
Chose Grasshopper
Other systems just aren't as user-friendly.
Chose Grasshopper
For the money and features, Grasshopper wins hands down to other solutions we've used.
Chose Grasshopper
In all candor, we only considered an in-house solution and Grasshopper. We have all of the technical wherewithal to implement our own Grasshopper-like system. The deciding factor for us was maintenance. Had we done it ourselves, there would need to be at least two people (a …
Chose Grasshopper
We have not used similar products.
Text-Em-All
Chose Text-Em-All
I think the database is easier to use and more simple.
Chose Text-Em-All
It's very expensive, there's no free trial, and it's not very user-friendly. We almost registered with them, but thank god we found text-em-all.
Chose Text-Em-All
We used Sense before Text-Em-All, and they were very pricey. We heard about Text-Em-All through Avionte and signed up after the introduction. We are delighted with Text-Em-All.
Chose Text-Em-All
Different products, but Text-Em-All reaches more users at a better price.
Chose Text-Em-All
We used Synergy two years ago for a one-off text campaign for our EOY Fund, but it was managed by our direct mail partner at the time. We prefer working with TEA because we can import and export the information ourselves and the pricing is affordable.
Chose Text-Em-All
Text-Em-All was the first and only choice. Prior to coming on board we were using a messaging system that was geared towards educational systems and it did not work nearly as efficiently has Text-Em-All has worked. The ease of use made it the decision to move to Text-Em-All easy.
Chose Text-Em-All
Our last provider was costly for what we needed. We need the ability to text, and that's it. The sense was challenging to navigate; I had to sign a one-year contract and pay thousands upfront. Text-em-all has been the best thing.
Chose Text-Em-All
It's great. I did not like our old solution and thoroughly appreciate Text-Em-All. Text-Em-All is a solution that we can be proud of and the reporting is terrific so we can be sure that the dollars that we are spending are being allocated in a smart way. We also can know if …
Chose Text-Em-All
By far Text Em All trumps other similar products we've tried. With customer service alone, we were blown away.
Chose Text-Em-All
Both are fine. Previous employer used Constant Contact for newsletters and other ads.
Chose Text-Em-All
Text-Em-All was easier to use in terms of adding contacts, creating the SMS, and sending it. Delivery rates were much better as well.
Chose Text-Em-All
It's been a few years since we last used the service so I cannot remember the name of the company but it was free and it was lacking.
Chose Text-Em-All
Text-Em-All allows us to add and subtract folks from our contact list easily, where Textedly only has the option of static contact lists where once someone is removed from the list they cannot be put back onto the list without jumping through hoops.
Chose Text-Em-All
It’s been over a year since we reviewed solutions, I don’t recall the competitors we looked at. But none of them had the features we were looking for at the price point we needed as a non-profit.
Chose Text-Em-All
We have only used Text-Em-All, but have liked it so much we have stayed with it. We have another program that could potentially be used in this way, but Text-Em-All is more cost-effective, allowing you to add funds as needed instead of monthly charges.
Chose Text-Em-All
Text-em-all was a recommendation from a mutual customer. The integration with CRM can be better (writeback capabilities) that automatically enter in notes within our CRM system. This is a glaring issue that will be a major win.
Chose Text-Em-All
My facility has not utilized another platform like this, and at this time we do not feel the need to even look elsewhere. We have been so pleased with our experience with Text Em' all. We do not think that we could find another product that is as easy to use, and is as …
Features
GrasshopperText-Em-All
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
9.7
Ratings
20% above category average
Text-Em-All
-
Ratings
Hosted PBX9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User templates10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Call reports9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Directory of employee names9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
9.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Text-Em-All
-
Ratings
Answering rules9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Call recording9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Call park9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Call screening10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Message alerts9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
7.9
Ratings
0% below category average
Text-Em-All
-
Ratings
Video conferencing7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio conferencing7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Video screen sharing8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant messaging8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
8.9
Ratings
12% above category average
Text-Em-All
-
Ratings
Mobile app for iOS8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Emergency Notification System
Comparison of Emergency Notification System features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
-
Ratings
Text-Em-All
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
Mass Notification00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multi-Channel Delivery00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Customization and Templates00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Geo-Targeting00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Multi-Language Support00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Emergency Contacts Database00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Two-Way Communication00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Notification Reporting and Analytics00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Integration with External Systems00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Mobile Notifications00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GrasshopperText-Em-All
Small Businesses
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GrasshopperText-Em-All
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GrasshopperText-Em-All
Likelihood to Recommend
Seems like it is perfectly suited for ANY small to medium business. I can imagine that a business would outgrow the system eventually, but probably around 75-100 employees? Great system for offices that are not managed full time, companies with remote workers, budget conscience start ups, anyone with a need for a registered office line.
Read full review
We have found them to be very good for immediate communication of a brief message to a large number of people at once. Thus, it works perfectly for a neighborhood association. It may not be suitable for longer messages or situations with excessive notifications.
Read full review
Pros
  • Since calls always come into my cell phone from the same Grasshopper number I just saved that number in my phone as my company name. So I always know when a call is coming in for my company and that it's not a personal call. Of course, all calls are saved and logged in Grasshopper so if I need to go back and check the actual caller ID I can do that.
  • All voicemails are immediately sent as audio files in an email to the email address on file for each extension. I personally love this feature. I can choose to go into the Grasshopper app to listen to them but its use so much more convenient to get an email, open it up and listen right from the email. The caller ID for the call is also included in the email text. So all the info I need for any missed calls is right there. Great stuff.
  • By far, one of my favorite features is the option to receive faxes to the same business number. Even though fax is being used less these days it is still used quite a bit and being able to receive faxes and having them immediately emailed to me is great.
  • The ability to transfer calls from extension to extension (as in cell phone to cell phone) is great. It doesn't matter where my colleague is. I can send the call to the right person and it's ringing on their phone in seconds.
Read full review
  • The ability to customize the rate of outgoing calls in order to avoid getting overwhelmed.
  • The ease of use makes their service beneficial to me rather than another chore on my list.
  • Giving details on how much my message will cost and giving me the ability to modify it in real-time to control what I am spending.
Read full review
Cons
  • Making calls from your Grasshopper phone number - Sometimes (well, most of the time) I'll just make a call directly from my cell phone because the process of opening the app, typing in the number I want to call and then making the call can take more time than the call itself.
  • Missed Calls - Myself and other coworkers have experienced frustration with Grasshopper and "missed" calls. Sometimes my phone won't ring, but I'll get an email with a voicemail. So it skips ringing my phone all together and goes directly to voicemail. I've had my phone in my hand before, ringer on, and never receive a call but received an email with a voicemail.
  • Checking Voicemails on your phone - In order to hear a voicemail from your mobile device, you have to log into the app. But the voicemail shows up under missed calls / voicemails like normal phone calls but when you try to listen to it, it's just a recording of grasshopper telling you that you have a voicemail.
  • Transferring Voicemails - You have to memorize all the extensions and the process for transferring voicemails. While it's just memorization needed to make the process work correctly, it takes a lot of time to remember how to transfer the call, the extension you want to transfer it to, and sometimes after going through all of the steps I accidentally hang up on the caller. It's user error, but I feel like if they made the process simpler, and they gave you a directory when you indicate you want to transfer the call, it'd make it a lot easier.
Read full review
  • My initial concern was regarding the "opt out" feature. I work with the senior population, and many of whom are not that tech-savvy. I have a couple of residents who had unintentionally opted out of messages thinking it was an individual message they were skipping. I would suggest that there be a clarifying question when a user chooses to opt out; it should default to opting out of a single message and survey the user to see if they would like to opt out of receiving additional messages. My residents were wondering why they were missing information and why I hadn't informed them of important dates and events.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Text-Em-All is a great way to get messages to our associates versus posting on a memo board and hoping they see it. Very efficient. I would recommend this great tool to companies big or small as a form of business related communications. The only thing I would change is the ability to use more characters in the messages. And it would be a plus if you can translate to different languages in the app.
Read full review
Usability
The admin functions are kind of confusing in the old interface which was my most recent experience on the admin side.
Read full review
It's fantastic. In general, it's a 10. But I give it a 7 because of the way I know it can improve. I save my workers' names in lists...and I have only the first and last name fields to classify them. I grade my workers based on their experiences and based on their jobs; so I use the last name field to group them. This could be easier by you adding another field.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
The availability of the text em all is amazing specially when we needed the most to spread out the word on an event that was happening.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
I love the performance it provided us. Also, want to clarify that the time it takes to send out a mass text is amazing
Read full review
Support Rating
When I was setting up my account I contacted support a couple of times. They were also very professional, personable, and helpful. Their response is prompt and thorough. I'm confident I can get any question answered as well as help with any issue I might have. That's pretty important to me.
Read full review
There have been few times over the last 18 years that I have had to make changes to our billing or deal with particular tech questions and I have never had any issues with their response time or ability to be helpful once the issues were communicated
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
This was the best way we were able to reach out to everyone we wanted to, being that there were some not tech-sabi elderly people. This was a better way for them to be able to get the information they needed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We moved away from Grasshopper when we implemented an answering service that had an application which provided the same functions as grasshopper for calling and texting. We initially selected Grasshopper as our communication solution because our original answering service just handled incoming calls and did not have an app available to clients.
Read full review
Our last provider was costly for what we needed. We need the ability to text, and that's it. The sense was challenging to navigate; I had to sign a one-year contract and pay thousands upfront. Text-em-all has been the best thing.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We have never had a problem being able to use Text em all when we needed it
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Having an IVR allows us to miss fewer calls from clients or prospects, positively impacting our sales.
  • Saving money by not having to hire a receptionist helps keep our expenses down.
  • I do believe that the professional image our Grasshopper IVR gives our customers has a positive impact on our customer loyalty.
Read full review
  • 100% of the company received reliable information at the same time for the first time without having to hold a “town hall” which used to cause all work to stop for at least 15-20 mins.
  • Because work no longer has to stop for verbal communication announcements, 7.5 hours total of work is saved for every message sent.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Text-Em-All Screenshots

Screenshot of broadcast creation.Screenshot of the interface to add contacts.Screenshot of where to broadcast results.Screenshot of broadcast details.Screenshot of the contact management interface.Screenshot of two-way conversations.