Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Cloud
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS is a low-code / no-code approach to IFS solution suite, supporting various industries including aerospace & defense, construction, energy & utilities, and manufacturing with ERP, EAM and field service management functionality. IFS Cloud can be run as a service from IFS, or in a location of choice including on-premise as a containerized application.N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
SAP Business One
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Business One is an integrated enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses, The product encompasses functionality around sales, customer relationships, inventory, operations, financials and human resources.
$99
per month
Pricing
IFS CloudMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Limited
$99.00
per month
Starter
$110.00
per month
Pro
$132.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS CloudMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS CloudMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Considered Multiple Products
IFS Cloud
Chose IFS Cloud
We were using Quickbase instead of IFS Cloud before. Due to cost as a concern we shifted to IFS Cloud. Now we are migrating all our systems from Quickbase to IFS Cloud slowly. We are under UAT as of now. We are planning to go Live Next Year. I am not aware honestly about the …
Chose IFS Cloud
We haven't used any big products, but we used to use Excels to store the data.
Chose IFS Cloud
IFS Cloud is an upgrade of IFS applications. IFS applications solution is under extended support and would eventually be replaced by cloud solution in coming years.
Chose IFS Cloud
User documentation of IFS Cloud is very well organized, and easy to follow. So, the time taken for the key business users to be trained is comparatively less. The integration with other well-suited third-party applications for HR and Payroll has been standardized and easy to …
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is obviously superior to the other platforms I’ve used simply in its robustness and GAAP compliance features, but with far less usability and even in someways less usable reporting.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Business Central wasn't out then. Nav, the predecessor, was out, but its user interface was dated until 2009, when the role-tailored client came out; it was much better afterwards. If your company has manufacturing, then Business Central is the way to go. It's unfortunate that …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
It is more powerful in features and ease of use as Microsoft GP provides an intuitive user interface leading to quicker adoption.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Xero is easier to use, closer to Quickbooks. Most of the background GL is automated, where as in GP it is not.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Due to the size of our company Microsoft Dynamics GP works better for us than Quickbooks because of the reporting capabilities. However, the NetSuite demo proved to be much more user-friendly with more reporting capabilities.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks, SAP, and Netsuite. We are a small-sized business so Dynamics GP is better for our business.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
There are more features and products overall in the Microsoft package at a better price point. Overall, Salesforce has a much sleeker and more user-friendly design.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We moved from Epicor Eagle N Series to Dynamics GP as an accounting solution for our new POS system. I believe Dynamics GP has more options to create and present financial statements for a large company with many regions and districts. However, because of the weakness of our …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
They both accomplish the same thing, I think Oracle was what I first learned and thus making the change to Microsoft Dynamics GP just took a little bit of time to learn the technology. After you get the hang of it, it becomes much easier and I taught my coworkers how to use it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I did not pick Dynamics over Salesforce, my company was using it and eventually switched over to Salesforce. I would say that Dynamics is user-friendly and the interface is quite easy to understand. I really like the reporting capabilities as well. Once again, the aesthetic …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
GP is more robust than QuickBooks bar none.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
At the time of purchase, Microsoft Dynamics GP seemed more appropriate and more in sync with the needs of our company. The software was more responsive, user-friendly and it allowed for more flexibility with the way it was intended to be used. We were also promised better …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
My recollection of Quickbooks pro isn't great, and it was over 10 years ago. Obviously many things have changed in that time frame, so any comparison would likely not be relevant.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
The only product with have shopped was Sage Intacct. It is somewhat unfair to compare the two solutions, because Sage Intacct is a cloud-based solution. That said, Intacct appears to advertise better reporting/business intelligence capabilities. MS Dynamics GP should be aware …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Dynamics GP is much more flexible and enterprise-oriented than Quickbooks Pro or similar software. It can support many more users and scenarios. However it requires more dedicated infrastructure (such as servers and databases) and more dedicated IT resources to maintain and …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I love Dayforce for payroll. It has been configured to meet all our needs, is user-friendly and the customer support is fantastic. We originally moved from MDGP payroll to Ceridian Insync payroll due to the issues we had. We upgraded to Dayforce and are very happy with the …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Learning GP with so many resources from the GP community has been easy. Someone always has the answer or suggestions to point me in the right direction. I've had very few instances where the systems caused an error that required research in order to fix the glitch.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We looked at several general ledger software packages. We had excellent customer service and implementation guidance through a third party. Having a knowledgeable consultant is critical to a successful implementation.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks Pro and GP are not on the same playing field. GP is a full account system adhering to GAAP, while QuickBooks is designed for the small business market. While starting out with QuickBooks is easy, if you plan to grow, you will soon outgrow it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics is a good, easy to use product for entities that do not have advanced manufacturing.
If I were to go into a distribution or service type business I would highly recommend it.
If I were to go into an advanced manufacturing environment I would not consider GP.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
More user friendly in certain areas and much more cost effective to manage and support
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
TechSoup had great privcing, I had experince with GP in previous companys and there are a lot of staff accountants who have relevant experience.
SAP Business One
Chose SAP Business One
We choose SAP Business one because it is most reliable and popular ERP solution than Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Chose SAP Business One
As a consultant, SAP Business One has a strong set of core features that will perform well for a multitude of businesses. It is a mature product with lots of documentation and available training online to answer questions and assist users. It also has multitudes of proven …
Chose SAP Business One
NetSuite ERP and Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (Dynamics AX)
Chose SAP Business One
SAP Business One is a good fit for an organization that wants to transform its business operation with a reasonable cost for migration from the legacy system. SAP Business One can match and support the organization needs because it has most of the best business practices …
Chose SAP Business One
We did not use many ERP systems yet so I'm unable to go to much in detail. We tested some and the main issue was the pricing.
Good alternatives would be Oracle NETSUITE, Microsoft Dynamics if your company is Microsoft based with al the other programs (great integrations). And …
Chose SAP Business One
SAP Business One and SAP Business Rules Management are similar, but SAP Business One better matched my organization's needs. I like how the system can be used across multiple departments at once to keep all my colleagues connected. Being able to accurately track inventory …
Chose SAP Business One
We ended up choosing not to discard Salesforce. Now these two systems are working together, where Salesforce will be responsible for CRM and SAP Business One for financial, tax, and logistics. This was a strategic decision by the company.
Chose SAP Business One
I think that NetSuite is more user-friendly. Especially on the reporting side. They have many more training offerings and seem to have greater capabilities. I know that the bolt-on products around manufacturing in NetSuite are very flawed so I am not sure that it would operate …
Chose SAP Business One
NetSuite and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (formerly Dynamics NAV)
Chose SAP Business One
SAP offers more add ons and built-in applications for production versus QuickBooks.
Chose SAP Business One
We like that SAP B1 can be expanded with add-on modules.
Chose SAP Business One
Infor, Microsoft Dynamics
Chose SAP Business One
SAP business one provided a more complete solution since all modules are included in their package. Other ERP providers charged extra for each module that was implemented. SAP was more economical than other providers.
Chose SAP Business One
To date, e-automate is my favorite system. Easy to configure and date-mine. However, SAP is the closet software I have come across that matches its ability to easily interact between inventory, billing, and accounting.
Chose SAP Business One
We have previously evaluated Netsuite but decided to go with SAP B1 due to the cost-effectiveness and more inventory geared toward it.
Chose SAP Business One
I honestly preferred QuickBooks for our business needs. We went with SAP because more employees had previous experience with it and were not keen on learning something new.
Chose SAP Business One
Trust in size of SAP and the partner network they've built. It was ultimately Vision33 that made the difference for us. We also liked the feature fit to our manufacturing needs.
Chose SAP Business One
This is just as powerful for our purposes as the Oracle system I used in my prior employment, with lower maintenance costs and easier maneuverability.
Chose SAP Business One
Many other ERP do not include end to end business operation module. And it's an renounced ERP due to which you get the value for money in term of support.
Features
IFS CloudMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
6.2
Ratings
17% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
Ratings
17% below category average
SAP Business One
9.9
Ratings
29% above category average
Pay calculation5.60 Ratings6.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration5.10 Ratings5.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files5.10 Ratings7.50 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
Ratings
55% below category average
SAP Business One
9.8
Ratings
26% above category average
API for custom integration8.00 Ratings2.50 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Plug-ins8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.9
Ratings
17% below category average
SAP Business One
9.8
Ratings
15% above category average
Single sign-on capability8.70 Ratings5.70 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.40 Ratings8.20 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.2
Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
SAP Business One
9.0
Ratings
19% above category average
Dashboards8.40 Ratings3.50 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Standard reports8.00 Ratings6.20 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Custom reports8.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings8.90 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.7
Ratings
12% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.0
Ratings
42% below category average
SAP Business One
5.9
Ratings
26% below category average
Accounts payable9.50 Ratings6.30 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.00 Ratings5.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support8.60 Ratings6.00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.50 Ratings4.70 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.50 Ratings4.60 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.00 Ratings3.80 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.00 Ratings6.20 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Cash management00 Ratings6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation00 Ratings5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management00 Ratings4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management00 Ratings4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support00 Ratings2.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance00 Ratings3.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings3.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings2.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings3.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.7
Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.4
Ratings
50% below category average
SAP Business One
9.4
Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking8.30 Ratings5.90 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Automatic reordering8.30 Ratings1.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Location management8.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Manufacturing module00 Ratings4.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.1
Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.6
Ratings
70% below category average
SAP Business One
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Pricing8.00 Ratings3.60 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Order entry8.40 Ratings3.60 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Credit card processing5.60 Ratings1.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.50 Ratings5.10 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.50 Ratings5.20 Ratings9.90 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility00 Ratings3.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution00 Ratings3.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.3
Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
7.4
Ratings
1% below category average
Billing Management6.50 Ratings00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Period Close8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.8
Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting9.50 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Project Costing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cost Capture8.50 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance9.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition9.50 Ratings00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.9
Ratings
24% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
9.0
Ratings
25% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling8.30 Ratings00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers8.40 Ratings00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools7.70 Ratings00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.9
Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
8.4
Ratings
13% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.9
Ratings
23% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
8.5
Ratings
19% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Contract Authoring8.00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Contract Repository6.10 Ratings00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated8.50 Ratings00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Supplier Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.5
Ratings
24% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
8.6
Ratings
25% above category average
Risk Repository8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Control Management8.40 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments7.40 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Issue Detection7.10 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification5.70 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
7.8
Ratings
12% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
8.0
Ratings
14% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization6.60 Ratings00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management6.60 Ratings00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Fulfillment Management5.60 Ratings00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.8
Ratings
16% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
9.1
Ratings
20% above category average
Production Process Design8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Production Management8.50 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Configuration Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Work Execution7.50 Ratings00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
7.6
Ratings
4% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
7.9
Ratings
8% above category average
Forecasting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Inventory Planning7.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Performance Monitoring7.50 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.9
Ratings
19% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
9.6
Ratings
27% above category average
Proposal Management7.10 Ratings00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS CloudMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 5.2 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.4 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS CloudMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
4.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
4.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.5
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
2.8
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS CloudMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Likelihood to Recommend
The IFS Cloud has well suited to keeping track from beginning to end and engages from the internal team to the external team very well. It takes everything with them and helps them to grow at a wide pace. It creates a systematic workflow process which helps in achieving the goal more fast and friendly environment
Read full review
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
SAP Business One would be more useful if it contained tools to acommodate the growing need of online sales. A more complete shipping module which handles tracking numbers with the common couriers would be great. A built in warehouse management system would be great designed to be used with barcode scanners
Read full review
Pros
  • IFS cloud has good documentation
  • User interface is easy to use / understand.
  • Its like a centralised repository, where we get all the relevant data such as HR, Vendors, etc.
Read full review
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
  • Customized Reports to fit the companies' special configuration and needs.
  • Individual interfaces for many aspects of the business; manufacturing, inventory, sales, distribution, service, etc. Each department can have its own space.
  • All the modules are connected and can interact with one another.
Read full review
Cons
  • Easy options to upload data from excel to IFS Cloud
  • AI capabilities
  • Better help functionality
Read full review
  • Supply chain management is adequate but not exceptional, and there are challenges tying the product to a website front end. These features are present and work fine in many environments but are often lacking for customers who need more robust systems.
  • Reporting tools often require consulting expertise or an internal business analyst to develop. Many smaller companies don't have this skill set, so it can be costly to upgrade to GP from a smaller packages like QuickBooks.
  • Some features that are available in competing products are still not present in GP, such as full copy-paste functionality and more intelligent workflow/batch processing functions.
Read full review
  • Following a bench mark process - this seems contradicting to flexibility however we have wished we could follow more of an industry benchmark. Our challenge as a small company has been knowing how to properly use the system. We have discovered that we have set up the system wrong based and are using it improperly which has cause a lot work to correct.
  • Better live reporting options - current we are on prem SQL. Yes SAP is moving to HANA however smaller companies like ourselves are not ready for that. We need to be able to maintain our existing SQL DB. We also have a demand for live BI Reporting. It has been difficult to do this with our current set up.
  • Error handling - have found it very difficult to troubleshoot. Errors are not always clear and answers are hard to find.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
I cannot run my business without SAP Business One in place. I only consult on on product and that is SAP Business One. Business volume goes to zero if I don't use SAP Business One. It is the best product on the market - head and shoulders above other ERP packages I have looked at or implemented in the past.
Read full review
Usability
I will give a full rating to this software as it has helped me in achieving the Goal faster than expected and has created a systematic work flow that helps us to increase our work productivity and have track of each and every section. It has one product that changes your organization's environment better to perfect.
Read full review
Menus are generally quite difficult to navigate, user-friendliness is lacking, platform can at times be unstable (crashes, etc), reports tha would seem to report one thing do not actually return that data. Usability is probably the biggest weakness of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Read full review
I rate SAP Business One's overall usability as excellent (10). The system has a user friendly interface that is easy to navigate. I enjoy how much SAP Business One helps to simplify everyday work tasks. This is a wonderful asset for any organization to use across any and all departments.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
The SAP Business One software is up and running every time
you need it as it was planned. In more than 6 years that we have been
using the product, it has never been unavailable and if it ever was, it was because of a planned maintenance window scheduled in the company.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
SAP Business One performance depends mostly on the speed of your internal servers, should you have the solution on premise as we do. Sometimes the system tends to be a little slower for some users when others are executing really big reports of performing some batch loads, but generally, the performance is acceptable to all the users.
Read full review
Support Rating
IFS Support for IFS Cloud product has different levels of support agreement with the customers, including 24*7 support service for the product. Since the customers have the option of selecting IFS-managed cloud for the implementation, all of the responsivities for maintaining the managed services can be handed over to IFS.
Read full review
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
We had some complex questions and went in a loop with calls emails etc. They where unable to find the right person to talk with us, and when we found 1 he was unable to reach... We ended up working with a local profession for the implementation, and that went smoothly. I would suggest SAP to start with that if there are complex projects...
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
The training I get was a consultant level training, so it's basically a 6 weeks training covering every aspect and every module of the system. It covered most common use cases and exercise training so you can get along with the software, as well as examples so there culd be a better understanding.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Over the past two years SAP has added a great deal of new SAP Business One on-line training for version 9.0 and 9.1. Most of the training is very strong, but some is difficult to understand and follow. Additionally, SAP still has a few holes in their on-line training around Production, Bill-of-Materials, MRP and Service.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
These implementations are not easy. Even a standard implementation can be difficult. With a never-been-done-before implementation, the implementation team and the user team need to be thorough with planning, make a decision on key points, and stick to them before any design happens. Our biggest challenge was not from StellarOne, rather it was from the mid-implementation decisions from our internal team. StellarOne did a great job warning us, implementing our decision, and then helping us adjust our SAP to handle the new direction we took.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We were using Quickbase instead of IFS Cloud before. Due to cost as a concern we shifted to IFS Cloud. Now we are migrating all our systems from Quickbase to IFS Cloud slowly. We are under UAT as of now. We are planning to go Live Next Year. I am not aware honestly about the pricing, but I have heard that IFS Cloud is more affordable than Quickbase if we consider the functionality and the support they provide.
Read full review
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
SAP Business One is a good fit for an organization that wants to transform its business operation with a reasonable cost for migration from the legacy system. SAP Business One can match and support the organization needs because it has most of the best business practices deployed in its core modules so the organization can adapt to the standardized business process by choosing SAP Business One solution. Single source of data and information visibility is the huge benefit of using SAP Business One.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
For most small businesses, the only way you outgrow SAP Business One is if the nature of your business changes radically. Going from 1 to 50 users is quite easy with SAP B1. Going beyond 50 may require moving to the Hana SAP B1 platform to maintain or improve performance, but the path is there.
Add-ons to SAP B1 can also be added as specific needs are encountered that are not closely met by the standard product. These may be required early in the product life because of the nature of your business, or as you expand the use of SAP B1.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Reduced the time taken for the users to prepare and generate reports since most are automatic with IFS Cloud
  • Increased the reliability and visibility of the inventory of the products from procurement of raw materials through the manufacturing of final product to delivering to customer's place
  • Took a considerable time configuring the roles and access of the users while implementation
Read full review
  • We have never missed a payroll using Great Plains. We have the ability to fix any issues that come up quickly.
  • It streamlines our departments that handle money into one unified system. This gives accounting and finance the overall picture in one system.
  • With Integration Manager we have to worry less about taking time to hand key transactions. This cuts down on entry time and increase efficiency for our clerks.
Read full review
  • SAP Business One is intentionally designed keeping flexibility in mind
  • This software can be deployed on-premise or on cloud and you can change the on-premise hosting to cloud anytime in the future
  • It is designed from the ground up. SAP Business One is an affordable product that is quick to install, easy to use, and simple to maintain.
Read full review
ScreenShots