TrustRadius Insights
Kemp LoadMaster has proven to be an invaluable tool for addressing performance and stability issues on marketing websites. Users have …
Starting at $1,720 per year
View PricingOverview
What is Kemp LoadMaster?
LoadMaster from Kemp Technologies in New York is an application delivery controller.
Recent Reviews
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Pricing
VLM-500
1,720
On Premise
per year
VLM-500
2,000
On Premise
perpetual license
VLM-3000
3,050
On Premise
per year
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Product Demos
Citrix Storefront Demo I Load Balancer
YouTube
Kemp Flowmon Use Case Demo: Application eXperience with LoadMaster and Flowmon
YouTube
Microsoft Azure Stack Demo & first look by Kemp
YouTube
Managing Multi-cloud Application Delivery Environments | Kemp 360 Central Demo
YouTube
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- Downloadables
- FAQs
What is Kemp LoadMaster?
Kemp hyper-performance load balancers are built to power the always-on application experience [AX] that organizations needs to succeed. Kemp boasts redefining the load balancer by providing more simplified deployments, more flexible licensing options, more throughput per $, and direct access technical support.
Kemp LoadMaster Features
- Supported: L4-7 virtual ADC and Reverse Proxy
- Supported: Fully-featured Web Application Firewall
- Supported: Global DNS & Traffic Management Services
- Supported: SSO & Secure Application Access
Kemp LoadMaster Competitors
Kemp LoadMaster Technical Details
| Deployment Types | On-premise |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems | Windows |
| Mobile Application | No |
Kemp LoadMaster Downloadables
Frequently Asked Questions
LoadMaster from Kemp Technologies in New York is an application delivery controller.
NGINX, NetScaler ADC, and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) are common alternatives for Kemp LoadMaster.
Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 9.8.
The most common users of Kemp LoadMaster are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(88)
Community Insights
TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
- Recommendations
Kemp LoadMaster has proven to be an invaluable tool for addressing performance and stability issues on marketing websites. Users have found that the content switching and header modification rules in LoadMaster have helped overcome challenges during website launches, ensuring a smooth and seamless user experience. The powerful API in LoadMaster allows for easy integration into continuous delivery pipelines, making it a popular choice among tech industry professionals. The product is widely used as a load balancer for Exchange deployments, ADFS infrastructure, and webserver farms with custom applications, providing efficient load balancing and high availability for critical systems. Kemp LoadMaster has also resolved the issue of unreliable round-robin load balancing, offering a more effective solution for inbound email balancing across multiple Microsoft Exchange servers. Its integration with various third-party tools such as Azure DevOps, Redis, and Kubernetes allows for seamless load balancing of web shops and internal tools. With features like SSL acceleration and flexible environment consolidation, Kemp LoadMaster is considered a simple and efficient load balancer that increases the capacity and reliability of applications while providing an extra layer of protection against bad actors. The deployment process of Kemp LoadMaster is logical and straightforward, enabling users to create highly available configurations without external assistance. It has been successful in providing load balancing and continuous service to web and API servers, ensuring redundancy and seamless service to users. Overall, Kemp LoadMaster addresses various business problems by improving performance, enhancing security, ensuring high availability, and streamlining operations across different industries including finance, healthcare, transportation, and technology.
Easy Configuration and Setup: Many users have praised the product for its simple and user-friendly configuration process. They appreciate the availability of templates for various use cases, which makes setting up the product straightforward.
Exceptional Support: Numerous reviewers have highlighted the exceptional support provided by the company. Whenever users encountered issues with more complex setups, they received quick assistance from the support team. This prompt and helpful support greatly enhances their experience with the product.
Value for Money: Several users feel that the product offers great value for its cost compared to its competitors. They find that the features and performance provided by the product justify its price, making it a worthwhile investment.
Outdated User Interface: Several users have expressed dissatisfaction with the outdated and in need of a refreshed modern look and feel. They mentioned that the GUI of the software is also outdated and in need of improvement. Users would appreciate a more visually appealing and intuitive interface.
Inconvenient Manual Refresh: Some users find it inconvenient that the web-based interface sometimes requires a manual refresh to show the actual status of services, which can be time-consuming and disruptive. It would be more convenient if the system automatically updated in real-time without requiring manual intervention.
Outdated Statistics and Graphs: Users have mentioned that the statistics and graphs provided by the software are outdated, making it difficult for them to make informed decisions based on real-time data. They would like to see up-to-date information presented in clear visualizations for effective monitoring and analysis.
Users have made several recommendations for the Kemp Load Balancer based on their experiences. One common recommendation is to take advantage of the free trial offered by Kemp. Users suggest that this allows potential customers to get a better feel for the product and determine if it meets their needs.
Another recommendation is to utilize the support provided by Kemp. Users have found that the support team is knowledgeable and able to assist with any issues that arise during the setup or configuration process.
Users also recommend Kemp for its ease of use and management. They mention that the initial setup, configuration, and ongoing management are straightforward, thanks to a user-friendly interface and templates that facilitate quick configuration.
Overall, users recommend Kemp as an affordable option for load balancing and reverse proxy needs, especially for multiple applications or sites.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-1 of 1)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Our Kemp LoadMasters are being used as a High Availability Active/Passive Clustered Pair to load balance all On-Premises inbound SMTP traffic and email access across multiple protocols (ActiveSync, Webmail, etc.).
It's used for the entire organization's email.
It addresses the business problems of:
1. Having a single point of failure for email ingress.
2. Providing a simple, robust load balancing and mail routing solution.
3. Guarantees performance as a dedicated load balancer separate from shared load balancer equipment used for other business segments like web and application.
-UPDATED APRIL 2021-
After successfully upgrading from LM2400s to X3s and greatly leveraging Kemp Support throughout the process, with unique unforeseen issues that arose, Kemp Support very aggressively deployed their Support Experts to walk us through the cutover on multiple attempts until we were successful.
It's used for the entire organization's email.
It addresses the business problems of:
1. Having a single point of failure for email ingress.
2. Providing a simple, robust load balancing and mail routing solution.
3. Guarantees performance as a dedicated load balancer separate from shared load balancer equipment used for other business segments like web and application.
-UPDATED APRIL 2021-
After successfully upgrading from LM2400s to X3s and greatly leveraging Kemp Support throughout the process, with unique unforeseen issues that arose, Kemp Support very aggressively deployed their Support Experts to walk us through the cutover on multiple attempts until we were successful.
- Provisioning of Virtual Services to Real IP'ed internal systems.
- Detailed logging facilitating rapid and easy Root Cause Analysis of issues.
- Extensive Online community resources and excellent customer support for issues.
- Simple, effective and intuitive UI design.
- Effortless manual failover/failback and upgrading procedures.
- Provided meticulously detailed upgrade-in-place documentation for transitioning to new hardware
- Pursued Root Cause possibilities of unforeseen upgrade issue/misconfiguration scenarios
- Ability to 'clone' existing Virtual Services for rapid deployment of similar ones.
- A better API for ease of automation.
- Simplification of Certificate management.
- Better explanations of Kemp implementations of industry standard protocols like VRRP (or CARP)
- More control over device factory reset configuration and forcibly breaking HA pairs at boot time
- It has drastically reduced time spent on mail chasing/delivery delay investigations.
- It has greatly improved and modernized the mail flow evolution of our On Premise Email.
- It has given the Infrastructure Team great flexibility and control over implementing different mail routing topologies for various segments of our business, particularly with Customer Communications and IT Development.
- It has provided a robust, simpler & more affordable alternative to Netscaler or F5 for HA Load Balancing of critical internal & external business services
- Citrix ADC (formerly NetScaler ADC)
Although we use the two LBs in vastly different roles, the Kemp's architecture and interfaces are generally much easier and intuitive than the Netscaler's. Hardware/sw/fw upgrades and hardware migrations of the Kemps are much easier and straightforward. The Netscaler does excel in its online community and market share, but the Kemp's loyal following and devoted support staff make for a great customer experience.
Don't hesitate to open a proactive Support Case with them, they will provide you with updated documentation and advise on any gotchas in your environment.
Research KEMP's implementation for VRRP (CARP) if you are using HA, in respect to your own upstream core or edge switch vendors for known issues (we discovered one during our project!)
Research KEMP's implementation for VRRP (CARP) if you are using HA, in respect to your own upstream core or edge switch vendors for known issues (we discovered one during our project!)
No - we have not done any customization to the interface
No - we have not done any custom code
Yes
Because our company depends on the LoadMaster as critical infrastructure hardware.
No
The previous time I contacted support their Tech helped identify (via Verbos logs and packet captures) the downstream issue (invalid certificate path) with our own different equipment, and went so far as to help remediate that issue and test afterward to insure our equipment was all working as expected. He followed-up with a recap of the issue and gave steps to avoid the issue from recurring.
- Hardware upgrade/Upgrade-in-Place preserving configs and certificates
- VIP additions and monitoring
- Out-of-box Setup
- HA configuration in an Upgrade-in-Place scenario
- Ability to change eth interface settings from console after HA configs applied