Atlassian Confluence vs. Diligent Boards

It has a comment option on the page, where you can tag other teammates tagging them. it sends the mail notification. Comment at the page end is pretty good for referring to other stakeholders and future references of the topic on the page. Creating the highlights of the discussions, and meeting held points with highlighted tagging. Easy shortcuts such as to add a date just type "//". The interface is cool and has easy shortcuts for quick page making.

I find that Diligent Boards is extremely user-friendly and the functions are advanced and appropriate in our circumstances. Being able to restrict access to certain members of papers within a book is very beneficial. I also think having the Web version is an asset as I know from our Users that this is advantageous, especially when their device is updated and they have forgotten their password to be able to download the app

Incentivized

• QUICK How-to Guides that can be generated and share instantly
• One can subscribe to the pages and spaces and receive updates in the feed on their home page
• Automatic Email notifications of new updates in the Confluence area
• The platform integrates easily with other Atlassian platforms including third-party apps thus improving its reliability

Incentivized

• Easy end-user interface - for boards with maybe less technological experience, the format was very user friendly.
• Facsimile signature - eliminates trying to coordinate schedules to obtain signatures to written consents.
• Customer Service - Diligent Boards trained employees, not a call center, available 24/7.

Incentivized

• Navigation. Similar to other Atlassian products, users have complained that aspects of Confluence are difficult to learn right away[.]
• An issue that users can face when using Confluence is attempting to edit a document while someone else is editing. Although users can access the document and save it, they are unable to see the changes happening in [real-time] that other users are implementing until they refresh their page. Some users have also noted that this can result in loss of edits.
• Another drawback of using Confluence is its specific organizational structure. All information is stored within one page or project, although the page is able to be broken up into sections, some users do not prefer this style. Users can use the ‘page tree’ on each page to organize the different elements of each project.

• Formatting in the questionnaire needs improvement. I end up with different fonts and sizes for some reason. Wish there was a way to universally change the font. It's tedious going into each question individually.
• Sub questions and making questions contingent is a bit clunky. Could use some improvement

Incentivized

I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.

The cost will be a key factor when we look to renew or not with Diligent Boards

Incentivized

Confluence can - and in my personal opinion, it will - be a bit hard to use in the first moment. Atlassian is a great company and is eager to help you with any question you have, though. The interface seems to be a bit clumsy at first but the customization options are enough to make it easier and simpler. In general, Confluence is easy to use when you understand what each section does, but this can take a while.

Incentivized

Would appreciate all functionality to be in one place and not have to use OneClick.

I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.

Incentivized

Pages load very quickly, which makes it useful for quickly obtaining information. The search functionality is also very quick and is able to parse through all of the documents to provide the most relevant results for the query. Other information based software gets bogged down, but so far Atlassian Confluence maintains its performance.

Incentivized

This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.

Incentivized

They do look to set themselves apart in their customer service, and they have succeeded. While having every board and user set up via customer service is a mild annoyance, their turnaround time is excellent. I generally deal with a single point of contact when I contact them, which is top-quality support.

Incentivized

Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).

This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!

Incentivized

I think our Diligent Boards implementation went well

Incentivized

We used to use Google Drive to store all of our documentation, but it is disconnected from our every day working environment and it was easy to lose documents and become disorganized within the broad drive environment. [Atlassian] Confluence has kept us more organized and its tight coupling with Jira has made documents more accessible and more likely to be kept up to date.

Incentivized

This was a product recommended to use by a trusted network contact. We did not look at any other systems for this kind of software. Once we evaluated its capabilities, it was evident that it met our needs. We implemented based on that work without looking at alternatives in the market in this instance.

Incentivized

This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.

Incentivized

• We've gone from folders and folders of Word documents and PDFs into a single system with a search feature to bring all of our data together and trackable
• While onboarding took a bit longer for the company (to switch from a Word document centric mindset - to a web-based one), overall the company has embraced the features and power of Confluence within the working stack
• However, as costs continue to climb for the Atlassian product, we are forced to continue our evaluation of the product - with replacing it a remote possibility if it begins to outprice its usefulness to us.

Incentivized

• Positive: Provides a better understanding of multi-department production
• Positive: Changes in finances & profitability are easily seen
• Positive: Easy to use and allows for easy to understand

Incentivized