Box is an online Intelligent Content Management solution that caters to individual users as well as businesses.
$21
per month 3 users (minimum)
Microsoft Teams
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Priority Matrix
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Priority Matrix is a prioritization, collaborative, task management software used by more than 2500 businesses worldwide and 85,000 paid customers. Priority Matrix is used by customers who need visibility and alignment in team priorities. Priority Matrix uses the 4-quadrants to help customers prioritize by critical and urgency.
$10
per month
Pricing
Box
Microsoft Teams
Priority Matrix
Editions & Modules
Business Starter
$7
per month per user (3 minimum)
Business
$20
per month per user (3 minimum)
Business Plus
$33
per month per user (3 minimum)
Enterprise
$47
per month per user (3 minimum)
Enterprise Plus
$50
per month (billed annually) per user (3 minimum)
Enterprise Advanced
Contact us
per month per user (35 minimum)
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Box
Microsoft Teams
Priority Matrix
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
A discount is available for annual pricing.
Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
Box is more professional when comparing other alternatives
Verified User
Analyst
Chose Box
Our university previously used a private VPN, and we've used Google Drive as well before. At a previous university, I had experience with Dropbox. While I was unhappy about the switch to Box at first (change is always hard), Box seems superior in ease of use and collaboration …
Simply put, having unlimited file storage is a clear differentiator. Furthermore, the number of integrations offered by Box is simply unmatched. If you are looking for pure document and file sharing, I don't think there is a better product on the market. The benefits from …
Box is infinitely more reliable and easy to use, without the sometimes days-at-a-time delay when the site was down, nor the data loss we experienced when our content was housed in SharePoint. Our day to day workflow has been hugely positively impacted by the switch to Box.
I prefer Box over Dropbox. I found the online interface more intuitive and user-friendly. In addition, Box is integrated with more software than Dropbox, and it is also easier to share files of any size using Box. Finally, Box comes with slightly more enhanced security features …
Box is agnostic, so it makes it a little easier to sell to MAC and Windows users alike. We also enjoy the 1TB of space per user available in Enterprise. Box seems to have pinned down all the options that are important to corporate/enterprise customers as opposed to One Drive, …
My organization selected Box because it's a product that many organizations use, so it was easy to get users up to speed and collaborating together. The interface is very user friendly and intuitive. This has saved us time and effort in allowing users to become proficient in …
OneDrive is also being used in tandem since our licensure is through Microsoft. While one is not trying to replace the other, we just utilize both for redundancy and integration purposes. They can have files moved between the two manually by the end users to ensure they're …
We moved most of our tech to Microsoft, which is why we made the switch from Slack to Microsoft Teams. The interface is pretty similar and we are able to complete all our tasks within this program. No downfalls - I would like to see a basic user video or demo of some sort to …
The focus of Priority Matrix is on prioritization. Other apps exist that do a fine job with task and project management, but none of them equal Priority Matrix in terms of focusing your attention on the right task. The 80/20 principle that people often talk about (80% of the …
Features
Box
Microsoft Teams
Priority Matrix
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Box
7.6
26 Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Priority Matrix
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging
8.119 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
9.725 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document management
8.424 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Records management
7.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
8.224 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
8.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
5.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
8.226 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management
8.912 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated workflows
8.914 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence
2.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile support
6.723 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration
9.623 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Box
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
7.9
235 Ratings
2% above category average
Priority Matrix
8.4
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
7.9174 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
7.791 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.0202 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
8.1121 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.1223 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
7.4206 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
8.4138 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Box
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
8.0
244 Ratings
0% below category average
Priority Matrix
-
Ratings
Chat
00 Ratings
9.0243 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
8.3242 Ratings
00 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
8.6229 Ratings
00 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
8.1140 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
8.5152 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
00 Ratings
6.547 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
00 Ratings
5.743 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
00 Ratings
9.1155 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Box
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
8.1
229 Ratings
1% above category average
Priority Matrix
-
Ratings
Versioning
00 Ratings
8.4161 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video files
00 Ratings
8.3196 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio files
00 Ratings
8.6195 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document collaboration
00 Ratings
8.8209 Ratings
00 Ratings
Access control
00 Ratings
8.5191 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced security features
00 Ratings
8.4151 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive
00 Ratings
5.353 Ratings
00 Ratings
Device sync
00 Ratings
8.5165 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
I think Box is great for research teams or anyone that has a large number of files that need to be securely stored. Particularly in the case of social science research, where it is important to protect identifying data, Box is a great option. In cases where teams need a more reliable means for real-time collaboration, I would probably consider a different alternative
It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
If you're overwhelmed with too many things to do, and need help deciding which tasks to focus on, Priority Matrix is for you. Priority Matrix uses the classic Eisenhower matrix methodology which has been shown to be really effective for this purpose. Now you can use an app for that, instead of a piece of paper or Excel.
The main feature that I like the most in Box is that it makes collaboration seamless, workers can easily check the documents any time and make changes according to the needs.
Box manages and backs up all of your files on its cloud servers, and provides a very nice interface for creating, viewing, editing, and collaborating on the most commonly used file types (PDF, XLS, DOC, etc.).
Over the past few years, Box has built on top of its basic cloud storage management with a host of other tools, such as workflows, AI, monitoring, and analytics.
It is helping us to make good connections with clients and our workers themselves as to its syncing and viewing feature to all is very much helpful and easy to go.
The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
I like the security features and I like the website. It's easy to use and create and move things around as needed. The main reason for a lower rating is because the Box Sync app is just not a good program. It's a memory hog, it's slow, transfer speeds are slow, and it's not the most efficient route. If you have a large Box account and you need to get a computer up to speed on a large amount of data within Box, you are in for the long haul. Last time I had to do this, it took 3 days to sync all of the files and we are talking around 100 GB worth of data
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Everything with Box is seamless. It can be integrated into virtually any other software or application. You can even get the app for your phone or tablet to work on the go. File syncing is so quick. The only reason I gave it a 9 is the issue I discussed earlier about the local file application rebooting and not continuing to sync files. Other than that, it's great!
If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
Yeah, it's always worked, I've never had any kind of connection issues, the only issues I've had it I've been on our end when the Internet hasn't worked.
The general operation and management of Box is very efficient, both when accessing the account, and when adding files, downloading or modifying any document directly. The web platform, mobile and desktop versions work really well and quickly, making all the work and process flow smoothly and without setbacks. So far I have not been able to observe any inconvenience
I found their support community lacking in clarity when I experienced a login issue. The error messaging was poor on my Box Sync application. I did not reach out to support staff for help, instead, I reasoned that I should try downloading the Box Sync application again and reinstall it. That fixed my issue, thankfully. I think a less computer-savvy user would've been much more frustrated.
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
The documentation is good. Since Box is a popular service, there were also a number of YouTube videos and other sources that were helpful as we were considering the product and planning for deployment. Also, the ability to try the free version helped to prepare us.
Be careful with settings. It is easy to get overwhelmed with updates. For example, you don’t want to be updated when doing historical data uploads. I recommend taking off notifications initially and then turn on post you have done your historical data upload.
They are kind of the same. And both of them do their job as promised. But for company and project wise I think that Box slightly wins for some points. Which [makes him] win over Google Drive (don't forget that Google Drive is very easy to use and has a lot [of] nice features too).
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
The focus of Priority Matrix is on prioritization. Other apps exist that do a fine job with task and project management, but none of them equal Priority Matrix in terms of focusing your attention on the right task. The 80/20 principle that people often talk about (80% of the results come from 20% of the inputs) is clearly visible when you use PM.
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Box has been an only positive experience. It provides a seamless way for me and my team to collaborate on documents in such a way where we're not sending the document back/forth via email. It's a huge timesaver.
Box reduces the risk of sharing a sensitive document to the wrong person via email.
Box has provided a platform where my team can share notes in meetings - this has helped streamline and organize our meetings. Our meetings are more productive and actionable.
Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.