TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Contentsquare, now with Hotjar vs. DSE Backup Expert Pro vs. Optimizely Web Experimentation

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Contentsquare

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AContentsquare is an enterprise experience intelligence and Digital Analytics platform designed to track, visualize, and optimize user journeys across websites and mobile applications. The platform captures digital interaction telemetry—such as clicks, scrolls, hovers, and page drop-offs—without manual event tagging to power Web Analytics, session replays, funnel visualization, and experience monitoring.N/A

    DSE Backup Expert Pro

    N/AN/AN/AN/A

    Optimizely Web Experimentation

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AWhether launching a first test or scaling a sophisticated experimentation program, Optimizely Web Experimentation aims to deliver the insights needed to craft high-performing digital experiences that drive engagement, increase conversions, and accelerate growth.N/A
    Pricing
    ContentsquareDSE Backup Expert ProOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ContentsquareDSE Backup Expert ProOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ContentsquareDSE Backup Expert ProOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Considered Multiple Products
    Contentsquare
    No answer on this topic
    Data Safety Expert
    No answer on this topic
    Optimizely
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optmizely is much more performant product. We have witnessed less issues with page performance on Optimizely and have no issues with flickering. We had these issues with Maxymiser.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    It's a lot more, well, site stacked, it's way better than that. Adobe Target. I think the UI is easier to use on Optimizely. The one thing that I would say comparatively is our analytics talking to each other. Obviously Adobe, we use Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target, so they …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Google Optimize was much less flexible for our program needs and requires Google Analytics for analysis and metrics tracking. Optimizely Web Experimentation lets you build any number of metrics which can be much more complex than standard GA goals. Optimizely Web …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    We use heap and ClickTale but for different reasons. They don't do a/b test creation but they are great additions to analyzing your Optimizely tests.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optimizely has loads more out of the box, such as heat mapping! And integrates with Demandbase great!
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    I was not part of the implementation. The decision to go with Optimizely was made before I began working here.
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    53 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Would buy again
    89 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    50 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    69 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    53 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    89 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    44 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    52 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    42 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    87%
    Implementation went as expected
    58 Answers
    Features
    ContentsquareDSE Backup Expert ProOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and DSE Backup Expert Pro and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    5% above category average
    DSE Backup Expert Pro
    -
    Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    -
    Ratings
    Responsive Design for Web Access8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Application8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Results and Analysis
    Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and DSE Backup Expert Pro and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    9.7
    1 Ratings
    3% above category average
    DSE Backup Expert Pro
    -
    Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    8.3
    149 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Heatmap tool8.01 Ratings00 Ratings9.313 Ratings
    Click analytics10.01 Ratings00 Ratings8.833 Ratings
    Scroll maps10.01 Ratings00 Ratings8.517 Ratings
    Conversion tracking10.01 Ratings00 Ratings8.744 Ratings
    Goal tracking10.01 Ratings00 Ratings8.2127 Ratings
    Session Recording and Replay10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form fill analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings8.072 Ratings
    Test reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings7.9137 Ratings
    Results segmentation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.7103 Ratings
    CSV export00 Ratings00 Ratings7.9102 Ratings
    Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings00 Ratings8.049 Ratings
    Testing and Experimentation
    Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and DSE Backup Expert Pro and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    DSE Backup Expert Pro
    -
    Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    8.0
    163 Ratings
    5% below category average
    a/b experiment testing00 Ratings00 Ratings9.0163 Ratings
    Split URL testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.5135 Ratings
    Multivariate testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.4139 Ratings
    Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings00 Ratings7.9126 Ratings
    Cross-browser testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.197 Ratings
    Mobile app testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.075 Ratings
    Test significance00 Ratings00 Ratings8.4147 Ratings
    Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings00 Ratings8.1133 Ratings
    Advanced code editor00 Ratings00 Ratings7.9125 Ratings
    Page surveys00 Ratings00 Ratings6.217 Ratings
    Visitor recordings00 Ratings00 Ratings8.418 Ratings
    Preview mode00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6145 Ratings
    Test duration calculator00 Ratings00 Ratings7.9112 Ratings
    Experiment scheduler00 Ratings00 Ratings8.2112 Ratings
    Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings00 Ratings7.890 Ratings
    Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.574 Ratings
    Client-side tests00 Ratings00 Ratings7.896 Ratings
    Server-side tests00 Ratings00 Ratings7.250 Ratings
    Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings00 Ratings8.280 Ratings
    Audience Segmentation & Targeting
    Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and DSE Backup Expert Pro and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    DSE Backup Expert Pro
    -
    Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    8.2
    152 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.4147 Ratings
    Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6122 Ratings
    Traffic allocation control00 Ratings00 Ratings9.1144 Ratings
    Website personalization00 Ratings00 Ratings7.8111 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ContentsquareDSE Backup Expert ProOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Small Businesses
    Fullstory
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Acronis Cyber Protect
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Quantum Metric
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Carbonite by OpenText
    Score7.1 out of 10
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Glassbox
    Score6.3 out of 10
    Druva Security Cloud
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ContentsquareDSE Backup Expert ProOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (118 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (254 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    5.1
    (13 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.5
    (51 ratings)
    Usability
    9.5
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (58 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (16 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (11 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (163 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ContentsquareDSE Backup Expert ProOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Contentsquare
    Hotjar is good for a first pass at understanding user sentiment or locating potential usability issues. There are features such as "rage clicked" which shows recordings or instances when a user rage clicked or had an issue with your site. Hotjar has also been helpful to launch intercept surveys on mobile, desktop, and app, which not all competitor software allow. Hotjar recordings are fun to watch. "Watching Hotjar like Netflix" is a favorite pastime at work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    I think it can serve the whole spectrum of experiences from people who are just getting used to web experimentation. It's really easy to pick up and use. If you're more experienced then it works well because it just gets out of the way and lets you really focus on the experimentation side of things. So yeah, strongly recommend. I think it is well suited both to small businesses and large enterprises as well. I think it's got a really low barrier to entry. It's very easy to integrate on your website and get results quickly. Likewise, if you are a big business, it's incrementally adoptable, so you can start out with one component of optimizing and you can build there and start to build in things like data CMS to augment experimentation as well. So it's got a really strong a pathway to grow your MarTech platform if you're a small company or a big company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Contentsquare
    • Heat mapping is great on Hotjar. It is a good place to start when you are looking at the UX & CRO on your website. You can see the % of people clicking on elements on a page, how far they scroll, and mouse movements.
    • Hotjar is great for session recordings. These record the mouse movements, clicks, pages and scrolls of a user in video format. You can watch these to investigate what works well on a site and identify potential roadblocks and bugs.
    • Hotjar is great as it ensures that users details are anonymous; for instance, if you are watching a session recording, you cannot see what a user types in a form field, as Hotjar blanks this out.
    • Hotjar has a poll function, so you can have polls on your website.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    • The Platform contains drag-and-drop editor options for creating variations, which ease the A/B tests process, as it does not require any coding or development resources.
    • Establishing it is so simple that even a non-technical person can do it perfectly.
    • It provides real-time results and analytics with robust dashboard access through which you can quickly analyze how different variations perform. With this, your team can easily make data-driven decisions Fastly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Contentsquare
    • Hotjar is primarily used for web-based experiences. Not that easy to use on mobile apps.
    • I'd love to see Hotjar integrated with Google Analytics for an even deeper view.
    • Hotjar is primarily used by smaller organizations...pricing can get steep quickly for larger organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    • JavaScript is hard to implement sometimes especially for JQuery elements
    • ROI reporting should be part of the overall experimentation reporting
    • CMP integration: where we can easily show status of test on the HPT request
    • CMS integration
    • More widgets like social proof banners, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Contentsquare
    For small companies with limited user testing budgets, ClickTale serves as a useful user testing tool. When I cannot get the funds for in depth user testing, I always know that I have a baseline of information I can rely on
    Read full review
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    I rated this question because at this stage, Optimizely does most everything we need so I don't foresee a need to migrate to a new tool. We have the infrastructure already in place and it is a sizeable lift to pivot to another tool with no guarantee that it will work as good or even better than Optimizely
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Contentsquare
    It is fairly easy to use, easy to explain, and easy to learn even for a non-techie like me. I admit I was a little intimidated when it was recommended by my developers, but I learned afterwards that there really was nothing to worry about. My experience has been awesome so far!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    Optimizely Web Experimentation's visual editor is handy for non-technical or quick iterative testing. When it comes to content changes it's as easy as going into wordpress, clicking around, and then seeing your changes live--what you see is what you get. The preview and approval process for sharing built experiments is also handy for sharing experiments across teams for QA purposes or otherwise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's availability as a 10 out of 10. The software is reliable and does not experience any application errors or unplanned outages. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's performance as a 9 out of 10. Pages load quickly, reports are complete in a reasonable time frame, and the software does not slow down any other software or systems that it integrates with. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Contentsquare
    Hotjar is a SaaS-based company, and as such has a good support service. Users can quickly submit support tickets through Hotjar's online portal. Enterprise customers get access to additional support members and have SLAs to support their larger, more complex needs. Overall, Hotjar is extremely reliable and I've never had to reach out to customer support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    They always are quick to respond, and are so friendly and helpful. They always answer the phone right away. And [they are] always willing to not only help you with your problem, but if you need ideas they have suggestions as well.
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    The tool itself is not very difficult to use so training was not very useful in my opinion. It did not also account for success events more complex than a click (which my company being ecommerce is looking to examine more than a mere click).
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    In retrospect: - I think I should have stressed more demo's / workshopping with the Optimizely team at the start. I felt too confident during demo stages, and when came time to actually start, I was a bit lost. (The answer is likely I should have had them on-hand for our first install.. they offered but I thought I was OK.) - Really getting an understanding / asking them prior to install of how to make it really work for checkout pages / one that uses dynamic content or user interaction to determine what the UI does. Could have saved some time by addressing this at the beginning, as some things we needed to create on our site for Optimizely to "use" as a trigger for the variation test. - Having a number of planned/hoped-for tests already in-hand before working with Optimizely team. Sharing those thoughts with them would likely have started conversations on additional things we needed to do to make them work (rather than figuring that out during the actual builds). Since I had development time available, I could have added more things to the baseline installation since my developers were already "looking under the hood" of the site.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Contentsquare
    ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but bad positioned on the page...), and that's a thing you can't really measure trough a traditional web analytics tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you need to confidently make changes
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    We can use it flexibly across lines of business and have it in use across two departments. We have different use cases and slightly different outcomes, but can unify our results based on impact to the bottom line. Finally, we can generate value from anywhere in the org for any stakeholders as needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Contentsquare
    • Our UX team can now use hard data to back up and validate design decisions that we make. Our role as usability experts is becoming more respected and integral to business objectives because we now have data that can back up our field of study and prove that our roles are demonstrably useful and necessary.
    • HotJar allows our small team of 3 UX designers to get research data as if we were a much larger team. Instead of painstakingly using our time to do guerrilla research, endless user observations, and other types of manual testing, we can now get a significant portion of our data from HotJar.
    • Using HotJar is actually giving our team a sense of excitement and enjoyment in our day-to-day usability work. Instead of seeing UX as a chore, HotJar is making data gathering and analyzing more fun, because we can see tangible results from a much larger pool of user/user-data than we could in the past.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Data Safety Expert
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    • We're able to share definitive annualized revenue projections with our team, showing what would happen if we put a test into Production
    • Showing the results of a test on a new page or feature prior to full implementation on a site saves developer time (if a test proves the new element doesn't deliver a significant improvement.
    • Making a change via the WYSIWYG interface allows us to see multiple changes without developer intervention.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Optimizely Web Experimentation Screenshots

    Screenshot of AI-Powered Experimentation with Opal:

- Instant Test Ideas: Generates high-quality A/B test ideas based on any goals and audience insights.
- Smarter Experimentation: The AI can suggest impactful variations, reducing guesswork and increasing test velocity.
- More Than Just Ideas: From hypothesis generation to analyzing results, Opal helps optimize every stage of the experimentation process.Screenshot of the new Visual Editor with an AI Variation Development Agent

Create simple or advanced website changes fast without writing a line of code with our AI Development Agent.

Use natural language to build out your ideas and apply brand styles to your experiments instantly.Screenshot of Advanced Audience Targeting:

- Delivers personalized experiences by targeting users based on behaviors, attributes, and real-time conditions.
- Defines precise audience segments using first-party data, geolocation, and device type.
- Can test and optimize for different audience groups to maximize impact and engagement.Screenshot of Variation Template

Library of experience templates that you can access right within the Visual Editor. Customize these templates or create your own to easily reuse throughout your experimentation program.

- Offers pre-built templates for common test setups.
- Standardized variations and maintains brand integrity with reusable templates.
- Templates can be customized visually or tweak them with code for full flexibility.Screenshot of Web Experimentation Results Page:

- Data visualizations help interpret experiment performance.
- Displays which variations are winning with built-in statistical significance calculations.
- Results can be filtered by audience segments, events, and conversions to uncover key trends.Screenshot of the custom code editor for JavaScript & CSS changes, used to build complex tests.