TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Contentsquare, now with Hotjar vs. Matomo Analytics vs. VWO

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Contentsquare

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AContentsquare is an enterprise experience intelligence and Digital Analytics platform designed to track, visualize, and optimize user journeys across websites and mobile applications. The platform captures digital interaction telemetry—such as clicks, scrolls, hovers, and page drop-offs—without manual event tagging to power Web Analytics, session replays, funnel visualization, and experience monitoring.N/A

    Matomo Analytics

    Score9 out of 10
    N/APiwik is an open source analytics platform that enables users to measure web and mobile apps as well as intranet portals. It protects the privacy of users through advanced privacy features and its approach to data ownership. Piwik offers On-premises and Cloud deployment options. Available in over 50 languages, it is fully customisable and vendor-independent. Piwik offers over 70 integrations with Content Management Systems, Ecommerce solutions, Forums as well as other mobile and web platforms.…

    $0

    VWO

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AVWO is an A/B testing and conversion optimization platform that enables growing businesses to conduct qualitative and quantitative visitor research, build an experimentation roadmap and run continuous experiments on their digital properties. With its 5 capabilities Plan, Track, Test, Analyze, and Target, it brings the entire CRO (conversion rate optimization) process at one place. VWO helps online businesses follow the process- and data-driven conversion…

    $49

    per month

    Pricing
    ContentsquareMatomo AnalyticsVWO
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Free download (open source)
    $0
    Free 30 day trial
    $0
    limited to 30 days
    Essential
    $9
    number of pageviews (monthly traffic)
    Business
    $29
    number of pageviews (monthly traffic)
    Enterprise
    $199
    your requirements and monthly traffic
    Content Optimization Bundle
    $579
    per installation
    Growth Bundle
    $1,149
    per installation
    Premium Bundle
    $1,499
    per installation
    Email Support Subscription
    $2,090
    per installation
    Subscription
    $99.00
    per month
    TESTING
    Get a Demo
    The classic VWO A/B testing solution
    CONVERSION OPTIMIZATION
    Get a Demo
    The all-in-one platform for all your optimization needs
    ENTERPRISE
    Get a Demo
    Customized solution with advanced AB testing and conversion optimization capabilities
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ContentsquareMatomo AnalyticsVWO
    Free Trial
    NoYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsOn-premise Edition is free to download and install on one's own servers.
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    ContentsquareMatomo AnalyticsVWO
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Matomo Analytics and VWO
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Matomo Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    VWO
    -
    Ratings
    Responsive Design for Web Access8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Application8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Results and Analysis
    Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Matomo Analytics and VWO
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    9.7
    1 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Matomo Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    VWO
    7.0
    1 Ratings
    21% below category average
    Heatmap tool8.01 Ratings00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
    Click analytics10.01 Ratings00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
    Scroll maps10.01 Ratings00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
    Conversion tracking10.01 Ratings00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Goal tracking10.01 Ratings00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Session Recording and Replay10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Results segmentation00 Ratings00 Ratings5.51 Ratings
    Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Web Analytics
    Comparison of Web Analytics features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Matomo Analytics and VWO
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Matomo Analytics
    9.8
    2 Ratings
    19% above category average
    VWO
    -
    Ratings
    Lead Conversion Tracking00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Bounce Rate Measurement00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device and Browser Reporting00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pageview Tracking00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Event Tracking00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting in real-time00 Ratings8.12 Ratings00 Ratings
    Referral Source Tracking00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable Dashboards00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing and Experimentation
    Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Matomo Analytics and VWO
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Matomo Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    VWO
    7.5
    11 Ratings
    11% below category average
    a/b experiment testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Split URL testing00 Ratings00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Multivariate testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
    Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
    Cross-browser testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Test significance00 Ratings00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Advanced code editor00 Ratings00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Visitor recordings00 Ratings00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
    Preview mode00 Ratings00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
    Test duration calculator00 Ratings00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
    Audience Segmentation & Targeting
    Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Matomo Analytics and VWO
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Matomo Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    VWO
    8.2
    1 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Traffic allocation control00 Ratings00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Website personalization00 Ratings00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ContentsquareMatomo AnalyticsVWO
    Small Businesses
    Fullstory
    Score8.9 out of 10
    StatCounter
    Score9 out of 10
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Quantum Metric
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Lead Forensics
    Score8.9 out of 10
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Glassbox
    Score6.3 out of 10
    Chartbeat
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ContentsquareMatomo AnalyticsVWO
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (118 ratings)
    10.0
    (23 ratings)
    7.7
    (108 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    5.1
    (13 ratings)
    8.7
    (13 ratings)
    8.7
    (20 ratings)
    Usability
    9.5
    (8 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.7
    (5 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    6.7
    (3 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.6
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ContentsquareMatomo AnalyticsVWO
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Contentsquare
    Hotjar is good for a first pass at understanding user sentiment or locating potential usability issues. There are features such as "rage clicked" which shows recordings or instances when a user rage clicked or had an issue with your site. Hotjar has also been helpful to launch intercept surveys on mobile, desktop, and app, which not all competitor software allow. Hotjar recordings are fun to watch. "Watching Hotjar like Netflix" is a favorite pastime at work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Matomo
    If you want to balance data-driven marketing and a privacy-minded approach to analytics, Matomo Analytics is for you. It's easy to be compliant with GDPR and other regulations while still having detailed (anonymized) analytics that help inform what content is resonating vs what content is not resonating. And of course you also get all of the rich referral, campaign, and goal conversion data to help you optimize your marketing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    It works better for either small or big companies because small companies can start with the free plan which is very decent and has everything they need. Also for big companies who get the best paid plans they get a lot of premium functionalities, the insight module, outstanding reports. But for medium size companies who can only afford the basic paid plan, it may not be the best tool as it is very limited. For example, they cannot analize a/b tests for new and ruturning visitors, neither based on the users device category.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Contentsquare
    • Heat mapping is great on Hotjar. It is a good place to start when you are looking at the UX & CRO on your website. You can see the % of people clicking on elements on a page, how far they scroll, and mouse movements.
    • Hotjar is great for session recordings. These record the mouse movements, clicks, pages and scrolls of a user in video format. You can watch these to investigate what works well on a site and identify potential roadblocks and bugs.
    • Hotjar is great as it ensures that users details are anonymous; for instance, if you are watching a session recording, you cannot see what a user types in a form field, as Hotjar blanks this out.
    • Hotjar has a poll function, so you can have polls on your website.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Matomo
    • One of Piwik's strengths is the provision of customizable widgets for different bits of analytics data. The ability to add and remove them, change dates and more makes this a flexible way to visualize data.
    • The visitor log section is also rich, providing date, keywords, actions and more in a single table, which makes it easy to identify your most effective content.
    • And the visitor actions table includes both bounce rate and time on site, so you can quickly tell which pages have the most engagement.
    • Data display is a strength for Piwik, as you have access to overview charts while simultaneously being able to drill deeper.
    Read full review
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    • VWO is pretty easy to implement on websites and doesn't require a heavy technology lift
    • The VWO interface is pretty intuitive and let's non-technical users make variants for testing
    • The VWO reporting dashboard is excellent for determining statistical significance and understanding whether differences in conversion rates are meaningful or not
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Contentsquare
    • Hotjar is primarily used for web-based experiences. Not that easy to use on mobile apps.
    • I'd love to see Hotjar integrated with Google Analytics for an even deeper view.
    • Hotjar is primarily used by smaller organizations...pricing can get steep quickly for larger organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Matomo
    • From a user security standpoint it would be useful to provide users the ability to have two-factor authentication. While stats data is not necessarily sensitive in aggregate, some users may feel that certain portions need to be more secure.
    • It would be nice if there was a tighter integration with the Google search/referrer API so that "keyword not defined" would be replaced more often with the actual keyword that is being used to send a visitor to a site.
    • An easier branding method, maybe in the form of an API function set, that pulled branding URLs from a set of database fields would be great as well.
    Read full review
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    • The user interface within VWO does take a bit of time to get used to, especially as it pertains to switching back and forth between tests. When running multiple experiments on a site at a time, a clear and succinct dashboard for everything in one place would be helpful (as opposed to needing to switch between A/B, multivariate, etc).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Contentsquare
    For small companies with limited user testing budgets, ClickTale serves as a useful user testing tool. When I cannot get the funds for in depth user testing, I always know that I have a baseline of information I can rely on
    Read full review
    Matomo
    At this point, there is not a single conceivable reason as to why we would not renew and continue to use Piwik Analytics. Especially since it is a free program and open source. The product will only get better over time as more people look into it and donate to cause so that development can continue.
    Read full review
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    It's great value and we think we've ironed out all the major teething troubles. However, if we experience any more bugs or problems that significantly slow us down then we're seriously considering switching to Optimizely, which I haven't personally tested but have heard great things about from my CRO peers
    Read full review
    Usability
    Contentsquare
    It is fairly easy to use, easy to explain, and easy to learn even for a non-techie like me. I admit I was a little intimidated when it was recommended by my developers, but I learned afterwards that there really was nothing to worry about. My experience has been awesome so far!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Matomo
    Piwik succeeds in presenting me (and my associates and my clients...) large amounts of data in a user friendly way. The interface and functionality can easily be customized. While some enhancements do need technical background (API calls by programming language from the webserver or javascript), others are easy to use (goal / event tracking)
    Read full review
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    I gave Visual Website Optimizer a rating of 8 because it is overall a great product to use. Setting up and keeping track of various tests is easy and straight forward. The only reason why this product is not rated higher is because the support documents online leave a lot of room for improvement.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Matomo
    No answers on this topic
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    I have not experienced an application error or unplanned outage with VWO.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Matomo
    No answers on this topic
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    VWO doesn't appear to slow down our website at all, though some customers with adblockers like UBlock Origin have been known to not see entire pages if VWO is making changes to the page at a macro level (background, font, etc). This is rare though.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Contentsquare
    Hotjar is a SaaS-based company, and as such has a good support service. Users can quickly submit support tickets through Hotjar's online portal. Enterprise customers get access to additional support members and have SLAs to support their larger, more complex needs. Overall, Hotjar is extremely reliable and I've never had to reach out to customer support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Matomo
    The best thing about the Matomo support is that they have a forum which basically you can find the answer to almost all of your questions and most of the time you don't need to contact them regarding your questions and problems but if you need help they will answer in a reasonable time slots.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    While their online document support is lacking a simple email to their support team will almost always get responded to the next day. It has however taken more than one email to explain the problem to the support team till they understood the problem. The solution I was given also only half fixed the problem the rest I figured out on my own.
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Matomo
    No answers on this topic
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    Training was good, just limited to the onboarding process. They walked through all of the steps it takes to get started in VWO and each of the modules, along with giving us ideas for starting our first test. I feel like it could be better if there was a guided process within the VWO program to continue to educate you along the way, and a way to turn that off for experienced users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Matomo
    Only one hiccup when we were using a beta installation. Other than that, smooth sailing.
    Read full review
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    Overall, the implementation of VWO is straightforward. If you've got a straightforward way of deploying code to all of your test pages, either a good CMS or a TMS, then implementation should be a breeze. There is no tweaking to be done to the code itself, and once deployed it has the flexibility to cope with different VWO modules (tracking, conversion analysis, session analysis) without modification.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Contentsquare
    ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but bad positioned on the page...), and that's a thing you can't really measure trough a traditional web analytics tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Matomo
    It is much more robust out of the box, easier to set up and more intuitive to use. The reports are set up already and it requires little to no setup after installation to start gathering insights.
    Read full review
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    There are significant differences in each platform when it comes to Optimizely and vwo. From a functionality and performance perspective they each have their pros and cons. It is important to go through the feature sets of each and ensure the solution you select will work specifically with your business objectives and conversion rate optimization goals
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Matomo
    No answers on this topic
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    The product seems infinitely scalable for our needs (small business) and we've never had any issue with loading VWO-edited elements. I will say, though, that online customers with ad blockers have been known to not see certain VWO elements as their third-party scripts are disabled.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Contentsquare
    • Our UX team can now use hard data to back up and validate design decisions that we make. Our role as usability experts is becoming more respected and integral to business objectives because we now have data that can back up our field of study and prove that our roles are demonstrably useful and necessary.
    • HotJar allows our small team of 3 UX designers to get research data as if we were a much larger team. Instead of painstakingly using our time to do guerrilla research, endless user observations, and other types of manual testing, we can now get a significant portion of our data from HotJar.
    • Using HotJar is actually giving our team a sense of excitement and enjoyment in our day-to-day usability work. Instead of seeing UX as a chore, HotJar is making data gathering and analyzing more fun, because we can see tangible results from a much larger pool of user/user-data than we could in the past.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Matomo
    • We can see the analytics of our web applications and thus having the insight of the systems' behavior.
    • It helps in improving the performance and scalability of our web application.
    • It helps us improve the user experience on our sites; seeing the user's activity we can take decisions to make it better.
    • A cost-effective tool, since it is free.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wingify Pvt Ltd
    • The ability to offer a CRO service is greatly enhanced by VWO, as it allows us to run tests for clients
    • The editor means to some extent we don't need much developer resource to run the tests, lowering costs of doing so
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Matomo Analytics Screenshots

    Screenshot of Customizable dashboardScreenshot of ReferrersScreenshot of Mouse scroll HeatmapScreenshot of Web page HeatmapScreenshot of A/B testingScreenshot of Form Analytics overview

    VWO Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshot