Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SAP Cloud ERP (SAP S/4HANA Cloud) is a modular ERP that enables users to run mission-critical operations in real time from anywhere, introduce new business models in any industry, and expand globally. SAP Cloud ERP is a SaaS product and can also be deployed in a hybrid landscape for quicker time to value. SAP Cloud ERP is a foundational component of the
N/A
Vena
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GP
SAP Cloud ERP
Vena
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
SAP Cloud ERP
Vena
Free Trial
No
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Optional
Additional Details
—
Per user, per month
The Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal.
Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services.
For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs.
Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
The only product with have shopped was Sage Intacct. It is somewhat unfair to compare the two solutions, because Sage Intacct is a cloud-based solution. That said, Intacct appears to advertise better reporting/business intelligence capabilities. MS Dynamics GP should be aware …
We did not evaluate any other products. We knew we wanted to embrace, not replace, excel, and Vena is best in class as a CPM tool that leverages Excel as a lens into the database.
We had Prophix (old version) for planning and budgeting and it was way less user-friendly and flexible than Vena. We always had to go back to Excel to build more complex reports and share them. And we extended the use of Vena to monthly reporting, which could not have been done …
I did not select Vena, and would not after popping the hood. It looks slick at a glance and has a good concept going, but once you begin to investigate further, there are a lot of foundational issues. Have your IT department perform a deep dive before making a decision.
We were using Dynamic Budgets before we moved over to Vena and researched many, many, many other products before settling on Vena in the end. One of the things that quickly knocked out other vendors was our unique fiscal calendar. We have 13 periods (4 weeks each) and that …
Assuming a staff-member has excellent MS Excel skills, Vena Solutions is (most likely) capable of producing just about anything one can imagine. That said, Excel's visuals leave something to be desired. Most folks would choose a Tableau dashboard over a Vena dashboard any day. …
At the end of the day, many of Vena's competitors will offer more web-based capabilities. At the time when we made the decision, we primarily chose Vena due to the steeply discounted price tag. However, over the past couple of years, Vena has added the web-based capabilities …
We spent about a year and a half in the selection process for our budgeting system. The issue that we kept coming across was speed, flexibility, and a lack of understanding of our process during the sales cycle. Most of these other products wanted us to change our budgeting …
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GP
SAP Cloud ERP
Vena
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
SAP Cloud ERP
8.1
411 Ratings
10% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
6.319 Ratings
7.8361 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
5.915 Ratings
7.9349 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.518 Ratings
7.6348 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
6.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
SAP Cloud ERP
7.7
630 Ratings
4% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
2.526 Ratings
7.8604 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.021 Ratings
7.6557 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
SAP Cloud ERP
8.3
725 Ratings
1% below category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
5.832 Ratings
8.4682 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.240 Ratings
8.1714 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
37% below category average
SAP Cloud ERP
7.7
732 Ratings
5% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Dashboards
3.529 Ratings
7.7677 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.239 Ratings
7.8719 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.539 Ratings
7.6664 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
40% below category average
SAP Cloud ERP
8.3
754 Ratings
8% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
6.445 Ratings
8.2732 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
5.936 Ratings
8.2697 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash management
6.436 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
5.741 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
4.531 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
8.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
4.628 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
2.919 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
3.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
3.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
7.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.07 Ratings
7.9250 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
4.721 Ratings
8.0263 Ratings
00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
3.918 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
4.513 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
4.726 Ratings
8.0282 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
2.916 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
4.017 Ratings
8.0258 Ratings
00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
3.814 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.219 Ratings
8.3291 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.5
26 Ratings
48% below category average
SAP Cloud ERP
8.3
631 Ratings
5% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
6.224 Ratings
8.3617 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
1.013 Ratings
7.8535 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
4.018 Ratings
7.9510 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing module
4.515 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
SAP Cloud ERP
8.2
643 Ratings
4% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Pricing
3.618 Ratings
8.0613 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
3.621 Ratings
8.0623 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
1.012 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
5.225 Ratings
8.2588 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
5.39 Ratings
7.9212 Ratings
00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
3.812 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution
3.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.5
276 Ratings
13% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Billing Management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
7.9249 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
7.5211 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
8.0270 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
9.3
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.1
118 Ratings
9% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
8.1118 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
7.9
229 Ratings
12% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
7.8158 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
7.9162 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
7.7157 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
8.1205 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
8.0203 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
9.8
1 Ratings
39% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.0
185 Ratings
15% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.1163 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
7.9158 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
7.7146 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
8.2149 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.0150 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.2
180 Ratings
10% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
8.2163 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
8.3165 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
8.2155 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
8.1160 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
8.1160 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
7.8
216 Ratings
9% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
7.7192 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
7.9207 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
7.7196 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
9.0
197 Ratings
21% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
00 Ratings
8.0197 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Vena
7.9
153 Ratings
5% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.0103 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.2139 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.5145 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Vena
8.0
251 Ratings
2% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.4238 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.4238 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.299 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.1214 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Vena
8.0
202 Ratings
0% below category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.6117 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.2155 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.1169 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.1154 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
SAP Cloud ERP is best suited for medium- to large-sized organizations seeking scalability, real-time insights, and standardized processes. It will help them streamline financial operations & core HR functions, optimize inventory management & procurement process. Its intelligent automation will help them automate repetitive, routine tasks and use machine learning for predictive analysis.
Vena is great for managing data and putting all of your information in one easy-to-locate spot. It also makes finding data faster and easier. It is also great for tracking project performance and budgeting. It is fairly user-friendly and easy to use from an admin side.
Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
The software helps in forecasting and identifying potential challenges that would affect our organisation in the near future. This enables us to prepare in advance and also adopt practical and viable measures.
It enables faster and accurate data processing, which enhances decision-making.
It's easily customizable according to specific organizational needs. This promotes overall efficiency and productivity of the organization.
With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Preparing forecasts under different scenarios can be challenging. Your input templates need to be set up to toggle between the various scenarios. We found that certain templates, particularly workforce were not able to easily switch between different scenarios.
Connection to Bamboo - initial testing of this resulted in the history being deleted and only showing the current employees. For us it was important to have the history in Vena.
No native connection to Tableau - while a CSV upload is a way around would be great to have this since you already have a Power BI connection.
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
The cost of SAP as an ERP is quite high and the switching costs associated with ERP systems are even higher. That being said moving from one ERP to another only happens once in a great while for large organizations. Those switching costs include retraining, IT hardware requirements, outside consultants and more
Vena has been a huge win for us as an organization, as it vastly improved our budgeting process by removing manual consolidation that was incredibly time consuming, and it allows us to see a multi-year view of our organizational budget across all of our funding sources. We've seen Vena's platform grow over the years and we've not yet fully adopted some of them so it feels like there's still potential to get even more value out of the platform.
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
SAP Cloud ERP is a useful solution for automating and streamlining business processes. It offers modern technologies such as built-in AI, machine learning, and real-time data analytics. It offers multi-currency, multi-language support to manage international operations smoothly. It comes with a modern, role-based user interface that enhances your user experience and lets you perform tasks smoothly.
I would rate Vena's overall usability as an 8 out of 10. Vena offers a user-friendly interface, especially for those familiar with Excel, making it relatively easy to use. Most features are intuitive. However, some advanced functionalities may require more training or time to master, so it's not a perfect score. Overall, Vena provides a solid user experience that supports efficient financial planning.
Vena has been available and running. There are notifications well ahead of scheduled maintenance and so far, scheduled maintenance has been occurring during off hours and fortunately has not occurred during a time that is crucial for us to be actively using.
Vena Solutions pages load quickly and only a few times does it get a bit slow, only when there are many integrations and the reports are long. But in general it is always fast and honestly I am very satisfied with the speed in the generation of statistical reports and the pages
The support system I find great as whenever I run into problems they rectify them quickly as possible they never reacted late the support is just up to the mark for me. They provide many solutions to the problems I faced the [technical] team support is always amazing they [listen] to mean work accordingly.
They are very quick to respond when you submit a ticket and typically fix issues quickly as well. I only didn't give this a 10 because there is still an open issue with our Salesforce connection that we've been waiting on now for a few months.
Our initial in person training was a little rough b/c I felt like our trainer wanted to focus on maximizing Vena rather than understanding what we were needing for our organization. He was very responsive and added insights, but could have worked to understand our needs a little better.
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
SAP requires a lot of internal and external resources to complete its successful implementation. The cloud version requires a deeper understanding of the different capabilities of the local systems (hardware) and the connection towards your local IT team. We found several problems on our systems that we couldn't foresee before the implementation and roll out.
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
The platform utilizes advanced predictive analytics to anticipate operational bottlenecks and put them out of commission before the problems become larger. We can proactively develop effective strategies that help keep service quality in the face of unexpected changes in the market, or external disruptions, by continuously analyzing historical performance data as well as elements of the current market
Vena is a strong fit for teams that want to keep working in Excel while adding structure, workflows, and a centralized database. Vena emphasizes its native Excel experience, along with planning templates, workflow automation, and integrations for budgeting/forecasting.
Planful is more positioned as an end-to-end financial performance platform, with a broader emphasis on planning, budgeting, forecasting, reporting, AI/ML-driven forecasting support, real-time collaboration, and enterprise-scale (including multi-entity/multi-currency environments). It also supports Microsoft 365 reporting via Spotlight. We selected Vena because it was a better fit for our current use case and team setup:
Our Operations and FP&A teams primarily use it for budgeting and forecasting, so the Excel-based workflow made adoption easier.
It was easier to implement and simpler for users to learn and operate day-to-day.
It fit well with our need to improve planning structure without forcing a major process change.
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Automated monthly financial statements saves us 3 hours a month.
Moving reporting away from IT has begun to save hours of IT involvement, which will only grow as we shift more reports to Vena. This frees up IT to work on more important IT initiatives.
Using budget templates saved hours of copy and paste time when gathering inputs from each department.