Figma, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their collaborative design and prototyping application to support digital product and UI development.
$15
per month per editor
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$8
per month per user
Pricing
Figma
Miro
Editions & Modules
Professional
$144
per year
Organization
$540
per year
Starter
Free
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
I think they serve different purposes. For Miro, we usually use that for workshops and brainstormings. There are some templates we can make use of. For Jamboard, it is quite lightweighted so we use that for quick brainstorming or retro. Figma is the only option for talking about …
ChatGPTFigma surpasses Miro by offering a comprehensive design experience, allowing not only collaborative brainstorming but also the creation of realistic wireframes and prototypes. Its design-centric approach enhances visual representation, making Figma a versatile tool that …
Figma does everything that Miro does but better, especially in the performance department where Miro tends to be laggy in browsers and Figma is smooth and responsive. While Krita is more like a photoshop, Figma has a lot of the features Krita offers and implements them at the …
Verified User
Professional
Chose Figma
Figma excels are prototyping whereas Miro is great for collaborating. Figma could do better with Figjam but the navigation is counter intuitive to people that don't use it often, so leaders often have a hard time moving about and collaborating in Figma. Figma is also is able to …
I think Figma is much better than Adobe XD, in that it is trying to create collaborative software that serves full product teams and not just designers. However, I think Figma still has a way to go to replace a tool like Miro, which is much easier for non-creatives to work in.
We use Miro, but for different reasons. Miro stacks up in its collaboration features and really we use this tool for brainstorming, workshop building, and anything the product designers don't want to do. As a product manager, I tend to use Miro more as it is easier to adopt and …
Figma's collaboration and speed of new feature development, coupled with their existing feature set when we purchased made them a clear choice. Their prototyping functionality was particularly impressive vs Sketch, but also their system compatibility (even browser) helped to …
In Figma, multiple team members can collaborate on the same project simultaneously, making real-time teamwork smooth and efficient. I really like its cloud-based nature which ensures that changes are instantly synchronized across devices, allowing teams to iterate rapidly and …
Verified User
Manager
Chose Figma
Figma is a lot cleaner, easier to navigate and organize. Maybe you can't do as much visually but you can move faster in Figma. I'm trying to remember more but honestly I've been using Figma for so long now.
Figma supports and is supported by other design apps, but it really shines in prototyping for web and app development. It's easy to share with colleagues and collaborate in one space, the open space allows for a ton of iteration, and the organization of layers functions better …
Figma won over many competitors with it's design-dev collaboration model and it essentially has tools like Zeplin or Folio integrated in - where you had to have one file uploaded somewhere and everyone working on it. You don't need other programs. The component libraries are …
Visily is still developing and it lacks many advanced features. Unlike Figma has better collaboration & real-time feedback updates. Designers have all the tools readily available & visible on the dashboard itself. Prototyping is very advanced on Figma with multiple sharing …
I've been using Figma for the past 4 years so I'm not on top of the most recent versions of the other tools but we chose Figma as it allowed our distributed team of designers who are not just in different cities but different regions and timezones to collaborate better and stay …
Figma is much more user friendly and collaborative. It works in your browser and contains everything you need really, whereas Sketch requires other tools to run it properly. It is also much easier to import and export things into Figma, which means we can work across lots of …
Figma is a better layout tool than all of the other products I have used. I believe it’s worse at prototyping than Sketch and axure. Also its lack of a design kit from officially from Apple is a ding on the product and a plus for Sketch in my opinion. XD is awful and not worth …
Collaboration in real-time: Figma operates entirely in the cloud, allowing multiple users to collaborate on designs simultaneously. This real-time collaboration is especially useful for remote teams or those working across different …
Adobe XD really feels like a tool stuck in the past when compared to Figma. Online collaboration, autolayout, reponsive options, it's hard to argue for XD.
Compared to Sketch, Figma is more user friendly and easier to collaborate. The component and library feature is better. Sketch does not have Figjam. Figjam has amazing features like sticky notes, templates, voting, emojis, stickers, etc. The community of Figma is my favourite. …
Not really a direct comparison or apples to apples in my opinion. Figma is solely focused on design creation, collaboration, and asset management whereas the others are collaboration tools but span various departmental verticals. Figma is a niche software that addresses our …
Miro is much easier to use for everything. Miro is much more intuitive and easier to learn. The only thing I would use Figma for over Miro is for complex/pixel perfect UX designs and prototyping.
Miro is very good but as it’s not a full design software it can’t be compared too closely to Figma. Very good for collaboration and presentation of designs rather than the design work itself.
I use Figma a lot. It is definitely more powerful. And just gives you more control, which I love. But for the use cases that I use Miro for, Miro is probably easier. Typically I'll start in Miro, and then flip to Figma. I've not used Figjam too much. That is probably closer to …
Miro was selected for us by our organization, so I didn't really have a choice. I would say Miro is like all the best components (or nearly the best) of the other applications all wrapped up in one.
Miro seemed more powerful and provided more functionality at the time of testing. The learning curve for Miro seemed shallower when compared to fig jam.
Its a good product for a wider range of user types/users from a range of teams. It does a wide scope of functionalities. From whiteboarding, presentation creation, workshopping, onboarding space, and more!
Altho Miro does not have key functionality against some of the apps that are on the market, in the end it is an amazing virtual whiteboard with additional capability. The continued enhancements and ongoing surveys that seek user feedback is proof that it is moving towards a …
In many cases the other tools did a single thing better than Miro but overall Miro better solved all our needs. In some cases, like FigJam the hurdle was licensing. Teams just doesn't have an awesome set of features. MindMap is good for what it is but not so good for other …
I started with Mural during Covid but quickly switched to Miro due to better usability and design possibilities on Miro. Tools like FigJam were nice to have but I always preferred MIRO over FigJam or any other tool as I got used to it quickly and found everything that I needed.
Working with Miro is much easier. When I am using Miro, I dont have to thing about where to save documents. I dont need to think twice about sharing with colleagues. All the other tools have their advantages and disadvantages. When working with other tools, you need to think …
Miro is first still in my mind. Miro in my opinion has the potential to become its own operating system where with the help of better integrations can hold everything you need to perform and operate during work and possibly outside work.
We still have tutors who prefer how they used to do things. The fact that I am able to convince most (not all) of these often stodgy academics to switch to Miro after one demonstration is a testament to how its simple to use interface is truly unique in the market.
Everything about Miro is better. Bluescape had limited object tools, always froze, was jittery when you tried to move things around, and overall was disliked by everyone in the company. When one group began using Miro, everyone else wanted to use it too, which ultimately led …
Mural was already a tool adopted by 3M prior to the Pandemic. However, it had low adoption with many users frustrated with its model, both from a usability and as a business model. It also did not support our design process well.