Figma vs. Miro

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Figma
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Figma, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their collaborative design and prototyping application to support digital product and UI development.
$15
per month per editor
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$8
per month per user
Pricing
FigmaMiro
Editions & Modules
Professional
$144
per year
Organization
$540
per year
Starter
Free
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FigmaMiro
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FigmaMiro
Considered Both Products
Figma
Chose Figma
I think they serve different purposes. For Miro, we usually use that for workshops and brainstormings. There are some templates we can make use of.
For Jamboard, it is quite lightweighted so we use that for quick brainstorming or retro.
Figma is the only option for talking about …
Chose Figma
ChatGPTFigma surpasses Miro by offering a comprehensive design experience, allowing not only collaborative brainstorming but also the creation of realistic wireframes and prototypes. Its design-centric approach enhances visual representation, making Figma a versatile tool that …
Chose Figma
Figma does everything that Miro does but better, especially in the performance department where Miro tends to be laggy in browsers and Figma is smooth and responsive. While Krita is more like a photoshop, Figma has a lot of the features Krita offers and implements them at the …
Chose Figma
Figma excels are prototyping whereas Miro is great for collaborating. Figma could do better with Figjam but the navigation is counter intuitive to people that don't use it often, so leaders often have a hard time moving about and collaborating in Figma.
Figma is also is able to …
Chose Figma
I think Figma is much better than Adobe XD, in that it is trying to create collaborative software that serves full product teams and not just designers. However, I think Figma still has a way to go to replace a tool like Miro, which is much easier for non-creatives to work in.
Chose Figma
We use Miro, but for different reasons. Miro stacks up in its collaboration features and really we use this tool for brainstorming, workshop building, and anything the product designers don't want to do. As a product manager, I tend to use Miro more as it is easier to adopt and …
Chose Figma
Figma's collaboration and speed of new feature development, coupled with their existing feature set when we purchased made them a clear choice. Their prototyping functionality was particularly impressive vs Sketch, but also their system compatibility (even browser) helped to …
Chose Figma
In Figma, multiple team members can collaborate on the same project simultaneously, making real-time teamwork smooth and efficient. I really like its cloud-based nature which ensures that changes are instantly synchronized across devices, allowing teams to iterate rapidly and …
Chose Figma
Figma is a lot cleaner, easier to navigate and organize. Maybe you can't do as much visually but you can move faster in Figma. I'm trying to remember more but honestly I've been using Figma for so long now.
Chose Figma
Figma supports and is supported by other design apps, but it really shines in prototyping for web and app development. It's easy to share with colleagues and collaborate in one space, the open space allows for a ton of iteration, and the organization of layers functions better …
Chose Figma
Figma won over many competitors with it's design-dev collaboration model and it essentially has tools like Zeplin or Folio integrated in - where you had to have one file uploaded somewhere and everyone working on it. You don't need other programs. The component libraries are …
Chose Figma
Figma is far superior in many ways. Figjam far outshines the responsiveness and features of other software we have tried.
Chose Figma
Visily is still developing and it lacks many advanced features. Unlike Figma has better collaboration & real-time feedback updates. Designers have all the tools readily available & visible on the dashboard itself. Prototyping is very advanced on Figma with multiple sharing …
Chose Figma
I've been using Figma for the past 4 years so I'm not on top of the most recent versions of the other tools but we chose Figma as it allowed our distributed team of designers who are not just in different cities but different regions and timezones to collaborate better and stay …
Chose Figma
It's the organization's decision to move from Google Suite to Microsoft, so we changed our design tool to Figma.
Chose Figma
Figma is much more user friendly and collaborative. It works in your browser and contains everything you need really, whereas Sketch requires other tools to run it properly. It is also much easier to import and export things into Figma, which means we can work across lots of …
Chose Figma
Figma is a better layout tool than all of the other products I have used. I believe it’s worse at prototyping than Sketch and axure. Also its lack of a design kit from officially from Apple is a ding on the product and a plus for Sketch in my opinion. XD is awful and not worth …
Chose Figma
Figma stands out for several reasons:

Collaboration in real-time: Figma operates entirely in the cloud, allowing multiple users to collaborate on designs simultaneously. This real-time collaboration is especially useful for remote teams or those working across different …
Chose Figma
Figma is a one stop tool which has all the functionality over using multiple tools
Chose Figma
Adobe XD really feels like a tool stuck in the past when compared to Figma. Online collaboration, autolayout, reponsive options, it's hard to argue for XD.
Chose Figma
Figma is better suited for designers to use to make amazing creations
Chose Figma
Compared to Sketch, Figma is more user friendly and easier to collaborate. The component and library feature is better. Sketch does not have Figjam. Figjam has amazing features like sticky notes, templates, voting, emojis, stickers, etc. The community of Figma is my favourite. …
Chose Figma
Sketch had 2 important cons at that time:
  • No real time collaboration
  • Very annoying way of merging changes - commits
Chose Figma
Not really a direct comparison or apples to apples in my opinion. Figma is solely focused on design creation, collaboration, and asset management whereas the others are collaboration tools but span various departmental verticals. Figma is a niche software that addresses our …
Miro
Chose Miro
Miro is much easier to use for everything. Miro is much more intuitive and easier to learn. The only thing I would use Figma for over Miro is for complex/pixel perfect UX designs and prototyping.
Chose Miro
Miro is very good but as it’s not a full design software it can’t be compared too closely to Figma. Very good for collaboration and presentation of designs rather than the design work itself.
Chose Miro
I use Figma a lot. It is definitely more powerful. And just gives you more control, which I love. But for the use cases that I use Miro for, Miro is probably easier. Typically I'll start in Miro, and then flip to Figma. I've not used Figjam too much. That is probably closer to …
Chose Miro
Mural isn’t in the same ballpark as Miro.
FigJam is rapidly improving. We use Figma for our interface and interaction design, and now for dev handover but our designers do still prefer Miro
Chose Miro
Miro was selected for us by our organization, so I didn't really have a choice. I would say Miro is like all the best components (or nearly the best) of the other applications all wrapped up in one.
Chose Miro
Haven't really used it much at ll, but from what I've seen, and been told, it is a fairly similar product
Chose Miro
Organization supported and was using Miro, which is why I began using it.
Chose Miro
Miro seemed more powerful and provided more functionality at the time of testing.
The learning curve for Miro seemed shallower when compared to fig jam.
Chose Miro
Its a good product for a wider range of user types/users from a range of teams. It does a wide scope of functionalities. From whiteboarding, presentation creation, workshopping, onboarding space, and more!
Chose Miro
Altho Miro does not have key functionality against some of the apps that are on the market, in the end it is an amazing virtual whiteboard with additional capability. The continued enhancements and ongoing surveys that seek user feedback is proof that it is moving towards a …
Chose Miro
Miro is much better. It offers the best of these tools and much more. As a direct comparison, it's significantly better than Mural.

As a tool, it's pretty unique and the powerful integrations put in a league of its own. Miro is my go to tool in this regard.
Chose Miro
In many cases the other tools did a single thing better than Miro but overall Miro better solved all our needs. In some cases, like FigJam the hurdle was licensing. Teams just doesn't have an awesome set of features. MindMap is good for what it is but not so good for other …
Chose Miro
I started with Mural during Covid but quickly switched to Miro due to better usability and design possibilities on Miro. Tools like FigJam were nice to have but I always preferred MIRO over FigJam or any other tool as I got used to it quickly and found everything that I needed.
Chose Miro
Working with Miro is much easier. When I am using Miro, I dont have to thing about where to save documents. I dont need to think twice about sharing with colleagues. All the other tools have their advantages and disadvantages. When working with other tools, you need to think …
Chose Miro
Miro has a user friendly interface, more integration options and offers easy collaboration. The variety of board templates are endless
Chose Miro
Miro is first still in my mind. Miro in my opinion has the potential to become its own operating system where with the help of better integrations can hold everything you need to perform and operate during work and possibly outside work.
Chose Miro
I think Miro is more collaborative and easier to use than other platforms. It is also more user-friendly in my opinion.
Chose Miro
We still have tutors who prefer how they used to do things. The fact that I am able to convince most (not all) of these often stodgy academics to switch to Miro after one demonstration is a testament to how its simple to use interface is truly unique in the market.
Chose Miro
Miro lacks integration with specific tools.
Chose Miro
Everything about Miro is better. Bluescape had limited object tools, always froze, was jittery when you tried to move things around, and overall was disliked by everyone in the company. When one group began using Miro, everyone else wanted to use it too, which ultimately led …
Chose Miro
Mural was already a tool adopted by 3M prior to the Pandemic. However, it had low adoption with many users frustrated with its model, both from a usability and as a business model. It also did not support our design process well.

We selected Miro after an in depth …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
FigmaMiro
Small Businesses
OmniGraffle
OmniGraffle
Score 9.4 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OmniGraffle
OmniGraffle
Score 9.4 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
OmniGraffle
OmniGraffle
Score 9.4 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FigmaMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(114 ratings)
9.0
(4535 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(4 ratings)
9.0
(97 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(6 ratings)
8.0
(71 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(8 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(15 ratings)
6.5
(26 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(3290 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(3630 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(8 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
FigmaMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
Figma
A solo developer or small team that wants to integrate development, feature planning and ui design in a single app can find a lot of value in using Figma, since the FigJam whiteboard and UI editor are in the same app. Business plans and software features can be mapped out on FigJam and then implemented in the UI editor, that way there is reduced context switching and teams can operate smoothly without having to toggle between multiple apps.
Read full review
Miro
Miro's infinite canvas and sticky notes functionality make it ideal for brainstorming ideas, contributing thoughts and organizing them visually in real-time.Software teams use Miro to manage sprints, backlogs, and stand-ups, visualizing tasks and progress. We use it for sprint planning, retrospectives, and kanban boards.Miro is well suited for user journey maps, facilitating collaboration between designers, product managers, and developers.We've also used it for strategy planning and workshops: mapping out strategies, SWOT analysis, and plan projects. It's useful for visualizing goals, actions, and timelines.Also, we use it to organize research findings, synthesize user insights, and map out data visually, helping in the analysis and decision-making process. Less appropriate scenarios for Miro include working with Text Documents; doing High-Fidelity Prototyping and interactive prototypes that require detailed user interactions; and working with large datasets & calculations. We don't use Miro to replace the polished, slide-based presentations created in PowerPoint. Also, we need to be very careful with confidential information.
Read full review
Pros
Figma
  • As a visual designer, I spend 90% of my working time in Figma. So, as a design tool, Figma is mature and feature-rich. It covers all the basic needs and provides extras, such as simple prototyping and the ability to use external plugins.
  • Collaboration: It’s very easy to work together on the same file in Figma. You can easily brainstorm together or use Figma as a shared screen.
  • Smartness of components: Figma provides many adaptability options for components that allow building very flexible and scalable layouts.
Read full review
Miro
  • Exceptional templates help me get started quickly with almost any type of whiteboarding, creating consistency where needed and extreme variety when also needed.
  • Having multiple active users on the same board happens so smoothly. It's easy to get people on the board and updating objects simultaneously without weird conflicts is amazing.
  • The amount of objects & tools Miro provides allows us to create very specific and detailed artifacts.
Read full review
Cons
Figma
  • Access control - it wasn't apparent to me at first that a project was shared with everyone in the company vs just people i choose to share it with. I think the inverse should be the default.
  • Sometimes it struggles to import old sketch files - no clue how to make this better, but its frustrating
Read full review
Miro
  • Probably our instance of Miro, our security reqs: repeated need to sign in. Blerg.
  • I like rectangular stickies - but Miro defaults to square. Let me set my default.
  • Layers - I wish I could more easily have something below my stickies - yes - can do with locking but if you have to change your locked material, it's a pain.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Figma
It's by far the best tool and I feel delighted using it every day.
Read full review
Miro
There is no other tool like Miro for process Mapping in particular. I've tried PowerPoint, Word, and other programs, but when collaborating virtually on how to improve a process, Miro has all of the tools and more to enable successful mapping. The colors, different types of shapes and text books, along with the ability to integrate different documents and other functionality, make it ideal for this purpose. In a virtual world, it's a must-have.
Read full review
Usability
Figma
It's so simple to use! I have no background in UI design but basic designing and I was able to learn this software Figma within 3-5 days. There are tons of tutorials available on Youtube from so many popular YouTubers in the space, you can just go through them and start designing.
Read full review
Miro
It's pretty easy to use. My gripes are with some small idiosyncrasies with selection behavior with objects and editing text. When I move an object, it automatically de-selects it when I am not done with it. I have to click to select again. Text control is challenging and could be improved. It could use a little more styling capability. It's also weird that it behaves differently in a shape then when using the text tool.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Figma
No answers on this topic
Miro
I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
Read full review
Performance
Figma
No answers on this topic
Miro
I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
Read full review
Support Rating
Figma
I haven't used their support lately but in the past, they had a chat that I used often. They often responded in a few hours and were able to give a satisfactory solution. I would imagine it's less personal now but the community has expanded drastically so there are more resources out there to self serve with a bit of Google magic.
Read full review
Miro
The support staff at Miro are fantastic. Whenever I have had an issue, they have been timely and helpful with their response. They are also very knowledgeable and go out of their way to not only help, but offer proactive training sessions on different topics and new functionality so everyone can try it out.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Figma
No answers on this topic
Miro
Not applicable as never had in person training
Read full review
Online Training
Figma
No answers on this topic
Miro
Superb. very well explained videos. Really helps get the knowledge up on the product. The slides are divided into the topics of usage. I have enjoyed following and implementing all of these slides. The videos are well explained and it is easy to follow. There are tutorials that you can take yourself later. It would be nice however if more training modules were added.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Figma
No answers on this topic
Miro
It was and still is a challenge to get our IT folks at 3M to support the tool. Single sign on still not implemented. I now have Miro on my personal computer. I had a few hardware issues, but nothing major.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Figma
Much more intuitive, Adobe XD fails to keep up with the newest market changes thus it did not let us stay on top of the technology. The big plus of Figma is that the majority of our clients worked with it, whereas it was not the case with Adobe XD. You can get similar results working with both, but the process will be different in Figmas favour
Read full review
Miro
I find Miro to be a superior tool, other tools I have used became unresponsive or too slow to be effective in the roles and jobs I needed them to do. I am currently working in a Miro board with over 1000 discrete elements and it loads fast, I can maneuver and work with the material in real time without the board lagging to keep up. When working with a tool like this, it's important the tool itself doesn't become an obstruction to getting the work done. With Miro, I've never had to worry about that
Read full review
Scalability
Figma
No answers on this topic
Miro
Miro is great for scaling. In every department and subdivision across my entire organization, there is someone using it. From Sales to marketing, to manufacturing and operations; and even in legal and finance, there isn't a process or a department that is not using Miro, and if they aren't, they're missing out! Even at the highest to the lowest levels of the organization, it is essential for virtual collaboration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Figma
  • Negative -- the Figma mirror app is quite poorly connected with Figma itself, hence when we were conducting user testing, we got some incorrect data.
  • Positive -- time spent for discussion because we have something visual to base on discussion on
  • Negative -- it's difficult to find files and comments, which is a lost of time
Read full review
Miro
  • Simplicity- it’s simplified our communication
  • It’s taken away the stress of manually documenting research with pen and paper in live design thinking sessions
  • Remote - we can host our diverse teams from all over the world in quick productive meetings without paying for travel
  • Miro has helped me design for over 8 enterprise product teams
Read full review
ScreenShots

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.