TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Carbonite by OpenText vs. CrashPlan vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Backup

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Carbonite by OpenText

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/ACarbonite by OpenText (also replacing the former EVault products acquired from Seagate in 2016) is a cloud backup solution for small business. Designed to recover anything from a single file to an entire system with the click of a button, Carbonite users can protect virtually any type of file.N/A

    CrashPlan

    Score6.8 out of 10
    N/ACrashPlan® provides secure, scalable, and straightforward endpoint data backup, to help organizations recover from any worst-case scenario, whether it is a disaster, simple human error, a stolen laptop, ransomware, or an as-of-yet-undiscovered calamity.

    $8

    per month per user

    OpenText Core Endpoint Backup

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AOpenText Core Endpoint Backup, formerly Carbonite Endpoint, provides an enterprise-grade backup solution for all endpoints, including mobile devices or devices spread across a distributed enterprise network.

    $24

    per month

    Pricing
    Carbonite by OpenTextCrashPlanOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Basic Computer Backup
    $24
    per month
    Advanced Endpoint Protection
    $34
    per month
    Basic Server Backup
    $50
    per month
    Basic Backup
    $55
    per month
    Advanced Server Protection
    $147
    per month
    Advanced Protection
    $199
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Carbonite by OpenTextCrashPlanOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    Free Trial
    YesYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual billing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Carbonite by OpenTextCrashPlanOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    Considered Multiple Products
    OpenText
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    I prefer code42's admin console, it was cleaner, more responsive, and easier to navigate. The backup system was very similar.
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    No cloud backup.
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    We use Symantec Backup Exec which backs up to an external hard drive. We wanted a secondary, offsite backup and chose Carbonite as it was reasonably priced and it suited our business needs at this time.
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    Carbonite felt it was much better for us to be on Server Backup incase our server went down.
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    They don't really compare as we use them in different ways.
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    Carbonite sever backup is easy to set up and configure. Cost per byte is reasonable.
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    Honestly the first use I had of this product was because I had inherited it. My first interaction came from a new client who was utilizing the software, this was a few years ago. Since that first interaction I've become more impressed with the software over the years, and when …
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    We used Symantec many years ago, so I don't know that I can compare the two fairly. Backup Exec was hard to use and we backed up on tapes, rather than in the cloud. I feel much more confident in the backups that we have with Carbonite.
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    N/A - since I've always used Carbonite (in lieu of thumb drive backups).
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    Much easier, I love how easy it is to verify my backups. With some other products, I did not really know how they were doing because it was too time-consuming to verify the backup. With carbonite, I get email reports every day with any issues and with successes! That is going …
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    Netbak is a great product but we also had a secondary issue of having to backup several PC's on site and at remote locations. Carbonite helped with both and gave us one central admin console to be able to check the progress of all our backups, where netbak would have required …
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    [Carbonite has] Better service, better pricing, [and is] easier to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    We need a license for each server to backup to tape and then had to run it all at once here its not tied to key but to the amount of space I use ... more space, more money etc. I also don't have to worry about a license not registering, and I can run the backups all at once or …
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    I use Carbonite to backup our desktops and laptops before adding our server. Adding the server helped save time and money. Carbonite has always been highly rated.
    Incentivized
    Chose Carbonite by OpenText
    Carbonite Server Backup performs exceptionally well versus Barracuda Backup. One of the best features is the cost savings of not having to buy expensive equipment to keep in our office building. Plus, the ease of mind knowing our backup is being handled off site. Though …
    Incentivized
    CrashPlan
    Chose CrashPlan
    For our business model, Carbonite was not as economical. CrashPlan offered unlimited backup and unlimited deleted file retention for similar cost. Additionally, we had better results with support during evaluation with CrashPlan.
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    We compared CrashPlan with other choices and they were either too expensive or didn't have the backup capacity we required at the time. For lack of a better solution, we were very close to signing with Mozy, and this was years ago when CrashPlan was still a new player in the …
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    CrashPlan seems like it is much more geared towards enterprises and organizations than either Carbonite or Mozy. There are many more features that enterprises can use.
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    We tried out both Mozy and Carbonite before choosing Crashplan - it was the simplicity and power of the backup application that led us to pick Crashplan. Backups and restores just made sense and the application was organized in a way that was easy to navigate and understand. …
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    Mostly the price is what drew me to CrashPlan -others I have used are expensive per GB storage and difficult to manage. Carbonite was costing $1000.00 a year for 1 server with 2 TB of data. CrashPlan helps keep down the cost and the client spends much less time paying me to …
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    The main advantage that CrashPlan has on competing services is it's ability to back up network drives and keep your backup archives indefinitely. While Backblaze costs significantly less ($50/year/computer vs. $10/year/computer - or $120/year/computer), it does not have the …
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    For personal, end user backup CrashPlan really is the best option in my opinion. Easy to use, easy to manage, relatively easy to recover.
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    I like Crashplan's centralized nature and flexibility with support for all platforms. Their support has been the best of all other competitors' solutions.
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    Centralized administration, AD integration, super ease to use, super easy to add users, 3-year contract discounts.
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    Crashplan is easier and less expensive than the competition.
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    The deduplication feature and continuous backup puts this application ahead of others. The ability to prevent users from deleting files from backups is another feature that was attractive for our management and legal team. Set and forget is great. No intervention from the …
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    Continuous backup, in house sever, centralized management
    Incentivized
    Chose CrashPlan
    We tried (actually purchased) one of these competitors first and had a terrible restore experience on a laptop used by one of our VPS. We tried CrashPlan and once we did, we bought it immediately.
    Incentivized
    OpenText
    Chose OpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    I think this solution is decent, and works well enough for most businesses. I find their lack of alerts to be very troublesome - finding out you can't restore a file because the back did not run for two days is not a conversation I ever need to have again with the owner of the …
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    Overall, Carbonite is a better product, with a more intuitive interface and easier to use. The price was comparable, but I tried Carbonite again, and was able to install it correctly on my next computer.
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    I use a mix of online backup solutions depending on the client's needs. If a client that I don't manage monthly needs monthly backups, I typically suggest Carbonite for its ease of use.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    11 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    11 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    80%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    4 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Features
    Carbonite by OpenTextCrashPlanOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Carbonite by OpenText and CrashPlan and OpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    Feature
    Carbonite by OpenText
    8.8
    24 Ratings
    3% above category average
    CrashPlan
    8.3
    1 Ratings
    3% below category average
    OpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    5.6
    1 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Universal recovery10.09 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Instant recovery3.311 Ratings9.01 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Recovery verification9.89 Ratings9.01 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Business application protection9.015 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations10.016 Ratings8.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification9.821 Ratings7.01 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud9.423 Ratings8.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression9.013 Ratings00 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Snapshots10.011 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Flexible deployment8.812 Ratings8.01 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Management dashboard8.812 Ratings9.01 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Platform support8.813 Ratings8.01 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Retention options6.014 Ratings9.01 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Encryption9.914 Ratings00 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Enterprise Backup
    Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Carbonite by OpenText and CrashPlan and OpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    Feature
    Carbonite by OpenText
    8.4
    3 Ratings
    1% below category average
    CrashPlan
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    6% below category average
    OpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    6.5
    1 Ratings
    27% below category average
    Continuous data protection8.33 Ratings10.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Replication8.32 Ratings8.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Operational reporting and analytics6.93 Ratings00 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Malware protection9.01 Ratings00 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Multi-location capabilities8.22 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Ransomware Recovery10.02 Ratings6.01 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Carbonite by OpenTextCrashPlanOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    Small Businesses
    Acronis Cyber Protect
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Acronis Cyber Protect
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Acronis Cyber Protect
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    MSP360 Backup
    Score7 out of 10
    Carbonite by OpenText
    Score7.1 out of 10
    Carbonite by OpenText
    Score7.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Druva Security Cloud
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Druva Security Cloud
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Druva Security Cloud
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Carbonite by OpenTextCrashPlanOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (49 ratings)
    6.7
    (84 ratings)
    7.0
    (23 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    5.0
    (8 ratings)
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.8
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    5.0
    (8 ratings)
    9.7
    (6 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    9.7
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Carbonite by OpenTextCrashPlanOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    More than enough for small companies with several on-prem servers. In 2021, it wouldn't be wise to pit all important data to a single backup service. Carbonite Server is solid, but it's not 100% reliable so I'd definitely recommend having multiple backup services either on the cloud in conjunction with other backup services so the user has multiple safety nets in case of disaster and failed granular restorations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CrashPlan
    Individuals (SOHO), families and SMBs, who have a tight budget for offsite critical company data backup are well suited to this product. Especially if you want your data to be hosted locally (Australia in our case). Larger companies, with higher requirements and budgets would be better served elsewhere. Especially when you consider the poor technical support. Although, to be fair, their poor support may just be issues with their Pro/SMB products, as opposed to their enterprise products. However, if that is the case it's a pretty poor show/indicator still.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Carbonite Endpoint 360 is a great solution for any organization with compliance needs. Office 365 defaults to a 30 day backup of all data. Carbonite Endpoint 360 extends this well beyond 30 days and provides an all-inclusive source for retention for data in Office 365. Any small to medium business would greatly benefit from this solution as they can design their entire infrastructure in Office 365 and ensure it's all backed up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Simple administrative web interface - It's easy to provision users, look at data usage stats, disable users, and update policies to control what folders users are allowed to backup, and what options they can access
    • Easy client installation - Installing and updating clients was very simple. The client would notify the user when a new update was approved by the site admins, and they typically went very smoothly.
    • Good performance - Backups went fairly fast, and were generally invisible to the user, other than the icon updating on files to indicate whether the current version of a file was backed up or not.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CrashPlan
    • Code42 is the most affordable backup system offering unlimited storage that I could find. I came from SOS Online Backup, which I ultimately decided to drop after my monthly rate for their unlimited plan increased by 20x.
    • With Code42's unlimited storage option, I don't have to worry about the fact that my backups are significant in space. As a photographer with thousands of images at stake, I need to run large backups often.
    • Code42 runs continuously and silently in the background of my desktop computer. It is truly "set and go", so I don't have to think about it when I'm away. It runs until the designated drive has been fully backed up to my cloud storage. It will then automatically email me once the backup is complete (or, it will email me if it encounters any errors).
    • Customer service is above par. Anytime I need help, a chat agent is available (chat is my communication preference), they are always friendly, and go above and beyond to resolve my needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • It is excellent at automating your backups. You don't need to manually do it, just set it up once and let it run in the background.
    • It's pretty simple to set up and use. It will automatically suggest the best options that work for most people and you can be up and running pretty quickly.
    • It's safe and reliable. We have been using it for a couple of years now and had no major issues.
    • Their phone support is excellent.
    • It's also really easy to maintain your backed up data to reduce redundancy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • While overall file restoration is easy to do, obtaining earlier versions is not as user friendly as it could be. You need to enter a date and click search to bring up the latest versions as of the date entered. That’s fine, but what is missing is the ability to see all versions of an individual file. If I am looking for a past file version I want to be able to view the file history as a subset of that file (in other words I should be able to click a + sign and expand to see past versions of the file). Otherwise I am just guessing which dates the file was changed in the past. Sometimes that’s OK, but Mozy needs to build in this enhanced, but necessary feature.
    • A couple of years ago, for non enterprise users, Mozy made radical storage and pricing changes forcing myself and many users off their system, as the price for the same storage was going up significantly. So be careful when using Mozy as past experience has shown they are willing to make major changes regardless of the negative impact on their users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CrashPlan
    • The CrashPlan program installed on your computer is Java-based vs. a native application. While this makes development for CrashPlan easier, there are a lot of drawbacks to Java programs including more resources usage, less stability, and overall more clunky interface.
    • While this was also in the Pros category - CrashPlan is an extremely powerful and flexible program, which adds a great deal of complexity. Setting up CrashPlan isn't always a simple procedure, and depending on the complexity of your backup set, can take a while to tinker around with the settings to get everything to work properly.
    • The CrashPlan desktop program consists of a Java program front end, as well as a backend service - there are times when the backend service will crash, and the front end Java program will refuse to load. Typically, restarting the service or restarting the computer will resolve the issue, but sometimes more in-depth troubleshooting is required.
    • Perhaps one of the biggest downsides to CrashPlan is its price - at $10/month/computer CrashPlan is more than double the price of some existing backup services such as Backblaze (priced at $50/year/computer). To add salt to the wound, about a year and a half ago, CrashPlan discontinued their consumer options - which were very reasonably priced at $60/year for a single computer or a family plan priced at $150/year for up to 10 computers. When these options were discontinued, the cost of backing up with CrashPlan was effectively doubled for the same feature set.
    • Along with the previous example, CrashPlan had the option to back up to a remote machine on a different network with a free Crashplan account. This option was eliminated when the consumer line of services were discontinued.
    • While the backup service provided by CrashPlan are still first in class, the above two controversial changes have broken some trust between CrashPlan and its clients.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • To be honest not so impressed with the amount of time it has taken to get data backed up to the cloud.
    • I have not had to do a restore at this time so I cannot comment on the restore process.
    • I was not aware at time of procurement that the upload process would take so long since we were not procuring their hardware. Sales rep mad it seem like upload would only take a day or two and we are now starting week 7 hoping to be done by week 8 for 1.5 TBs of data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    Carbonite Server Backup does not integrate or support any reporting; it is not good at it. We required monthly and quarterly reports for audit. If we fail in that we get fined or we have to pay a certain amount of money to customer. It does not support cloud instances and we are using N2WS for the cloud instances. This is an additional burden for customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CrashPlan
    No other product works as well.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    I found their alerting to be very poor. I missed several days of backups without knowledge of this, until I signed into the portal. I would get daily emails reporting backups were in progress or done, but nothing indicating that a backup had been stuck or paused for 3 days. For this reason alone, I did not renew.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    Out of all the vendor we deal with they are one of the best when it comes to customers service. Reliable,you can reach them by telephone easily, Great overall can not say anything to the contrary. Usibility is excellent. I recommend them highly whether you need a simple backup ofr more complex for servers etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CrashPlan
    Overall, it is simple to use, lightweight, and effective.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    I usually find what I need to know by looking in the Carbonite knowledge base online. We haven't had any major problems, usually we just need clarification on a point or more details about a feature so we look it up. We haven't had to call in for help in quite awhile.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CrashPlan
    Friendly and knowledgeable support team available to assist with this product. Code 42 (formerly CrashPlan) offers unlimited storage options for reasonable costs, so you really can't go wrong with this product. They have been a reliable resource for our company, and I would recommend to others looking for an easy setup with unlimited storage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Does what it needs to do quietly and efficiently in the background without interrupting the workflow. It offers instant automated back-ups without troubling the end user. As it is such an automated system, once it is up and running, there is little or no support needed from the service provider. From what I understand the support from Carbonite during the setup and implementation was absolutely fine.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    OpenText
    We had appliance and we just needed to setup the Director Console which was straight forward and easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CrashPlan
    Very easy to follow the install guide.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    Netbak is a great product but we also had a secondary issue of having to backup several PC's on site and at remote locations. Carbonite helped with both and gave us one central admin console to be able to check the progress of all our backups, where netbak would have required us to setup a tunnel or use the internet to move data back to our main office.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CrashPlan
    Unitrends is our primary backup solution here at my place of employment, and I have no complaints. It does on-prem backups to a storage pool and with that, we chose not to also use Unitrends could storage as the cost was pretty high. Crashplan has a low cost and we were familiar with it. We found a great fit for Crashplan at a remote office with a web server, file share server, and a Domain Controller in addition to the Unitrends solution there. I also set up CrashPlan for a nonprofit org, as well as a Health foods store. I felt like I could stand behind the CrashPlan solution with my experience with it, in places like these where every dollar mattered.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    We have also used Mozy Pro and Dropbox. They are all pretty similar in functionality/features of backing up data (not system state or databases as I don't think any of the 3 are well suited for that). To me, it comes down to personal preference and choosing a product that is universal for multiple users, for ease of management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • We have a safety net that we didn't have before.
    • Key players are now backed up through an automated system that was easy to silently install.
    • The resources used impacted our exchange server negatively and slowed email until it was disabled.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CrashPlan
    • Tremendous cost savings as the amount of data you backup doesn't impact cost. One flat rate!
    • Implementation time was minimal and requires little to no maintenance. Since installation, I've not had to correct or fix any issues. It just works.
    • We opted to supplement Code42 with another solution that allowed us to backup data to a local repository due to the amount for data that changes in our firm.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Carbonite Endpoint has demonstrated value in its ability to easily restore seemingly lost files for remote users.
    • While we haven't yet had to exercise it, knowing we have the option of remotely wiping endpoints containing sensitive data has brought confidence to our management team that we can mitigate data breaches through preventable means.
    • The privacy issue around device tracking is costing the company in terms of employee trust and morale and needs to be mitigated with appropriate messaging and/or disabling of this feature.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    CrashPlan Screenshots

    Screenshot of Dashboard – Endpoints Backup, Shows: Active users, assets, completed restores, total data backed up, and users without active assets.Screenshot of Dashboard – OneDrive for Business
This screen tracks backup performance for OneDrive for Business.
Metrics: Active users, active assets, users with completed backups, assets not protected (0%), and total backup size (321.45 MB).
Reports include Data Protection Scorecard, Asset Assignment, and Capacity Savings.Screenshot of Dashboard – Microsoft Exchange
This screen presents Microsoft Exchange backup overview.Screenshot of Dashboard – SharePoint Online
This view shows backup activity for SharePoint Online.