Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Analytics
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Google Analytics is perhaps the best-known web analytics product and, as a free product, it has massive adoption. Although it lacks some enterprise-level features compared to its competitors in the space, the launch of the paid Google Analytics Premium edition seems likely to close the gap.
$0
per month
ibi WebFOCUS
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
The ibi™ WebFOCUS® product is an enterprise business intelligence and analytics solution equipped with data management, visual discovery, predictive analytics, and visualizations. Combining these capabilities and data science in one unified containerized platform, the WebFOCUS® solution can be used to make data-driven decisions across the enterprise and provide reports, dashboards, and customer-facing applications at scale.N/A
Looker
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Looker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems.N/A
Pricing
Google Analyticsibi WebFOCUSLooker
Editions & Modules
Google Analytics 360
150,000
per year
Google Analytics
Free
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Analyticsibi WebFOCUSLooker
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsMust contact sales team for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Analyticsibi WebFOCUSLooker
Considered Multiple Products
Google Analytics
Chose Google Analytics
Wix and other website platforms have a built-in analytic tool, but it is not as sufficient as Google Analytics, so I always use GA as the main source of information about sales. Most of the analytic tools on web platforms can't visualize user flows, which is very important when …
Chose Google Analytics
Ease of use: Google Analytics is known for its user-friendly interface and straightforward setup process, making it accessible for beginners. Adobe Analytics has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise.
Features: Adobe Analytics offers a more comprehensive …
ibi WebFOCUS
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Webfocus handles the side of our business that is involved with our catalogs. Our catalogs is a huge revenue driver for us and this tool has been extremely useful with planning feature catalogs. Tableau is used more for marketing and merchandising purchases since we can filter …
Looker
Chose Looker
I haven't used a very similar software to Looker. However, for the same means, I have extensively used Google Analytics.
While Google Analytics is great for e-commerce, it has some issues for businesses where you need to input conversion from different sources, and that is …
Chose Looker
Looker is a lot less overwhelming and lets you take the data that you have in Google Analytics to make it understandable, focused and specific to the audience that is viewing the content. I haven’t used any other tools, but feel because of the ease of accessibility and cost, …
Chose Looker
Tableau was significantly more expensive than Looker, more detailed, and required more set-up. Overall, Tabluea is great; we just didn't need something that robust. Plus, our client budgets can't afford a multi-year contract. Perhaps once they scale more, we'll need something …
Chose Looker
Tableau provides additional visual functionality and is great for more in-depth visuals or further data exploration, but it is costly and an extremely robust solution for simple data reporting. Looker can't be beat when it comes to integrating with other G-Suite tools. All in …
Chose Looker
Looker Studio is not as robust as Tableau or Microsoft BI. So it does not provide quite as much insight or depth and it has more limitations overall then the other major reporting products. However, it is also free and connects perfectly with other Google products. Plus, all of …
Chose Looker
Technically, Power BI is much more complete and powerful, but it's like an ocean liner. I didn't need all that equipment. In my case, I needed to move more quickly, like on a speedboat, to build a page with several data sources in a single source of truth that could be easily …
Chose Looker
We use both Looker and Tableau. It depends on the specific team. However, there is a clear correlation that we use Tableau more often when there are more data sources, including financial data.
Chose Looker
Looker is an off-the-shelf, free tool for Google business users. Other than the internal cost of time to build, we had no costs to set up what we needed to do. Knowledge sharing internally and using templates greatly reduced this cost, making the overall cost very low.
Chose Looker
The easy which with data and reports can be customized in Looker for adhoch or individual needs is amazing - Very easy to filter and save views.
Chose Looker
Tableau- Not web based which makes it more difficult to use and share templates etc. Seems more dated.
ChartIO - Looker's LookML layer that predefined joins was appealing to us vs a tool like ChartIO which requires more raw SQL comprehension.
Chose Looker
I considered Looker along with RJ Metrics and Domo. The other platforms seemed to be offering much more of a service-focused offering, with fees that would likely scale quite high without certainty. Looker is focused on more of a product-driven approach and would be a good fit …
Features
Google Analyticsibi WebFOCUSLooker
Web Analytics
Comparison of Web Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
8.4
11 Ratings
4% above category average
ibi WebFOCUS
-
Ratings
Looker
-
Ratings
Lead Conversion Tracking8.110 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bounce Rate Measurement8.410 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Device and Browser Reporting9.211 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Pageview Tracking9.011 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Event Tracking8.311 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting in real-time7.910 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Referral Source Tracking8.510 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Dashboards7.910 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
ibi WebFOCUS
7.7
11 Ratings
6% below category average
Looker
7.6
133 Ratings
7% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings7.06 Ratings6.7109 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.011 Ratings8.4132 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.011 Ratings7.6114 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
ibi WebFOCUS
9.3
13 Ratings
15% above category average
Looker
7.1
131 Ratings
12% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.013 Ratings6.7127 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings10.013 Ratings6.8129 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings9.08 Ratings6.155 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings10.012 Ratings8.8130 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
ibi WebFOCUS
8.2
11 Ratings
0% below category average
Looker
8.1
127 Ratings
2% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings10.09 Ratings7.8105 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.09 Ratings8.1112 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings6.010 Ratings7.983 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings10.011 Ratings8.5109 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
ibi WebFOCUS
6.3
10 Ratings
24% below category average
Looker
6.6
127 Ratings
19% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings6.08 Ratings7.7123 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings7.09 Ratings7.5109 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings6.07 Ratings4.66 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
ibi WebFOCUS
9.0
11 Ratings
6% above category average
Looker
7.5
127 Ratings
12% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.011 Ratings7.8119 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings10.011 Ratings7.3104 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings10.011 Ratings7.3121 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings00 Ratings7.459 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
ibi WebFOCUS
5.9
11 Ratings
27% below category average
Looker
5.4
94 Ratings
36% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings9.011 Ratings5.590 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings3.32 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings8.08 Ratings6.084 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
ibi WebFOCUS
8.6
3 Ratings
11% above category average
Looker
-
Ratings
REST API00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Analyticsibi WebFOCUSLooker
Small Businesses
StatCounter
StatCounter
Score 9.0 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.1 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.1 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Analyticsibi WebFOCUSLooker
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(192 ratings)
7.0
(16 ratings)
8.3
(132 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(51 ratings)
8.6
(5 ratings)
9.3
(8 ratings)
Usability
7.4
(19 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
8.8
(12 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(4 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(42 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
8.8
(14 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(2 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(7 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Analyticsibi WebFOCUSLooker
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Google Analytics is particularly well suited for tracking and analyzing customer behavior on a grocery e-commerce platform. It provides a wealth of information about customer behavior, including what products are most popular, what pages are visited the most, and where customers are coming from. This information can help the platform optimize its website for better customer engagement and conversion rates. However, Google Analytics may not be the best tool for more advanced, granular analysis of customer behavior, such as tracking individual customer journeys or understanding customer motivations. In these cases, it may be more appropriate to use additional tools or solutions that provide deeper insights into customer behavior.
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
I would less recommend it because it looks like IBI is receding a bit from the European market. I would not be certain for future support. Knowledge in the market in western Europe is limited Functional wise the application suits almost all situations. I would for sure recommend it purely based on its capabilities
Read full review
Google
When data drives potential for new orders, Looker earns its place in our tech stack. If, on the other hand, we are hoping for pipeline generation, Looker is useful if you are willing to repeatedly go check customer utilizations .... it is not appropriate if you are hoping to automate data analysis for this purpose.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Multiple reports to see website use and behavior
  • Allows you to customize reports with days, weeks, months, and years
  • You can build out a dashboard to easily view stats from multiple websites in one place
  • You can share analytics reports via the dashboard, automatically emailed PDFs or in other formats
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
  • One thing that has always been good at WebFOCUS is how they interact with the customer on items. They take suggestions and implement them. In addition technical support is timely and very detailed.
  • I think they keep up with and lead in implementing new technologies in the BI space. One case of this are the ability for user to create their own easy dashboard using the green plus buttons. Also the ability to link d3 into and have the ability to implement new types of graphs is nice.
  • I have been to a spoke at one of their user conferences and they are worth going to. In addition to all of the great seminars the interaction you get with vendors and other users is key in the growth of your knowledge. I've learned so much for my time at these conferences.
Read full review
Google
  • Show visited pages - sessions, pageviews - which programs are viewed the most.
  • Displays session source/medium views to see where users are coming from.
  • It shows the video titles, URLs, and event counts so we can monitor the performance of our videos.
  • It gives a graphic face to the numbers, such as using bar charts, pie graphs, and other charts to show user trends or which channels are driving engagement.
  • Our clients like to see the top pages visited for a month.
  • I like the drop-and-drag approach, and building charts is a little easier than it was before.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Data sampling is somewhat inaccurate on the free tier - this is addressed in premium but is expensive.
  • Some of the UI is very similar in naming when presenting different data, some in-situ information might be useful.
  • Gotchas around filtering and data validation.
  • Implementation can be tricky, it can take a lot of time and expertise to get a full, accurate picture of your metrics.
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
  • The newest versions of WebFOCUS have an unnecessarily complicated security layout that makes configuration difficult to accomplish without bringing in the vendor for installs.
  • This software tries to cover too many bases allowing you to switch from writing code manually to creating reports using only GUI tools. This sometimes complicates screens and functionality where the two methods don't always work well together. -though its nice to have the choice.
  • The sales force is not as top notch as many software companies
Read full review
Google
  • Documentation is scarce, and very difficult to find when you need it.
  • Pricing is unclear, particularly as you look to scale your reports across the business.
  • Data from other sources is not represented in the system as well as first party Google services.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
We will continue to use Google Analytics for several reasons. It is free, which is a huge selling point. It houses all of our ecommerce stores' data, and though it can't account for refunds or fraud orders, gives us and our clients directional, real time information on individual and group store performance.
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
This software is deeply engrained with my organization and has become a tool that would not easily be replaced without spending more money and resources to get the same results. License cost is comparable to other report writing tools and the capabilities are greater than the competition without having to buy multiple apps to do the same thing.
Read full review
Google
I give it this rating because it deems as effective, I am able to complete majority of my tasks using this app. It is very helpful when analyzing the data provided and shown in the app and it's just overall a great app for Operational use, despite the small hiccups it has (live data).
Read full review
Usability
Google
Google Analytics provides a wealth of data, down to minute levels. That is it's greatest detriment: find the right information when you need it can be a cumbersome task. You are able to create shortcuts, however, so it can mitigate some of this problem. Google is continually refining Analytics, so I do not doubt there will be improvements
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
Best BI tool/product I have used. The others don't compare overall. Some can look fancier, but when you actually use them with large data and data from numerous systems/sources that is where most of the competition falls away. I also don't like downtime. I have basically none for a large user base with WebFocus. Even SAP Crystal Reports went down for 4 days once - 4 days because the admin password got locked out due to a glitch and we had zero reports for 4 days. WebFocus has never had more than a few minutes of downtime. It's like a tank that just keeps rolling. There is no other choice for reliable BI.
Read full review
Google
Looker is relatively easy to use, even as it is set up. The customers for the front-end only have issues with the initial setup for looker ml creations. Other "looks" are relatively easy to set up, depending on the ETL and the data which is coming into Looker on a regular basis.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
We all know Google is at top when it comes to availability. We have never faced any such instances where I can suggest otherwise. All you need is a Google account, a device and internet connection to use this super powerful tool for reporting and visualising your site data, traffic, events, etc. that too in real time.
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
Tracking availability formally for almost two years and we are at 99.8%
Read full review
Google
No objections
Read full review
Performance
Google
This has been a catalyst for improving our site's traffic handling capabilities. We were able to identify exit% from our sites through it and we used recommendations to handle and implement the same in our sites. We have been increasing the usage of Google Analytics in our sites and never had any performance related issues if we used Analytics
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
No answers on this topic
Google
Somehow resources heavy, both on server and client. I recommned at least 50Mbs data rate and high performance desktop comouter to be abke to run comolex tasks and configure larger amount of data. On the other hand, the client does not need to worry when viewing, the performance is usually ok
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
The Google reps respond very quickly. However, sometimes they can overly call you to set up an apportionment. I'm very proficient and sometimes when I talk to reps, they give beginner tutorials and insights that are a waste of time. I wish Google would understand my level of expertise and assign me to a rep (long-term) that doesn't have to walk me through the basics.
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
They have extremely knowledgeable techs that I have worked with over the years. Some have actually become really good friends of mine. I see them often at local user groups and when we show them how we are using their tools to save millions of dollars throughout the company
Read full review
Google
Never had to work with support for issues. Any questions we had, they would respond promptly and clearly. The one-time setup was easy, by reading documentation. If the feature is not supported, they will add a feature request. In this case, LDAP support was requested over OKTA. They are looking into it.
Read full review
Online Training
Google
love the product and training they provide for businesses of all sizes. The following list of links will help you get started with Google Analytics from setup to understanding what data is being presented by Google Analytics.
  1. How to Use Google Analytics for Beginners – Mahalo’s how-to guide for beginners.
  2. A beginner’s guide to Google Analytics – A free eBook walking you through Google Analytics from setup to understanding what data is being presented.
  3. Getting to Know Your Google Analytics Dashboard – The title says it all! This is a brief post with one goal: to introduce you to the Google Analytics dashboard.
  4. Google Analytics for Beginners: How to Make the Most of Your Traffic Reports– This guide doesn’t cover setup, but it does a great job of helping you to better understand the data being presented.
  5. Google Analytics Video Tutorial 1: Setup – A video presentation that walks you through Google Analytics setup.
  6. Google Analytics Video Tutorial 2: Essential Stats – A video presentation that introduces you to some of the most important data being presented in Google Analytics.
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
It's hit and miss, the last class was overcrowded and people were having trouble connecting which took up much of the time. Instructors vary
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Google
I think my biggest take away from the Google Analytics implementation was that there needs to be a clear understanding of what you want to achieve and how you want to achieve it before you start. Originally the analytics were added to track visitors, but as we became more savvy with the product, we began adding more and more functionality, and defining guidelines as we went along. While not detrimental to our success, this lack of an overarching goal resulted in some minor setbacks in implementation and the collection of some messy data that is unusable.
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
Plan ahead on what data will be accessible and the type of security required on the database and if you will want to use security that is built into the software. It is worth consulting with the vendor on what your plan is and how they recommend you proceed in order to get results you are happy with.
Read full review
Google
Very satisfied, easy to implement
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
I have not used Adobe Analytics as much, but I know they offer something called customer journey analytics, which we are evaluating now. I have used Semrush, and I find them much better than Google Analytics. I feel a fairly nontechnical person could learn Semrush in about a month. They also offer features like competitive analysis (on content, keywords, traffic, etc.), which is very useful. If you have to choose one among Semrush and Google Analytics, I would say go for Semrush.
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
Webfocus handles the side of our business that is involved with our catalogs. Our catalogs is a huge revenue driver for us and this tool has been extremely useful with planning feature catalogs. Tableau is used more for marketing and merchandising purchases since we can filter data based on website sales.
Read full review
Google
Looker Studio, you can easily report on data from various sources without programming. Looker Studio is available at no charge for creators and report viewers. Enterprise customers who upgrade to Looker Studio Pro will receive support and expanded administrative features, including team content management. So it's good.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Google
No answers on this topic
IBI (Information Builders)
No answers on this topic
Google
Perfect price to performance
Read full review
Scalability
Google
Google Analytics is currently handling the reporting and tracking of near about 80 sites in our project. And I am not talking about the sites from different projects. They may have way more accounts than that. Never ever felt a performance issue from Google's end while generating or customising reports or tracking custom events or creating custom dimensions
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
No answers on this topic
Google
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Google
  • It has helped us gain understanding of what is going on on our website.
  • It has helped us determine areas that need fixing (i.e. pages with extremely high bounce rates may need to be redone).
  • It has helped us understand our biggest avenues for bringing traffic to the website and business in general.
  • It has helped guide our website redesign.
Read full review
IBI (Information Builders)
  • We are not yet a success story. Though we've been implementing WebFOCUS for over a year, we have very few products in our Production portal. Of course, this is not all the responsibility of Information Builders, but we were ill-advised by our 'training coordinator' in our training of staff and coming up to speed with the tools has been very slow.
  • Once skilled analysts and professional IT staff achieve a grasp of the products, they are able to very quickly create polished and well-received products.
  • The DW/BI project has helped us to establish standards and protocols of communication that will allow us to more quickly meet knowledge transfer requirements
Read full review
Google
  • Looker has a poignant impact on our business's ROI objectives. As an advertising exchange we have specific goals for daily requests and fill, and having premade Looks to monitor this is an integral piece of our operational capability
  • To facilitate an efficient monthly billing cycle in our organization, Looker is essential to track estimated revenue and impression delivery by publisher. Without the Looks we have set up, we would spend considerably more time and effort segmenting revenue by vertical.
  • Looker's unique value proposition is making analytical tools more digestible to people without conventional analytical experience. Other competing tools like Tableau require considerably more training and context to successfully use, and the ability to easily plot different visualizations is one of its greatest selling points.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Looker Screenshots

Screenshot of a Looker dashboard with a geo chart.