From GoTo (formerly LogMeIn), GoToMeeting is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software that enables users to connect via the internet. It hosts a suite of online meeting tools, including real-time screen sharing and integrated audio.
$12
per month
Microsoft 365
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft 365 (formerly Office 365) is a Microsoft Cloud subscription service that includes Microsoft Office products (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote, Outlook, Publisher, and Access). The software can be installed across multiple devices and ensures that users always have the most up-to-date version of the included Office applications.
$5
Per User Per Month
Pricing
GoTo Meeting
Microsoft 365
Editions & Modules
Professional
$12.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
Business
$16.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 250 Participants [billed annually]
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
3,000 Participants
Business Basic
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Individual
$5.84
*Per Month
Business - Apps
$8.25
Per User Per Month
Enterprise - F3
$10.00
Per User Per Month
Business Standard
$12.50
Per User Per Month
Business Premium
$20.00
Per User Per Month
Enterprise - E3
$32.00
Per User Per Month
Enterprise - E5
$57.00
Per User Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GoTo Meeting
Microsoft 365
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Pricing available by monthly or annual subscription, with discounts for annual commitments.
*When billed annually.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GoTo Meeting
Microsoft 365
Considered Both Products
GoTo Meeting
Verified User
Professional
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is very similar to DialPad. GoTo Meeting and Dialpad are both cloud-based communication but are very different from one another. Theres less guess work in how to use GoTo Meeting, whereas the Dialpad app took a while getting used to. While I have enjoyed both, …
GoTo Meeting is cheaper but in general, both systems are comparable. Webex is also intuitive and offers good audio and video quality as well as basic online meeting features like screen sharing, whiteboard etc. We used GoTo Meeting with some external companies who find Webex …
GoTo Meeting is substantially better. Much more reliable and easier for participants to join. We have never had a "zoombomb" with GoTo Meeting but we did with Zoom working with a prospective investor. It was hard to come back from what the client saw! Zoom is not an option for …
GoTo is right up there with the more popular Zoom. There is really not a lot of difference between these two platforms. Zoom can get bogged down with needing multiple meetings at the same time with our company so we'll opt for GoTo as a back-up. The Microsoft Teams version was …
Greater audience. No lag. It doesn't shutdown sound when the resources are lost. Easy to learn for the professionals. Very good product to use. Sound quality is good. You can effectively present as if you were in a conference room. Setup is easy and the functions are great.It …
We use Zoom for the entire organization because it’s far more cost effective. But, my role as training manager requires my use of GTM to allow all the required features that make my training sessions the most productive. I would always prefer to use GTM over Zoom because the …
GoTo Assist is by far the easiest solution to use in regards to simplicity and functionality, especially for the end user receiving support. But we have recently consolidated all 5 of our GoTo products (Meeting, Connect, Assist, Resolve and Webinar) into two just offerings now: …
Interface was more seamless, connecting unrelated parties was done with more ease, and features such as slide shows, Q&A, and polls integrated into meetings in a more seamless manner. Aesthetically it is more pleasing, and accessing different features such as screen sharing and …
GoTo Meeting is a superior product to Teams. Teams, however, is included at no additional charge with our enterprise license with Microsoft. Because Teams does 90% of what GoTo Meeting does, the ROI isn't there for GoTo Meeting.
Compared to Zoom, GoTo Meeting is the far superior …
It is excellent. It has also introduced a recording option. Very user-friendly. Google Meet is very easy to use and doesn't require any special setup. All you need is a Google account, and you can start a meeting with just a few clicks. With Google Meet, you can share your …
GoTo Meeting is more affordable than Zoom and seems more reliable and easy to use, especially for novices. Zoom has become very widespread, and our employer has pushed for us to use it more, but many of us continue to use GoTo Meeting due to the easy interface and familiarity.
Microsoft Teams were too clunky when we tried a demo of it. It was not as user-friendly as the GoTo platform, and the video and audio quality did not seem as updated as we would have liked in selecting a product to use.
I personally feel GoTo Meeting stacks up well against zoom and it has been my go to software of choice for demos, product reviews, problem-solving as well as screen capturing for additional investigation into a problem
GoTo Meeting ended up costing less than a comparable Zoom enterprise license, though it's still an additional cost over Microsoft Teams, which we are technically already paying for as part of our O365 subscription. Functionality is largely the same as Zoom, though end-users who …
Microsoft Teams has some extra features, like extended chat with file sharing and emoticons/gifs + the option to blur out your background. Zoom is similar to GoToMeeting, but with a slicker design. I would recommend considering both options when you compare this to GoToMeeting. …
GoToMeeting is much easier to use than Skype for Business and offers a lot more functionality. GoToMeeting was selected for my department because of how highly another department thought of it. A third department still uses Adobe Connect, but I think the goal would be to have …
I think GoToMeeting is a great way to run a meeting through a shared presentation that everyone can follow along with. The other platforms I have used have not had this functionality. The ability to gather audience responses in a variety of ways is also incredibly helpful and …
I provide regular training as a big portion of my job. There is weekly training with an infinite number of users in attendance on any given date—GoTo Meeting is not the best option for this because I would have to mute users as they join the meeting. However, I also provide frequent training sessions to a small number of users that feature more individualized content, and having them able to mute/unmute at will is a better fit for a smaller group with in-depth materials.
Microsoft 365 would be well suited for medium to large enterprises. This is where there are several hundreds or thousands of people. Since most everyone has used one of the applications the learning curve would be reduced. Another reason would be the ability to implement security measures to prevent access to sensitive data. This could justify the cost of an Enterprise license.
We used other software like goto meetings but found it best because of its user friendly interface and easy interfacing. It helped us in COVID and now we can say we are depending on it and love it. We recommend it to our friends company and they are also using it. It is very affordable and easy to integrate with system
So far the Microsoft 365 platform provides features and tools that can cater to 100% of present organizations needs considering both technical and business necessities, however most features are not been effectively utilised at present. The current featureset is able to cover for most of the future needs of the business and technical functions.
The simplicity of GoToMeetings desktop, mobile, and web-based applications make it a very robust and user-friendly meeting solution. At times, it may be more complex than needed, but it is nice to have so many features that can be used if needed. Once installed, it is very easy to use and navigate.
Microsoft 365 is the gold standard for performing project tasks in a professional environment, enabling the quick transfer and exchange of files and ideas for team members who work locally and remotely. Its suite of tools is familiar and has evolved to being cloud based, allowing for files to be updated in real time from near and far.
To-date Microsoft 365 platform has offered an amazing uptime and availability percentage per year compared to all other products which provide the stability and overall business resilience of their ecosystem which is a great relief for information technology service entitites which heavy rely on Microsoft offerings as a whole to redeliver their own custom products
The Microsoft 365 tools expects and demands a substantial amount of system resources to operate at optimal level and even more when integrated with other applications which is a downside, however given that external supporting tech factors such as fibre/broadband speed bandwidth, high speed RAM and ample storage resources are allocated the tools work error free providing robust communication
When we have issues, they seem to respond quickly and do everything they can to help us. They have even tried to find other ways we could get more use out of their product, or improve the way we are currently using it. Overall, their support has been fairly good for us.
Over the past 8 years of using Microsoft 365, I have noticed that they change vendors often. This always leads to a poor experience in the beginning, then levels out after some time for the company to get things worked out. As a customer, it is really frustrating because I don't have time when something isn't working to have them "look into my issue" and get back with me. They have even closed a ticket I specifically told them to keep open. Your applications are only as good as the support.
The resellers involved with selling Microsoft products are reluctant to provide in person specialist trainings to consumers due to the fact of costs of economies of scale and is not provided free of charge most of the time. In Person trainings needs to be agreed to at the initiation of projects and implementations for better ROI.
The standard training offered with 3rd part resellers are fairly standard and covers the basic workability however the trainings needs to be specifically customised according to unique requirements of the organizations. for example an MSP would need to master specific communications verticals within Microsoft 365 whereas and online store using Microsoft 365 would needs to master a different set of tools within the suite to get the best ROI post implementation.
The Microsoft support partners are more than capable of handling implementations and dealing with unprecedented errors during the implementations. Not part of the implementation though the setup was done with minimum misconfigurations which is evident with present live setup which works fine without any bugs and gaps at present context.
Many times, it seems like GoTo Meeting requires less bandwidth to run. We noticed with a few test machines that if you have over twenty video streams, this product could handle the load better than if we used Microsoft Teams and had many video streams.
Typically I prefer working with companies with Microsoft 365 as their main tool because they're usually a fast growing company with a global presence. I like using it for work because it's easy to collaborate, share, review, comment, reply in any of the tools. The mobile app for Outlook and Teams are lifesavers when we're constantly traveling and you can join meetings on the mobile Teams to never miss a beat.
Microsoft pricing is not very expensive and yet not very cheap as well, and it hovers in between the baseline. The charges are mostly based on the tier level partners who charge based on their individual reputation in the market. Power negotiation will lead to cost effective and attractive pricing
Multiple tools within the same platform have been deployed successfully within different functional technical and non technical teams such as Devops, SOC, NOC, Shared services, Managed services, Global Information technology, Cloud operations, Finance, Administration, human resources and all these teams collaborate while maintaining central uniformity in terms of global standards who are dispersed in different geographical locations with ease
Have not directly obtained professional services from Microsoft but rather obtained specialized services such as implementations and configurations, setting up and integration support with Microsoft authorized suppliers, 3rd parties, and resellers, which has been a pleasant experience. Again the level of delivery quality on professional services is based on the level of hands on exposure of the 3rd party
Any collaboration app these days are now a great addition for those organizations which have more than one office and they need to collaborate with each other.
GoTo Meeting can contribute to cost savings by reducing the need for extensive travel, accommodation, and related expenses associated with in-person meetings especially in case like us as we have multiple branches.
We have a lot of nonprofit users, so they have a good ROI.
I like the constant updates without having to purchase the software repeatedly.
I used to purchase each Office (insert year here) often, so the software was up to date and had the newest options and connectors. I think my return on investment would have been much better if Microsoft had updated those versions to keep them current; after all, we did pay for them.
Microsoft 365's offering a monthly fee or a discount for a year helps, and you can look at it as a free backup if you have everything set to back up to One Drive. (Cloud-based document filing you can access anywhere ( with an internet connection)—you Can't beat that!)