Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SharePoint
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's SharePoint is an Intranet solution that enables users to share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and collaborate across the organization.
$5
Per User Per Month
Miro
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Miro is an online collaborative whiteboard for cross-functional teams, boasting over 20 million product managers, project managers, Agile coaches, developers, and other team members around the world as users of Miro to collaborate, brainstorm, and visualize ideas.
$12
per month per user
Pricing
Microsoft SharePointMiro
Editions & Modules
Plan 1
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Plan 2
$10.00
Per User Per Month
Office 365 E3
$20.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SharePointMiro
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsCONSULTANT: For consultants and agencies working with client teams. $12 per user per month (billed annually) BUSINESS: For teams requiring SSO and options for external collaborators. $16 per user per month (billed annually) ENTERPRISE: Custom pricing. Proposal upon request. For companies that need advanced features and security. Education (Classroom): Miro helps you to engage with your students wherever they are, guide discussions, design a research project, illustrate key concepts, leave feedback, and facilitate group work easily. Free forever up to 100 users Education (Student): Miro makes distance learning and working with classmates or colleagues easy and fun. If you're a student, an educator or a school, you can apply for a Miro account. Free for 2 years & up to 10 users Non-Profit: Nonprofit organizations get a 30% discount on paid Miro plans (per user per month) to support the important work they're doing. 30% Discount Start-Ups: Miro is aiming at enabling startups to work effectively together, from brainstorming with digital sticky notes to planning and visualizing ideas to bring your business to life $8 per user per month & a $1,000 credit
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft SharePointMiro
Considered Both Products
SharePoint

No answer on this topic

Miro
Chose Miro
Miro offers a very unique feature set and user experience when compared to simply sharing a Google or SharePoint Doc. It doesn't "lock you in" to simply writing lines on a page, but allows for 3-dimensional editing -- much more akin to butchers' paper in real life. From this, …
Chose Miro
We tried to use both Kanban Tool and Trello a while ago, but they never really caught on. Miro is way more flexible and user friendly. We still use SharePoint for many things, but it is not useful for the same jobs as Miro. While Miro allows for absolute real-time interactivity …
Chose Miro
Miro has more capabilities. FigJam is sometimes easier to integrate bc our team uses Figma a lot. But Miro is better when expanding out to people outside our department.
Chose Miro
I've used InVision in a brainstorming session with an external company; Miro is easier to grasp as it is more functional. I much prefer using Miro than I did InVision.
Chose Miro
Miro has a Much better functionality set and it’s user experience is so much better too.
Chose Miro
I have only used MURAL 2-3x and found it a bit clunky but overall similar. It has been 2-3 years since that experience. I was not interested in looking into MURAL more.

I have used FigJam until recently when company policy removed access. FigJam is great for design …
Chose Miro
It has very similar features to the others mentioned; a lot of the basic functionality of using objects, text, and sticky notes. It seems to have the same learning curve as a result. However, we have now switched over to Figma for design and it would be nice to have more …
Chose Miro
The interface really simulates physical boards which makes it intuitive and there is no need for endless training on how to use the tool.
It supports many differnet formats, can be exported in differnet formats and can be integrated with many different apps (including Microsoft …
Chose Miro
Much better than Microsoft Whiteboard in nearly everyway.
Chose Miro
I'm not sure I selected the correct product, but we did use another type of just Whiteboard in the past with another team that I was on and it was OK. But unlike Miro, everything had to be created from scratch. I really love how Miro had so many pre-made templates to choose …
Chose Miro
MURAL was at one time the choice tool for virtual collaboration for my company, but at some point in 2019 there was a decision to move away from it and an intent to move to Miro. That never really transpired at an enterprise level, but I was so impressed by the possibilities …
Chose Miro
I wasn't part of selecting Miro over MURAL, but as a user I prefer Miro for the ease of use, templates, rich feature set, and far greater adoption.
Chose Miro
Miro was much easier to design within that Luma workplace. I also found it much easier to onboard new users to Miro than the Luma canvas.

The LUMA workplace had more training modules to help me understand which design thinking. technique could be used on their white board.
Chose Miro
Miro's feature set is among the best and gives numerous ways of working with it. It is extremely effective in building teams that are engaged and work productively.
Chose Miro
Miro offers a more complete feature set and is easier to use than most, if not all, of its competitors.
Chose Miro
I found Miro WAY easier to learn and use as compared to Figma. Also way more inviting as well.
Chose Miro
I have not used other products like Miro. This is my first time using a platform of this kind that has allowed me to edit a live document that is not an Excel file or Word document. Miro was introduced as a platform that Adidas pays for, so I was encouraged to use it as a …
Chose Miro
Figma has a better way of displaying comments based on a user's initials and creating high-resolution images. I also enjoy the presentation mode in Figma a little better than in Miro. Otherwise, these two applications have a lot of similarities in terms of capabilities. Miro is …
Chose Miro
I am more of an Engineer Role as opposed to Project Management. I am not a fan of Jira or any of the Framework that complements it. I just appreciate a good whiteboard.
Chose Miro
Way fewer features on Jamboard--it felt really restrictive and akin to using a slide deck. Seemed comparable at first but really no competition.
Chose Miro
Miro is modern and has many features which are still not available in other tools. It's cross-platform and -organization which makes it unique.
Chose Miro
Feature parity and not sure how to describe the differentiators if I'm honest. My previous company created a proprietary solution similar to Miro but it lacked the robustness, templates, etc. that Miro has so I leaned toward using both Miro and MURAL as needed. It would be …
Chose Miro
Miro is definitely more interactive, and easy to use when compared to Jamboard. Personally, I felt Jamboard lacked a lot of features when trying to work on the tool, whereas Miro with no strict boundary or text limitations felt much easier and convenient. Would definitely …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Microsoft SharePointMiro
Small Businesses
Concrete CMS
Concrete CMS
Score 9.2 out of 10
Canva
Canva
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.3 out of 10
Canva
Canva
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.3 out of 10
Lucidspark
Lucidspark
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft SharePointMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(190 ratings)
8.9
(3786 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.8
(21 ratings)
8.9
(70 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(17 ratings)
8.0
(37 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(17 ratings)
8.2
(13 ratings)
In-Person Training
4.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.4
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.0
(8 ratings)
8.5
(3035 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
2.7
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(6142 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft SharePointMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
MS Sharepoint is specifically useful when you have to collaborate with multiple teams. All teams know what exactly is happening and if they need help they can get it without asking you to share the link every time. This really [transfers] the burden from my shoulders to the participants. As participants can access all resources on demand. For a small team[,] it might feel [like] firing a cannon to kill a mosquito. They can avoid Sharepoint and use [a] planner. If you are the one like me who was excited to see different templates, you will be sad to see there are not many and most of them [look the same].
Read full review
Miro
It is very well suited to both small-team and large-team content creation and collaboration. Recent versions are especially good for instruction and training scenarios. Miro is able to do some similar things that presentation software can do but is limited. It is less well-suited for professional presentations that may require a higher fidelity of object placement, and sizing.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Microsoft SharePoint integrates well with Office 365. So long as the content is organized and users know what they are looking for, it can store a wealth of information.
  • It's simple for administrators to add and remove users. It is possible to restrict access to specific pages of a website to particular individuals or groups.
  • As long as the document structure is simple and keeps track of authors and last edited dates, it is simple to store documents in Microsoft's simple document structure.
Read full review
Miro
  • The catalog of pre-built templates and content examples is hugely helpful as a time saver and to inspire layout creativity
  • Meeting facilitation tools such as timers, voting, and seeing everyone's cursor on the board add a level of engagement that makes remote meetings feel more "present"
  • Input controls are smooth, intuitive, and include a lot of QoL features like grid snapping, alignment tools, and shape/flow copy tools that make usage feel like magic once you are used to it!
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It does take some work to get your setup to be as graphical as modern design tends to be.
  • Overlapping calendars are great but they do take some time investment to create.
  • Depending on how many project or teams you work with it can get a little overwhelming to have so many different groupings.
Read full review
Miro
  • Privacy mode to allow participate to create cards that are hidden by facilitator.
  • Polls or voting that is simplified.
  • Allow the facilitator to separate background/structure items (that cannot be moved) from other items that everyone can interact with (that can move), thus preventing error movements in boards.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
It's integral to our business. It's already included with most of the Office 365 licensing we buy, so the cost is effectively zero. It stores our files, it is the foundation for custom applications, and Microsoft only continues to enhance its functionality and its connections to other Microsoft tools. SharePoint just keeps getting better and better.
Read full review
Miro
Miro is very good but still too basic. It would be great to have more precision and some advanced tools. More control over the text size and objects alignment is a need for our design team. Also, the experience on the tablets is not so good. Many dead clicks and problems while trying to select objects and tools.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No usability issues reported. Individual teams also have allocated areas which replace legacy shared drives on local LANs. Access to Sharepoint resources is fully integrated with corporate Active Directory with additional two-factor authentication required for administrative users. Users have access to Microsoft Services Hub which allows you to create, manage, and track support requests while staying current on Microsoft technologies with access to select self-paced learning paths
Read full review
Miro
It's pretty easy to use. My gripes are with some small idiosyncrasies with selection behavior with objects and editing text. When I move an object, it automatically de-selects it when I am not done with it. I have to click to select again. Text control is challenging and could be improved. It could use a little more styling capability. It's also weird that it behaves differently in a shape then when using the text tool.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Miro
I have never had a problem with the availability
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Miro
Most of the time pages load quickly but occasionally it does take time to point you to the area that you initially worked on.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
Support for SharePoint is quite good. Microsoft provides good support. Microsoft offers
  • Quick turnaround time for issues
  • A range of support services
  • Access to a network of resources
  • Escalation of issues
  • Ongoing development and commitment to produce enhancement
The majority of support is required for initial installation. Once complete and the system is operating we have had very few support issues.
Read full review
Miro
I have personally not required support when something was broken but used the training slides provided to get more knowledge of the tool
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
The face to face training I received was on SharePoint Administration. It was rushed as there was a lot of information to cover and the application of the labs weren't that great either. I like to be able to relate what I am learning to what I am currently doing.
Read full review
Miro
Not applicable as never had in person training
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
I like to learn at my own pace and online training allows for that. Additionally, you can skip through pieces of content that you already know or are already comfortable with. Microsoft actually offers great videos on their website for basic fundamental SharePoint Training. I have used these training videos in some of my own training sessions with end users.
Read full review
Miro
Superb. very well explained videos. Really helps get the knowledge up on the product. The slides are divided into the topics of usage. I have enjoyed following and implementing all of these slides. The videos are well explained and it is easy to follow. There are tutorials that you can take yourself later. It would be nice however if more training modules were added.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Planning to the last detail would be advised. SharePoint is a very large application that takes a lot of finesse to get operational
Read full review
Miro
We learned as we went when we first started with Miro. Most of the controls and functions were easy to understand right away. Some of the functions were less intuitive but we figured them out. I appreciate that Miro offers virtual walkthroughs of its functionality to help get new users up to speed
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
The reasons for selecting MS SharePoint are: SharePoint provides ease of use and web design assistance and support SharePoint helps you schedule your content for publishing. enables users to share documents with external parties and offers a better internal structure of the content and better indexing and searching capabilities.
Read full review
Miro
Against draw.io Miro is next generation tool, but we are still using draw.io because of its simplicity for drawing AWS diagrams and exporting them, and it is free.
There is also a competitor not mentioned on the list, excalidraw. It outperforms miro when it comes to drawing mind maps and simple stuff.
I think, when miro shines is the whiteboard collaboration.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Miro
The product is being used across the company and still no issues with the same.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Increased collaboration - MS Sharepoint has increased knowledge share and collaboration between departments. This saves time and energy because of its efficient and effective communication
  • Increased document security - MS Sharepoint has increased our document security so we're safer knowing that our documents are security and access controlled appropriately. We are less prone to get in trouble by our customers due to the security provided by MS Sharepoint
  • Negative Impact Compared to other software - Not sure if the MS Sharepoint's main functionalities could've been met with other tools we currently have
Read full review
Miro
  • Miro makes it super easy to collaborate in a hybrid working environment.
  • Allows teams to work together on different projects, interactive workshops easily.
  • Saves time and cost. By allowing us to ideate engage and hold meetings in virtual room which enhances productivity and efficiency of all our employees.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Brainstorm together and visualize ideas at the speed of inspiration.Screenshot of From ideation to prototype, Miro supports the end-to-end design thinking process in one infinite space.Screenshot of Run online project planning sessions to keep teams moving in the same direction.Screenshot of Supports agile processes with collaborative retrospectives, sprint planning, and huddle boards.Screenshot of Visual mapping and diagramming to explain complex processes and systems.Screenshot of Can be used to help team workshops smooth, save time, and find patterns and insights more easily.