TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Teams

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.

    $4.80

    per month per user

    Nintex

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/ANintex offers a platform that helps companies discover, automate, and optimize business processes.

    $480

    Minimum 1,000 users per user

    Pricing
    Microsoft TeamsNintex
    Editions & Modules
    Microsoft Teams Essentials
    $4.80
    per month per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month (paid yearly) per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Basic
    $7.20
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Standard
    $15
    per month per user
    Enterprise - Process Platform
    $480
    Minimum 1,000 users per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft TeamsNintex
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft TeamsNintex
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    I don’t prefer Microsoft Teams, compared to its competitors. I am sure part of it is simply that I have less experience with it as a platform. Typically during a meeting, people need to multitask at some point, and Microsoft Teams is the least intuitive of how to …
    Incentivized
    Nintex
    Chose Nintex
    We like having a single source of truth to access current maps and ideally we would be able to better search for similar processes across the various campuses and universities to find ways for improving processes that are similar or address issue in new ways.
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    I previously had used SharePoint and this was at my last employer. At my current job we use Nintex and have since I joined the company. I have found Nintex much more user friendly than SharePoint and that it crashes less. I also think it has a better technology interface.
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    Nintex Process Platform was pretty comparable to these options. The major things that stood out for Nintex Process Platform, which ultimately made us select it, was the ease of use for the end users and the ability to report on the process. SharePoint workflow was the solution …
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    Nintex process platform is so easy for non-IT users to use for themselves and automate their day to day workflows, which is a huge success for the overall organization. Browser-based process modeling and WYSIWYG form builder is a great option for non-IT users without steep …
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    Last year October some actions in the workflows were not possible in Power Automate.
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    These used to be great tools until the new pricing model made them really painful and expensive to use. Nintex pricing is more reliable and we can plan better.

    Also PowerApps/Flow don't seem as intuitive to learn, they need some 'development' background.
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    I have found Nintex much easier to use and cost-effective in comparison to K2.

    At this time, Nintex is also more full-featured and powerful than Flow and PowerApps (now PowerAutomate) from Microsoft.
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    Nintex is much more powerful for complex workflows. Flow is great for simple and quick personal level (or maybe even team level) scenarios. For more complex workflows, that require extra care and handling or approval, as well as adherence to a more stringent lifecycle such as …
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    We use Flow for simple tasks like taking information from an MS Form and writing to an SP list. We also use MS forms for free quick data collection including externals. When processes are more difficult or forms need to have rules then we use Nintex as it is far more powerful. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    The integration of Nintex with SharePoint was seamless and the affordable cost allowed us to deploy the service as a shared platform without the need for complex charge back models to each team. Developing in ServiceNow is significantly more complex and more expensive since it …
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    Unfortunately I have not used other products that are similar to Nintex Process Platforms so it's impossible for me to compare it to any competitors. Not necessarily because of a lack of experience, but because Nintex has thus far continued to not only meet our current needs, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Nintex
    We got Nintex before microsoft flow was around and K2 at the time was more expensive and didn't have the mobile apps option. SharePoint is licensed per SharePoint Webfront end WFE server and we only had one WFE server.

    microsoft flow and power apps requires additional conenctor …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    90%
    Would buy again
    255 Answers
    83%
    Would buy again
    94 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    225 Answers
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    85 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    255 Answers
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    107 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    144 Answers
    90%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    69 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    174 Answers
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    78 Answers
    Features
    Microsoft TeamsNintex
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Microsoft Teams and Nintex
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    8.2
    241 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Nintex
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management8.1179 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts8.196 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling8.3208 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation8.4126 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access8.2229 Ratings00 Ratings
    Search7.6212 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools8.4143 Ratings00 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Microsoft Teams and Nintex
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    8.0
    251 Ratings
    0% above category average
    Nintex
    -
    Ratings
    Chat9.0250 Ratings00 Ratings
    Notifications8.4249 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discussions8.7235 Ratings00 Ratings
    Surveys8.2146 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase8.6157 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with GoToMeeting6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.743 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Outlook9.1155 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Microsoft Teams and Nintex
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    8.2
    236 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Nintex
    -
    Ratings
    Versioning8.6168 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video files8.4202 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audio files8.8200 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document collaboration8.9216 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control8.6198 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced security features8.5158 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Google Drive5.353 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device sync8.6172 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Teams and Nintex
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Nintex
    6.6
    190 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings6.6176 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings6.8179 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings6.4143 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of Microsoft Teams and Nintex
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Nintex
    7.0
    258 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Process designer00 Ratings7.6230 Ratings
    Process simulation00 Ratings5.021 Ratings
    Business rules engine00 Ratings7.7198 Ratings
    SOA support00 Ratings7.0174 Ratings
    Process player00 Ratings7.357 Ratings
    Support for modeling languages00 Ratings6.014 Ratings
    Form builder00 Ratings8.0228 Ratings
    Model execution00 Ratings7.7181 Ratings
    Collaboration
    Comparison of Collaboration features of Microsoft Teams and Nintex
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Nintex
    9.0
    18 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Social collaboration tools00 Ratings9.018 Ratings
    Content Management Capabilties
    Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Microsoft Teams and Nintex
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Nintex
    10.0
    23 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Content management00 Ratings10.023 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft TeamsNintex
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Process Street
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    TIBCO® BPM Enterprise
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft TeamsNintex
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.6
    (329 ratings)
    7.4
    (302 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    2.7
    (34 ratings)
    Usability
    8.7
    (114 ratings)
    7.6
    (23 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.9
    (7 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.7
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (114 ratings)
    8.7
    (24 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (12 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (3 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    6.3
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.8
    (3 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.8
    (3 ratings)
    Professional Services
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.7
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.7
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft TeamsNintex
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
    Read full review
    Nintex
    We use Nintex to automate fundraising outreach at scale. It helps us send personalized emails to a large contact list, and we’d also like to automate follow-ups when there’s no reply.
    If you need highly customized solutions or clean, fully controllable code, I wouldn’t recommend Nintex. It has many features, but it’s not the same as building your own system from scratch. That said, it can save a lot of time for standard automation workflows.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • All in one communication for Teams.
    • High quality and reliable both audio and video meetings.
    • Well organized and clear instant chat.
    • Excellent security features.
    • Beautiful integration with 3rd party tools and systems.
    • Perfect compatibility with windows ,android and iOS.
    • Allow meetings recordings for later us or sharing with teams that missed the live.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    • Integrations with other services using various secure authentication methods, along with the seamless integration with SharePoint, are the icing on the cake. This makes it superior to other BPM tools available in the market.
    • Flexibility in application development - The diverse configurable properties offer multiple ways to utilise the controls and events, affording the flexibility to expand your scope and enabling the creation and use of processes in a myriad of ways.
    • The streamlined and efficient deployment process significantly accelerates release management, allowing for faster and smoother implementation of updates and new features.
    • The user interface of the pages offers a more refined and appealing look and feel compared to most other BPM tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
    • The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
    • The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    • If you are creating a process with parallel subprocesses, there's no way to see, in a single view in Nintex, all the steps for the subprocesses. You have to view each sub-process in its own view, so it's hard to see what's going on at a high level.
    • There isn't an easy way to filter the processes by another user (not yourself) in Nintex. There is a report that shows processes and objects by user, but that's not as convenient. This is something that I've seen in other tools (OpenPages by IBM) so I am surprised that it is missing.
    • Nintex doesn't really have a way to capture iterative processes (which we have a lot of). It's designed for linear processes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    We are currently investigating which collaboration platform best suits our needs. Chances are that we move to SharePoint Online and then we're going to also consider the microsoft power platform (power automate and power apps) to develop forms and workflows. Aspecially the pricing model for the cloud is currently a blocking factor to go for the Nintex solution in the Cloud.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    Based on the on-prem experience with this tool, I believe that they have a lot of potential to help the online version catch up to where the on-prem left off. Nintex developed their online version and it is not as fully formed or capable compared to the on-prem version, and the licensing model scales back what we would have liked to be an expansion or at least continuous improvement of existing flows. It is also not near as user friendly specifically to non-developers and has an uncanny similarity to Microsoft Flow in the online instance. Consistent with my reviews of the tool - I believe they have some good approaches to design thinking that, if translated well from on-prem to online, could make this a clear winner again.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    Rare, but outages do happen
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    The Nintex Process Platform has never crashed or had any availability issues during my usage. However there was an issue that was of my own making that caused a slowdown of the system. I had set up a process to run once a day and check for employees on a list that had certain parameters selected, and for some reason that I had to troubleshoot, the process instead ran constantly, which filled the cache quickly. I ended up having to dismantle that process so the system didn't crash.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Microsoft
    Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    Unlike any other process automation product out there. Not only is it a low-code, easy to use tool for building processes in environments like SharePoint or Salesforce, they have really started to expand their tool-set by offering tools to manage other things like process mapping, RPA, mobile,etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    The support team works as fast as they can and they are usually fast to solver the issues. Sometimes they need more time to solve one of them because our workflows and so on are more complex than usual clients.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Nintex
    The trainer addressed the smallest queries in a friendly and timely manner; He walked us through all the necessary products we were using
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Nintex
    I used the Nintex training software, it was easy to watch and follow along. It didn't go too fast and was descriptive enough to understand what the steps needed were in order to produce efficient workflows and user friendly forms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    1.Start with Simple Workflows: Begin with basic workflows to gain user confidence before tackling complex processes.
    2.Involve Stakeholders Early: Engage business users and IT early to align workflows with real business needs.
    3.Comprehensive Training: Invest in user training to ensure smooth adoption and reduce resistance.
    4.Leverage Prebuilt Templates: Use Nintex’s templates to speed up implementation and maintain consistency.
    5.Iterate and Optimize: Continuously improve workflows based on user feedback and performance metrics.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    Microsoft environment does not have the scalability of Nintex; it is perfect for small and medium-sized companies, especially in environments where Microsoft environment is almost entirely used. Although Microsoft offers options to connect to other applications, its platform lacks the development and robustness that Nintex provides. Nintex not only covers Microsoft environments but also Google and other important platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Microsoft
    Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
    Read full review
    Nintex
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    The scalability is really bottlenecked by the imagination of the user. I was able to make processes for my own personal usage, making my daily tasks easier. I was also able to make processes that affected hundreds of employees, making large standardization and efficiency gains. So either way, the system is used the same way, and I was the limiting factor.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Microsoft
    I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
    Read full review
    Nintex
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
    • I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
    • If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nintex
    • People have woken up to the amount of overlap after mapping their processes.
    • People can be resistant to process changes. You need to have the support from above or support from the 'business' that you are process changing to be able to see the positive impacts.
    • Numbers talk. if you can get a general salary figure from your HR dept to show savings for 'employee bands', then when you present reports, they will be all the richer in data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Nintex Screenshots

    Screenshot of Nintex Automation CE, a complete agentic business orchestration platform — unifying process intelligence, agentic workflow orchestration, and AI-driven solution building in one governed platform.Screenshot of the Nintex K2 dashboard. The application offers on-premises and hosted solutions that brings together advanced orchestration, control, and scalability, and security into a single platform.