Quick Base from my perspective.
Overall Satisfaction with Quick Base
We use Quick Base (QB) primarily to compile regional information in which we use this data to help manage business opportunities. We also use QB with RPA to help us systematically show the status of each sales rep, when they're available or unavailable, this helps us best serve our customers in a timely manner.
Pros
- Low Code developments
- API Calls
- Webhooks
Cons
- ODBC Connection
- Query against data connections (i.e. once a table is built and connections are joined to other tables, the ability to query against those results manually, like SQL)
None (SO FAR) but we're always looking to make sure we're using the best tool for our operations.
Using Quick Base
870 - It's a diverse group of people who all work within the medical device market. From sales training to business operations, we use Quick Base for a variety of business needs. We track regional information, sales rep availability, training sessions, and inbound requests just to name a few. We have dozens of apps deployed and used daily.
3 - All though Quick Base is a low code - no code platform, and not having to be a developer or coding guru, having a good understanding in math equations, some HTML knowledge, some Java knowledge, and base understanding of how relationship database structuring works, would greatly increase the development and deployment of apps. With that being said, even if one didn't have these skills, using Quick Base as a "Nube" won't be hindered.
- Regional Data informaton
- Inbound Requests
- Rep Availability
- Works with with RPA
- Via ODBC connection makes life easier adding data in.
- Data Integration into business operations.
- Automated Information Requests
- Working with Alexa App for Requests
- Integrate data requests to SAP
- Initially we had a high ROI in that we were able to build and deploy quickly.
Evaluating Quick Base and Competitors
- Existing Relationship with the Vendor
Originally QB was brought in by a different department (Marketing) but the 2 individuals that used QB were retiring and Marketing was not going to go forward with QB. Marketing approached us to see if we wanted to take over the licensing and product of QB and we did, and we've been using it for 4 years now.
We would had wanted to get some more specific training on the backend development of the Apps rather than the frontend (GUI) interface.
Quick Base Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was minimal
- End User buy-in
- Department managers understanding of QB
Quick Base Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Knowledgeable team Kept well informed Support cares about my success | Difficult to get immediate help Need to explain problems multiple times |
We had a question about Automation and Webhooks at EMPOWER17, and was able to get immediate help at the tech bar.
Using Quick Base
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Easy to use Well integrated Feel confident using | Requires technical support |
- Table to table relationships
- Dashboard design
- Using buttons
- No backend data querying
- Not built in ODBC connection
- Automation still needs more tweaking
Yes, but I don't use it

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation