Solid replacement for physical phone system
April 26, 2025

Solid replacement for physical phone system

Bruce Carter | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Webex Calling

We recently replaced almost all of the physical phones with Webex Calling across campus. It was a building by building phase in as part of the "Next Generation Voice Services" project here. The basic business case was that management of the physical phones was getting unwieldy and expensive, and a more sustainable solution was sought. Since every full time employee is supplied an enterprise managed computer to which we could deploy a digital solution, it seemed a natural progression.

Pros

  • Has clients for multiple platforms and devices
  • Uses existing network connections instead of hardwired phone lines
  • Client can be consolidated with other communications methods (Slack, Zoom, Chat) in one place
  • Client is simple to use
  • Client integrates with remainder of physical phone system for special cases (university main reception number, for instance)
  • Handles call routing to different locations well
  • Integrates with existing computer audio (for instance, Apple AirPods)

Cons

  • Settings area is a little confusing
  • We occasionally have voice quality issues, but this may be local infrastructure
  • Integrate contacts list with directory servers
  • Infrastructure costs significantly reduces from previous system.
  • Maintenance costs are now integrated with basic networking.
  • Very few physical phones remaining and only in specialty locations.
  • Breakage is practically non-existent, people are more careful with their computers than their phones. No slamming the receiver into the cradle.
We have a very balkanized communication envelope. Several systems are currently in use (Slack, Google Chat, Microsoft Teams, etc.), depending on the specific features desired by the particular unit involved. It is unlikely, just due to university politics, that we will ever be able to completely consolidate this into one vendor's array of products. We do heavily rely on Cisco networking equipment, though.
I believe it meets the needs quite well. It is much more convenient for me to take a call on my desktop computer, laptop, or iPhone than with a separate physical phone. Our Information Security department reviewed the system and found that it met all appropriate security requirements for Higher Education. It is quite easy to set up for most endpoints through our existing endpoint management systems, and we are able to pre-configure anything specifically needed.
The main thrust of the project was to contain costs and reduce overhead for device (physical phone) management. Since we already had somewhat of an investment in Cisco infrastructure, Webex calling seemed a natural option to evaluate. I was not involved in the product selection other than being in the proof of concept test group.

Do you think Webex Calling delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Webex Calling's feature set?

Yes

Did Webex Calling live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Webex Calling go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Webex Calling again?

Yes

It seems quite able to handle the normal day to day voice call requirements quite well. Our previous Cisco phones had cameras that could do video calls, but if we need that we go to a Zoom session. Conference room use is not terribly convenient, although this might just be a case of us figuring out how to adapt the environment.

Webex Calling Feature Ratings

Hosted PBX
Not Rated
Directory of employee names
9
Answering rules
8
Call recording
Not Rated
Call park
9
Call screening
8
Voicemail Transcription
9
Mobile app for iOS
9
Mobile app for Android
9
High quality audio
8
High quality video
8
Calendar integration
Not Rated
Meeting initiation
8
Record meetings / events
Not Rated
Desktop sharing
Not Rated
Live chat
8
User authentication
9
Participant roles & permissions
9
Centralized communications management
8
Team messaging
Not Rated
Team document sharing
Not Rated
Call and meeting analytics
8

Cisco Hybrid Work

  • Webex Calling
  • Cisco AnyConnect
  • Working from anywhere (e.g., coffee shop, airport)
  • Working from an office or other company space
  • Working from home
We had to take the campus into full remote mode during COVID, and several teams are still on either hybrid or full remote. Most of the system engineer and administrator groups are still working remotely for the most part. We have set up "hotelling" suites on campus for normally remote users who need to come in to campus on an ad hoc basis.
We had to support full off campus classes and support structure during COVID. Much of that carried over into our post-pandemic crisis atmosphere. Mostly the challenges involved making sure we had sufficient bandwidth to support those function, making equipment upgrades to classrooms to facilitate as much "personal" contact as possible, and re-engineering some things for peer to peer contact.
Since hybrid/remote revolves around efficient networking use, Cisco was a huge help in basically reconfiguring most operations on the campus to be able to exist in as low of person to person direct contact as possible. Most of that work has now carried over into the hybrid environment. It was a pretty smooth transition with very little waste (some rooms received some fancy camera systems that they would not have otherwise received).
Things have been very flexible. Speaking as a systems engineer, it is really no different functionally (with the systems and procedures we have in place) for me to be working on campus or remotely. The security products and features that are provided through Cisco make "virtual" work just as effective as in person on campus work.
The original choice of Cisco was essentially made by our networking group. We have been on Cisco networking equipment for quite a while. I don't have experience with any other core networking equipment in the time I have been here.
  • Webex
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Zoom
  • Google Meet
  • Slack
  • GoTo
  • Other
As mentioned earlier, we have a vast variety of collaboration tools in what is essentially a very distributed, and somewhat balkanized, environment. There have been some initiatives to consolidate some of that, but it is Higher Education after all. Everyone has their independent opinion of the preferred tool for any particular task.

Using Webex Calling

5 - The above number is kind of an aggregate of telephony specialists, desktop computer support, and networking people. That's an approximate FTE figure for what I believe to be the overall support load. Making the actual app itself work is really straightforward, but I know that some quality of service settings on the network needed to be made, which required specialized knowledge in that area.
5000 - Webex Calling is used across the entire university. With the exception of a few special cases (main reception for the university, for example) everyone working at the university uses Webex Calling from the university president through all of the exempt and non-exempt employees and on-call personnel. It is pretty ubiquitous.
  • Emergency communication
  • Daily business communications
  • On-campus conferencing
  • Off-campus conferencing
  • Call routing
  • Being able to have everywhere communication through our campus number
  • Recording calls (eventually, with legal approval)
  • Replacing/consolidating other communication systems
I seriously doubt we will ever move back to physical phones. This was a large project and required quite a lot of behavioral socialization, so I don't think that effort and those gains will be easily ignored.

Evaluating Webex Calling and Competitors

Yes - Physical phones and infrastructure. The goal of the project was to contain costs, reduce infrastructure, and modernize the campus voice system. We also had a lot of breakage with the physical phones being knocked off desks and so forth. They were constructed out of a fairly thin plastic and were subject to damage. Now the only separate part of the system is the headset/earphones.
  • Scalability
  • Integration with Other Systems
  • Ease of Use
The single most important factor was definitely cost containment, although this was followed closely by ease of use. The campus community had a fair amount of angst over giving up physical phones, but after being able to try out the system most folks came around to the viewpoint that it just consolidates another operating onto their computing devices.
The pilot was fairly limited to people in the IT division of the university. I would probably try to get more novice technology users involved. Students were not part of the conversion since we haven't supplied residence hall private phones in quite some time (almost every student has a mobile phone), but I might bring in a few students just to have a representation of the population.

Webex Calling Training

Very easy to pick up just by running the client and reading the screen. Some departments requested training, but it was discovered that the client was so easy to use that it really wasn't necessary. We have a few open Zoom meetings for people that had questions, but it was very low key.

Webex Calling Support

I haven't needed much support on this as it is very easy to use, but we do have an on-campus expert, a well trained Service Desk, and escalation options to the vendor. We also have a specific account representative available to expedite any issue resolutions. Their documentation on the product is also quite good and the interface is intuitive to start with.
ProsCons
Quick Resolution
Good followup
Knowledgeable team
Problems get solved
Kept well informed
Immediate help available
Support understands my problem
Support cares about my success
Quick Initial Response
None
I do not know if we have a premium level of support. That would be something decided by senior management. We do have extensive agreements with Cisco on a variety of equipment, though.
Yes - We were getting occasional voice quality issues. It was resolved, and turned out to be a local configuration setting that was adjusted.
As I mentioned before, I haven't really needed a lot from tech support, but I did just talk to the project manager for the Next Generation Voice Services project, and he said that Cisco was very responsive and helpful throughout the proof of concept and the actual roll out of the service on campus.

Using Webex Calling

Basic functions are very intuitive and easy to use. The Settings area could use a little bit of UI work, but it is usable if you just pay attention to what is on the screen (not always an attribute of end users). Overall, it is pretty straightforward, especially when pre-configured.
ProsCons
Like to use
Relatively simple
Easy to use
Technical support not required
Well integrated
Consistent
Quick to learn
Convenient
Feel confident using
Familiar
None
  • Answering calls is just plain simple.
  • Integration with the campus directory is very easy to use, just type in a name. I would like to integrate with additional directories.
  • Forwarding to another number, or to ring on all devices is easy.
  • The interface is only what you need and nothing superfluous.
  • I haven't really had difficulties with anything in particular. Some of the features have been turned off by the project team, which confused some of the testers at first, but not a big deal.
Yes - It works just fine, although in these days of unlimited voice contracts for mobile phones I'm not sure that's a big feature point anymore when you can just forward everything directly to your cell.

Webex Calling Reliability

So far it has been very reliable, with very little down time that was associated with the product itself. We have had network outages due to external factors such as construction cutting a fiber link, but other than that kind of thing not much for failures.
I've not actually had it ever be unavailable when I needed to use it. As mentioned before, a network outage would take it down, but we have redundant systems for our network connections with automatic failover.
I don't really see this impacting any other system performance at all. The client is very light use on resources, even on my iPhone. I don't know what else it connects to behind the scenes other then the campus directory, but I haven't seen or heard of any impacts. It seems fairly self contained except for wherever it interfaces with the general telephone system connectivity outside the campus.

Comments

More Reviews of Webex Calling