Solid replacement for physical phone system
Overall Satisfaction with Webex Calling
We recently replaced almost all of the physical phones with Webex Calling across campus. It was a building by building phase in as part of the "Next Generation Voice Services" project here. The basic business case was that management of the physical phones was getting unwieldy and expensive, and a more sustainable solution was sought. Since every full time employee is supplied an enterprise managed computer to which we could deploy a digital solution, it seemed a natural progression.
Pros
- Has clients for multiple platforms and devices
- Uses existing network connections instead of hardwired phone lines
- Client can be consolidated with other communications methods (Slack, Zoom, Chat) in one place
- Client is simple to use
- Client integrates with remainder of physical phone system for special cases (university main reception number, for instance)
- Handles call routing to different locations well
- Integrates with existing computer audio (for instance, Apple AirPods)
Cons
- Settings area is a little confusing
- We occasionally have voice quality issues, but this may be local infrastructure
- Integrate contacts list with directory servers
- Infrastructure costs significantly reduces from previous system.
- Maintenance costs are now integrated with basic networking.
- Very few physical phones remaining and only in specialty locations.
- Breakage is practically non-existent, people are more careful with their computers than their phones. No slamming the receiver into the cradle.
We have a very balkanized communication envelope. Several systems are currently in use (Slack, Google Chat, Microsoft Teams, etc.), depending on the specific features desired by the particular unit involved. It is unlikely, just due to university politics, that we will ever be able to completely consolidate this into one vendor's array of products. We do heavily rely on Cisco networking equipment, though.
I believe it meets the needs quite well. It is much more convenient for me to take a call on my desktop computer, laptop, or iPhone than with a separate physical phone. Our Information Security department reviewed the system and found that it met all appropriate security requirements for Higher Education. It is quite easy to set up for most endpoints through our existing endpoint management systems, and we are able to pre-configure anything specifically needed.
The main thrust of the project was to contain costs and reduce overhead for device (physical phone) management. Since we already had somewhat of an investment in Cisco infrastructure, Webex calling seemed a natural option to evaluate. I was not involved in the product selection other than being in the proof of concept test group.
Do you think Webex Calling delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Webex Calling's feature set?
Yes
Did Webex Calling live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Webex Calling go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Webex Calling again?
Yes
Webex Calling Feature Ratings
Cisco Hybrid Work
- Webex Calling
- Cisco AnyConnect
- Working from anywhere (e.g., coffee shop, airport)
- Working from an office or other company space
- Working from home
We had to take the campus into full remote mode during COVID, and several teams are still on either hybrid or full remote. Most of the system engineer and administrator groups are still working remotely for the most part. We have set up "hotelling" suites on campus for normally remote users who need to come in to campus on an ad hoc basis.
We had to support full off campus classes and support structure during COVID. Much of that carried over into our post-pandemic crisis atmosphere. Mostly the challenges involved making sure we had sufficient bandwidth to support those function, making equipment upgrades to classrooms to facilitate as much "personal" contact as possible, and re-engineering some things for peer to peer contact.
Since hybrid/remote revolves around efficient networking use, Cisco was a huge help in basically reconfiguring most operations on the campus to be able to exist in as low of person to person direct contact as possible. Most of that work has now carried over into the hybrid environment. It was a pretty smooth transition with very little waste (some rooms received some fancy camera systems that they would not have otherwise received).
Things have been very flexible. Speaking as a systems engineer, it is really no different functionally (with the systems and procedures we have in place) for me to be working on campus or remotely. The security products and features that are provided through Cisco make "virtual" work just as effective as in person on campus work.
The original choice of Cisco was essentially made by our networking group. We have been on Cisco networking equipment for quite a while. I don't have experience with any other core networking equipment in the time I have been here.
- Webex
- Microsoft Teams
- Zoom
- Google Meet
- Slack
- GoTo
- Other
As mentioned earlier, we have a vast variety of collaboration tools in what is essentially a very distributed, and somewhat balkanized, environment. There have been some initiatives to consolidate some of that, but it is Higher Education after all. Everyone has their independent opinion of the preferred tool for any particular task.
Using Webex Calling
5 - The above number is kind of an aggregate of telephony specialists, desktop computer support, and networking people. That's an approximate FTE figure for what I believe to be the overall support load. Making the actual app itself work is really straightforward, but I know that some quality of service settings on the network needed to be made, which required specialized knowledge in that area.
5000 - Webex Calling is used across the entire university. With the exception of a few special cases (main reception for the university, for example) everyone working at the university uses Webex Calling from the university president through all of the exempt and non-exempt employees and on-call personnel. It is pretty ubiquitous.
- Emergency communication
- Daily business communications
- On-campus conferencing
- Off-campus conferencing
- Call routing
- Being able to have everywhere communication through our campus number
- Recording calls (eventually, with legal approval)
- Replacing/consolidating other communication systems
Evaluating Webex Calling and Competitors
Yes - Physical phones and infrastructure. The goal of the project was to contain costs, reduce infrastructure, and modernize the campus voice system. We also had a lot of breakage with the physical phones being knocked off desks and so forth. They were constructed out of a fairly thin plastic and were subject to damage. Now the only separate part of the system is the headset/earphones.
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
The single most important factor was definitely cost containment, although this was followed closely by ease of use. The campus community had a fair amount of angst over giving up physical phones, but after being able to try out the system most folks came around to the viewpoint that it just consolidates another operating onto their computing devices.
The pilot was fairly limited to people in the IT division of the university. I would probably try to get more novice technology users involved. Students were not part of the conversion since we haven't supplied residence hall private phones in quite some time (almost every student has a mobile phone), but I might bring in a few students just to have a representation of the population.
Webex Calling Training
- No Training
Very easy to pick up just by running the client and reading the screen. Some departments requested training, but it was discovered that the client was so easy to use that it really wasn't necessary. We have a few open Zoom meetings for people that had questions, but it was very low key.
Webex Calling Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed Immediate help available Support understands my problem Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
I do not know if we have a premium level of support. That would be something decided by senior management. We do have extensive agreements with Cisco on a variety of equipment, though.
Yes - We were getting occasional voice quality issues. It was resolved, and turned out to be a local configuration setting that was adjusted.
As I mentioned before, I haven't really needed a lot from tech support, but I did just talk to the project manager for the Next Generation Voice Services project, and he said that Cisco was very responsive and helpful throughout the proof of concept and the actual roll out of the service on campus.
Using Webex Calling
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Answering calls is just plain simple.
- Integration with the campus directory is very easy to use, just type in a name. I would like to integrate with additional directories.
- Forwarding to another number, or to ring on all devices is easy.
- The interface is only what you need and nothing superfluous.
- I haven't really had difficulties with anything in particular. Some of the features have been turned off by the project team, which confused some of the testers at first, but not a big deal.
Yes - It works just fine, although in these days of unlimited voice contracts for mobile phones I'm not sure that's a big feature point anymore when you can just forward everything directly to your cell.


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation