Adobe Test and Target is an A/B, multi-variate testing platform which Adobe acquired as part of the Omniture platform in 2009. It is now part of the Adobe Marketing Cloud. It offers tight integration with Adobe analytics and content management products.
N/A
Webtrends Optimize
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Webtrends Optimize is a web optimization platform and is offered by the company of the same name. The product competes most often with Adobe Test and Target, Maxymiser, SiteSpect, and Optimizely.
N/A
Pricing
Adobe Target
Webtrends Optimize
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Target
Webtrends Optimize
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
There is no tiering and no different prices for different tools. The entire feature set is available to all users as standard at one price, agreed up front.
I still use Optimizely as it helps with project managing. We have been using that for quite sometime and we have recently started using Adobe Target Platform and are testing both of them to see which one would work the best for us. In terms of reporting Adobe Target has been …
For us, the decision was very straightforward. We chose to invest in the Adobe stack and utilize tools that are developed to integrate together and complement each other. Ex: Adobe Target 'A4T' integration within Adobe Analytics. Optimizely appears to be a great tool, but …
Google Optimize - Way better than Adobe, even the free version. It automatically work with Google Analytics, and tracks revenue out of the box. Fantastic. Use this.
Optimizely - As a paid service, this is another good option. Tracks revenue out of the box, good heatmapping, most …
Previously, we had the opportunity to work with some similar services and to be honest we had a disastrous experience because they were not what we were looking for, but since Adobe Target was implemented it has proven to be a highly professional service for our company.
In my personal opinion, Optimizely is a clear choice here while Google Optimize is for the low-budget minded decision-makers and Evergage for the COE more geared toward personalization; however, in our case we were already locked into using Target prior to my arrival. I don't …
I have used Optimizely for A/B testing. Optimizely makes it easier to set up almost any type of testing experiment. Optimizely is also strongly recommended for a limited number of users and when you want to optimize the cost. Optimizely was selected over Adobe Target since the …
We seriously considered another software but because we use so many other Adobe products this made the most sense for us. If you are not dependent on other Adobe software and are a smaller company, in my opinion, Target may not be the best fit.
We have looked at Optimizely but at this point are sticking with Test & Target. We like the integration it has with our Analytics tools such as Ad Hoc and SiteCatalyst. Also, we feel that Adobe has some interesting products that we would like to dig into in the future such as …
I have used Google Analytics on my personal website but I can't compare it with Test and Target, because Google Analytics is free which will do less than what Adobe Test and Target does.
While my organization has been using Adobe Test & Target, I have had the chance to evaluate Optimizely, another tool that allows for multivariate testing with a smooth interface. The reason I like to stick with Adobe Test & Target is its ability to interface and interact with …
There's a LOT of B2B software out there. It's easy to get lost in all of the incoherent noise, between different programs. Webtrends is constantly updating and working with their users to create the best experience possible. I would highly recommend webtrends, and as a second …
Webtrends Optimize is one of the best solutions out there for digital marketers to improve their sales by providing a better experience for their customers' journey. With that said, it is also a costly solution in comparison to other services in the market today. The adage of …
Webtrends, Qubit and Maxymiser were all excellent companies to work with. There's honestly not much between them in my experience. I selected Webtrends based on the quality of their consultants.
Webtrends Optimize can be used for much more complex tests, allows better conversion tracking and data collection. Visual Website Optimizer (VWO) is suitable for smaller, simple projects. Webtrends Optimize comes with an excellent consultancy that could save you a lot of time …
Webtrends Optimize definitely gave me a more comphrensive overview of the product
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Webtrends Optimize
Omniture: extreme feature set and integration with business intelligence and other systems. The problem was price. I was never able to convince management that the price tag was justified.
Features
Adobe Target
Webtrends Optimize
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Target
8.1
Ratings
4% below category average
Webtrends Optimize
8.3
Ratings
1% below category average
a/b experiment testing
9.30 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Split URL testing
8.60 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Multivariate testing
7.90 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
8.30 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
8.30 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Mobile app testing
8.50 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Test significance
8.40 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
7.40 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Advanced code editor
6.50 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Page surveys
8.70 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Visitor recordings
8.40 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Preview mode
8.10 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Test duration calculator
8.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
8.40 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
7.60 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
7.40 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Client-side tests
8.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Server-side tests
7.40 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
7.70 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Target
8.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Webtrends Optimize
8.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation
8.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
7.50 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
8.40 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Website personalization
9.20 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
We recommend this application because it allows us to segment and track the traffic of our domain under an analysis of their behavior, ranging from counting the number of clicks they make on a single element to the most complete action within our page in real time.
There are certainly a few things to consider. If you're looking to run A/B/n or Multivariate tests with some basic segmentation or targeting then Webtrends Optimize is capable of providing that. If budget is a major consideration then that is another area where Optimize may be more attractive. However, based on both of these criteria it is my opinion that there are other tools out there that provide more value. For segmentation discovery, identification of user affinities, and execution of an effective targeting and personalization strategy then there are certainly other tools that should be considered.
The Webtrends team are excellent at taking the time to understand and learn about our distinct business needs, and recommend suggestions in response.
The Webtrends platform has undergone several changes over the time I was using it. This illustrates the constant thrive to improve their service to users, something I greatly appreciated.
Webtrends Optimize enables the whole process to be simple with its handy instructional guides that can inform clients about using the service.
There should be some more clarity around what makes a test significant. While this can be decided by the client themselves, some direction from the tool would be helpful.
Also, if there was an easier way to organize campaigns and search for them it would be helpful. Right now there is just a long list of campaigns and you have to rely on search to find a specific campaign. What if you don't know the name of the test?
The cost is a factor. When you're trying to save money, particularly as a startup (a lot of our clients are up-and-comers) it has to be seen as an investment...but the cost to implement the system is fairly large.
There's a bit of a steep learning curve, you can't just dive into the program.
It's not impossible but it's not as easy as snapping your fingers to easily implement the program cross-platform.
Once you get started with your testing program, you realize that it is necessary to continue. You must keep optimizing in order to remain a vital competitor in today's marketing world. Even if you're not using Test & Target or any other user experience testing software, you ought to be performing comparison tests on your own, simply by routing your audience to different experiences and quantifying the aggregate of the results.
The recent UI update is a complete mess. It is difficult to navigate and find features that previously existed. The reactiveness of the page depending on window size is also ridiculous and it is absurd that depending on how large your window is, entire columns of functions will disappear with no indication that they are missing. The usability of the tool has fallen off a cliff.
Set up of basic tests that do not use segmentation or targeting is an intuitive experience that can be learned quickly by new users. However, as the need for segmentation and other more advanced capabilities arise, the experience begins to degrade.
On several occasions, we have had the need to ask for help from the Adobe Target support team, and I must say that they have provided us with an excellent experience, as they take care of solving the problems quickly and with high precision
The instructor that came to train us was awesome and this training was very useful. I would recommend it for anyone who is going to be using this software. I only mark it lower because it is an added expense to an already expensive product, and a lot of the training covered the "Target" portion of the software (which again, we didn't use)
The training was very easy to understand, however it would have been more useful to my development team than me. It was also primarily over-the-phone, which is never as easy to follow as in-person. We ended up scheduling and paying for an in-person training session to supplement the online/phone training because it wasn't helpful enough.
Implement using a global mBox on the page so you can change any and everything over the traditional method. Traditional method is good if you do not have technical web dev resources, do not know Javascript/jQuery, or you have money to blow on mBox calls. Global deployment reduces mBox calls and allows you to touch many parts of the page easily. A lot more customizable
For us, the decision was very straightforward. We chose to invest in the Adobe stack and utilize tools that are developed to integrate together and complement each other. Ex: Adobe Target 'A4T' integration within Adobe Analytics. Optimizely appears to be a great tool, but for us aligning with the Adobe suite, ensuring that future product enhancements and tools would work well together was a very important key factor in our decision
Webtrends Optimize is one of the best solutions out there for digital marketers to improve their sales by providing a better experience for their customers' journey. With that said, it is also a costly solution in comparison to other services in the market today. The adage of you gets what you pay for is true as they are a market leader in the optimization space.
This is something we've been working to improve on, as far as how we're calculating and tracking this, but Target has had a substantial ROI on our business.
I will say specific to our efforts, we could have probably done similar work if not the same work using a different testing tool (Optimizely for example), but Target has been good for us.
So far we haven't seen an ROI that we can accurately measure due to only running a couple of tests that haven't resulted in direct, site wide changes. However, we have learnt a lot about how to set up the right processes and documentation.