Atlassian Confluence vs. Text-Em-All

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Confluence
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
$0
Free for 10 Users
Text-Em-All
Score 9.8 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Text-Em-All, headquartered in Frisco, delivers personalized, informational, emergency mass text messages and phone calls, whether they’re going to five people or 50,000.
$0
Pricing
Atlassian ConfluenceText-Em-All
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Free for 10 Users
Standard
$6.40
per month per user
Premium
$12.30
per month per user
Data Center
220,000.00
40,001+ Users - Annually
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Starter
$0
Credits
$0.05
per credit
Monthly
$19
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConfluenceText-Em-All
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.Text-Em-All offers a variety of pricing plans to cater to different user needs. The monthly plan starts at $19, with pricing based on group size, making it ideal for consistent senders who reach the same group(s) each month as often as needed. Plans provide access to the full range of Text-Em-All features, to ensure a comprehensive messaging experience. Additionally, the platform offers credits, or pay-as-you-go pricing model, with costs ranging from 5¢ to 9¢ per credit, suitable for users with occasional or high-volume messaging needs. To help potential customers evaluate the service, Text-Em-All offers a free account so users can evaluate and try the service with 25 free credits.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian ConfluenceText-Em-All
Considered Both Products
Confluence
Chose Confluence
It has great features like integration and real time collaboration with new features like AI and automation. So it gives an edge over other tools I have used in the past few years. I am sure there are a lot of features which I have not explored yet, but the features I am using …
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence has a more comprehensive and flexible set of capabilities that stand out and made the decision upfront more straightforward for our team. The tools we evaluated have knowledge management, task management and collaboration capabilities, however Atlassian …
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is way popular for a larger team and makes collaboration way easier. The community is strong and you get easier resolution against any request. It's integration with other Atlassian products like JIRA is an icing on the cake.
Chose Confluence
In my experience, Atlassian Confluence is at the top of these tools. I've had first hand experience with other tools and they are not at par with Atlassian Confluence. The versatility of the tool is very well recognized and utilized. Being a new user is not a probably as all …
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is a super handy hub for sharing ideas and keeping all your docs in one place. While Jira Service Management is more about handling tickets and support issues, Atlassian Confluence really makes teamwork easy. I feel Atlassian Confluence is user-friendly, …
Chose Confluence
We choose Atlassian Confluence because it is the reference for managing a SAAS wiki service. And having such a solution in our company to manage the knowledge and especially the knowledge transfer is crucial.
Chose Confluence
Confluence has a more robust set of capabilities compared to Dovetail and Trello and also was already approved by our legal and compliance teams, so it tends to keep its stickiness due to that. It's also widely known in the market as a knowledge management tool. I would say it …
Chose Confluence
It's good if you're using Atlassian products, the other ones provide different connections and better UX for documentation in different ways.
Chose Confluence
Overall, Atlassian Confluence is a user-friendly tool and offers such a vast array of capabilities for project and knowledge management purposes and beyond. Other tools listed above have much more limited capabilities, although they are great tools for very specific needs and …
Chose Confluence
The main reason for moving to Atlassian Confluence was for: 1) Having 1 space that holds all of the org's documentation and knowledge sharing 2)We already used JSM and Jira so it would an organic move to have Atlassian Confluence as our main documentation hub 3) The cost …
Chose Confluence
Confluence, since it is part of the overall infrastructure of Atlassian, makes it immensely powerful internally, to build an internal knowledgebase, and is far ahead of its counterparts in Zendesk and Hubspot, which is more centered towards their customers. Confluence is just …
Chose Confluence
Sharepoint in out organisation was mostly used for collaborating on documents, which to some degree has been moved to Confluence, where the Confluence pages have replaced the specific documents.
Chose Confluence
Being a company which uses other Atlassian tools, Atlassian Confluence was a great fit; the natural and automatic linking of assets from other platforms made following paper trails seamless. Though the editing options aren't as advanced as some other options out there, it does …
Chose Confluence
We find Atlassian better for its ease of use, real time editing, integration with Jira for bug tracking, stores our security compliance documents in structured way, it is feature rich and have lots of capabilities.
Chose Confluence
In the past, I have used MediaWiki hosted locally as well as Microsoft Team Foundation Server. Wiki was simply a nightmare so all the money saved from paying for Atlassian subscriptions was lost in time while trying to use Wiki and format something properly. I haven't used …
Chose Confluence
We use Jira for the IT tickets, so the step to use Atlassian Confluence was the logical decisson.
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is better suited for documenting and acting as a repository for information than the more immediate what is currently being worked on things that are better suited for in Jira. In my opinion, Atlassian Confluence certainly has it's short comings but it is …
Chose Confluence
We still use Atlassian Confluence only for its integration with Jira and Bitbucket. For everything else, we moved away from it and are using more modern solutions.
Chose Confluence
We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and …
Chose Confluence
Freshdesk is basically for support teams, while Confluence is better for internal communication and collaborations.
Chose Confluence
The alternatives tested are based only on the whiteboarding functionality added by Confluence Whiteboard, and not the core Confluence functionality (documentation).

Chose Confluence
Again, Atlassian Confluence is efficient when paired with Jira and can do most of what a company needs it to do. But, I thi Spekit is better for "just-in-time" learning, Sharepoint is better for file hosting and organization, Asana is much better for project/task management, …
Chose Confluence
We were inclined to use Atlassian Confluence for its easy collaboration with Jira which is used for tracking project development tasks and issues. Using Atlassian Confluence, content creation became easy and even applying access control to the created content was possible. It …
Text-Em-All
Chose Text-Em-All
I think the database is easier to use and more simple.
Chose Text-Em-All
It's very expensive, there's no free trial, and it's not very user-friendly. We almost registered with them, but thank god we found text-em-all.
Chose Text-Em-All
We used Sense before Text-Em-All, and they were very pricey. We heard about Text-Em-All through Avionte and signed up after the introduction. We are delighted with Text-Em-All.
Chose Text-Em-All
Different products, but Text-Em-All reaches more users at a better price.
Chose Text-Em-All
We used Synergy two years ago for a one-off text campaign for our EOY Fund, but it was managed by our direct mail partner at the time. We prefer working with TEA because we can import and export the information ourselves and the pricing is affordable.
Chose Text-Em-All
Text-Em-All was the first and only choice. Prior to coming on board we were using a messaging system that was geared towards educational systems and it did not work nearly as efficiently has Text-Em-All has worked. The ease of use made it the decision to move to Text-Em-All easy.
Chose Text-Em-All
Our last provider was costly for what we needed. We need the ability to text, and that's it. The sense was challenging to navigate; I had to sign a one-year contract and pay thousands upfront. Text-em-all has been the best thing.
Chose Text-Em-All
It's great. I did not like our old solution and thoroughly appreciate Text-Em-All. Text-Em-All is a solution that we can be proud of and the reporting is terrific so we can be sure that the dollars that we are spending are being allocated in a smart way. We also can know if …
Chose Text-Em-All
By far Text Em All trumps other similar products we've tried. With customer service alone, we were blown away.
Chose Text-Em-All
Both are fine. Previous employer used Constant Contact for newsletters and other ads.
Chose Text-Em-All
Text-Em-All was easier to use in terms of adding contacts, creating the SMS, and sending it. Delivery rates were much better as well.
Chose Text-Em-All
It's been a few years since we last used the service so I cannot remember the name of the company but it was free and it was lacking.
Chose Text-Em-All
Text-Em-All allows us to add and subtract folks from our contact list easily, where Textedly only has the option of static contact lists where once someone is removed from the list they cannot be put back onto the list without jumping through hoops.
Chose Text-Em-All
It’s been over a year since we reviewed solutions, I don’t recall the competitors we looked at. But none of them had the features we were looking for at the price point we needed as a non-profit.
Chose Text-Em-All
We have only used Text-Em-All, but have liked it so much we have stayed with it. We have another program that could potentially be used in this way, but Text-Em-All is more cost-effective, allowing you to add funds as needed instead of monthly charges.
Chose Text-Em-All
Text-em-all was a recommendation from a mutual customer. The integration with CRM can be better (writeback capabilities) that automatically enter in notes within our CRM system. This is a glaring issue that will be a major win.
Chose Text-Em-All
My facility has not utilized another platform like this, and at this time we do not feel the need to even look elsewhere. We have been so pleased with our experience with Text Em' all. We do not think that we could find another product that is as easy to use, and is as …
Features
Atlassian ConfluenceText-Em-All
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.1
Ratings
9% below category average
Text-Em-All
-
Ratings
Task Management7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Search6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Text-Em-All
-
Ratings
Chat6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
Text-Em-All
-
Ratings
Versioning8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Emergency Notification System
Comparison of Emergency Notification System features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
Text-Em-All
8.1
Ratings
5% below category average
Mass Notification00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multi-Channel Delivery00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Customization and Templates00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Geo-Targeting00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Multi-Language Support00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Emergency Contacts Database00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Two-Way Communication00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Notification Reporting and Analytics00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Integration with External Systems00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Mobile Notifications00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian ConfluenceText-Em-All
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian ConfluenceText-Em-All
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.4
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.4
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.8
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian ConfluenceText-Em-All
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian Confluence is a great tool for housing important information and resources across the organization, as it's very easy to search and find content across different teams and departments. The search function is mostly very accurate and the additional tagging with keywords also helps in the search experience. It's also good at tagging other team members, which triggers an automated email to them. Atlassian Confluence also has an extensive template library for all kinds of purposes like project management, etc., which saves time overall.
Read full review
We have found them to be very good for immediate communication of a brief message to a large number of people at once. Thus, it works perfectly for a neighborhood association. It may not be suitable for longer messages or situations with excessive notifications.
Read full review
Pros
  • Its integration with Jira for tracking development and the bugs and work linked to detailed Confluence documentation.
  • We use it extensively for writing Software Product Requirement Documents, feature specs, architecture designs, and retrospectives.
  • Our company follows compliance very seriously, so it helps in streamlining all documentation for ISO27001/27017 compliance and security-related information.
  • Its integration with various tools allows us to create flow diagrams which are often required to make client and customer understand the overall flow of interactions across various modules of the design architecture
Read full review
  • The ability to customize the rate of outgoing calls in order to avoid getting overwhelmed.
  • The ease of use makes their service beneficial to me rather than another chore on my list.
  • Giving details on how much my message will cost and giving me the ability to modify it in real-time to control what I am spending.
Read full review
Cons
  • You need to watch over the structure of the content yourself. if not you can get information added anywhere so nobody can find it.
  • Top search field is hard to set to only search a section of pages.
  • You really need to think your structure through before starting. a guide when setting up at the start could help in that perspective.
Read full review
  • My initial concern was regarding the "opt out" feature. I work with the senior population, and many of whom are not that tech-savvy. I have a couple of residents who had unintentionally opted out of messages thinking it was an individual message they were skipping. I would suggest that there be a clarifying question when a user chooses to opt out; it should default to opting out of a single message and survey the user to see if they would like to opt out of receiving additional messages. My residents were wondering why they were missing information and why I hadn't informed them of important dates and events.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
Read full review
Text-Em-All is a great way to get messages to our associates versus posting on a memo board and hoping they see it. Very efficient. I would recommend this great tool to companies big or small as a form of business related communications. The only thing I would change is the ability to use more characters in the messages. And it would be a plus if you can translate to different languages in the app.
Read full review
Usability
It's very intuitive for most things, making it easy to jump in and start creating pages and collaborating. This makes it ideal for onboarding new members to the team. There are a few areas that could be a little smoother, but overall it's a great experience.
Read full review
It's fantastic. In general, it's a 10. But I give it a 7 because of the way I know it can improve. I save my workers' names in lists...and I have only the first and last name fields to classify them. I grade my workers based on their experiences and based on their jobs; so I use the last name field to group them. This could be easier by you adding another field.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
Read full review
The availability of the text em all is amazing specially when we needed the most to spread out the word on an event that was happening.
Read full review
Performance
We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
Read full review
I love the performance it provided us. Also, want to clarify that the time it takes to send out a mass text is amazing
Read full review
Support Rating
This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
Read full review
There have been few times over the last 18 years that I have had to make changes to our billing or deal with particular tech questions and I have never had any issues with their response time or ability to be helpful once the issues were communicated
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
Read full review
This was the best way we were able to reach out to everyone we wanted to, being that there were some not tech-sabi elderly people. This was a better way for them to be able to get the information they needed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian Confluence is a super handy hub for sharing ideas and keeping all your docs in one place. While Jira Service Management is more about handling tickets and support issues, Atlassian Confluence really makes teamwork easy. I feel Atlassian Confluence is user-friendly, integrates smoothly with other Atlassian tools, and helps everyone stay in sync. It's great for brainstorming, and project planning as well. Overall, it is a great way to boost collaboration and ensure all team members are on the same page.
Read full review
Our last provider was costly for what we needed. We need the ability to text, and that's it. The sense was challenging to navigate; I had to sign a one-year contract and pay thousands upfront. Text-em-all has been the best thing.
Read full review
Scalability
This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
Read full review
We have never had a problem being able to use Text em all when we needed it
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Merging instances has saved search time - We used to have several instances of Atlassian Confluence, which means they're separate and so can't communicate with each other. We've since merged into one instance and now with the help of the search feature can find the documents you're looking for in seconds rather than several minutes.
  • Cross linking product assets streamlines following paper trails - Being able to click on a BitBucket link from a Confluence page which then links to a JIRA ticket means you can follow paper trails really easily; seconds rather than several minutes.
Read full review
  • 100% of the company received reliable information at the same time for the first time without having to hold a “town hall” which used to cause all work to stop for at least 15-20 mins.
  • Because work no longer has to stop for verbal communication announcements, 7.5 hours total of work is saved for every message sent.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Text-Em-All Screenshots

Screenshot of broadcast creation.Screenshot of the interface to add contacts.Screenshot of where to broadcast results.Screenshot of broadcast details.Screenshot of the contact management interface.Screenshot of two-way conversations.