Cornerstone Galaxy is a cloud-based application for talent management. Cornerstone offers suites for recruiting, training, performance monitoring and planning, learning, and HR data management. It is scaled for enterprises.
N/A
ICIMS Hire
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
ICIMS Hire is an enterprise applicant tracking system (ATS) that supports core hiring workflows. With comprehensive support for screening, interview management, offer management, and onboarding, it is built on enterprise‑grade technology and designed to support complex, global hiring at scale.
N/A
PCRecruiter
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
PCRecruiter is a web-based recruiting platform. It supports candidate sourcing and placement via candidate tracking, job advertising, CRM, applicant tracking, and salesforce automation.
$85
per user/per month
Pricing
Cornerstone Galaxy
ICIMS Hire
PCRecruiter
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Basic
$85
per user/per month
Basic
$85
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cornerstone Galaxy
ICIMS Hire
PCRecruiter
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
Entry-level set up fee? - Implementation pricing is determined on a per-company basis.
Starting price (does not include set up fee) - Pricing is determined on a per-company basis, tailored to organization size, configuration, and selected solutions.
Discounts available based on number of users, affiliations, length of contract, and other needs.
I would say the ease of use its probably the thing that makes CSOD better than the others from a user standpoint. They are becoming bigger and bigger in terms of knowledge and with functionalities and are looking to establish themselves as a leader in all in one stop shop …
Cornerstone was selected in 2014 based on its ease of use for both our HRIS team and end users. Cornerstone was engaged in our process from the beginning and provided value added recommendations as we moved from a home grown system to one that is fully supported in the cloud.
Other products were either inferior or too expensive. The one product that was closest to what we needed was Halogen. In the end, our selection of Cornerstone was based on:
iCIMS is the most user friendly ATS that I have used.
Verified User
Manager
Chose ICIMS Hire
iCIMS proved to be a more robust/mature tool that increased recruiter efficiency. Reporting was a big winner, the speed of pulling data and sharing it with peers, scheduling exports, etc.
iCIMS is very robust. Some programs are leaner and have to be customized to have all of the bells and whistles. The tools are built in here to be able to do anything, you just have to learn how to access them. Their customer support is also great and they are amazing at …
PCRecruiter blows both of these products away in ease of use, building both the front and back end, visual appearance for the user and the applicants, and features such as presentation of candidates and parsing resumes. It's just so much easier to use and keep candidates at top …
I have used PCRecruiter for over 10 years now. The product takes some time to learn, but once you invest the time to learn its functions, it provides an amazing solution for the recruiting function. I have used this product in three different companies and implemented it with …
PCRecruiter doesn't lock me into an enterprise approach (having to purchase blocks of licences vs. individual licenses). It's implementation was far easier based on past experiences.
Features
Cornerstone Galaxy
ICIMS Hire
PCRecruiter
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
6.5
134 Ratings
11% below category average
ICIMS Hire
-
Ratings
PCRecruiter
-
Ratings
New hire portal
7.569 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
5.7116 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
6.4127 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
8.4
115 Ratings
14% above category average
ICIMS Hire
-
Ratings
PCRecruiter
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
8.596 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
8.099 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
8.0107 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
8.595 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
9.0110 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
8.5
122 Ratings
21% above category average
ICIMS Hire
-
Ratings
PCRecruiter
-
Ratings
Performance plans
8.594 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
8.581 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
9.070 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
9.082 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
9.097 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
8.064 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
8.094 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
9.086 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
9.083 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.3116 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
6.5
58 Ratings
4% below category average
ICIMS Hire
-
Ratings
PCRecruiter
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
6.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
5.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
8.052 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
7.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
5.8
67 Ratings
20% below category average
ICIMS Hire
8.4
131 Ratings
6% above category average
PCRecruiter
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
7.045 Ratings
7.7128 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
8.041 Ratings
8.8121 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
9.038 Ratings
8.7106 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
9.038 Ratings
8.7111 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
8.040 Ratings
10.0113 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
5.043 Ratings
9.8124 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
5.040 Ratings
8.7117 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
6.041 Ratings
8.0125 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
6.041 Ratings
8.5126 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
4.036 Ratings
8.0114 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
5.038 Ratings
7.097 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
4.560 Ratings
8.8126 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
3.061 Ratings
7.8124 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
3.556 Ratings
7.8112 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
3.564 Ratings
7.8125 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy is a good solution for larger companies that focus on training and want to offer a variety of options to their employees and departments. It is highly customizable. It does require a tech savvy team to set-up, and maintain. This is not a set-it-and-forget-it system. From an LMS perspective, it wouldn't be my top choice for employees who only need a mobile-friendly approach.
iCIMSis is really good in managing high-volume federal recruitment where visibility into each stage of the hiring process is essential. Changing candidate statuses (e.g., referred, interviewed, selected) provides clear insight into pipeline progress and helps coordinate across multiple hiring managers.
PCRecruiter is great for staffing and recruiting companies that are looking to organize their database. It is also suitable for companies that are also wanting to organize their recruiting processes. Many companies still receive resumes in paper and do not digitalize them. It is even suitable for sales and marketing departments, since you can do marketing and track sales with it.
Ability to provide multiple customizable access roles from general end user to full system admin and anything in between
Powerful reporting system in the LMS to track a plethora of data points within the platform (user data, training information, transcript information)
Great options to customize the look and feel of your "home page" to best meet your company's needs and goals.
Ability to customize the transcript view for learners (i.e. when Completed training will move to their Archived transcript, what to do with Inactive training on transcripts)
The opt-out message after the 1st text helps weed out the people who are not interested.
Having the ability to have templates/answers to frequent questions saved and ready to use makes it easier/faster to talk to multiple people.
Being able to schedule text campaigns is amazing. Every Saturday I set up my campaigns for the next week. This gives me more time to focus on other things.
Applicant tracking is a great tool. We are able to search resumes or search by keyword. This is a definite time saver and will eliminate your filing cabinets.
Linking candidates to job orders. We are able to create jobs and link candidates to open job orders. This allows us to see what positions are currently open and also lets us know the length of time the position was open before being filled.
Notes: We are able to keep notes on start dates, end dates, call-offs, tardiness, workers comp claims, disciplinary, and anything else that our company needs. This is a great tool when you have workers comp claims, unemployment, or documentation for ending a work assignment.
Sometimes finding the right answer to your support question can be a bit more difficult than it should be.
I would like to see more OSHA related courses.
At times, the administrative interface seems to need to be updated, but the tradeoff honestly might be the absolute rock-solid stability of the platform.
It would be wonderful if once a presentation is made and additional information is added to a candidate's profile that PCRecruiter would update and include that information in the link.
Building out the backend of PCRecruiter with letters and setting up the flow of the candidate and moving the candidate through that flow is not intuitive and can be confusing to new users.
It would be wonderful if PCR integrated with more company's software when posting on 3rd party sites so that I wouldn't have to parse so many resumes.
As long as pricing stays reasonable, we will likely stay with Cornerstone for at least one more contract renewal. It would be a large task to migrate all of our content to a new system. However, the LMS landscape is diversifying with new startups that are showing some real innovation.
I would say that we are very likely to renew with iCIMS. They seem to continuously be improving their product based on the feedback from their clients. In addition, the thought have having to go through another implementation of this level is daunting and as long as the software continues to meet the business needs of the company and provides the appropriate level of support we will most likely stay. Costs regarding future renewals will also impact this decision and if necessary we will go to market to evaluate other options.
I really like using PCRecruiter and give this rating because the product has helped me with all the reports and services I need to make my job easier. I also enjoy the fact that if I do happen to have an issue of some sort, I can either search for the solution or I can contact a technician and they will take care of the issue immediately.
Easy to use, easy to learn, lots of support during the learning process. There are a few parts of the system we don't use and I'm hesitant to begin using because other clients have said they're difficult and cumbersome (certifications) or outdated (libraries)
iCIMS was already in play by the time I moved into an executive role, but it made a significant impact in the 6 months from when I had previously done hiring using just emailed and printed applications, in my previous role as an HR Assistant. The ease of use was incredible. We had a full manual on how to use the system, but I felt, even as a first-time user, I didn't need to reference the manual much to navigate easily and figure out the system. As someone who likes to poke around in systems, I was able to comfortably get around and explore other functions with iCIMS.
As the past VP of Recruiting for a boutique search firm. I trained many recruiters on the PCR system. All were using the system like a pro in a week to 10 days tops. PCR does everything a recruiting team will need without being overly complicated to learn or navigate.
I haven't really had any major availability problems. The service is practically impeccable but it is true that at times, due to server and latency problems, the application has been slower. But these have been specific issues that have resolved themselves.
There is always ample advance notice before the software goes down for maintenance and this is usually done at off-peak hours. As for system failures - I can't think of any that have effected us in over two years od use.
I have had little to no downtime with PC Recruiter (except for planned maintenance). Whether I am using it on my laptop or the mobile versions (iPad and Android based phone), I am able to get to my information quickly and easily
I haven't seen many issues at all with load times. Sometimes learning assignments will take longer then expected but it is still reasonable. They have taken great effort over the last couple years to speed things up like reports and search results so I expect that effort to continue in the coming year.
We can think of no dissatisfaction with our daily use of iCims, involving its response time to commands or incompatibility with any other software we presently use.
Its always important to have support when you are facing problems and when you are the main admin of the organization. Cornerstone Support is very supporting when you have not found the answer in the help guide. its very useful to have a team support to guide you.
Before pandemic and iCIMS Talent Cloud acquisitions I would give 10 without a doubt. Unfortunately, I see a strong decrease in the support model, which seems to be mainly connected with the fact that acquired companies/tools/features need to be integrated with the platform, and knowledge of newly provided services and tools were not yet incorporated fully into the support.
The technical support team is awesome. Very knowledgeable and if it is something out of the ordinary they will quickly find the answer or someone that has the expertise to help. I have never had a bad experience with PCR technical support services. They are first class.
we use also to admin all our training in person events and sessions. Its easy to admin this kind of trainings and automatize some processes we have. Also de user experience and the integration with other systems helps to the employees to use more. All modules integrated oriented to develop people is the principal reason to have CSOD. The training administration is very complete and allows to automate many processes.
The online modules are pretty good. You can access them at any time, which we have done. You learn a lot in the beginning, but having the ability to retake short lessons when you are working on those items was very helpful.
I would say I believe iCims online training is very good. It's informative, visually appealing, and simple in explaining all the different aspects of iCims. I also really like the new candidate onboarding, and all the other training curricula you have up to be able to inform or send out to the candidate. I like you can attach a URL link for videos as well so you can really customize the training. I feel that overall, I would like to see more. Perhaps, more robust options with the training, if that's something iCims is expanding on in the future.
The implementation was pretty difficult. We felt they (Cornerstone) didn’t properly allocate the resources to complete our implementation in the timetable we wanted.
For example, we worked on Workday and SSO integrations - work that we had specifically contracted for in advance. When we were ready to work on that project, they didn’t have the people ready to help us, so it took a lot longer than necessary. That was my biggest pain point.
The implementation approach we went with was a self-led implementation. We would speak to the implementation manager once per week, and self-trained. We met with implementation manager to discuss issues, review things that we’d learned for 1 hour. We found that wasn’t enough. Other things would come up outside that one hour window that we couldn’t get answers to. We didn’t have anyone to ask about those things and we had to wait to ask during our weekly meeting.
The advantage of the self-led implementation approach was that it was really inexpensive – significantly less than the implementation cost for the other systems that we looked at. I also liked that we could pace ourselves. There were however big roadblocks. We would have to make sure the right resources were available. We had an implementation/project manager with a lot of experience and felt that the person was knowledgeable but missed on a few things.
In hindsight, I would still go with the self-led implementation, but knowing what I know now, I would ask for the integration person to be available more. I would work that into the contract. With single sign-on, we needed deep linking to build direct links through a Single Sign-On tool, e.g. when someone gets an email, it directs them to training. But it has to go through SSO to get them to the correct link. Deep linking wasn’t turned on in our system and they had to activate it. We encountered little things like that – sequencing pre-requisites which were problematic. We tried to troubleshoot ourselves.
I recommend you consider contracting for some extra implementation hours and determine when they are going to be available. Work it into the contract that you have the ability to call tech support during implementation. In addition to weekly implementation meetings, they have technical webexes – 4 every week, but 2 didn’t apply to us – one as we were using SSO. The challenge is they were not always relevant – we had specific questions that didn’t fall into those categories
The user experience is a lot better than using SumTotal as an admin CSOD makes working easy. Without having workarounds. Reporting is a lot better than both platforms. Reporting in CSOD is complex however easy to manage and create when you understand the data points collected
Fully available automation, lesser bad data quality, more information is gathered at the time of applicant profile creation without having the need to ask for any follow ups or additional notifications. Integrates better with Oracle, Workday and SAP than other similar systems. Service tickets are resolved faster than other vendors we worked with.
PCRecruiter is very effective in the placement of employees and has been able to achieve our vision. My experience with a similar platform was not as effective as with PCRecruiter since the speed of loading web pages is reliable. The cost of deploying PCRecruiter is relatively low as compared to other recruiting software. The support team of this platform is very reliable and can be easily reached at any time.
It is important to be familiar with the terms and annual increases in licenses and other aspects of the contract. I recommend analyzing this from the beginning and the permanence is relevant because Cornerstone updates its modules and brings out new features that may allow you to leave a module to acquire another
iCims is currently pretty good and the best TAS for us at our stage of growth - but further improvement and enhancements will only help make it even better.
As I have said before, I have no doubt that the services of the Cornerstone sales people were very good. In particular, our salesperson spent a lot of time in contact with us to make the process go smoothly. Perhaps being a large company in some cases the times were slowed down but it is something normal to take into account.
We implemented iCIMS Talent Cloud right before the pandemic. The pandemic created the most difficult recruitment environment ever. I cannot say that iCIMS Talent Cloud has helped us realize any advantageous success in this battle we are fighting. It gets the job done, but we have realized anything like filling jobs faster or having resources within iCIMS Talent Cloud to allow us to attract candidates differently. Status quo, I guess.
Because I am a solo practitioner, with low volume recruiting, I don't use it to the fullest extent. So I'd say zero impact other than to track my information in case of discrepancies with clients.
There is a learning curve, so it does take away time from your day to learn the system.