TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about GoodData.AI

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

GoodData.AI

Connect with GoodData.AI

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with GoodData.AI so that GoodData.AI and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GoodData.AI

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AGoodData is an analytics platform used by organizations to deliver real-time, governed insights, embedded into products, customized for users, and integrated into any data environment.N/A

    Infor Birst

    Score6.5 out of 10
    N/AInfor Birst offers multi-tenant cloud BI for deployment in a public or private cloud, or on-premises. It provides an in-memory columnar data store and a BI layer comprising a reporting engine, predictive analytics tools, mobile native apps, dashboards, discovery tools, and an open client interface.N/A

    Looker

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ALooker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems.N/A
    Pricing
    GoodData.AIInfor BirstLooker
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GoodData.AIInfor BirstLooker
    Free Trial
    YesNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeRequired
    Additional Details——Must contact sales team for pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GoodData.AIInfor BirstLooker
    Considered Multiple Products
    GoodData.AI
    Chose GoodData.AI
    Both the tools are awesome. However, Looker Studio is completely free now.
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    Looker and GoodData are both powerful BI platforms, but they have distinct strengths. Looker offers seamless integration with Google Sheets, enabling easy data import and analysis. On the other hand, GoodData excels in data modeling, providing a user-friendly interface for …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    GoodData stacked better over Looker in its ability to manage distribute and provide custom control to end users.
    overall cost with GoodData would be lower as it would wound not depend on the data platform for compute resources.
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    GoodData is easier to understand and designed to detail critical data within a dashboard system. Visualization is essential, and the filters are quite varied. Metrics are also easy to use, so users only need to think a little more carefully about setting up the SQL required for …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    Embedding flexibility was the main reason we chose GoodData. Interactivity, customization options, and programmatic ability were all very important to us and GoodData's embedding via React SDK offers exactly that. Implementation time was 50% shorter with GoodData than with …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    GoodData seems less user friendly and doesn't provide that many visualization options so we are slowly moving to other solution in part of the company. There are still teams that plan to continue with GoodData and use React code in orther to supply missing functions.
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    The metric engine is the most powerful in GoodData that I have used, being able to define metrics that reference other metrics and using different grains is extremely powerful. Visualisations are relatively easy to create compared to others, sometimes I wish I could see the SQL …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    GoodData is much more customisable in our case so we choose this. Also when it comes to pricing part GoodData is the best economically as well and in terms of features and functionalities. As compared to others similar products I believe that GoodData is much more reliable with …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    GoodData has been proven best for us as it has given the most accurate analytical insights on our data. I've used other tools too but no one has been this good in terms of reporting, handling data, decision making.
    Using GoodData for almost every organisational decision and …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    All of the tools have their plusses and minuses. The one thing that stands out with Qlik is that it allows for two-way API integrations with Salesforce. This means that analytics reporting results can interact with the Salesforce application.
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    The primary reasons GoodData was selected was data modeling capability, ability to standardize complex metrics, quality of viaualization and multi-tenancy
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    I have used all softwares in my past 10 years of experience. GoodData stands out with its seamless data integration, advanced predictive analytics, and collaborative features. Unlike Tableau and Power BI, GoodData offers scalable solutions with a user-friendly interface for …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    Choosing between GoodData and other platforms was clear for me as the superiority of GoodData over others due to our needs. GoodData stands out for its awesome dashboards, robust predictive analytics, reports, and analysis. Data integration helps us for business intelligence …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    GoodData is best among every other platform I used because it's a cloud based platform and way to easy to use. Its robust predictive analytics and unified data view set it way apart. While Power BI and Tableau excel in visualization, GoodData's focus on comprehensive business …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    I was involved in the decision making but not final decision maker. Ease of implementation for GoodData vs Cognos (used for 15 years in multiple companies). I think Tableau's visualizations are better, but there is much that just can't be done in Tableau that GoodData handles …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    Pricing & startupiness was the key in our decision
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    In GoodData we really liked the fact that sales and engineering were on our side from the beginning, the calls were very easy to book and were efficient with clear agenda and participants. We also got invited on Slack were we had support from the team and also we liked the …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    I actually investigated around 20 options and in most part the embedding + multi tenant mode that became a key concern. They either do not have the support or the price scaling is terrible or the startup cost is prohibitive.
    On the average startup cost is around 50k per year and …
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    For the feature sets we were needing and most importantly aligning around a common culture and vision, GoodData easily made the most sense.
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    I selected GoodData as customer support is a lot better as well as the pricing model.
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    it's easier to use and a bit faster
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    For analysts, Tableau is far better because of better graph visualization. Tableau does not need to deal with the amount of uploaded data. Our company uses Gooddata because of its unbeatable price.
    Incentivized
    Chose GoodData.AI
    Most of the have high upfront cost and the scaling model is extremely complicated.
    Incentivized
    Infor
    Chose Infor Birst
    Cloud first strategy: Oracle did not have a cloud BI solution.
    Single end-to-end platform: Domo and GoodData relied upon third party ETL.
    Incentivized
    Chose Infor Birst
    During the vetting process, we looked at 14 different products (one of them internal) to see if they would fit our needs and whittled it down to this one over a three month period. We did not contact sales for all of them (sales sites were enough to rule out some), but did have …
    Incentivized
    Chose Infor Birst
    Birst was the only tool that did the following:
    • robust enough ETL for our data warehouse team
    • data would remain within our data warehouse and not within the tool's proprietary store, in case the company went out of business.
    Incentivized
    Chose Infor Birst
    Birst allows direct access to an internal data store, which none of the products we evaluated provided. We also found the birst ETL layer far more powerful than the other platforms we considered.
    Incentivized
    Chose Infor Birst
    The ability to scale was the primary factor for our CIO's approval. The other products had solutions for scale, but Birst has the one we preferred. As an IoT company our CIO concentrates on products that will meet our requirements today and far into the future. The other …
    Incentivized
    Chose Infor Birst
    We preferred to have an all-in-one cloud solution that could connect to Salesforce.com and on-premise servers. I thought the combination of ETL built into a star-schema was unmatched. QlikView could do something similar, but the resulting data file was not an enterprise grade …
    Incentivized
    Chose Infor Birst
    Business Objects, Microsoft, Pentaho, JasperReports, GoodData. Birst provided the broadest set of functionality at the best cost of ownership. Ease of implementation and getting quickly up to speed provided the biggest cost savings vs the other packages. The keys to ease of …
    Google
    Chose Looker
    • Birst: very opaque for teams accustomed to DevOps (i.e., programmable infrastructure)
    • Tableau: no cloud strategy. Does not scale horizontally
    • GoodData: flexible, but cumbersome. Requires Java
    Incentivized
    Chose Looker
    I evaluated everything under the Gartner BI quadrant (i.e., Tableau, Birst, MS SSRS, MicroStrategy, etc.) — from the niche players, all the way through the powerhouse (supposed) "leaders" in BI. Looker was a nice fit for my company, because all though we are quite large (in …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    90%
    Would buy again
    73 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Would buy again
    85 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    70 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    75 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    73 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    87 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    55 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    55 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    84%
    Implementation went as expected
    54 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    69 Answers
    Features
    GoodData.AIInfor BirstLooker
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of GoodData.AI and Infor Birst and Looker
    Feature
    GoodData.AI
    8.1
    74 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Infor Birst
    7.4
    77 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Looker
    7.4
    134 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Pixel Perfect reports8.055 Ratings7.068 Ratings6.5110 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards8.974 Ratings8.077 Ratings8.2133 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates7.362 Ratings7.159 Ratings7.5115 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of GoodData.AI and Infor Birst and Looker
    Feature
    GoodData.AI
    8.1
    74 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Infor Birst
    7.0
    78 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Looker
    6.8
    132 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Drill-down analysis7.772 Ratings8.078 Ratings6.3128 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities7.674 Ratings7.077 Ratings6.6130 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration8.069 Ratings7.068 Ratings8.8131 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings6.127 Ratings5.555 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of GoodData.AI and Infor Birst and Looker
    Feature
    GoodData.AI
    7.9
    69 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Infor Birst
    6.9
    72 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Looker
    6.6
    128 Ratings
    19% below category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)8.067 Ratings8.072 Ratings7.7124 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.656 Ratings7.058 Ratings7.5110 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics6.540 Ratings5.833 Ratings4.66 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining9.620 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of GoodData.AI and Infor Birst and Looker
    Feature
    GoodData.AI
    8.0
    75 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Infor Birst
    8.3
    72 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Looker
    7.3
    128 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)8.974 Ratings9.070 Ratings7.5120 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model8.666 Ratings8.068 Ratings7.2105 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.072 Ratings8.069 Ratings7.2122 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)6.546 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings00 Ratings7.360 Ratings
    Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
    Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of GoodData.AI and Infor Birst and Looker
    Feature
    GoodData.AI
    8.3
    51 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Infor Birst
    -
    Ratings
    Looker
    -
    Ratings
    REST API8.443 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Javascript API8.339 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    iFrames8.340 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of GoodData.AI and Infor Birst and Looker
    Feature
    GoodData.AI
    -
    Ratings
    Infor Birst
    8.0
    75 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Looker
    7.9
    128 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings8.052 Ratings7.7105 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.067 Ratings7.8113 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings7.28 Ratings7.984 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings9.066 Ratings8.2110 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of GoodData.AI and Infor Birst and Looker
    Feature
    GoodData.AI
    -
    Ratings
    Infor Birst
    5.0
    54 Ratings
    43% below category average
    Looker
    5.2
    95 Ratings
    39% below category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings7.052 Ratings4.991 Ratings
    Mobile Application00 Ratings3.034 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings3.042 Ratings5.885 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    GoodData.AIInfor BirstLooker
    Small Businesses
    Yellowfin
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Reveal
    Score10 out of 10
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Power BI Embedded
    Score8 out of 10
    Sisense
    Score6.9 out of 10
    Sisense
    Score6.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GoodData.AIInfor BirstLooker
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (102 ratings)
    7.5
    (99 ratings)
    8.0
    (134 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.9
    (19 ratings)
    9.0
    (35 ratings)
    9.2
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    9.4
    (81 ratings)
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    8.8
    (12 ratings)
    Availability
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    4.1
    (6 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    7.5
    (6 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (11 ratings)
    6.0
    (19 ratings)
    8.8
    (14 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    5.3
    (6 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    8.0
    (13 ratings)
    6.0
    (24 ratings)
    8.5
    (51 ratings)
    Data Sources
    8.0
    (13 ratings)
    7.6
    (76 ratings)
    7.3
    (51 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.3
    (4 ratings)
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    8.7
    (2 ratings)
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GoodData.AIInfor BirstLooker
    Likelihood to Recommend
    GoodData.AI
    I think it works nicely for shops that want the analytical power and are ok to host their own infrastructure for the data and etl. For smaller operations with limited budgets but still high demand for analytical features the math may not work out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    Infor Birst OEM and embedded analytics are well suited for advanced analytics and business intelligence. It has flexible deployment features and a lot of configuration ability with low code - no coding ability. Ability to ingest data from multiple live data sources. Source data from multiple sources can be segregated into multiple sections based on business criteria. Easily searchable business terms (metadata) across all enterprise analytic content.
    Read full review
    Google
    When data drives potential for new orders, Looker earns its place in our tech stack. If, on the other hand, we are hoping for pipeline generation, Looker is useful if you are willing to repeatedly go check customer utilizations .... it is not appropriate if you are hoping to automate data analysis for this purpose.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    GoodData.AI
    • The source datasets are often complex, semi-structured and un-linked to key entities. With GoodData, all of these datasets are unified to serve as a central semantic data model layer, building into a galaxy schema with dimensions, bridge, and facts, which then forms the backbone that powers the [...] data intelligence cloud. Building insights and dashboards become a much easier task once the underlying data model is designed. GoodData enforces certain best practices as a BI tool, which must be adhered to get the true value of the raw data. For e.g. the source FDA dashboard may just show inspection data but the Site Profile dashboard built on GoodData goes beyond the standard information and shows more insight into site risk scores and can be drilled into details. There is blog written on this topic: [...].
    • GoodData provides a rich collection of visualization options that help us create compelling story-telling via dashboards. Being well-prepared for FDA inspections is essential for maintaining product quality, regulatory compliance, and avoiding serious business setbacks. FDA inspections are critical events that can shape a company’s market access and reputation. The FDA itself offers the FDA Data Dashboard, but it doesn’t make every document available. There is a blog written on this topic: [...].
    • Medical devices and technologies do not stop evolving after they receive regulatory approval. Once a product hits the market, it faces real-world usage, compliance challenges, and an array of regulatory scrutiny. Managing these postmarket dynamics is critical to a product’s long-term success and patient safety. However, many companies struggle to keep track of relevant events across a product’s markets, from adverse event reports to changing regulations. Postmarket Intelligence developed on GoodData platform enables us to solve that problem. It empowers MedTech companies to efficiently monitor, assess, and act on postmarket data—saving time, improving decision-making, and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Anyone who is used to trying to get the data they need from the various FDA, and other regulatory agency websites, knows that collecting, cleaning, and structuring that data takes hours. And that’s before any analysis can get done. We enable customers to free up time to focus only on the high-value analysis and subsequent recommendations to leadership, rather than wrangling the data.
    • The data pipeline refresh that is provided by GoodData Platform is also quite useful from data engineering perspective. The Automated Data Distribution v2 or commonly called as ADD refresh follows a set pattern of identifying the analytical data model through output stage which helps abstract the complex table definition to simpler views that can help with quick rebuild at the data warehouse level while loading the data into GoodData's ADS storage layer. The import first way of loading data into GoodData's cloud storage, followed by querying for any aggregations or metrics on the GoodData analyzer, makes this simple and fast.
    • GoodData's latest product i.e. Cloud also offers several good features like Analytics as Code which helps software engineering teams follow a code-first approach to analytics, where building insights, dashboards or even datasets can be done in YAML templates or serviced by REST APIs. This is particularly forward thinking in the modern technology stack and evolving industry requirements. These provide seamless integration options to front-end and backend code, embedded analytics with multiple choices from HTML to React based workloads. At [...], we are currently exploring most of these features while planning for a future migration from Platform to Cloud.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    • End-to-end solution, from raw source data, ETL, warehousing and reporting, Birst is able to do everything we need in one package instead of needing to develop and maintain multiple technologies
    • Intuitive report development. The drag and drop creation of reports is simple. More complicated queries are easy to generate.
    • Very user-friendly and interactive. A lot of nice features are available both for developers and end users to streamline the process of preparing and consuming data
    • Rich API which allows us to programmatically interact with Birst
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Show visited pages - sessions, pageviews - which programs are viewed the most.
    • Displays session source/medium views to see where users are coming from.
    • It shows the video titles, URLs, and event counts so we can monitor the performance of our videos.
    • It gives a graphic face to the numbers, such as using bar charts, pie graphs, and other charts to show user trends or which channels are driving engagement.
    • Our clients like to see the top pages visited for a month.
    • I like the drop-and-drag approach, and building charts is a little easier than it was before.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    GoodData.AI
    • Good Data is already have certain customizable options. However, having more flexibility in customizing reports and dashboards & control over the visual aspects would enhance the overall user experience.
    • To make Good Data even more powerful tool, improving the speed and responsiveness of the tool, especially during data-intensive tasks, would be a significantly helpful.
    • For new users, the interface can be made more user friendly which would promote easy navigation through features of tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    • Birst prices are fairly expensive. License plus cost of users can add up pretty quickly
    • Depending on the size of data, rendering of reports can take a little bit. Need faster processing of data
    • Takes a little time to understand how to build reports, not the most intuitive UI
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Documentation is scarce, and very difficult to find when you need it.
    • Pricing is unclear, particularly as you look to scale your reports across the business.
    • Data from other sources is not represented in the system as well as first party Google services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    GoodData.AI
    Because gooddata really helps us in processing data to make reports or dashboards. So we are very satisfied when we use it. What we like is the flexible use of charts. We change at will the use of charts to display in reports or dashboards. Thank you Gooddata for helping companies like us who need flexibility in usage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    We have been able to overcome any of the drawbacks we've found with Birst easily and it has fulfilled almost all of our analytic needs to date. Having seen their roadmap it would be highly unlikely we would move away from this platform any time soon. You simply can't beat the functionality that Birst provides for the price and the things I see coming out of the company solidify that our decision to choose Birst was the best possible choice. We have never regretted the decision.
    Read full review
    Google
    I give it this rating because it deems as effective, I am able to complete majority of my tasks using this app. It is very helpful when analyzing the data provided and shown in the app and it's just overall a great app for Operational use, despite the small hiccups it has (live data).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    GoodData.AI
    From a customer perspective it is incredibly usable. We have more users building their own reports that would normally need custom work from our support team. The back end can be daunting when trying to configure things like new data elements or push changes to a report to all existing customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    I would like to see additional usability put into the ETL scripting. Recently, Birst added a nice function reference inline to formula creation which has kept me from having to return to documentation so much. The same in ETL would be very beneficial. The interface problems related to the Flex framework are being addressed in a rewrite to HTML 5, but for now they are still a hindrance to a higher usability rating.
    Read full review
    Google
    Looker is relatively easy to use, even as it is set up. The customers for the front-end only have issues with the initial setup for looker ml creations. Other "looks" are relatively easy to set up, depending on the ETL and the data which is coming into Looker on a regular basis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    GoodData.AI
    We are approximately one month since go-live. There has been one short outage.
    Read full review
    Infor
    We frequently experience -103 errors due to us using the Live Connect functionality, which does not seem to handle even minor interruptions in connectivity, and treats all future connection attempts or data requests as errors, even if the issue does not exist any longer
    Read full review
    Google
    No objections
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    GoodData.AI
    I'm generally impressed with how fast it reflects so much data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    Everything runs very fast and smoothly. The only process that I wish was faster would be processing the data after uploading new data or making changes to the existing data model. It can take 15-20 minutes (roughly) to upload and process new data once you start getting into 10's of millions of rows. Given my experience with how long it takes me to pull the same data using SQL Server Management Studio, I don't think Birst is unreasonably slow - but for me to give a higher rating, I would want it to be unreasonably fast
    Read full review
    Google
    Somehow resources heavy, both on server and client. I recommned at least 50Mbs data rate and high performance desktop comouter to be abke to run comolex tasks and configure larger amount of data. On the other hand, the client does not need to worry when viewing, the performance is usually ok
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    GoodData.AI
    Support team has been highly responsive and helpful from our first initial deployment to present day. They engage and work with us. know when to escalate for more challenging problems. They also follow up. Overall have had a very good experience with support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    • Poor turnaround time
    • Low response rate when the problem at hand are large
    • Lack of infrastructural knowledge when it comes to scaling solutions
    • Lack of inter team work noticed
    • Most of the tickets are open for a long period of time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Never had to work with support for issues. Any questions we had, they would respond promptly and clearly. The one-time setup was easy, by reading documentation. If the feature is not supported, they will add a feature request. In this case, LDAP support was requested over OKTA. They are looking into it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    GoodData.AI
    Petr was a rock star - patient, knowledgeable, clear and easy to work with.
    Read full review
    Infor
    I have attended two different training sessions. The first one was my initial training on the system. It was well paced, clear and concise. If there were questions that were not able to be answered by the instructor, he took down the question and actually followed up and provided us a response quickly. The second session was specific to the dashboard and report design components. This training was very good though there were some attendants who had little or no experience and their questions slowed the class.
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    GoodData.AI
    GoodData implementation team was professional and courteous
    Read full review
    Infor
    Although I found the online resources helpful, a lack of appropriate examples for certain tasks key to report creation and advanced modeling make the online training/documentation less than perfect. For an inexperienced BI professional, the online training would not enable a streamlined launch of the product.
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    GoodData.AI
    Implementations are hard and we had limited technical resources. We relied too heavily on GD care team. When we found technical gaps, they weren't simple to overcome
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    Have clean data! Birst flexibility allows - Start small, then introduce functionality and complexity along the way. If you try to present all the functionality [bells and whistles] and wow them, but bad data is uncovered, the end user blames the new application and turns away.
    Read full review
    Google
    Very satisfied, easy to implement
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    GoodData.AI
    GoodData comparing to other platform is very easy to use, customer support and on-boarding support. Set of features, speed of integration in our platform. Also great benefit for us was very competetive pricing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    Birst was better than Domo for our needs because we could get in and tinker with it. Our impression of Domo was that it had a lot of connectors and ready to go reports, but it made too many assumptions about applications we use. We customize too much to use a "ready to go" solution like that. When we looked at Tableau, we liked its visualization capabilities, but it wasn't going to help us do the extractions, ETL, and warehousing of data. It may have come some distance since then.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Looker Studio, you can easily report on data from various sources without programming. Looker Studio is available at no charge for creators and report viewers. Enterprise customers who upgrade to Looker Studio Pro will receive support and expanded administrative features, including team content management. So it's good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    GoodData.AI
    No answers on this topic
    Infor
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    Perfect price to performance
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    GoodData.AI
    We never had any issues with scalability, other than being limited by workspaces
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    we can see that loading a lot of data can cause a noticable slow down in performance. Birst support indicated that they don't really consider anything less than 30 seconds to be an issue, but that is not the case for our customers, so we have had to change some of implementation to address this
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    GoodData.AI
    • I personally pushed our management to get GoodData implemented, and there on we have been making much more profits than we ever did!
    • Last month we made a decision using the platform and withing a short span of time our ROI gets 7X.
    • We also made a marketing spend of $100,000 every quater using the insights and metrics, and we are really happy with the returs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    • Being a manufacturing company we tend to lag behind technologically. But having all the data for different ERP systems in one place has been an eye opener for the executives. It has lessened the need to convert some legacy ERP systems.
    • Having such a simple reporting tool is a great asset to some of our sites that have traditionally had trouble gathering data from AS400 systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Looker has a poignant impact on our business's ROI objectives. As an advertising exchange we have specific goals for daily requests and fill, and having premade Looks to monitor this is an integral piece of our operational capability
    • To facilitate an efficient monthly billing cycle in our organization, Looker is essential to track estimated revenue and impression delivery by publisher. Without the Looks we have set up, we would spend considerably more time and effort segmenting revenue by vertical.
    • Looker's unique value proposition is making analytical tools more digestible to people without conventional analytical experience. Other competing tools like Tableau require considerably more training and context to successfully use, and the ability to easily plot different visualizations is one of its greatest selling points.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    GoodData.AI Screenshots

    Screenshot of Governed Analytics and AI, Built for ScaleScreenshot of Build and Scale Analytics with CodeScreenshot of Ground AI in Trusted Business ContextScreenshot of Automate Analytics with Assistants, Copilots, and AI WorkflowsScreenshot of Embed and Extend Analytics AnywhereScreenshot of Optimize Performance and Compute Cost

    Infor Birst Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    Looker Screenshots

    Screenshot of a Looker dashboard with a geo chart.