Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google App Engine
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Google App Engine is Google Cloud's platform-as-a-service offering. It features pay-per-use pricing and support for a broad array of programming languages.
$0.05
Per Hour Per Instance
Microsoft Azure
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters.
$29
per month
UKG Pro
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
UKG delivers cloud-based HCM solutions including UKG Pro that help businesses simplify payroll computations, accelerate talent acquisition, manage time and attendance, and support proactive, strategic talent management on a global level.N/A
Pricing
Google App EngineMicrosoft AzureUKG Pro
Editions & Modules
Starting Price
$0.05
Per Hour Per Instance
Max Price
$0.30
Per Hour Per Instance
Developer
$29
per month
Standard
$100
per month
Professional Direct
$1000
per month
Basic
Free
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google App EngineMicrosoft AzureUKG Pro
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThe free tier lets users have access to a variety of services free for 12 months with limited usage after making an Azure account.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google App EngineMicrosoft AzureUKG Pro
Considered Multiple Products
Google App Engine
Chose Google App Engine
Compared with Microsoft Azure, Google App Engine requires a more complicated development environment setup. It's not as simple as using Visual Studio 2015 with Azure SDK. There are multiple IDE on the market to choose from for developing apps for Google App Engine. JetBrains …
Chose Google App Engine
If you have a small team which is also responsible for development of the product then surely go for it. And if you have a larger team with dedicated person to take care of deployments. Go for cheaper options such as compute engine or AWS (be sure to do your research on pricing …
Chose Google App Engine
We were on another much smaller cloud provider and decided to make the switch for several reasons - stability, breadth of services, and security. In reviewing options, GCP provided the best mixtures of meeting our needs while also balancing the overall cost of the service as …
Chose Google App Engine
I think that Microsoft and Amazon are simply investing more in their offerings, and there are a bunch of cool PaaS solutions out there as well. Google App Engine is solid, and is probably the right choice for some projects. But ultimately one should evaluate each platform …
Chose Google App Engine
  • No management of operating system
  • Cheaper
Microsoft Azure
Chose Microsoft Azure
We have settled with Microsoft Azure considered its effective administration and the ability to data visualization and analysis, together with the top-notch security/stability.
UKG Pro

No answer on this topic

Features
Google App EngineMicrosoft AzureUKG Pro
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
9.5
32 Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces9.018 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability10.032 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead9.032 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability8.024 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control10.031 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration10.028 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation10.029 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication10.028 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification9.028 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery9.026 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes10.029 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
8.5
27 Ratings
3% above category average
UKG Pro
-
Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime00 Ratings8.126 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic scaling00 Ratings8.725 Ratings00 Ratings
Elastic load balancing00 Ratings8.624 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-configured templates00 Ratings8.225 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring tools00 Ratings8.326 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images00 Ratings8.424 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating system support00 Ratings9.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Security controls00 Ratings8.626 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation00 Ratings8.224 Ratings00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
7.8
940 Ratings
4% below category average
Employee demographic data00 Ratings00 Ratings8.6851 Ratings
Employment history00 Ratings00 Ratings8.3877 Ratings
Job profiles and administration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.0847 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6832 Ratings
Organizational charting00 Ratings00 Ratings7.1743 Ratings
Organization and location management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.0756 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)00 Ratings00 Ratings7.2599 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
8.1
857 Ratings
0% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.2811 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings00 Ratings7.7407 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment00 Ratings00 Ratings8.2318 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6732 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings00 Ratings8.5799 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.2659 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.057 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
7.7
663 Ratings
6% below category average
Approval workflow00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6588 Ratings
Balance details00 Ratings00 Ratings7.7618 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment00 Ratings00 Ratings7.7510 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
8.0
908 Ratings
2% below category average
View and generate pay and benefit information00 Ratings00 Ratings8.2876 Ratings
Update personal information00 Ratings00 Ratings8.4881 Ratings
View company policy documentation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.9650 Ratings
Employee recognition00 Ratings00 Ratings7.3340 Ratings
View job history00 Ratings00 Ratings8.3862 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
7.5
229 Ratings
7% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets00 Ratings00 Ratings7.5229 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
7.1
843 Ratings
6% below category average
Report builder00 Ratings00 Ratings7.3819 Ratings
Pre-built reports00 Ratings00 Ratings7.2832 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data00 Ratings00 Ratings6.7579 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
7.8
644 Ratings
2% below category average
New hire portal00 Ratings00 Ratings8.1637 Ratings
Manager tracking tools00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6516 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
7.5
438 Ratings
7% below category average
Corporate goal setting00 Ratings00 Ratings7.3345 Ratings
Individual goal setting00 Ratings00 Ratings7.5417 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6298 Ratings
Performance tracking00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6387 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
7.5
542 Ratings
5% below category average
Performance plans00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6484 Ratings
Performance improvement plans00 Ratings00 Ratings6.9381 Ratings
Review status tracking00 Ratings00 Ratings7.7498 Ratings
Review reminders00 Ratings00 Ratings7.5468 Ratings
Multiple review frequency00 Ratings00 Ratings7.5394 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
7.1
235 Ratings
10% below category average
Create succession plans/pools00 Ratings00 Ratings6.7189 Ratings
Candidate ranking00 Ratings00 Ratings7.2203 Ratings
Candidate search00 Ratings00 Ratings7.5206 Ratings
Candidate development00 Ratings00 Ratings7.0187 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
UKG Pro
7.4
530 Ratings
5% below category average
Job Requisition Management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.5499 Ratings
Company Website Posting00 Ratings00 Ratings7.5489 Ratings
Publish to Social Media00 Ratings00 Ratings7.2387 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings00 Ratings7.4451 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention00 Ratings00 Ratings7.1382 Ratings
Applicant Tracking00 Ratings00 Ratings7.7486 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6451 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google App EngineMicrosoft AzureUKG Pro
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.4 out of 10
Dayforce Powerpay
Dayforce Powerpay
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google App EngineMicrosoft AzureUKG Pro
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(35 ratings)
8.8
(96 ratings)
8.1
(1032 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.3
(8 ratings)
10.0
(17 ratings)
10.0
(197 ratings)
Usability
7.7
(7 ratings)
8.3
(36 ratings)
7.9
(268 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(2 ratings)
10.0
(76 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(333 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(12 ratings)
9.0
(27 ratings)
6.4
(496 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(88 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(206 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(87 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(78 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(68 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(95 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(57 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(50 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google App EngineMicrosoft AzureUKG Pro
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
App Engine is such a good resource for our team both internally and externally. You have complete control over your app, how it runs, when it runs, and more while Google handles the back-end, scaling, orchestration, and so on. If you are serving a tool, system, or web page, it's perfect. If you are serving something back-end, like an automation or ETL workflow, you should be a little considerate or careful with how you are structuring that job. For instance, the Standard environment in Google App Engine will present you with a resource limit for your server calls. If your operations are known to take longer than, say, 10 minutes or so, you may be better off moving to the Flexible environment (which may be a little more expensive but certainly a little more powerful and a little less limited) or even moving that workflow to something like Google Compute Engine or another managed service.
Read full review
Microsoft
Azure is particularly well suited for enterprise environments with existing Microsoft investments, those that require robust compliance features, and organizations that need hybrid cloud capabilities that bridge on-premises and cloud infrastructure. In my opinion, Azure is less appropriate for cost-sensitive startups or small businesses without dedicated cloud expertise and scenarios requiring edge computing use cases with limited connectivity. Azure offers comprehensive solutions for most business needs but can feel like there is a higher learning curve than other cloud-based providers, depending on the product and use case.
Read full review
UKG
I would say, well, I don't want to focus on less appropriate. I want to be well suited. I really feel like if the transparency with our count rep and then just diving in onto how to problem solve and how to troubleshoot, I think that's most important with that.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Quick to develop, quick to deploy. You can be up and running on Google App Engine in no time.
  • Flexible. We use Java for some services and Node.js for others.
  • Great security features. We have been consistently impressed with the security and authentication features of Google App Engine.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Azure is highly scalable and flexible. You can quickly scale up or down additional resources and computing power.
  • You have no longer upfront investments for hardware. You only pay for the use of your computing power, storage space, or services.
  • The uptime that can be achieved and guaranteed is very important for our company. This includes the rapid maintenance for security updates that are mostly carried out by Microsoft.
  • The wide range of capabilities of services that are possible in Microsoft Azure. You can practically put or create anything in Microsoft Azure.
Read full review
UKG
  • UKG has an amazing support team to reach out to if assistance is needed
  • All add-ons of UKG Pro integrate seamlessly making it a powerful software program
  • UKG Pro is very configurable to meet the specific needs of companies
  • It is easy to use and navigate
  • The mobile app is loved by all employees and provides on-demand access
  • The Ultimate Community is amazing!! On-demand information on all products and how they are used. Connect with other companies that use UKG Pro and learn from each other.
  • The Learning Centre is also amazing!! Learning right at your fingertips anytime, anywhere.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • There is a slight learning curve to getting used to code on Google App Engine.
  • Google Cloud Datastore is Google's NoSQL database in the cloud that your applications can use. NoSQL databases, by design, cannot give handle complex queries on the data. This means that sometimes you need to think carefully about your data structures - so that you can get the results you need in your code.
  • Setting up billing is a little annoying. It does not seem to save billing information to your account so you can re-use the same information across different Cloud projects. Each project requires you to re-enter all your billing information (if required)
Read full review
Microsoft
  • The cost of resources is difficult to determine, technical documentation is frequently out of date, and documentation and mapping capabilities are lacking.
  • The documentation needs to be improved, and some advanced configuration options require research and experimentation.
  • Microsoft's licensing scheme is too complex for the average user, and Azure SQL syntax is too different from traditional SQL.
Read full review
UKG
  • Onboarding and recruiting need an environment that is more stable and dependable.
  • Core Benefits could be enhanced to allow OE and LE events via the mobile app.
  • Service and support need to be increased; days and weeks now, when we first went live, it was minutes and hours.
  • Adapting all version of time management into one or two versions, at no cost to the customer would allow the resources from UTA, UTM and WFM Classic to be directed to future enhancements and would allow support services to be increased for the 2 remaining platforms.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
App Engine is a solid choice for deployments to Google Cloud Platform that do not want to move entirely to a Kubernetes-based container architecture using a different Google product. For rapid prototyping of new applications and fairly straightforward web application deployments, we'll continue to leverage the capabilities that App Engine affords us.
Read full review
Microsoft
Moving to Azure was and still is an organizational strategy and not simply changing vendors. Our product roadmap revolved around Azure as we are in the business of humanitarian relief and Azure and Microsoft play an important part in quickly and efficiently serving all of the world. Migration and investment in Azure should be considered as an overall strategy of an organization and communicated companywide.
Read full review
UKG
We have been a customer since 2015, we have gone to market and find that UKG Pro product is both user friendly for administrators as well as the employee. The qualify of support and service of UKG team is valued and we trust the product.
Read full review
Usability
Google
I had to revisit the UI after a year of just setting up and forgetting. The UI got some improvements but the amount of navigation we have to go through to setup a new app has increased but also got easier to setup. Gemini now is integrated and make getting answers faster
Read full review
Microsoft
As Microsoft Azure is [doing a] really good with PaaS. The need of a market is to have [a] combo of PaaS and IaaS. While AWS is making [an] exceptionally well blend of both of them, Azure needs to work more on DevOps and Automation stuff. Apart from that, I would recommend Azure as a great platform for cloud services as scale.
Read full review
UKG
It gets the job done, but not with a few deep sighs. Once you know where stuff lives, it's manageable, but the first learning curve is steep, some menus feel buried. However, it's consistent, reliable and doesn't crash on me, which counts for a lot. With a little UI glow up it could push into a 9 zone.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It has proven to be unreliable in our production environment and services become unavailable without proper notification to system administrators
Read full review
UKG
For the most part UltiPro has been reliable, but it could definitely be better. There have been several notable server issues where we were unable to access the product or unable to utilize some of the features. Customer support is usually quick to respond to questions about these issues, but they do not proactively reach out to customers whose environments have been effected by outages
Read full review
Performance
Google
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
UKG
Normally UKG Pro loads quickly. We had been having major issues with reports running in a timely manner but recently they broke out our virtual server to another instance where is wasn't sharing resources and that seems to have helped reporting run more efficiently.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
Good amount of documentation available for Google App Engine and in general there is large developer community around Google App Engine and other products it interacts with. Lastly, Google support is great in general. No issues so far with them.
Read full review
Microsoft
We were running Windows Server and Active Directory, so [Microsoft] Azure was a seamless transition. We ran into a few, if any support issues, however, the availability of Microsoft Azure's support team was more than willing and able to guide us through the process. They even proposed solutions to issues we had not even thought of!
Read full review
UKG
The quality of UKG Support is related directly to the UKG rep. who handles the issue. In some cases you get someone who really is good at supporting the product and others may not have as much experience and it shows
Read full review
In-Person Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
UKG
I've been to a few in-person (hands on) training sessions and it is very similar to the online classes. You have the same reference material to look back on after the training. So regardless of in person training or online you really get the same thing.
Read full review
Online Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
UKG
Most of the online training was very generic (to be expected) but we had specific requirements for configuration that could have been better addressed with more individual sessions earlier on from our project team. However, we did finally begin booking training sessions with our implementation team which were recorded, and so provided additional information for how to correctly configure and test the system.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
As I have mentioned before the issue with my Oracle Mismatch Version issues that have put a delay on moving one of my platforms will justify my 7 rating.
Read full review
UKG
Make sure you have all of your tax account information with all the states you are registered in available and that you are knowledgeable about the filing status, frequency, etc. We had some unique challenges with our state unemployment tax set up that I was not aware of and needed to be addressed prior to going live. Working with the state unemployment office can be a challenge.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
We were on another much smaller cloud provider and decided to make the switch for several reasons - stability, breadth of services, and security. In reviewing options, GCP provided the best mixtures of meeting our needs while also balancing the overall cost of the service as compared to the other major players in Azure and AWS.
Read full review
Microsoft
As I continue to evaluate the "big three" cloud providers for our clients, I make the following distinctions, though this gap continues to close. AWS is more granular, and inherently powerful in the configuration options compared to [Microsoft] Azure. It is a "developer" platform for cloud. However, Azure PowerShell is helping close this gap. Google Cloud is the leading containerization platform, largely thanks to it building kubernetes from the ground up. Azure containerization is getting better at having the same storage/deployment options.
Read full review
UKG
We used ADP WFN prior to switching to UKG. We interviewed three different payroll companies to see what our options were. UKG stood out and aligned with our company values. The sales team was very helpful and asked questions about what we were currently doing and how they could assist with simplifying things. I personally had a side meeting with them to see if there were options for a process that we manually process and if UKG could actually eliminate the process. We came to the conclusion that we weren't able to get it 100%, but we could pull 80% of what we needed from UKG, and then we would only need to manipulate 20% of the information. It was also determined from that meeting that we wouldn't need to pay extra to have a special report built. The customer service is what we were sold on. The other companies that we looked at didn't give us the confidence that their customer service would be any better than what we previously had.
Read full review
Scalability
Google
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
UKG
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Effective employee adoption through ease of use.
  • Effective integration to other java based frameworks.
  • Time to market is very quick. Build, test, deploy and use.
  • The GAE Whitelist for java is an important resource to know what works and what does not. So use it. It would also be nice for Google to expand on items that are allowed on GAE platform.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • For about 2 years we didn't have to do anything with our production VMs, the system ran without a hitch, which meant our engineers could focus on features rather than infrastructure.
  • DNS management was very easy in Azure, which made it easy to upgrade our cluster with zero downtime.
  • Azure Web UI was easy to work with and navigate, which meant our senior engineers and DevOps team could work with Azure without formal training.
Read full review
UKG
  • Personally as a veteran user of UKG Pro, in past employers I have seen many amazing increases in employee engagement and ROI.
  • With QuVa, we are still very new to the UKG Pro platform and are just now beginning to get out of the implementation phase where we can start measuring the change. I will be looking for changes in Overtime spending to reduce as a result of more informative and actionable dashboards for managers to monitor overtime and timeclock abuses in real time. I am also expecting employees to engage more with new features being pushed out to the mobile app.
Read full review
ScreenShots

UKG Pro Screenshots

Screenshot of included workforce analytics.Screenshot of the payroll gateway.