TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    MindTouch

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AMindTouch is a customer experience management platform with content management and help authoring capabilities. Formerly known as MediaWiki, it is optimized for building knowledge bases for customer self-service and agent assistance purposes.N/A

    Userlytics

    Score5.9 out of 10
    N/AUserlytics headquartered in San Francisco provides their suite of usablity testing tools for UI or website developers (or deliverers of similar digital assets) on a pay-as-you-go / per participant basis, or a subscription basis.

    $3,450

    per year

    UserTesting

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AUserTesting helps UX researchers, designers, product teams, and marketers gather actionable insights through research, testing, and feedback. With a network of real people ready to share their perspectives, UserTesting enables organizations to make customer-first decisions at scale.N/A
    Pricing
    MindTouchUserlyticsUserTesting
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    MindTouchUserlyticsUserTesting
    Free Trial
    YesYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    MindTouchUserlyticsUserTesting
    Considered Multiple Products
    MindTouch
    No answer on this topic
    Userlytics
    Chose Userlytics
    Userlytics can be a good alternate in terms of price point and has a better integration of apps like invision which helps.
    Mobile recording needs to be improved. Nowadays, competitors are way better in terms of functionality comparision.
    Incentivized
    UserTesting
    Chose UserTesting
    UserTesting is probably the most polished with the largest tester pool, fastest turnaround, and great tools for both moderated and unmoderated tests.
    Userlytics is a solid alternative, especially for the budget-conscious. It supports usability testing on lots of devices, and …
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    We use both UserTesting and Userlytics in conjunction with each other. Userlytics we find to be stronger with 1-2-1 moderated study set up due to it being really simple and intuitive for both the researcher and the participant to use. Userlytics also utilises AI analysis of …
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    Userlytics was evaluated before but coverage of services was less as compare to UserTesting.
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    UserTesting has a better panel that is larger, more far reaching, and faster. UserZoom's GO platform has a better UI and a far better pricing structure, but their panel is smaller and studies take longer to fill. UserZoom has a poor panel for our needs. It is ok for general …
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    Userlytics is probably the best alternative to UserTesting. It has a large panel, a similar tool for creating tests, [but] their pricing model is much more favorable for our company. They don't charge per seat license, but only per test that you conduct. That would allow my …
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    UserTesting is easier to use, and the site's design is user-friendly. There are no glitches, and the site works without crashes or slow loading.
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    The large audience pool, unlimited testing and intuitive platform
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    They always have available studies
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    UserTesting is by far superior to other competitors. The amount of features and non-limitations is much better than what the competitors have. It's also much more pleasing to look at. Perhaps it's because it is well organized in comparison. It still have some annoying quirks, …
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    All the tools we had evaluated before purchasing had similar features but the one thing that set UserTesting apart from the rest was the size and reach of their user base. We needed to reach global audiences and at the time of our choice, only UserTesting was able to reach a …
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    I have not personally used the competing products for UX research, but in my initial review of our options, I found UserTesting to have the best balance of platform and pricing.
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    UserTesting has a better user base and quicker responses.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Would buy again
    128 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    94 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    126 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    82 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    90 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    MindTouchUserlyticsUserTesting
    Small Businesses
    Zoho CRM Plus
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Sogolytics
    Score9 out of 10
    Dovetail
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Dovetail
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Medallia
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Optimal
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Optimal
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    MindTouchUserlyticsUserTesting
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.6
    (110 ratings)
    7.6
    (4 ratings)
    8.5
    (196 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.8
    (18 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.4
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    7.5
    (29 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.6
    (174 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.8
    (31 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.3
    (173 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.8
    (5 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.7
    (10 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    4.6
    (4 ratings)
    Configurability
    5.0
    (5 ratings)
    2.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    1.4
    (3 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.3
    (4 ratings)
    2.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    MindTouchUserlyticsUserTesting
    Likelihood to Recommend
    MindTouch
    If a company doesn't want to make their knowledge base public-facing, you lose a lot of the value of using MindTouch in a closed environment. MindTouch is not ideal for extremely structured content management scenarios that are strong DITA advocates. Companies that require localization might not be good fits either.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    Userlytics would be appropriate to use if you were investigating UX on your website, or wanted to identify any pain points which could be causing lower conversion rates. Not only will it be a way to gain direct user feedback, but it enhances your visual ability to see how a user progresses through your website. It is well suited if you have less time to conduct moderated user research at a facility or a client doesn't quite have the budget for that. It may be less appropriate if a client wants a bigger project with larger budgets and more time. In this case, moderated, face-to-face research may be more appropriate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    UserTesting has been great for moderated customer interviews/usability testing as well as for unmoderated testing of messaging, imagery, prototypes and live experiences. I would say that the scope of what you want needs to be limited, as the participants are only paid so much and tests are supposed to not exceed a certain amount of time. For customer interviews, I think it can be difficult to onboard customers to UserTesting if they have never used it before. If I set up interviews, I don't even have them use the UserTesting scheduling tool, I actually set up all the interviews with the customers myself through the tool (being mindful of time zones!). When we run the meeting, they really don't even know UserTesting is involved. Might be nice for UserTesting to allow the upload/connecting to of a Zoom interview and let it do the transcription/analysis from there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    MindTouch
    • MindTouch helps to easily organize our help articles to ensure that our end user is receiving the proper information.
    • The MindTouch platform is extremely easy to navigate which reduces the turnaround time for our team to publish new material.
    • The editor tools supplied through MindTouch make styling our documentation a breeze.
    • The contextual help tool allows our customers to consume documentation based on the page they are viewing in our platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    • Excellent customer service
    • Fast response rate
    • Implementing new features
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    • Product Manager who follows up on your UserTesting usage and gives advice/support when you need it.
    • UserTesting University is a great platform to learn how to use UT and general information about research.
    • UserTesting can find participants quickly, so you won't need to wait long before you can start the analysis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    MindTouch
    • When we do have a support issue, we frequently need to go through multiple people, contacts, ways of explaining things, etc,. before someone on their end actually understands our problem. It's rare that the first person we talk to understands the big picture or appreciates our use case.
    • The draft functionality is a promising start but lacks some key features that cause us regular frustration. For example, you can only create one draft of a page at a time. This is fine if changes come to you in perfect sequential order, but it makes it impossible for us to update a live page while a draft exists. More specifically, if we're working on updating content on a page for a new feature being released next month, but then we notice a typo today, we can't fix the typo in production without first deleting the draft or doing some hacky workaround of temporarily copying/pasting the source HTML of the draft page and saving it someplace else.
    • Existence of, or integration with, true source control would be a huge win, but it's something currently lacking in the product. MindTouch's content reuse feature is helpful in the right situations, but it's not robust enough to scale well for lots of content.
    • Version history of page changes is not 100% reliable. Sometimes items don't show up at all or there is a delay before the diff is visible. Also, creating a draft does not register at all in the page version history.
    • In-site search is poor, unless you know the *exact* title of what you're looking for. We tell our customers to use Google, not the MindTouch search. Google is excellent at searching our MindTouch site.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    • User interface
    • Mobile support
    • Consolidation of Results
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    • Sometimes there are restrictions around types of research that can be used for moderated user-testing with our own users.
    • For tests on relatively small areas of a website or app, the AI analysis seems rather overblown, like it's trying too hard to come up with something insightful when the test is actually about something quite small (e.g. structure of a mobile app menu).
    • It's difficult to invite our own users to unmoderated user-testing because they wouldn't know how the UserTesting interface works - this is particularly an issue for mobile research.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    MindTouch
    We've put lots and lots of content into the MindTouch system, of course, so that makes it harder to opt out, but we're also very pleased with their rate of development and weekly pushing of improvements, as well as their response and solutions to our questions and input All in all, a winning combination.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    No answers on this topic
    UserTesting
    I'm very happy with my experience of the product and the level of service and learning resources they provide. If the service becomes more expensive than it currently is then we might not be able to justify additional cost - but this is theoretical. I would recommend UserTesting and would ideally renew our contract.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    MindTouch
    The site is responsive across multiple devices and screens. It has a clear path to contact support. The articles are searchable. Site users do have trouble navigating the site and finding what they need. That may be due to the architecture of the site, but it'd be nice if MindTouch offered more solutions are this. Our content is organized by product line. And many of those product lines have overlapping training content, so we have extensive duplicate content.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    I think it's very user friendly. I think it gives you a chance to get a feel for websites you may not previously have experience with nor have otherwise experienced. It's also a great way to give input and help shape functionality of business you may enjoy or have further interest in
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    It's very good, I have used other tools in the past and this is by far the most intuitive and user friendly. Testament to this is the ease with which other non researchers who have been onboarded to the tool with our additional seat have found it easy to use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    MindTouch
    No answers on this topic
    Userlytics
    No answers on this topic
    UserTesting
    Never encountered any problems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    MindTouch
    MindTouch is a hosted site, so as a heavy user there are times when I notice that pages are slow to load, or something happens like Amazon Web Services crashing the entire east coast for a few hours, that you do notice even if it isn't actually the fault of the MT tool itself. It's the risk of using a hosted tool, but the benefits are pretty amazing and outweigh these performance issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    No answers on this topic
    UserTesting
    Perfectly fine. Never had any problems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    MindTouch
    It's good. Pretty solid. We got a lot of input to get up and running, but did a lot of the setup and customization work ourselves, because of our high standards. We've gotten good response and results on specific projects related to customization and our CSM is also pretty responsive. Overall, I think that the jobs of CSMs and support folks would be easier if the product weren't wonky in some ways. They seem to have to do more "workarounds" for basic functionality that should just work out of the box
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    They give their best and also reply to queries immediately
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    I have contacted UserTesting's customer service online, by email, or by phone a few times, and each time, I have encountered the same professionalism and expertise. Even in person during a work event, they were there, and it was the same experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    MindTouch
    No answers on this topic
    Userlytics
    Well trained Professionls
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    MindTouch
    Written documentation and videos are very good and have helped on numerous occasions when I've had to look up how to accomplish a certain task. The reason I have not given a full score is mainly because there have been some inaccuracies in the documentation because updates to the MindTouch framework have slightly changed the way things work. But this is usually the same type of challenges I face when making documentation for the software solution we develop. So all in all I'm very satisfied with both the personal webinars and the online documentation MindTouch provides for their service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    Decent but not comprehensive
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    MindTouch
    Just know that there is so much more involved than adding your content. There are so many pieces to launching your site -- especially if you are moving from another platform. If you are not a person who typically works in the "website" realm, do your homework, ask your web people, engineers, etc., because there's a lot to do that you won't know about until you are unexpectedly smacked in the face with it. Learn from my mistakes! We are very happy now, but it was a long road getting to launch day for us
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    Even though it takes time to set up. The work is diligent and out of the quality is great
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    From a technical perspective, the implementation was extremely smooth. Most of the change management / implementation hurdles were clearing use of the tool through our various security, legal, and information privacy teams. Once these concerns were addressed (UserTesting.com was very helpful in providing all the needed documentation), the implementation process was very simple and we were able to get going right away.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    MindTouch
    I will be brief. DealerTeam is built upon Salesforce and we try to support native apps. We used Desk.com first for basic Help Ticket management. The product did not satisfy how our customers were looking for information. We upgraded to Service Cloud with Knowledge Base and spent one year writing content and developing our support agency. Again, our customers were upset about submitting help tickets and waiting for answers. They wanted access to self-help while working with a customer. Today we continue to use Service Cloud with MindTouch integration and have found complete success. There is simply no other solution I know of that is a flexible and easy to use as MindTouch when it come to providing customer success and product support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    We used WhatUsersDo. However, the tool currently got bought out by a bigger company and were removing the remote research tool. We chose to use Userlytics as it stacked up well against competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    The quality of the participants: they usually have good feedback and act like "professional" users. Which is good when we want a few insights in a short amount of time. Also, the interface is good. I miss having more features, like a good transcription tool like we have in Condens
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    MindTouch
    We tried to migrate to MindTouch for 5 months and failed, remained with Zendesk
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    Delay to get output
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    The package we have limits the number of people who can set up tests. This prevents us from scaling the use of the platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    MindTouch
    • Our operational efficiently has improved significantly. Prior to Mindtouch, we managing duplicate content in two separate authoring solutions. Delivering content predictably and consistently was difficult and stressful for writers. In Mindtouch, we were able to optimize our content (remove redundancies) giving us more time to test, review, and improve content quality.
    • Traffic to our knowledge center is increasing monthly.
    • Internally, SMEs and customer-facing teams are recognizing the value Mindtouch brings through self-service knowledge. These SMEs want to contribute more to content, either as contributing writers or collaborators with tech writers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Userlytics
    • Definitely positive, I would say about 30%.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    • Content is key to the sign up journey and UserTesting helps me improve that.
    • UserTesting has helped me improve the Cashier on our site, making it easier for users to deposit money.
    • UserTesting is helping me iterate all our content decisions, helping us improve the UX across all platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    MindTouch Screenshots

    Screenshot of Content from MindTouch site visualized with Wave Analytics.Screenshot of Example MindTouch implementation from customer Whirlpool.Screenshot of Example MindTouch implementation from customer Conga.Screenshot of Example MindTouch implementation from customer Cisco Meraki.Screenshot of Example MindTouch implementation from customer Hitachi Data Systems.Screenshot of Example MindTouch implementation from customer Zuora.

    Userlytics Screenshots

    Screenshot of Testing for all digital assets on desktop and mobile devicesScreenshot of Downloadable, advanced metricsScreenshot of Shareable video clips and resultsScreenshot of Sentiment analysisScreenshot of AI UX AnalysisScreenshot of AI based audio transcriptions

    UserTesting Screenshots

    Screenshot of UserTesting's several solutions for gathering rich customer experience narratives.Screenshot of Interactive Path Flows
Built on recent research in data mining, the Interactive Path Flow aggregates interaction data across multiple participant sessions to visualize the customer journey, surface unexpected behaviors, and locate key moments in the customer journey.Screenshot of Keyword Mapping
Similar keywords are automatically grouped based on overall sentiment (positive, negative, or neutral) to identify themes. Highlight reels associated with each keyword are grouped together, to discover the why behind each sentiment.Screenshot of Video capture and live streaming
Digital and real-world customer experiences are recorded on desktop and mobile devices or live streamed for in-platform viewing.Screenshot of Audience targeting
Audiences are specified by screening contributors from UserTesting’s global network of contributors or connecting to any preferred network.