Cisco Meraki: ease of use and interconnectivity!
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Meraki MX
We have multiple models of MX series connecting multiple branches for a nationally distributed WAN, allowing remote access via VPN and security tools like IDS/IPS and AMP. We have integrated with another company recently and used Meraki to link the two businesses together virtually, seamlessly with minimal fuss, and ease of use, access, and management. We also use both the MDM and SDWAN as well.
Pros
- Ease of management
- Cloud based access
- Security
- VPN
Cons
- VPN client could be better.
- Ability to delegate better lower level access for reporting.
- Reporting functions are sometimes limited.
- We were able to ditch our old terminal server based WAN.
- We have added VPN access.
- Ease of management and insight over the network.
We are able to see and manage the remote LANs we have up and down the east coast of the US with minimal fuss using Cisco Meraki compared to the unmanaged WAN we had prior to that. We have also been able to see the issues with ISPs and notify branches ahead of them calling us regarding issues.
- Cisco Catalyst 2960-L Series Switches, Cisco Catalyst 9200 Series Switches, Cisco Meraki MR, Cisco Meraki MS, Cisco Webex Teams and Cisco Umbrella
We have been able to use various Cisco products but still be able to manage them and integrate without having to reconfigure a lot of systems. We are also able to monitor traffic and manage the WAN and LANs from a single pane of glass and also integrate two businesses into one single network.
- HPE Aruba Ethernet Switches, Aruba Networks Wireless LAN (WLAN), Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) and Fortinet FortiGate
We were able to transition very easily from Cisco to Cisco Meraki MX's and connect the LANs into a single easy to manage WAN with remote access VPN and auto VPN between branches to interconnect all networks with minimal fuss but allowing high-speed networking and traffic passing, as well as managed traffic options.
Do you think Cisco Meraki MX delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Meraki MX's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Meraki MX live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Meraki MX go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Meraki MX again?
Yes
Cisco Meraki MX Feature Ratings
Cisco Hybrid Work
- Webex Meetings
- Webex App
- Webex Calling
- Slido
- Cisco Meraki MX
- Cisco Meraki MR
- Cisco Meraki MS
- Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker
- Working from anywhere (e.g., coffee shop, airport)
- Working from an office or other company space
- Working from home
With Cisco Meraki and Weebx we have network and telephony solutions to fit all needs of all employees no matter their location.
None as long as we used Cisco Webex and Meraki.
With the cloud management portals of Meraki and Webex our iT administration was easy and able to configure devices for access as well as calling, meetings, messaging with ease.
Worked well. Initially had tried MS Teams, Zoom and Dell SonicWall but had issues
Much better, seamlessly work well and integrate.
- Webex
Used to try to use Zoom and MS Teams but ran into issues Inc privacy and compliance. None of these issues with Webex.
Using Cisco Meraki MX
275 - I listed the end users which are behind the firewalls at all branches at this point. They are protected internally as well as externally as we also have the VPN licenses to go with the Meraki MX as well. This way no matter where or when, all our end users are protected.
2 - If you have some basic firewall and networking experience it helps, but if you are also able to take the ECMS courses via your Cisco Meraki representative it also helps. There are classes online too, so either way you are covered but the more experience you have the better but even with none to minimal you can still get by as well.
- Firewall
- IDS/IPS
- Security
- VPN
- Able to use with a cellular card
- VPN
- Mobile security
- HA PAIRING
- Unsure
- Not sure
Evaluating Cisco Meraki MX and Competitors
Yes - Dell SonicWall which had too many issues and also vulnerability.
- Cloud Solutions
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
Cloud management
None, all good.
Cisco Meraki MX Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | Escalation required |
Yes, we needed to trace some access issues and they were able to see active application blocking from the IDS/IPS portion as an app was misbehaving.
Using Cisco Meraki MX
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- All of them
- None
Yes - Mostly ok.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation