Retroactive tracking is simply amazing
Updated March 19, 2021
Retroactive tracking is simply amazing
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
Enterprise
Overall Satisfaction with Heap
Heap is being used primarily by our product department. We have been using Heap to better understand our users' full journey across our site and their interactions with the various touchpoints. We've also been using it to optimize our conversion funnel and identify potential areas for improvement. By giving us visibility into how our users use our product, we can derive more actionable insights.
Pros
- Being able to create events after the fact and still view the data is simply fantastic
- The configuration is point and click, which makes for an easy set up, especially for non-technical users
- I don't worry about the idea of creating a customer acquisition plan from the beginning because Heap helps me do it
Cons
- There are a lot of features and functionality of Heap and it can be a little overwhelming at first; this is a good problem to have but I definitely found it intimidating at first but stick with it
- If you are used to Google Analytics, it takes a bit of time to understand Heap metrics, as they are quite different--more user based and funnel based
- It can be difficult to navigate and can be confusing to know which primary menu item will show the appropriate sub menu items
- Conversion rates have definitely improved as we've been able to identify holes in our funnel
- DAUs and MAUs have increased because we've been able to identify bottlenecks to engagement and underused product features
- The combination of the two points above has increased our NPS/CSAT
Google Analytics is more intuitive to use but after you overcome that learning curve with Heap, it quickly becomes a much better analytics tool. The ability to retroactively track metrics is simply fantastic and the point-and-click configuration without the need for code changes put it heads and shoulders above Google Analytics.
Do you think Heap delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Heap's feature set?
Yes
Did Heap live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Heap go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Heap again?
Yes
Using Heap
15 - Product and Design
2 - The most experienced users of Heap support the rest of the organisation in terms of sharing knowledge, tips and providing troubleshooting guidance.
- Tracking usage
- Identifying drop off points and rates
- Identifying hotspots and unused areas
- Correlating usage to churn
Evaluating Heap and Competitors
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
The range of features was the most important factor for us - we did not want to let price influence the decision to choose the right tool. We also favored features over usability, which in hindsight should have been a joint factor.
We would consider usability equally alongside functionality.
Heap Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was minimal - No change management was required.
- Ramp up of the tool to internal users
- Rolling out to all our webpages.
Heap Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed No escalation required Immediate help available Support understands my problem Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
We had a good level of Support that came with the Enterprise version of the product.
Using Heap
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Well integrated | Unnecessarily complex Difficult to use Inconsistent Slow to learn Lots to learn |
- Event visualizer (after a couple of attempts)
- Integrating sources was very straightforward
- Managing teams, teammates, roles, and projects was enjoyably simple
- Creating and verifying definitions
- Building reports was not as straightforward as I had hoped
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation