QuickBase, the defacto standard for developing Business applications for the Web.
Overall Satisfaction with Quick Base
QuickBase is being used at a federal agency that I worked at, for their core business activity. It helps the management and the staff alike be able to track their cases across all the 5 major departments within the organization. It also helps the public file their legal cases with the agency electronically thus reducing the time and improving the accuracy of the filing.
Pros
- QuickBase is a SaaS product. Therefore, it eliminates the need to have a dedicated department full of people to manage/administer servers for databases, websiites, web applications and so on and so forth.
- It helps application developers get started with application development right away, without having to install any other software.
- With an extensive point and click system for application development that still encompasses almost ALL types of programming situations, it makes it easy and quick for developers to build solutions by focusing on the business needs rather than the nitty gritty details of the implementation of the small programming components.
- QuickBase is based on HTTP API calls and because of this, one can build custom applications using languages such as Java, JavaScript, Ruby on Rails, .NET etc so that the custom application can be the front-end while QuickBase is still the database and the backend as a service, including email as a service.
- There are several third party products that work as an extension of QuickBase. I have personally used Exact Forms Plus to be able to generate documents based on data coming from QuickBase applications. This is possible because of the HTTP API calls that come with QuickBase This makes QuickBase extremely extensible.
- Webhooks is a major extension of QuickBase that allows "triggers" to handle your business processes across a variety of other 3rd party SaaS products as well.
- Automations (now integrated with Pipelines) go beyond webhooks. They use drag and drop, drop-down select type of coding with wizards such that one can't go wrong. It improves the productivity of the application developer by at least 100x
Cons
- There have been several areas for improvement that QuickBase has collected over the years from their users via uservoice. Many cool features have been implemented.
- However, I still feel that they should either get rid of the limitation or expand the number of form rules one can use in a form that has formula fields. Currently it is at 20!
- I want QuickBase to seriously consider increasing datastorage at reasonable expense for developing applications that handle large transactions.
- Get FedRamp certified. Get FedRamp certified. Get FedRamp certified. Do whatever is necessary for that. But don't move to AWS for that. Amazon is a monster. Stay away.
At one of my previous jobs in 2008, we evaluated QuickBase and Salesforce and recommended QuickBase because it was much more functional and inexpensive than Salesforce. Over the years, both these companies have improved their offerings. Still I feel QuickBase has more features than Salesforce. Although Salesforce scored one big advantage...FISMA approval for Federal Government clients and I sincerely hope QuickBase will get there soon too. Because the Federal government deserves better.
Quickbase Feature Ratings
Integrations and Governance
- The Box
- Exchange
- Gmail
- With "The Box", it was fairly easy. You just set up the software and drop .CSV files there and when you setup QuickBase to trigger an import whenever a file is just created or modified etc, it runs that import job.
- With Gmail, however, you are not supposed to have MFA. That was an issue that I overcame by setting up mail forwarding select emails to another Gmail account without MFA. Then QuickBase was able to get the mail messages from there.
- Normally Exchange should be straightforward but different organizations have different email policies that are so stringent that it is impossible to set up with QuickBase. I had to get in touch with the "IT" who after the initial resistance came around and helped us out to have QuickBase read emails from the OWA online. With that, I was able to set up triggers for approval and rejection of invoices by the customer.
Using Quick Base
75 - Business Development, HR/Accounts Receivables, IT Functions such as Code Review, Law Firm Case Tracking
1 - People with extensive IT background, including 3GL, 4GL as well as low code platforms like QuickBase and RPA technologies such as UiPath.
- Time And Material
- CRM
- Code Review
- Accounts Receivables and Invoicing
- Asset Management
- UiPath Code Review
- Documentation of Reusable Components in UiPath
- Building UiPath SDK for QuickBase
- Learning Management Systems for Schools
- We are working on a Time and Material application for our organization, which would have taken several months, if it were not for Quickbase and its low code powerful platform
- When we want to put together a small app for conducting Code Review, QuickBase is always the first choice, because we could build the app in 5 minutes. Not weeks.
Evaluating Quick Base and Competitors
Yes - When we were evaluating a platform for SaaS/PaaS for Project Management, we looked into JIRA that was already being used in the organization and felt the need to look at other platforms, such as QuickBase and SalesForce. This was in 2008. At that time SalesForce was more expensive and had ready-made applications for CRM and not Project Management. Moreover, QuickBase was extremely intuitive to use unlike SalesForce and JIRA and thus QuickBase replaced JIRA by overcoming SalesForce!
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Vendor Reputation
- Positive Sales Experience with the Vendor
- Analyst Reports
- Third-party Reviews
Product Features: Back in 2008, it was a development platform where you can develop any type of application if the existing templates are not good for you. Whereas SalesForce was just a CRM tool. It was only in the last 5 or 6 years that SalesForce became an application development platform.
Besides, ever since QuickBase was spun off as a separate organization, they have invested heavily in product improvement. They added excellent features such as:
1. Webhooks
2. Actions (aka Triggers)
3. Automations (now integrated with Pipelines) and integrations with third-party file storage services, email services, third-party API based products such as Zapier and so on.
Besides, ever since QuickBase was spun off as a separate organization, they have invested heavily in product improvement. They added excellent features such as:
1. Webhooks
2. Actions (aka Triggers)
3. Automations (now integrated with Pipelines) and integrations with third-party file storage services, email services, third-party API based products such as Zapier and so on.
The trend is going toward low-code. While QuickBase is already a low code product, there are other features QuickBase can incorporate such as drag and drop coding like in UiPath, diagram coding like in Appian/Pega and so forth. Personally I feel it is a bit too much to do all that. But since that is the trend the world is going toward, I think QuickBase (and me too) need to think on those lines.
Quick Base Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution No escalation required Immediate help available | Less knowledgeable Problems left unsolved Not kept informed Need to explain problems multiple times Support doesn't seem to care Slow Initial Response |
Yes - Bugs are acknowledged immediately but they handle them on their own timeline, once a month. Not too bad.
When I lost some data and I raised a support case for restoring the data, QuickBase support did a phenomenal job of restoring the previous day's copy on a very short notice.
Using Quick Base
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Building tables, relationships, formula fields, forms, automations
- Building Datarules is easy and works excellently well.
- Security and permissions is a little cumbersome and unpredictable.
Yes - Not too well. The UI is confusing and unusable.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation