Great for unmoderated testing, although "professional testers" are commonplace.
Updated May 30, 2024
Great for unmoderated testing, although "professional testers" are commonplace.

Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with UserTesting
We use it to perform unmoderated user testing from time to time and organize individual interviews with customers. UserTesting provide us with access to an open-market customer base outside of our existing customers.
Pros
- Summarising unmoderated user testing.
- Ease of reviewing individual test clips.
- Easy to set up unmoderated testing.
Cons
- Avoid professional testers.
- More natural, candid test participants.
- Was hard to find the data summarising feature.
- Quick testing, provided timely feedback.
I don't think I collected authentic feedback/insights; I collected more just a better understanding of whether users would be able to achieve certain tasks.
- Maze and User Interviews
I prefer Maze as it is much more intuitive.
Do you think UserTesting delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with UserTesting's feature set?
No
Did UserTesting live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of UserTesting go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy UserTesting again?
No
Using UserTesting
We let the contract go
We let the contract go
- Unmoderated usability testing
- Interviews
- Summarising of unmoderated testing was excellent
Evaluating UserTesting and Competitors
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
UserTesting Implementation
- Implemented in-house
- Not sure
UserTesting Support
Using UserTesting
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Technical support not required Familiar | Slow to learn |
- recruitment
- analysis of research

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation