Adobe Test and Target is an A/B, multi-variate testing platform which Adobe acquired as part of the Omniture platform in 2009. It is now part of the Adobe Marketing Cloud. It offers tight integration with Adobe analytics and content management products.
N/A
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Salesforce Marketing Cloud Engagement (formerly Salesforce Experience Cloud or Salesforce Community Cloud) is an online forum powered by Salesforce that enables businesses to connect with their employees, customers, partner organizations, and prospects. Designed to help facilitate communication and information sharing, customers can ask questions and request help, administrators can integrate data from third-party apps, and employees can collaborate across projects and…
N/A
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
RWS Tridion Sites provides web content management capabilities, connecting people, processes, and information across teams, brands, and markets, to deliver impactful online experiences globally. RWS Tridion Sites' DPX platform enables the use of either traditional or headless publishing. It includes advanced features such as automated personalization, multilingual capabilities and Semantic AI. The BluePrinting® technology at the core of RWS Tridion Sites simplifies reuse and…
N/A
Pricing
Adobe Target
Salesforce Experience Cloud
RWS Tridion Sites
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Target
Salesforce Experience Cloud
RWS Tridion Sites
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Target
Salesforce Experience Cloud
RWS Tridion Sites
Features
Adobe Target
Salesforce Experience Cloud
RWS Tridion Sites
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Target
8.1
18 Ratings
3% below category average
Salesforce Experience Cloud
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
9.318 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
8.617 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
7.917 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
8.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
8.39 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
8.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
8.415 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
7.415 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
6.614 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
8.77 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
8.49 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
8.216 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
8.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
8.415 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
7.612 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
7.412 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
8.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
7.510 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
7.716 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Target
8.2
18 Ratings
7% below category average
Salesforce Experience Cloud
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
8.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
7.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
8.418 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
9.216 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Target
8.1
18 Ratings
6% below category average
Salesforce Experience Cloud
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool
7.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click analytics
7.615 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scroll maps
8.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form fill analysis
8.28 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion tracking
8.615 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Goal tracking
8.117 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test reporting
8.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results segmentation
8.316 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
CSV export
8.215 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard
7.318 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Target
-
Ratings
Salesforce Experience Cloud
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
9.0
9 Ratings
9% above category average
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Target
-
Ratings
Salesforce Experience Cloud
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
9.1
8 Ratings
16% above category average
API
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.36 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Target
-
Ratings
Salesforce Experience Cloud
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
8.5
8 Ratings
9% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Form generator
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
If you're using the Adobe stack and tools to power your website, Target is a great solution to implement. I've utilized Target within two organizations, one running on Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), and the other on Adobe Magento. I don't see how companies could harness the full capacity of Target without also having Adobe Analytics integrated. This is their 'secret sauce' and might not be a good solution for companies who are invested in Google Analytics 360. Integration was straightforward but did require support from the Adobe team to implement successfully. While Target is a great tool for digital teams to support, you'll need your tech team aligned and available to support implementation.
For well-suited, this product is great for your external clientele groups that you would not necessarily want to have a high user fee rate for. So basically general public or a group that will be authorized to come in and just do a few things here and there, but you don't necessarily want them access to all of your systems and your data points for groups that it would not be a great use for. I'd say probably your high level internal staff, they're going to be using a lot of the backend functionality automations, evaluating data, managing data, and doing custom inputs. That's just not what's intended for.
Love the product and I really like how we use it for public sites. The only negative aspect is that it is just hard to find Tridion devs that understand the tool, grasp .net, react, and understand the blueprint, etc.
This application gives us an incredible integration with Adobe Analytics that allows its operation to be the best and determine the performance of our website.
It offers us an analysis based on user behavior and a web page customization option to adapt and meet the needs of those users.
Easy to use, just like Salesforce's other products. Many users can sit down and figure it out in no time, and with a little training become power users.
Fast and secure - Salesforce is a leader in the cloud world so you get consistently fast results and security that is top notch in the industry.
Accessible from anywhere - if you use cloud CMS already this is a no-brainer, but for those that do in-house CMS still, this is a major difference. Mobile access from anywhere on the planet without a VPN is something you just can't do without the cloud.
This is something a lot of testing tools struggle with, but I think the WYSIWYG ("What you see is what you get") editor - or Visual Experience Composer (VEC) in Adobe terminology - could definitely use some work. It's a struggle to execute many tests beyond simple copy, color, placement changes, and even the features that do exist are often clunky if not altogether broken.
The interface itself can be a bit counterintuitive in certain parts. If you are familiar with other tools, it's likely middle of the road in this respect; think much easier to understand than Monetate for instance, but a far cry from the simplicity of an Optimizely.
It can be a bit buggy from time to time. The worst example is the frequency at which the tool will fail to save due to an error, but not inform you of this until you try to save, at which point your only option is to log out, log back in, and make all of your updates once again. It can become an extreme pain point at times, and I personally have just gotten into the habit of saving every couple of minutes to avoid a massive loss of productivity.
Unlike other CMS platforms like Wordpress and Adobe Experience Manager, Salesforce does not provide a fully featured editor with a drag-and-drop design tool.
Our content creators and marketing team often struggle with permissions and how to distribute content across different experience cloud sites.
Also, there is no side-to-side comparison view for content editors to update the content easily.
Tridion is complicated in enough ways that it makes it difficult to train new users. Therefore, we have to limit the number of people with access to the system since we have not yet implemented Workflow.
When something goes wrong (items fail to publish, or there is unexpected behavior with components), there is little explanation provided that would point us in the right direction to troubleshoot. As a result, content Authors and Editors have to frequently ask for IT assistance.
We have a team of people trained on how to use the application and it integrates well with the other Adobe products we use. Our future roadmap of testing will require some complex scenarios which we hope Target will be able to accomplish
I am giving this a semi-high rating because we have already got Tridion up and running and we are still in the process of moving the sites over to Tridion. It is unlikely we will be moving things to a new CMS AGAIN in the near future as the cost to get Tridion was high.
The recent UI update is a complete mess. It is difficult to navigate and find features that previously existed. The reactiveness of the page depending on window size is also ridiculous and it is absurd that depending on how large your window is, entire columns of functions will disappear with no indication that they are missing. The usability of the tool has fallen off a cliff.
Strengths: - Intuitive for Salesforce Users – If you’re already working within the Salesforce ecosystem, the Salesforce CMS is easy to navigate, with a clean UI, drag-and-drop content management, and reusable assets for quick updates. - Seamless Integration – Since it connects natively with Experience Cloud, Marketing Cloud, and CRM, it allows for efficient multi-channel content distribution without needing extra third-party tools. - AI-Powered Personalization – The ability to deliver dynamic content based on user profiles and engagement data is a huge plus, making content delivery more relevant and impactful. Challenges: - Learning Curve for New Users – If you're not already familiar with Salesforce, the interface can feel overwhelming, requiring training to fully leverage all features. - Limited Customization & Workflow Automation – While it works well for structured content, advanced approval workflows and deep editorial customization are limited compared to enterprise CMS platforms like Adobe Experience Manager. - Media & Design Limitations – Salesforce CMS is not as robust for managing rich media-heavy content, which can be frustrating for teams needing more flexibility in multimedia presentation.
The editor user interface is very user friendly and in-site editing makes simple updates fast and easy. The extensibility of Tridion is a big plus and the ability to add our own options into the default Tridion interface helps us integrate with external systems. Finally, the user permissions and security system helps us deploy it within our large organization.
Again, since we provide and recommend solutions, I can't speak to every client's individual experience, but can offer general reflections as to keep their collaborations private, that they are satisfied with the experience. We hear a lot about how this system helps to encourage collaborations between their own business partners, customers, and internal members, and enables quality integrations with other products that help drive revenue.
On several occasions, we have had the need to ask for help from the Adobe Target support team, and I must say that they have provided us with an excellent experience, as they take care of solving the problems quickly and with high precision
Although support from Salesforce itself can be quite unresponsive sometimes, the community hub is incredibly helpful. The large user base of Salesforce products contribute to troubleshooting and the forums are a powerful tool for finding solutions and possible bugs and response times can be quite fast compared to your regular support channels.
The instructor that came to train us was awesome and this training was very useful. I would recommend it for anyone who is going to be using this software. I only mark it lower because it is an added expense to an already expensive product, and a lot of the training covered the "Target" portion of the software (which again, we didn't use)
The training was very easy to understand, however it would have been more useful to my development team than me. It was also primarily over-the-phone, which is never as easy to follow as in-person. We ended up scheduling and paying for an in-person training session to supplement the online/phone training because it wasn't helpful enough.
Implement using a global mBox on the page so you can change any and everything over the traditional method. Traditional method is good if you do not have technical web dev resources, do not know Javascript/jQuery, or you have money to blow on mBox calls. Global deployment reduces mBox calls and allows you to touch many parts of the page easily. A lot more customizable
We seriously considered another software but because we use so many other Adobe products this made the most sense for us. If you are not dependent on other Adobe software and are a smaller company, in my opinion, Target may not be the best fit.
Salesforce Experience Cloud was selected due to its tight integration with our existing Salesforce CRM platform. Customization of the portal was much, much simpler compared to Sharepoint - especially with role-based security parameters that are ultimately inherited based on attributes within the Salesforce CRM platform. Salesforce Experience Cloud was a natural fit for this customer-facing purpose.
It is a nuclear missile compared to the other handguns and knives on the market today. But it also requires nuclear technicians and expertise that a handgun doesn't require. Do you need to decimate your competition and you have the investment capabilities necessary to put a nuclear missile into the sky? Then definitely do it. Especially if you need a very good multi-lingual blueprint provider like Tridion.
We have been able to run specific A/B tests that have shown an increase in conversion, which in turn has led to very large banked sales numbers for the year.
We have been able to prove that using and automated Merchandising process did not decrease conversion. This allowed us to greatly increase efficiency by opening up resource time.