Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) vs Google Compute Engine

Likelihood to Recommend

It works well as run-of-the-mill NFS that is managed as a service rather than a server. It works anywhere NFS is usable.

Read full review

Chris Saenz

Lead System Engineer

Azusa Pacific UniversityHigher Education, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

I have recommended the platform to students, friends and family members alike. The help and documentation is very easy to follow for a beginner. Plus, GCP has built in tools which make some common tasks that non-production level cloud users need to accomplish very easy in an automated way. Now, to address the question of recommending GCE to a colleague, ultimately the organization will have to make a decision regarding the entire cloud platform. It wouldn't make much sense, outside of a special case, to use GCE for some parts of your cloud infrastructure and a competitor on other parts. That practical caveat aside, I believe that the GCP brings a strong suite of tools to the table overall and is good value for money at this time as well. Developer familiarity to certain competing platforms can be a sticking point, but a colleague who is already asking for a recommendation is likely already open minded about moving to GCP.

Read full review

Frank Palladino

Data Scientist

CrocusOil & Energy, 11-50 employees

View all 26 answers on this topic

Feature Rating Comparison

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)

Google Compute Engine

Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime

Dynamic scaling

Elastic load balancing

Pre-configured templates

Monitoring tools

Pre-defined machine images

Operating system support

Security controls

Pros

EFS is easily made high-availability.
EFS is simple to implement.
EFS uses native NFS file-sharing protocol.

Read full review

Chris Saenz

Lead System Engineer

Azusa Pacific UniversityHigher Education, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

A simple web-based interface that is a breeze to train new engineers to use. Our experienced engineers never have trouble finding or doing anything on GCE.
Sustained use and Committed use discounts mean we get top-tier VMs for an incredibly competitive price.
Wonderful identity and access management that gives us peace-of-mind when granting access to machines to contractors and other 3rd parties.
Fast VMs, lastest in hardware, and enough RAM to power even the hungriest of our services.

Read full review

Tyler Johnson

Senior Software Architect

Beneath The InkComputer Software, 1-10 employees

View all 26 answers on this topic

Cons

EFS could be made highly-available across regions.
EFS could be made with a better on-premise extension than Cloud Gateway.
EFS could be made to support CIFS/SMB.

Read full review

Chris Saenz

Lead System Engineer

Azusa Pacific UniversityHigher Education, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

The L7 load balancer can be difficult to get set up. It's limited in its functionality, especially with the container engine.
It's hard to find certain objects on the web console. Often times the things I need to get to are buried in advanced menus.
Google's decision to only support MySQL on their relational DB service means that I have to manage Postgres instances in Compute on my own, managing everything from storage to backups.

Read full review

David Long, SPA

Director of Development

Cage DataComputer Software, 1-10 employees

View all 26 answers on this topic

Likelihood to Renew

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Google Compute Engine 9.0

Based on 1 answer

Overall services are good to go. Received good feedback from users. Have regional server locations. It has free extra service included.

Read full review

Sazzad Hossain Sharkar

Chief Operating Officer (C.O.O.)

Akhaura Info FoundationEducation Management, 11-50 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Usability

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Google Compute Engine 9.1

Based on 9 answers

Having interacted with several cloud services, GCE stands out to me as more usable than most. The naming and locating of features is a little more intuitive than most I've interacted with, and hinting is also quite helpful. Getting staff up to speed has proven to be overall less painful than others.

Read full review

Brendon Brown

Business IT, Web Development, eCommerce and Digital Marketing

Island City MediaRetail, 11-50 employees

View all 9 answers on this topic

Support Rating

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) 8.0

Based on 1 answer

The documentation is sufficient for setting up and it is basic NFS for mounting so not much support is required. I have not had any issues to warrant a request with AWS support.

Read full review

Chris Saenz

Lead System Engineer

Azusa Pacific UniversityHigher Education, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Google Compute Engine 8.8

Based on 11 answers

The documentation needs to be better for intermediate users - There are first steps that one can easily follow, but after that, the documentation is often spotty or not in a form where one can follow the steps and accomplish the task. Also, the documentation and the product often go out of sync, where the commands from the documentation do not work with the current version of the product.
Google support was great and their presence on site was very helpful in dealing with various issues.

Read full review

Verified User

Director in Information Technology

Internet Company, 10,001+ employees

View all 11 answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

EFS is essentially an NFS export offering, just simplified and accessible through all the automation and scalability that AWS offers. It provides high-available replicated data in multiple AZs with is akin to something like DRBD, but without having to manage the layer of software that does replication and keeps track of roles.

Read full review

Chris Saenz

Lead System Engineer

Azusa Pacific UniversityHigher Education, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

App Engine is somewhat similar, but we use it together with Compute Engine. App Engine is good for serving end requests to users -- it can scale automatically to any number of requests, but has it's own limitations. Compute Engine does not have any limitations. but you have to manage it by yourself and scale it manually as needed. I tried using Amazon's EC2 before the Compute Engine was released, but at that time their UI wasn't friendly, in the end Compute Engine provider much better integration with App Engine since their VMs can be really close to each other to reduce network delay. Google Cloud's UI is really good, you don't always want to manage your stuff using API.

Read full review

Dmitry Sadovnychyi

Software Engineer

LawInsider.comLegal Services, 1-10 employees

View all 26 answers on this topic

Return on Investment

EFS has made managing NFS file exports easier with less administration.

Read full review

Chris Saenz

Lead System Engineer

Azusa Pacific UniversityHigher Education, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Positive impact on the OpEx with reduction in CapEx resulting from reducing the time to move a workload from on-prem to the cloud
Incased RoI by reducing need for on-prem compute
Improved agility by providing the option to take on new AI workloads for test and dev without the need for upfront investment in

Read full review

Aditya Mohan

Manager

Skive itAirlines/Aviation, 51-200 employees

View all 26 answers on this topic

Pricing Details

General

Free Trial

—

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

No

General

Free Trial

—

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

No

Rating Summary

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)

Google Compute Engine

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)

Google Compute Engine

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)

Google Compute Engine

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)

Google Compute Engine

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) vs Google Compute Engine