Major differentiator is the cost and accuracy of data. While other tools solves the purpose too, Apollo.io in specific gives better data which is more accurate and cheaper. They also have a startup program which gives 50% discount to startup’s with less employees which supports …
ZoomInfo had great data but the price was insane for what we needed. Lusha was cheaper but too limited we still had to use other tools for outreach and tracking. Apollo.io basically gave us the best of all products good data, built-in sequences, CRM sync, and automation all in …
Salesloft to be exact is only a scheduling tool with having a kind of similar features like Apollo.io in context of sequences. in Salesloft there is cadence which is very similar to sequence in Apollo.io and it also works seamlessly but on the contrary it does not have …
Apollo.io has a mid tier dialer that I was looking to replace. Ultimately, I never replaced Apollo.io's dialer because it was really nice to just have one single tool that everything worked through, and never had to transfer data or call logs between platforms.
Apollo.io stacks up against other interfaces because of its overall all in one prospecting tool capabilities right from account identification to end to end reachout to leads no other prospecting tool provides such wide range of features for a bd reachout. It's a …
In terms of everything Apollo.io was very user friendly and was more accurate. The data received was on point and we did get more contact and email data from Apollo.io rather than Linkedin. The value for money was way better than the platforms we tried.
Apollo was a combination of Salesloft (outreach software) and ZoomInfo (B2B contact information). Apollo ended up being the perfect solution, and well-priced for the value!
Neither of the services I've previously used have been adept at giving me accurate contact information, or helping me to reach out to the folks I'm interested in speaking with. These tools don't help me be more efficient or save time. They might work with brute force, but …
ZoomInfo's sequencing is very early in development so there aren't any management tools yet and it's pretty buggy. Apollo's sequencing is much more flexible, easy to use and feature-rich. LinkedIn Sales Nav is awful for searches, no sequencing or email or contact data. It's …
I researched what would be best for small medtech startups and Apollo.io was the top choice. The other's begin to get too pricey for advanced features. For a little over $100/month, you can get a lot done with Apollo.io. I have not used the others so I can't really compare too …
I honestly really liked ZoomInfo and how it was set up. It also had a lot of data, the reason we went with Apollo.io was because for a small company like ours the price was much better. Something I really liked that ZoomInfo had was an Org Chart that allowed you to see everyone …
Apollo.io is good but I would rank Salesloft above it. Salesloft was very easy to use and honestly much simpler as it relates from storing messaging, sequences, etc. Apollo.io is better as it relates to being able to pull contact information. outreach was probably neck and neck …
Sales navigator is a good platform however there aspects where Apollo.io and Lusha enrich the prospecting quality, When you used together does give you the best possible results
Verified User
Employee
Chose LinkedIn Sales Navigator
LinkedIn Sales Navigator is the best at finding leads, in my opinion. However, it's not the best at finding contact information. You need a combination of ZoomInfo + LinkedIn Sales Navigator + Outreach in order to actually contact leads. Apollo.io does all of that for you in …
We preferred LinkedIn Sales Navigator because of its brand recognition, brand value and preference among our sales and marketing leadership to use the product. The price was a bit on the higher side but we still chose it over competitors because we were getting lot more value …
LinkedIn Sales Navigator has direct access to LinkedIn data, so its data is first-hand and very accurate compared to others. The tools are used for various purposes, but overall, we can utilize Sales Nav to identify individuals and then utilize the other tools to build lists …
Linkedin Sales Navigator has a specific role in your sales strategy -- to help you find the right person based on their job title or company, etc. DiscoverOrg and SalesLoft dig a bit deeper into giving more comprehensive contact information like email and address. Those options …
It is best used for cold outreach sales. While it has some research capabilities for trends in some ways, it really shines in finding and maintaining up to date information on contacts. Being able to mass update contacts that might have moved to a new company allows you to see easily when you might need to find a new contact, or if you have a contact at a new company, expanding your network and reach. It is not a CRM, I don't recommend using it as your full CRM, it is great for tracking cold outreach, but then you should move contacts to your actual CRM tool.
LinkedIn Sales Navigator is hands down the best tool for identifying targeted contacts or leads. You can drill down on a company and look at its entire workforce, or search by the exact title that is your key target. The information is up to date, as people tend to keep their LinkedIn profiles current. In terms of other marketing functions LI Sales Navigator is extremely limited. BUT if you are looking to identify contacts for prospecting purposes, then this tool is what you need.
Sequencing automated email campaigns for outbound prospecting (BD Function).
Integrating with Sales Navigator to help me find emails/phone #' numbers/"add to sequence" while prospecting. It's easy and seamless to find & then load contacts into Cadences.
Integration with Salesforce is a huge plus. Allows me to not worry about logging anything, but the executive team can see my activity & what is going on (emails going out, responses I get, etc.).
The analytics on the outreach data is always helpful as well (open rates, click rates, etc.).
Search Functionality: LinkedIn Sales Navigator has one of the most powerful search functions. The filters are not unnecessary and some are very well thought of. You can drill down to finding a needle in a haystack of 20000 employee company when it comes to using LinkedIn Sales Navigator if done in the right manner.
Smart Links: Gone are the days of attached Decks. One can simply create their deck online using this feature on LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or even upload an existing ppt. A smart link is shareable as well as trackable for opens and clicks.
Fewer Clicks: With a single click, I can filter out decision-makers in any company. With a single click, I can import contacts from LinkedIn Sales Navigator to Salesforce. Lesser clicks are actually less stressful if you think.
This question is a no-brainer. The tool is the industry standard for anyone tied to sales and marketing. The name "LinkedIn Sales Navigator" is synonymous with streamlining relevant customer and account data in an easy to use format that is actionable and intelligent. The focus on continuous improvement and richer means of communicating with customers and prospects is evident each time new features are rolled out. The social component of the tool even includes a gamification component to ensure that peers remain relevant among each other, which is refreshing and enjoyable for those who engage the tool on a daily basis.
It is easy to use. The UI has enough options to learn, with advanced documentation and support. The customer service is quick to respond and assists with information in real time. The UI has different segments for each feature which makes it easy to use.
Settings are easy to change as per preferred requirements
Overall, it's very user-friendly. It's hard for a tool to make sorting through loads of data easy, but Sales Nav does this very well. Its advanced search features enable us to be selective in finding the right people to talk to and connect with.
The team wants to solve probelms, but we are finding that they don't know how to solve the more technical issues quickly. I suspect that they don't have a mature process for escalations, and they don't have a usable knowledge base article repository. They seems to push emails around to let us know that people are working on the issues to find solutions, but this takes weeks and oftentimes still leaves us without a resolution.
I would recommend LinkedIn Sales Navigator entirely. It has been the most user-friendly tool to use starting off in a sales role. I genuinely enjoy the navigation of the tool and how easy it is to save lists and see job changes within those lists. Generating leads and finding the most up to date information on prospects is all housed within this tool.
I am unsure of the rollout, as I was not involved. I was an early adopter, and I have had a lot of success with the tool personally at multiple organizations, but I have no idea whether the implementation process encountered any errors. I can personally say that it works, and that I have not encountered significant issues with the tool since adoption, although a few issues like messages showing up as being unread even though they have been opened have been an on-again/off-again issues throughout the past few years. Overall, the company is doing a great job, and our implementation seems to have been effective.
I link the interface of Apollo.io better than Zoominfo. Zoominfo only provides a company employees and rarely the specific people I was looking for in shipping and logistics. It generally recommended higher level executives like Presidents or COO's instead of the decision makers I need to work with. I also found much of the info Zoominfo provided to be outdated. In some cases the people were no longer employed with the company
LinkedIn Sales Navigator is much more valuable than Dice or Cognism, as we do most of our prospecting on LinkedIn. Therefore, it means we can build lists of our prospects based on activity, connections, and buying intention. With Cognism and Dice, you cannot do this as they do not work alongside the LinkedIn platform and, therefore, lack the functionality that is essential to what we are using the platform for.
