Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. ZoneAlarm

Check Point Endpoint Security is well suited for businesses where confidentiality must be maintained in order to mitigate risk and compromise of customer information

Incentivized

Our company has very sensitive security data, and we use ZoneAlarm to help us protect that data. We use it on our office computers as well as our cell phones out in the field. It is reliable and trustworthy. It provides protection against phishing and ransomware.

Incentivized

• Identifies ransomware
• Low resource usage
• Self remediation

Incentivized

• ZoneAlarm is very user friendly and simple to install.
• ZoneAlarm provides 2-way firewalls so my company and customers' information is safe.
• The trial version is free and actually pretty decent.

Incentivized

• The prompts for one time logins are rather lengthy and it takes around five minutes to go through all of the authentication required. I believe this could be improved upon.

Incentivized

• The interface looks outdated.
• There is not a place to manage passwords.
• Tech support is slow to respond.

Incentivized

I found that Check Point identified more Ransomware attacks than Kaspersky.

Incentivized

We have used Norton before and ZoneAlarm was more cost effective and easier to use.

Incentivized

• It has enabled us to maintain privacy which has enhanced our highly rated brand standard. While basically it is a team member specific, behind the scenes program that protects systems from being used by unauthorized individuals, it contributes to the overall integrity of the organization which results in increased market share and return on investment for shareholders.

Incentivized

• ZoneAlarm is very easy to use, so it cuts down on management spending time checking each device.
• Keeps our data and information safe.
• ZoneAlarm is cost effective. You don't have to spend 100s of dollars to get good protection.

Incentivized