From GoTo (formerly LogMeIn), GoToMeeting is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software that enables users to connect via the internet. It hosts a suite of online meeting tools, including real-time screen sharing and integrated audio.
$12
per month
Webex Meetings
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Webex Meetings is a video conferencing solution powering hybrid work. It enables a seamless collaboration experience and better results with meetings that are designed to give everyone the ability to engage no matter their location, language, or communication style.
$14.50
per month per user
Pricing
GoTo Meeting
Webex Meetings
Editions & Modules
Professional
$12.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
Business
$16.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 250 Participants [billed annually]
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
3,000 Participants
Webex Meet
$14.50
per month per user
Webex Suite: Meet + Call
$25
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GoTo Meeting
Webex Meetings
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Pricing available by monthly or annual subscription, with discounts for annual commitments.
They both offer good features but GoToMeeting is easy to use and most students preferred and enjoyed using it. GoToMeeting has better audio and video receptions that are really necessary for any video conferencing software. The technical support of GoToMeeting is also …
Overall, we selected GoTo Meeting for its reliability, security, ease of use, and seamless integration with our existing tools. It offers a balanced combination of features that suit our business needs while remaining cost-effective. The platform has proven to be a dependable …
GoTo Meeting is cheaper but in general, both systems are comparable. Webex is also intuitive and offers good audio and video quality as well as basic online meeting features like screen sharing, whiteboard etc. We used GoTo Meeting with some external companies who find Webex …
GoTo Meeting's privacy, security, and hacking protection are much better than Zoom. Aside from that, Zoom also gave us too many technical issues using it and we didn't feel comfortable hosting important meetings or conducting interviews while worrying that some random person …
GoTo Meeting was the one, which in the period of pandemic and thus need, offered the best price. Not absolutely, but it was not necessary to reorganize the structure and require a great effort from IT. Moreover it was immediately accepted by the teams and well implemented in …
Goto meeting has strong privacy policy in terms of users data than other competitive platforms and maintains data centres in all regions in the world. Goto is widely used by people in every organisation.
easy to use rather another tools, improve performance in my solutions to my customers, when i use zoom has issues with guest machine because rare characters are typed with some disgusting with my customers, and we are not productive because lost several time correcting my …
GoTo requires less time to get going. Very straightforward to setup and get users using the system. Microsoft Teams for instance requires alot of backend setup and administering where as we can simply enroll out senior leadership team to manage GoTo meetings from their account …
GoTo Meeting has had the quickest learning time for any of our staff members compared to the other software we have used, which felt overly complex at times. The support staff is also much more helpful with GoTo Meeting and does not leave you hanging waiting for a response the …
goTo Meeting is great for keeping our teams connected both internally as well as with customers. It's easy for us to use, easy for customers to use and easy to create and manage meetings. I've used other products that make it difficult to sign in and GoTo does not have that …
While each of these products are similar, we had already been using GoTo Meeting prior to availability of the others. The price point of the competitors is enticing and is something that should be taken into consideration, but we have had no issues with GoTo Meeting. The …
Both of these tools have been delivering what they have been promising and it is quite a hard choice, but I would go with GoToMeeting. It has more host control over the meeting participants which Webex is lacking sometimes.
Our town selected GoTo Meetings and that's how I ended up using it so much, in monthly meetings with them. In all honesty, when the contract was due for renewal, they switched to Zoom, another platform I use in both my personal and professional settings. While I found GoTo …
GoTo Meeting is a solid contender in the video conferencing solution market. It does some things incredibly well and is clearly a market leader when it comes to webinar-style conferencing. Other things it is less strong in, like co-authoring or multiple conflicting technical …
I selected GoTo Meeting for all my online callings because of the video and audio qualities it offers,it gives the best qualities making all our online meetings so effective. It has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface giving exceptional call qualities and they have …
Verified User
Manager
Chose GoTo Meeting
I like the fast sign-in ability without downloading software.
For us, GoTo Meeting is recommended by the client as they were using it for quite some time and they were happy with the audio and video quality of the system, so we initially bought a few subscriptions to try it out. After using it, we can say that the software does an awesome …
The pricing and features of GoToMeeting surpassed the other products that the decision was a simple one to make. We wanted a tool that was easy for everyone to use and satisfy all of our expectations.
Zoom is the easiest to use, but of course, had security issues early on. GoTo Meeting is not a preferred platform for me, and the meeting I attended that used it has since gotten an account with Zoom instead. Microsoft Teams is integrated into their suite, which is nice but has …
WebEx having chatting, calling, screen sharing meeting schedule and record like that all options having in it but in GoTo Meeting only meeting perpos we can use
In terms of features and functionalities, Webex Meetings beats GoTo Meeting. Webex Meetings audio and video calls are of high-quality unlike GoTo Meeting. In terms of the number of participants that a meeting can hold Webex Meetings can host many participants compared to GoTo …
Webex compares well with gotomeeting software. It has excellent options, the go-to meeting app. It works well with the quality of connected hardware controls, like audio and video services. The chat and recording services work better, making it stand out in the industry. Works …
Webex Meetings has become the standard
for Business solutions. All others are lower in their solution offering.
Cisco is improving Webex Meetings day by day. It is the best solution for video,
Webex interface is great and beats many other software available in the market. It has better audio and video controls and provides a great way to share screen. The team has not raised concerns using Webex and has been satisfied using it yet. I believe the Webex has helped us …
Webex Meetings comes with good quality and easier to manage from the user experience point of view. It's easy for our team to learn and start using quickly without much training so it makes an easy to use application. The features including recordings, screenshare, AI makes it …
Webex [Meetings] is definitely a top-tier platform. Overall its choice boils down to ease of use and engagement tools from the end user's perspective. While many of the other platforms integrate better with our team or offer easier to use [the] functionality on the …
Webex is a very complete tool, it does not consume resources on laptops, and communication is very fluid. Platform stability is very good, fault-tolerant, and does not require a lot of bandwidth to work. You can record the sessions and you can invite many participants. The tool …
MS Teams somewhat similar (and more easily accessible than Webex, Webex requires you download from Google store and some users on Android unable to do so...problem bc we do not have control over users devices). Nonetheless a more robust overall solution than others.
Webex Meetings stacks up against them, given the robust security features and that it's ideal for large meetings and events. Considering factors like meeting size, frequency, budget, security requirements, and desired level of formality, I used Webex Meetings as it covers all …
As I said, It's very easy to navigate. You have everything you need in one software. Unlike others like GoTo that are very much hard to navigate and kind of has a dull interface, this one is a top notch choice for me. The interface also can be customized to your preference.
Cisco WebEx app is the all-in-one software which is providing audio, video, screen sharing, chat, and Q&A in a single dashboard. People love to see the screen of WebEx over any other competition app.
The pricing point of Webex is far good than that of Zoom, moreover there are no additional license required to be purchased for any other integration unlike zoom, we get a more capacity of video participant in cisco webex with inbuilt feature of Audio dial in with larger …
Webex [Meetings] really was the best meeting option for a while and it is so ubiquitous people will call having any online meeting "have a Webex" or "join a Webex". It doesn't do the kind of always-on functionality that Skype and Teams do (or it's at least not the first choice …
Webex Meetings are way ahead of the other software I've used when it comes to being user-friendly and convenient. Other software applications I have used often break down, don't offer as many useful features or lack a proper network structure to support widespread use on a …
I have tried several of the other similar products and found them close to the same to use. Personally, I liked the features that I found on Webex better than on the others. I like the ease of use and functionality.
Cisco Webex is still a helpful platform, particularly for large organizations. Multipurpose: Conferences and live webinars, and IT support are just some of the uses of this tool. There are no complicated features to learn how to use. It is unquestionably more user-friendly than …
Verified User
Administrator
Chose Webex Meetings
Webex is easy to manage. It gives immense quality compared to other online meeting apps. It doesn’t crash often. Very good support from the Cisco Webex team. Able to configure both SIP and h323 protocols. Its integration with VIdeo conferencing devices is easy and they provide …
I provide regular training as a big portion of my job. There is weekly training with an infinite number of users in attendance on any given date—GoTo Meeting is not the best option for this because I would have to mute users as they join the meeting. However, I also provide frequent training sessions to a small number of users that feature more individualized content, and having them able to mute/unmute at will is a better fit for a smaller group with in-depth materials.
The first reason is the ease of use and availability, which makes WebEx work for all. The quality of audio and video is adorable. As a business development associate, I must make an impression on the other side, and WebEx helps me make first impressions. A few features are complex for new users but can be resolved.
Only a few options are there for non-verbal feedback like hand raising or emoji reactions. They should work on it as expressing understanding or agreement would help collaborate with the cross-functional teams.
More options for creating custom workflows and integrations with internal tools would be helpful and the whiteboard also looks basic compared to other similar tools. I think, adding features like sticky notes and freehand drawing would be a great boost.
The mobile app is functional but I find it less intuitive and feature-rich compared to the desktop version. Should have parity in features and a more user-friendly interface will become more helpful for mobile users like me who sometimes conduct or attend meetings on the go.
We used other software like goto meetings but found it best because of its user friendly interface and easy interfacing. It helped us in COVID and now we can say we are depending on it and love it. We recommend it to our friends company and they are also using it. It is very affordable and easy to integrate with system
Because Webex Meetings is known for its consistent performance, with high quality audio and video that works well even in low bandwidth situations. This makes it a dependable tool for both small and large meetings without worrying about technical glitches. Also, the platform is easy to navigate, both for meeting hosts and participants. Features like screen sharing, chat, and breakout rooms are intuitive
The simplicity of GoToMeetings desktop, mobile, and web-based applications make it a very robust and user-friendly meeting solution. At times, it may be more complex than needed, but it is nice to have so many features that can be used if needed. Once installed, it is very easy to use and navigate.
Webex Meetings does not provide enough audio feedback for users with visual disabilities to properly navigate the tool. Students, faculty, and staff who are blind or have low vision may not be able to use Webex Meetings. Users with motor disabilities that navigate via keyboard, may not be able to navigate the web conferencing session enough to participate fully.
So personally I have never faced any kind of meeting unavailability issue while scandaling meeting with WebEx the bandwidth is really good and in terms of application performance the same is my opinion what I mentioned for availability it is good and the objective of communication is quite fruitfully achieved with a simple and effective product like WebEx which is often bundled with the purchase of course which is which we have at our company and great discount is being offered so it is easy on our pocket. I really don't have any specific errors which have faced I should mention over here the operation or application uses is quite smooth.
We use browsers to join Webex Meetings and it is very good no issue also appears from Webex APP is very organized and does not consume more resources of PC so no issues appeared. We join audio and video in many ways, all of which are good. We integrated it with active Microsoft Exchange with easy deployment.
When we have issues, they seem to respond quickly and do everything they can to help us. They have even tried to find other ways we could get more use out of their product, or improve the way we are currently using it. Overall, their support has been fairly good for us.
The support cases can be opened instantly. The support engineers can support you via Telephone, E-Mail, WebEx Meetings, and My favorite WebEx application.24X7 Availability of the engineers. Step-by-step guidance is available by an engineer. https://help.webex.com/ - Great Site for instant FAQ's. https://status.webex.com/ - Is helpful to identify the updated schedule of WebEx or to know the server status of WebEx services.
It was straight to the point and very informative. effective training often includes clear explanations, hands-on practice opportunities, time for questions and answers, real-world examples, and follow-up support. If you're trying to assess the quality of a specific training session, you might consider these factors. For organizations looking to assess the quality of their in-person training, it's best to solicit feedback directly from the participants. This can be done through anonymous surveys or feedback sessions, enabling the organization to gather firsthand information and improve future training sessions accordingly.
It was very interactive and well explained. The trainor is very much knowledgeable of the product. He was able to answer all of our inquiries in a timely and professional manner. There were lots of exercises done during the duration of the training to ensure that we have a better view on what to expect from the product.
That we needed complex implementation that we didn't get tells me 2 things: 1) the product was not designed in a way that "just worked" like some of its peers (Zoom / BlueJeans) and 2) had our company defined actual user needs and validated / verified that they had bought something that matched those, we would have pursued features / designs more closely aligned with what the product actually does: screen share, sometimes video, definitely VOIP audio (always an option regardless of license), and easy recording and retrieval of meetings.
Many times, it seems like GoTo Meeting requires less bandwidth to run. We noticed with a few test machines that if you have over twenty video streams, this product could handle the load better than if we used Microsoft Teams and had many video streams.
The ability to transfer multimedia files directly into the platform and a very robust free plan helped me make the decision to try out Webex Meetings. Easy to set up in a company environment and accessible once the learning curve and sign up process are complete. In-platform web navigating is also a nice feature when onboarding new staff or doing market research.
I work for a Fortune 500 company with many employees so I can testify to its usability for large corporations. In addition, I use the software within my small team of sales reps so it is always usable on a small scale as well. In my eyes, this tool is scalable for businesses of all sizes without any hiccups or issues.
Any collaboration app these days are now a great addition for those organizations which have more than one office and they need to collaborate with each other.
GoTo Meeting can contribute to cost savings by reducing the need for extensive travel, accommodation, and related expenses associated with in-person meetings especially in case like us as we have multiple branches.
The costly nature of individual accounts across multiple schools made it difficult to maintain the budget when our student population grew exponentially.
Often communicated to clients and stakeholders that we were a trustworthy and elevated provider.
Limited engagement and interactive features with students often contributed to complaints around student engagement and buy-in.