MOZARK vs. TestGrid

It is well suited for small-scale applications and freelance developers. It has in-built performance measuring criteria that give good insights about the application use. Overall it is good but it does need improvements in performance measuring metrics and more flexibility in reporting analytics for the application.

Incentivized

Easy navigation. Test Data Management. Flexible Supports for Automation Testing Sometimes it fails to connect to cloud devices or browsers

• Dashboard for application performance report and analysis
• Support for integration with versioning tools like Git helps to quickly move the fixes and test the application in real-time
• Realtime monitoring gives details about how the application will perform under different loads

Incentivized

• Low barrier to entry for beginner test engineer due to scriptless nature of test case
• Proficient test engineer could utilize CI/CD Integration
• Both Browser & Mobile Device Infrastructure Available Natively

• Documentation needs improvement
• No 24/7 customer support

Incentivized

• Can be slow in instances where multiple scripts and requests are running on a webpage plus the docs can also be improved

We frequently came across scenarios which were too cumbersome for manual testing & wanted an easy automation solution. We are now using TestGrid for those scenarios & are happy with the product.

• Easy to use interface
• Does not require in-depth training or knowledge to start and work with the tool

Incentivized

• we were looking for a remote infrastructure provider so that our remote team could use it for automation as well as manual testing.