Skype for Business was an online messaging and conferencing tool, now superseded by Microsoft Teams.
N/A
Webex Meetings
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Webex Meetings is a video conferencing solution powering hybrid work. It enables a seamless collaboration experience and better results with meetings that are designed to give everyone the ability to engage no matter their location, language, or communication style.
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype for Business's unique features offers many benefits.
When I need to communicate with my colleagues, I rely on the chat function. Its
interface is intuitive and has top-notch sound. Making groups is easy, and
Verified User
Analyst
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype is a great tool to increase communication across an organization. I believe Microsoft Teams encourages greater collaboration amongst employees by making conversations and chats easily accessible and also keeping a history of conversations to allow users to pick up where …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype enables me to have a conversation with people worldwide via calls or messaging, which is extremely convenient. We can share our work or presentation during the call by sending files, images, and even screen sharing. As a result of its superior video and audio quality, …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype for Business is great for arranging interactive sessions with group members. It has great audio and video quality and live chat enable others to communicate with each other personally or as a group during any session. File sharing is also easy. It is best for its quality …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Cisco products have more integration features (especially when integrating with Cisco hardware such as IP Phones and webex rooms) and seem more powerful but Skype for Business has simple interface and lower price. Taking the price into account Skype for Business looks as a good …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Of the five other products listed that I have used/evaluated (I have used them all), I would choose any one of them before using Skype for Business [(formerly Lync)] again. The one positive that Skype for Business has is that anyone that has used regular Skype will easily be …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype functions similarly to Webex and GoToMeeting, but overall is simpler to use and has many of the same key features as the other two software platforms.
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Very useful for one on one conversation. It as a great tool to be used for file sharing and screen sharing. No hassle of scheduling meeting and logging in for small tasks.
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
It's a great tool but as they bundle it in with Office 365, and that makes it hard not to want to use it. Our experience is that its used by so many other companies that it would be daft not to have an account and the client installed, to encourage collaboration. It does mean …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
SfB has some features that WebEx/Jabber doesn't, like the aforementioned recording, saved chats, etc. But, it was extremely rare that Webex or Jabber didn't work whereas SfB issues are weekly or daily. I really miss using WebEx and Jabber over Skype.
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
The product is a pretty much a tailored offering for the corporates. The deployment is extremely hassle-free. And it's amazing how they have combined - voice, chat, and video on one platform. The UI/UX is pretty intuitive and easy to get hands on. The quality of voice and video …
Verified User
Analyst
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype is more intuitive and easier to use than WebEx. It also has an instant messenger option which WebEx didn't offer.
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
We had a similar situation, when the server was saturated, it was impossible to connect, but you could raise your hand to ask questions, it had polling and Q&A. You could also record the meetings, even when you connected through phone.
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype for Business works, but it's not as user-friendly or stable as normal Skype. One difficulty with Skype for Business is that the features aren't always implementable. Skype for Business is more stable than Google Hangouts. It doesn't have as many features as WebEx, but it …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Slack has a bit higher sound quality on calls but does not have a very comfortable GUI and not very good notification sounds. On the other hand, you can connect several accounts to Slack client, as for Skype for Business you can connect only one account and run only one …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype for Business had all the capabilities we needed for all of our communication needs, both internally and with clients. We can send quick messages, have video conferences, hold large meetings or all-hands, communicate easily with clients, and also do it from our phones and …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype for Business is the best option from the two because it has a chat function, a video conference function, a call function, file transferring function, recording function, and event function. So we are able to address all our communication needs with one program instead of …
Selecting Webex was mainly because our external stakeholders were using it and not the other tools which we had for internal collaboration. To be honest, there isn't much to separate Webex from other tools for the simple reason that all of these tools have similar …
Webex Meetings integrates with a wide portfolio of devices. It can integrate with a large number of devices including IP phones, headsets, and many more endpoints. These devices are designed to work seamlessly with Webex Meetings and the advantage is that this type of …
Verified User
Manager
Chose Webex Meetings
I would say that Webex is very strong when it comes video conferencing and virtual events. Microsoft Teams is ideal for team collaboration, integration with Microsoft 365, and a unified platform for communication and collaboration. Skype for Business was historically very good …
We used CWMS (on-prem), Skype for Business (on-prem), Microsoft Teams, Webex Teams. We continue to use it.
Verified User
Engineer
Chose Webex Meetings
Webex has better integration with voice, chat, and video. It's a one-stop communication hub. Teams can't handle softphone capabilities. Skype didn't do video chat well. Teams is a little disjointed between the chats, which I do often, and the meetings, which I do rarely. Teams …
Webes is easier to use. All people inside and outside the company that used it were happy and shared their positive feedback. It needs less space on computers and doesn't make the computer slow. Customer service were outstanding and the whole experience was pleasant and …
Microsoft Teams is integrated with our business email, which makes it more convenient for internal calls/meetings. A big proponent of this is always having the status of our coworkers and MS teams can assist in scheduling meetings when the invitees are available. However if we …
Webex Meetings is superior to each of the other products we tried because of its better security, ease of use, and quality of audio and video. We have been using Webex Meetings for 2 years, and now when a vendor or client sends a meeting invite from another platform, it is …
Initially, Webex was the most reliable, secure, and feature-rich option on the market when we started our online schools 12 years ago. Skype was much more of a social platform (prior to Skype Business) and we wanted to communicate to potential school partners and parents that …
Webex is easy to manage. It gives immense quality compared to other online meeting apps. It doesn’t crash often. Very good support from the Cisco Webex team. Able to configure both SIP and h323 protocols. Its integration with VIdeo conferencing devices is easy and they provide …
Webex definitely stacks up against the competition with a little bit of a faster interface and a bit more of a nicer Meeting style and meeting window. Webex is also universally accepted especially with big banks So you have less to worry about when it comes to knowing if they …
Webex meetings work best and it's nowhere to be compared with other software such as Skype for businesses for its marvelous performance in easy integration and giving the best of the best video qualities.
Webex has a very unique feature that I should note out and that is the fact that it has the best video output engines which enables it to deliver high definition videos, it also has very clear audio output engines therefore you hear the other user very clearly.
Webex has a great functional scope; albeit, some are difficult to use. Webex seems to work more reliably especially for international attendees to meetings and local access numbers are readily available. Seeing a person's body language can be helpful in many situations.
Microsoft Teams is not user friendly as Webex Meetings. [I feel] It also takes up a lot of RAM and slows down most of the time. However, Webex Meetings never showed that issue. It works fine with low RAM requirements. The audio gets dodgy in Teams at times. but I have not …