TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Adobe Target

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAdobe Test and Target is an A/B, multi-variate testing platform which Adobe acquired as part of the Omniture platform in 2009. It is now part of the Adobe Marketing Cloud. It offers tight integration with Adobe analytics and content management products.N/A

    Firebase

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AGoogle offers the Firebase suite of application development tools, available free or at cost for higher degree of usages, priced flexibly accorded to features needed. The suite includes A/B testing and Crashlytics, Cloud Messaging (FCM) and in-app messaging, cloud storage and NoSQL storage (Cloud Firestore and Firestore Realtime Database), and other features supporting developers with flexible mobile application development.

    $0.01

    Per Verification

    Google Optimize

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AGoogle offers the Optimize A/B testing tool for testing website content and versions.N/A
    Pricing
    Adobe TargetFirebaseGoogle Optimize
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Phone Authentication
    $0.01
    Per Verification
    Stored Data
    $0.18
    Per GiB
    Google Optimize
    Free
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Adobe TargetFirebaseGoogle Optimize
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Adobe TargetFirebaseGoogle Optimize
    Considered Multiple Products
    Adobe
    Chose Adobe Target
    In my personal opinion, Optimizely is a clear choice here while Google Optimize is for the low-budget minded decision-makers and Evergage for the COE more geared toward personalization; however, in our case we were already locked into using Target prior to my arrival. I don't …
    Incentivized
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Google
    Chose Google Optimize
    Adobe Target is extremely powerful and provides features Google Optimize does not, but Adobe Target is also more expensive and harder to use. Google Optimize could benefit by offering basic built-in reporting so it doesn't require Google Analytics events.
    Incentivized
    Chose Google Optimize
    Much better and easier to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Google Optimize
    Google Optimize is a great entry-level test platform and is an ideal solution for my clients that want something simple to start with and see value. Although not as robust as the paid platforms, it still does the job well and delivers believable data ties to one of the most …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    15 Answers
    83%
    Would buy again
    19 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    86%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    19 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    16 Answers
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    21 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    75%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    83%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    47%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    19 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    Adobe TargetFirebaseGoogle Optimize
    Testing and Experimentation
    Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Adobe Target and Firebase and Google Optimize
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.0
    18 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Firebase
    -
    Ratings
    Google Optimize
    4.9
    8 Ratings
    53% below category average
    a/b experiment testing9.318 Ratings00 Ratings4.08 Ratings
    Split URL testing8.617 Ratings00 Ratings2.08 Ratings
    Multivariate testing7.817 Ratings00 Ratings4.08 Ratings
    Multi-page/funnel testing8.314 Ratings00 Ratings1.06 Ratings
    Cross-browser testing8.39 Ratings00 Ratings6.44 Ratings
    Mobile app testing8.57 Ratings00 Ratings2.72 Ratings
    Test significance8.415 Ratings00 Ratings1.07 Ratings
    Visual / WYSIWYG editor7.315 Ratings00 Ratings3.07 Ratings
    Advanced code editor6.414 Ratings00 Ratings2.07 Ratings
    Page surveys8.77 Ratings00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
    Visitor recordings8.59 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Preview mode8.116 Ratings00 Ratings3.06 Ratings
    Test duration calculator7.916 Ratings00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Experiment scheduler8.315 Ratings00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
    Experiment workflow and approval7.612 Ratings00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
    Dynamic experiment activation7.412 Ratings00 Ratings6.92 Ratings
    Client-side tests7.915 Ratings00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
    Server-side tests7.410 Ratings00 Ratings2.62 Ratings
    Mutually exclusive tests7.816 Ratings00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Audience Segmentation & Targeting
    Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Adobe Target and Firebase and Google Optimize
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.2
    18 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Firebase
    -
    Ratings
    Google Optimize
    7.0
    8 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Standard visitor segmentation7.918 Ratings00 Ratings6.08 Ratings
    Behavioral visitor segmentation7.417 Ratings00 Ratings7.06 Ratings
    Traffic allocation control8.418 Ratings00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Website personalization9.216 Ratings00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
    Results and Analysis
    Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Adobe Target and Firebase and Google Optimize
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.0
    18 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Firebase
    -
    Ratings
    Google Optimize
    8.2
    8 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Heatmap tool7.58 Ratings00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
    Click analytics7.515 Ratings00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Scroll maps8.88 Ratings00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Form fill analysis8.28 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Conversion tracking8.515 Ratings00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Goal tracking8.117 Ratings00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Test reporting7.918 Ratings00 Ratings7.06 Ratings
    Results segmentation8.316 Ratings00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    CSV export8.115 Ratings00 Ratings9.93 Ratings
    Experiments results dashboard7.218 Ratings00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Adobe TargetFirebaseGoogle Optimize
    Small Businesses
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Adobe TargetFirebaseGoogle Optimize
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.4
    (46 ratings)
    7.5
    (31 ratings)
    5.0
    (10 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.3
    (24 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.1
    (14 ratings)
    7.2
    (6 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    6.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    3.5
    (9 ratings)
    7.3
    (6 ratings)
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.2
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Adobe TargetFirebaseGoogle Optimize
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Adobe
    If you're using the Adobe stack and tools to power your website, Target is a great solution to implement. I've utilized Target within two organizations, one running on Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), and the other on Adobe Magento. I don't see how companies could harness the full capacity of Target without also having Adobe Analytics integrated. This is their 'secret sauce' and might not be a good solution for companies who are invested in Google Analytics 360. Integration was straightforward but did require support from the Adobe team to implement successfully. While Target is a great tool for digital teams to support, you'll need your tech team aligned and available to support implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Firebase should be your first choice if your platform is mobile first. Firebase's mobile platform support for client-side applications is second to none, and I cannot think of a comparable cross-platform toolkit. Firebase also integrates well with your server-side solution, meaning that you can plug Firebase into your existing app architecture with minimal effort.
    Firebase lags behind on the desktop, however. Although macOS support is rapidly catching up, full Windows support is a glaring omission for most Firebase features. This means that if your platform targets Windows, you will need to implement the client functionality manually using Firebase's web APIs and wrappers, or look for another solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    It is a little too limited for a full stack experimentation programme. Many times we required development support or tech advise but we were simply unable to get this due to it being google. This was a big problem for us. However it is quite good if you were looking to get started in experimentation and didn’t have the budgets for a wider tool
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Adobe
    • This application gives us an incredible integration with Adobe Analytics that allows its operation to be the best and determine the performance of our website.
    • It offers us an analysis based on user behavior and a web page customization option to adapt and meet the needs of those users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Analytics wise, retention is extremely important to our app, therefore we take advantage of the cohort analysis to see the impact of our middle funnel (retargeting, push, email) efforts affect the percent of users that come back into the app. Firebase allows us to easily segment these this data and look at a running average based on certain dates.
    • When it comes to any mobile app, a deep linking strategy is essential to any apps success. With Firebase's Dynamic Links, we are able to share dynamic links (recognize user device) that are able to redirect to in-app content. These deep links allow users to share other deep-linked content with friends, that also have link preview assets.
    • Firebase allows users to effectively track events, funnels, and MAUs. With this simple event tracking feature, users can put organize these events into funnels of their main user flows (e.g., checkout flows, onboarding flows, etc.), and subsequently be able to understand where the drop-off is in the funnel and then prioritize areas of the funnel to fix. Also, MAU is important to be able to tell if you are bringing in new users and what's the active volume for each platform (Android, iOS).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Easy to follow set up procedures. Once I walk a client through the process, it's effortless for them to emulate on subsequent tests.
    • Lots of geo and user attribute customization features to be able to drill down into specific targeted audiences — all based on the power of Google's immense data system.
    • Google Optimize is the logical choice for many people to start with since most are already familiar with and using GA.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Adobe
    • This is something a lot of testing tools struggle with, but I think the WYSIWYG ("What you see is what you get") editor - or Visual Experience Composer (VEC) in Adobe terminology - could definitely use some work. It's a struggle to execute many tests beyond simple copy, color, placement changes, and even the features that do exist are often clunky if not altogether broken.
    • The interface itself can be a bit counterintuitive in certain parts. If you are familiar with other tools, it's likely middle of the road in this respect; think much easier to understand than Monetate for instance, but a far cry from the simplicity of an Optimizely.
    • It can be a bit buggy from time to time. The worst example is the frequency at which the tool will fail to save due to an error, but not inform you of this until you try to save, at which point your only option is to log out, log back in, and make all of your updates once again. It can become an extreme pain point at times, and I personally have just gotten into the habit of saving every couple of minutes to avoid a massive loss of productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Attribution and specifically multi-touch attribution could be more robust such as Branch or Appsflyer but understand this isn't Firebases bread and butter.
    • More parameters. Firebase allows you to track tons of events (believe it's up to 50 or so) but the parameters of the events it only allows you to track 5 which is so messily and unbelievable. So you're able to get good high-level data but if you want to get granular with the events and actions are taken on your app to get real data insight you either have to go with a paid data analytics platform or bring on someone that's an expert in SQL to go through Big Query.
    • City-specific data instead of just country-specific data would have been a huge plus as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Only works for browsers, not for the apps testing.
    • Missing possibility to test complicated features.
    • Audience division in groups is not always accurate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Adobe
    We have a team of people trained on how to use the application and it integrates well with the other Adobe products we use. Our future roadmap of testing will require some complex scenarios which we hope Target will be able to accomplish
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Adobe
    The recent UI update is a complete mess. It is difficult to navigate and find features that previously existed. The reactiveness of the page depending on window size is also ridiculous and it is absurd that depending on how large your window is, entire columns of functions will disappear with no indication that they are missing. The usability of the tool has fallen off a cliff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    I don't use the Firebase UI much, but rather connect it to GA4. GA4 has a great event model but the GA4 UI and analysis capabilities are limited. It's harder to measure product usage type of engagement but if you have the time and resources to leverage the GA4 to BiqQuery export you'll have all the raw event data you'll need for deep analysis, segmentation, and audience activation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Google has always been known to make easy-to-use products. The Google Optimize interface is intuitive and easy to follow for anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Adobe
    i don't think we use the full functionalities of the tool, but to use the full functions, it's almost impossible (Too hard)
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Adobe
    The bottleneck is never the software program
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Adobe
    On several occasions, we have had the need to ask for help from the Adobe Target support team, and I must say that they have provided us with an excellent experience, as they take care of solving the problems quickly and with high precision
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Our analytics folks handled the majority of the communication when it came to customer service, but as far as I was aware, the support we got was pretty good. When we had an issue, we were able to reach out and get support in a timely fashion. Firebase was easy to reach and reasonably available to assist when needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Google has well-documented resources and unlimited use cases that can be found online. Plus, their support is always helpful and available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Adobe
    The instructor that came to train us was awesome and this training was very useful. I would recommend it for anyone who is going to be using this software. I only mark it lower because it is an added expense to an already expensive product, and a lot of the training covered the "Target" portion of the software (which again, we didn't use)
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Adobe
    The training was very easy to understand, however it would have been more useful to my development team than me. It was also primarily over-the-phone, which is never as easy to follow as in-person. We ended up scheduling and paying for an in-person training session to supplement the online/phone training because it wasn't helpful enough.
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Adobe
    Implement using a global mBox on the page so you can change any and everything over the traditional method. Traditional method is good if you do not have technical web dev resources, do not know Javascript/jQuery, or you have money to blow on mBox calls. Global deployment reduces mBox calls and allows you to touch many parts of the page easily. A lot more customizable
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Adobe
    We seriously considered another software but because we use so many other Adobe products this made the most sense for us. If you are not dependent on other Adobe software and are a smaller company, in my opinion, Target may not be the best fit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Before using Firebase, we exclusively used self hosted database services. Using Firebase has allowed us to reduce reliance on single points of failure and systems that are difficult to scale. Additionally, Firebase is much easier to set up and use than any sort of self hosted database. This simplicity has allowed us to try features that we might not have based on the amount of work they required in the past.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Google Optimize being part of the Google stack makes it great in reporting and analysis. Wish Google would add more features like dynamic tests, multi funnel tests, conversion calculator based on the total number of traffic of the page being tested instead of using the websites total traffic. Should integrate form analysis, heatmap, and page analytics.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Adobe
    • We have been able to run specific A/B tests that have shown an increase in conversion, which in turn has led to very large banked sales numbers for the year.
    • We have been able to prove that using and automated Merchandising process did not decrease conversion. This allowed us to greatly increase efficiency by opening up resource time.
    Read full review
    Google
    • Makes building real-time interfaces easy to do at scale with no backend involvement.
    • Very low pricing for small companies and green-fields projects.
    • Lack of support for more complicated queries needs to be managed by users and often forces strange architecture choices for data to enable it to be easily accessed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • We were able to increase our main KPI for conversions by almost 50% by testing button copy.
    • We were able to increase secondary KPIs for conversions by almost 30% by testing form design.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots