Amazon Elasticsearch Service vs. Lucidworks Fusion

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Elasticsearch Service
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that enables users to search, analyze, and visualize your log data at petabyte-scale. As a fully managed service, Amazon Elasticsearch Service manages the setup, deployment, configuration, patching, and monitoring of Elasticsearch clusters, so users can spend less time managing clusters and more time building applications. With a few clicks in the AWS console, users create scalable, secure, and available Elasticsearch clusters. Amazon…N/A
Lucidworks Fusion
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Lucidworks headquartered in San Francisco offers the Fusion Platform, an enterprise search application development platform supporting NoSQL and unstructured data search, and having machine learning augmented recommenders and search capabilities.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceLucidworks Fusion
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceLucidworks Fusion
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceLucidworks Fusion
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceLucidworks Fusion
Small Businesses
Algolia
Algolia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Algolia
Algolia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceLucidworks Fusion
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(4 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceLucidworks Fusion
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
Elasticsearch is a good alternative to relational databases for setting up complex searching of data. It's inbuilt features for slicing the data [in] different ways and its ability to add weights to search results makes it easy to set up complex searching scenarios. Given that data must be pushed to this service, it may be best suited for data that is not changing very rapidly.
Read full review
Lucidworks
Very well suited for out of the box enterprise search applications.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Fast Index based search.
  • Scalable.
  • Best for structured and unstructured data.
Read full review
Lucidworks
  • Signals feature to boost search results helps search relevancy
  • Business Rules feature for tuning search results
  • Query pipeline design gives great flexibility in application development
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Really satisfied with this service from Amazon.
Read full review
Lucidworks
  • Documentation can be improved
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Lucidworks
It is incredibly intuitive and so easy to use that business people can now complete functions that used to be limited to software developers only.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Lucidworks
It has continued to improve over the years.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Lucidworks
IDOL seems to be a blackbox solution. Fusion is much more flexible with more features and options for developers to choose from.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Elasticsearch has allowed us to spend more time on building features and less time on optimizing search queries
Read full review
Lucidworks
  • Allowed us to move software developers from enterprise search to other customer focused applications due to built in signals processing and related popularity boosting out of the box.
  • Enabled business experts to work directly with Fusion to influence search results and not be so dependent on developers.
Read full review
ScreenShots