Amazon GuardDuty vs. Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon GuardDuty
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Amazon GuardDuty is a threat detection service that continuously monitors for malicious activity and unauthorized behavior to protect your AWS accounts and workloads.N/A
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Cisco IPS Sensors have reached EOL, and EOS.N/A
Pricing
Amazon GuardDutyCisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon GuardDutyCisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon GuardDutyCisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Amazon GuardDutyCisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)
Small Businesses
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 8.0 out of 10
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon GuardDutyCisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon GuardDutyCisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
In a multi-account/multi-tenant environment, GuardDuty often alerts us to possible malicious traffic before it becomes an issue. The ability to automatically enable GuardDuty creates baseline security which is crucial when an account is first created. It also helps greatly in environments where other users are able to create resources as often GuardDuty alerts us to insecure resources we did not know about. It can however sometimes be a little overzealous with its assessments alerting on benign activity which then requires suppression rules.
Read full review
Cisco
IPS sensors are more suited for companies that do not have visibility into their network with third-party analyzing tools. Scenarios would be to place IPS sensors at the perimeter firewalls mainly. IPS sensors are less appropriate for companies that have third-party analyzing tools that will mitigate vulnerabilities and malicious traffic and activities already.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Monitors outgoing connections from AWS resources to known malicious hosts.
  • Monitors incoming connection to AWS resources from known malicious hosts.
  • Integrates with other centralized logging solutions.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Identifies and blocks malicious traffic.
  • Detects unwanted traffic and allows your company to be proactive, let alone reactive.
  • Comprehensive Threat protection allows companies to adjust thresholds and policies at will.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Does not have the ability to add any custom monitors.
Read full review
Cisco
  • The web GUI is somewhat slow.
  • Sometimes difficult to adjust policies.
  • Fail open feature may not work properly all the time.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Cisco TAC has been great at helping with configurations and issues that may arise
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Cisco
IPS sensors provides the necessary network visibility my company needs to satisfy its security appetite. By doing so, we have been able to stay compliant and up to date with today's network security requirements and procedures. We are able to be proactive with vulnerabilities and reactive to malicious traffic and intrusions in our day to day operations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • GuardDuty has helped us prevent possible security incidents multiple times which could have caused substantial damage.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Provided less need to purchase third party analyzing tools.
  • Needed more dedicated staff to build/review/and maintain policies and such.
  • Answers companies need for network security.
Read full review
ScreenShots